SaintsInDome2006
Footballguy
It could also be called a chocolate eclair.I’ve view it to be a unprecedented use of the 25th amendment and yes it could be called a coup.
It could also be called a chocolate eclair.I’ve view it to be a unprecedented use of the 25th amendment and yes it could be called a coup.
OH GODI’ve view it to be a unprecedented use of the 25th amendment and yes it could be called a coup.
Which proven liar are you referring to Cohen or Trump? Amazingly enough there are millions of people that believe the proven liar Trump.Well, if people are stupid enough to believe a proven liar with his back up against a wall maybe. I believe most of those folks are squarely in the "Trump is guilty" crowd already.
Cohen's entire existence was to keep Trump out of trouble. Anyone who doesn't think his crimes are done to cover up, and in conjunction with, Trump is being purposely aloof.Which proven liar are you referring to Cohen or Trump? Amazingly enough there are millions of people that believe the proven liar Trump.
Okay. You just seemed to have forgotten you said it.I said that given the historical precedent set by jd and fbi discussing to invoke 25th amendment. There been much debate that intent was for disable, death or inability to exercise powers. Since ratification in 1967, it’s been used for presidents during surgeries, when Reagan was shot and when Nixon resigned. None were generated from fbi or jd so it’s a type of coup imo. It’s a slippery slope that once it happens.
Different subject.Slippery slopes bother you now? Where is your outrage about the national emergency? You think that's what that was put in place for? To try to get your way when you can't get it passed through Congress?
I’m stating my views with material for discussion vs the absolutes that you always use.. Proven, absolutely false, etc... this is why joe challenged you but apparently you can’t change...So you are allowed to judge, but not the rest of us...got it.
It seems that way. I go food shopping and come back to 8 different posters challenging me.@stlrams - in this thread, we have been discussing the 25th amendment. Are we participating in a coup right now?
Conspiracy theories?. It’s a matter of public record with McCabe on 60 minutes.. either it true or McCabe is lying. What is it..Actions, not words, are what ultimately matter. If you view the world accordingly, you’ll stop being duped by conspiracy theories and have a better basis to analyze reality.
I'm guessing that the nuances of discussing the 25th amendment and what it means are lost on some folks.Conspiracy theories?. It’s a matter of public record with McCabe on 60 minutes.. either it true or McCabe is lying. What is it..
I don’t think the description you’re using in the first sentence is consistent with the statement of yours from the 15th I quoted.I’m stating my views with material for discussion vs the absolutes that you always use.. Proven, absolutely false, etc... this is why joe challenged you but apparently you can’t change...
The 25th would require that the VP and Congress agree with a majority of the cabinet that the President cannot discharge his duties. There’s a rather large number of people who would have to be involved, solely to make the VP the President.Wake up. This was not the intent of 25th amendment. What if the military, fbi and or jd didn’t’t like how a president was running things then it’s ok to for them to have discussions, approach cabinet etc and to get the president out? Like I said it’s a slippery slope and now you are empowering other parts of the govt....
"I don't accept what the media tells us" as the media broadcasts Trump speaking.So we are convicting a sitting president in this forum - right. I’ve learned to not 100% accept what’s on the internet either in forums or content nor what the media tells us and hopefully you know why. Again let see what hopefully are most of facts when mueller report comes out. I was sarcastic as sno nuff always responds with absolutes like he is the final say in any and all arguments and is never wrong.
What gives you that idea?I'm guessing that the nuances of discussing the 25th amendment and what it means are lost on some folks.
I admit at times getting frustrated with board but believe I’m generally open to discusssion. I honestly didn’t know much about the 25th amendment before a few weeks and enjoy reading articles and papers about the history etc thought it would be a good topic for discussion but I guess not. SadI don’t think the description you’re using in the first sentence is consistent with the statement of yours from the 15th I quoted.
True but if they knew they had backing from others I.e jd, fbi, military, sc etc it would make more people think about making a power grab..The 25th would require that the VP and Congress agree with a majority of the cabinet that the President cannot discharge his duties. There’s a rather large number of people who would have to be involved, solely to make the VP the President.
0 points for not contributing to the discussion."I don't accept what the media tells us" as the media broadcasts Trump speaking.
100 points for innovation.
I think it's a good topic for discussion, however I fully reject the concept that enacting the 25th is a coup. It's a legal, constitutional transfer of power.I admit at times getting frustrated with board but believe I’m generally open to discusssion. I honestly didn’t know much about the 25th amendment before a few weeks and enjoy reading articles and papers about the history etc thought it would be a good topic for discussion but I guess not. Sad
You’re suggesting that the majority of people appointed by the President, his running mate, and the majority of Congress would all be involved in a “power grab.” If that’s the case, it really sounds less like a coup and more like the majority of a government expelling one elected official.True but if they knew they had backing from others I.e jd, fbi, military, sc etc it would make more people think about making a power grab..
Some legal scholars and others argue that only in situations where it’s a willing transfer. It appears unsettle due to the vagueness of amendment.I think it's a good topic for discussion, however I fully reject the concept that enacting the 25th is a coup. It's a legal, constitutional transfer of power.
Trump has clearly lost some credibility within his cabinet, congress and his party based on his governing styleYou’re suggesting that the majority of people appointed by the President, his running mate, and the majority of Congress would all be involved in a “power grab.” If that’s the case, it really sounds less like a coup and more like the majority of a government expelling one elected official.
And yet no one has attempted to use the 25th Amendment.Trump has clearly lost some credibility within his cabinet, congress and his party based on his governing style
Shocking isn’t it... that’s why I find it interesting. He clearly will go down as the most hated president.And yet no one has attempted to use the 25th Amendment.
You had you a good deal of patient discussion about it yesterday. For instance it was explained that only the cabinet can implement the 25th, that the cabinet was never approached about it, and that the 25th was never used, implemented or activated. You even seemed to agree with this. And yet here you are arguing it was used.I admit at times getting frustrated with board but believe I’m generally open to discusssion. I honestly didn’t know much about the 25th amendment before a few weeks and enjoy reading articles and papers about the history etc thought it would be a good topic for discussion but I guess not.
Yes, because discussing the 25th amendment is akin to a coup attempt. Slippery slope and all.You had you a good deal of patient discussion about it yesterday. For instance it was explained that only the cabinet can implement the 25th, that the cabinet was never approached about it, and that the 25th was never used, implemented or activated. You even seemed to agree with this. And yet here you are arguing it was used.
It's a ####ty, misleading discussion designed to distract from real issues. I'm happy not to contribute to it.0 points for not contributing to the discussion.
Ow!Well, if people are stupid enough to believe a proven liar with his back up against a wall maybe. I believe most of those folks are squarely in the "Trump is guilty" crowd already.
Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.) said Sunday that House Democrats will subpoena special counsel Robert S. Mueller III to testify before Congress if his report on Russian interference in the 2016 campaign is not made public.
Schiff, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said on ABC News’s “This Week” that Democrats will also subpoena Mueller’s report and are prepared to go to court against the Trump administration.
“Well, we will obviously subpoena the report. We will bring Bob Mueller in to testify before Congress. We will take it to court if necessary,” Schiff said. “And in the end, I think the Department [of Justice] understands they’re going to have to make this public. I think [Attorney General William P.] Barr will ultimately understand that, as well.”
The 25th Amendment wasn't used when Reagan was shot.I said that given the historical precedent set by jd and fbi discussing to invoke 25th amendment. There been much debate that intent was for disable, death or inability to exercise powers. Since ratification in 1967, it’s been used for presidents during surgeries, when Reagan was shot and when Nixon resigned. None were generated from fbi or jd so it’s a type of coup imo. It’s a slippery slope that once it happens.
There is zero chance the unredacted report makes it public. Schiff can fight the redactions in court if he wishes though.Adam Schiff:
DOJ "understands" that they are going to have to make the Mueller report public and if they don't, "we will obviously subpoena the report, we will bring Bob Mueller in to testify before Congress, we will take it to court if necessary."
Via ABC
https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1099681687720456193
Holy straw man.There is zero chance the unredacted report makes it public. Schiff can fight the redactions in court if he wishes though.
Who among us does not remember the reign of Alexander the Great.The 25th Amendment wasn't used when Reagan was shot.
Why is it some of you all try to conjure up Joe? And don’t seem to understand what he actually said to me?I’m stating my views with material for discussion vs the absolutes that you always use.. Proven, absolutely false, etc... this is why joe challenged you but apparently you can’t change...
When you say things that seem off...multiple people may respond.It seems that way. I go food shopping and come back to 8 different posters challenging me.
You think that's what the Dems would sue for, to have the unredacted report made public?There is zero chance the unredacted report makes it public. Schiff can fight the redactions in court if he wishes though.
I think they are going to want to see more than what is offered.You think that's what the Dems would sue for, to have the unredacted report made public?
What if the only thing offered is a summary written by Barr? Do you think after 2+ years Congress and the public deserve to see the full report - with confidential information redacted of course?I think they are going to want to see more than what is offered.
"You weren't there, how could you know?"Why is it some of you all try to conjure up Joe? And don’t seem to understand what he actually said to me?
I use things like proven...for things that have been proven. Why is that bothersome? Because it goes against your opinion?
The point is...you judged this your way...but are bashing others for passing judgement in other things. It’s hypocrisy at its finest.
Congress is not the public. And absolutely has the right to see the full report -- with the usual restrictions on who and where and how. Maybe it's just the Gang of Eight or whatever, but someone.I think they are going to want to see more than what is offered.
I think a lot of it is going to fall into privileged communications and there will be a lot of angst and legal wrangling around it.What if the only thing offered is a summary written by Barr? Do you think after 2+ years Congress and the public deserve to see the full report - with confidential information redacted of course?
https://www.businessinsider.com/25th-amendment-colon-trump-reagan-bush-unfit-president-2017-10The 25th Amendment wasn't used when Reagan was shot.
Also, when Nixon resigned, the 25th Amendment had little impact since Article 2 already conveyed the powers of the presidency to Ford (the 25th merely clarified that Ford was "President" instead of "Acting President", which John Tyler had already unofficially clarified). The real impact of the 25th Amendment took place when Vice President Spiro Agnew resigned and Ford was nominated to take his place.
These are things that people should know before acting knowledgeable about the 25th Amendment on a fantasy football message board.
It bully tactics. Shout down anyone that doesn’t have the same opinion yet I was just trying to have a discussion about 25th amendment.When you say things that seem off...multiple people may respond.
Or it’s people acting independently and disagreeing with what many see as absurd conclusions of a coup (and have explained multiple times now why they disagree)...and doing so because people read a threaded topic from top to bottom and respond as they get to a post.It bully tactics. Shout down anyone that doesn’t have the same opinion yet I was just trying to have a discussion about 25th amendment.
It’s hard to start such a discussion by calling people hypocrites and declaring the use of the 25th Amendment a coup to remove the duly elected president.It bully tactics. Shout down anyone that doesn’t have the same opinion yet I was just trying to have a discussion about 25th amendment.
This shtick is tiredIt bully tactics. Shout down anyone that doesn’t have the same opinion yet I was just trying to have a discussion about 25th amendment.
Everything is a conspiracy, right guy?It bully tactics. Shout down anyone that doesn’t have the same opinion yet I was just trying to have a discussion about 25th amendment.
Or it’s people acting independently and disagreeing with what many see as absurd conclusions of a coup (and have explained multiple times now why they disagree)...and doing so because people read a threaded topic from top to bottom and respond as they get to a post.