I was just being a smartass. I didnt actually verify his comments. My reply was just a joke.
Sorry. I didn't mean to jump on anyone, and I know I'm being defensive, so I apologize. What gets me frustrated is that we recently had hundreds of posts in a thread lamenting the state of the Shark Pool, but when someone puts in the effort to actually do a little research into a relevant current topic (in this case, showing that the difference between Stafford and Newton and Ryan was actually very small in the second half of last season), hoping to actually inform others of something that probably not a lot of people realized, another poster takes 30 seconds to throw out a quick insult rather than spending an extra minute or two to double-check the data.Note that I say "insult" because rather than accuse a long-term poster of making such an obvious error in analysis, I would show them the respect of looking at the data briefly to see if my snap judgment was correct. And if that was done in this case, it would have been relatively easy to see that my numbers were not vastly incorrect by virtue of mistakenly omitting a bye week differential in the analysis.Anyway, carry on.