What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Trump is Unfit? (2 Viewers)

Trump's fortune is American based is it now? His landholding, businesses etc? 
are you asking me?  because I don't know.  you were the one stating things like his entire wealth is based in the US as fact so I asked for a little backup.  you provided none.

seems to me that Russian money laundering through real estate wouldn't be affected by the stock market

 
are you asking me?  because I don't know.  you were the one stating things like his entire wealth is based in the US as fact so I asked for a little backup.  you provided none.

seems to me that Russian money laundering through real estate wouldn't be affected by the stock market
Trump's mostly US invested I'm pretty safe to say

the Russian money thing was Hillary & Bill - crazy huh ?

http://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-clintons-russia-trump-688592

Bill Clinton did receive $500,000 to deliver a speech at a Russian bank that was promoting Uranium One stock, according to The New York Times, and the company’s chairman donated $2.35 million to the foundation in four installments as Uranium One was being acquired by Rosatum between 2009 and 2013.

All told, $145 million went to the Clinton Foundation from those linked to Uranium One and UrAsia, but it went to the charity organization and not the Clinton family. Furthermore, most of those donations occurred before and during Hillary Clinton’s 2008 campaign, according to The Post.



 
I didn't know they were getting bigger tax breaks ? oh ./... that's right, they don't

https://www.thebalance.com/trump-s-tax-plan-how-it-affects-you-4113968
Your article literally says that the tax reform helps businesses more than it helps us.  Is that what you were trying to prove?

"The tax plan helps businesses more than individuals. Business tax cuts are permanent, while the individual cuts expire in 2025."

"Among individuals, it would help higher-income families the most."

 
I loved that hearing with that DHS gal.

'He did not use that word, but definitely used very strong language'

'What was that strong language?'

'Uhhhhhhh...... I can't recall'

Yea... such strong language that you can't remember any of it....  riiiiight

 
Don't Noonan said:
So do these Democrats who voted for Trump in Ohio.  I am shocked that CNN actually aired this footage.

link
The opinion of 5 people from Youngstown really does change everything.

 
Stealthycat said:
Trump's fortune is American based is it now? His landholding, businesses etc? 

Clinton gets money from retirement checks, foreign countries and book sales - an economic crash wouldn't affect her too much or Bill 
These mental gymnastics are so amazing I'm wondering if the team doctor ever touched you inappropriately.

 
Stealthycat said:
Trump's mostly US invested I'm pretty safe to say

the Russian money thing was Hillary & Bill - crazy huh ?

http://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-clintons-russia-trump-688592

Bill Clinton did receive $500,000 to deliver a speech at a Russian bank that was promoting Uranium One stock, according to The New York Times, and the company’s chairman donated $2.35 million to the foundation in four installments as Uranium One was being acquired by Rosatum between 2009 and 2013.

All told, $145 million went to the Clinton Foundation from those linked to Uranium One and UrAsia, but it went to the charity organization and not the Clinton family. Furthermore, most of those donations occurred before and during Hillary Clinton’s 2008 campaign, according to The Post.
OOF!  how many times does Fox News have to debunk this before their viewers quit repeating it?

 
Hawkeye21 said:
Your article literally says that the tax reform helps businesses more than it helps us.  Is that what you were trying to prove?
pretty clear the below is not correct, they didn't get bigger tax breaks

Hawkeye21 said:
rich corporations will remain rich and now they get even bigger tax breaks to be richer yet.

 
Here is the most recent Newsweek article about Uranium One, from December of 2017.

 

The Justice Department has reportedly started questioning FBI agents about evidence they discovered in a previous investigation into the controversial Uranium One deal, as the country’s top law enforcement agency deals with allegations of bias from Republicans and President Donald Trump.

Related: The Hillary Clinton Russia Uranium One conspiracy theory makes no sense

The internal questioning comes after an assistant attorney general told the head of the House Judiciary Committee, in a letter sent last month, that Attorney General Jeff Sessions had “directed” federal prosecutors to determine if another special counsel was needed to investigate Uranium One, NBC News reported Thursday.

Keep Up With This Story And More By Subscribing Now

The FBI agents have recently been asked whether there was “any improper effort to squash a prosecution,” according to the report, and to “describe the results of their probe.”

Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd told House Judiciary Chairman and Representative Robert Goodlatte, the Republican from Virginia, in the letter dated November 13: “These senior prosecutors will report directly to the Attorney General and the Deputy Attorney General, as appropriate, and will make recommendations as to whether any matters currently under investigation require further resources, or whether any matters merit the appoint of a special counsel.”

Former presidential candidate Hillary Clinton at The Child Mind Institute Summit at The Paley Center for Media in New York, on November 13. The Justice Department has reportedly started questioning FBI agents about evidence they discovered in a previous investigation into the controversial Uranium One deal, which involved allegations of Clinton helping to approve the sale of an uranium company to a Russian nuclear agency when she was secretary of state.GETTY IMAGES/JAMIE MCCARTHY

Goodlatte and other members of the committee previously sent letters to Justice on July 27 and September 26 and asked for a second special counsel. They were concerned about how former FBI Director James Comey and former Attorney General Loretta Lynch handled Clinton’s private email server investigation.

Those cries were echoed by Trump’s legal team last week when they asserted conflicts of interest existed within Justice and the FBI and that another special prosecutor was needed.

“The Department of Justice and FBI cannot ignore the multiple problems that have been created by these obvious conflicts of interests,” Trump attorney Jay Sekulow told Axios. “These new revelations require the appointment of a special counsel to investigate.”

For months now, the Uranium One deal has become a rallying cry for Republicans and Trump over accusations of corruption within the Justice Department and the FBI. They’ve charged the agencies with unfairly targeting the president and favoring former Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton in her private email server investigation and Uranium One.

The controversy involves Clinton Foundation donors and allegations of Clinton helping to approve the sale of a Canadian uranium company to Russian nuclear agency Rosatom in 2009, when Clinton was secretary of state. Clinton’s husband, former President Bill Clinton, also received a $500,000 fee to speak at a Russian bank that was promoting Uranium One stock.

However, numerous reports have shown Clinton was not part of the sale’s approval, which included nine different government agencies and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Right, this is what sane people have been saying all along.  This wasn't a deal approved by Hillary Clinton alone.  The State of Utah was part of this approval........WHERE IS THE OUTRAGE AT UTAH!!!!!!111juanjohnsilver

 
This is from October, right after The Hill's bogus report job.  Why not post a more recent Newsweek article, like......the one I posted, for instance.

Also....
 

In June 2010, Uranium One acquired 50% and 49% respective interests in southern Kazakhstan-based Akbastau and Zarechnoye uranium mines from ARMZ. In exchange, ARMZ increased its stake in Uranium One to 51%. The acquisition resulted in a 60% annual production increase at Uranium One, from approximately 10 million to 16 million lb. The deal was subject to anti-trust and other conditions and was not finalized until the companies received Kazakh regulatory approvals, approval under Canadian investment law, clearance by the US Committee on Foreign Investments, and approvals from both the Toronto and Johannesburg stock exchanges. The deal was finalized by the end of 2010.[11] Uranium One's extraction rights in the U.S. amounted to 0.2% of the world’s uranium production. Uranium One paid its minority shareholders a dividend of 1.06 US Dollars per share at the end of 2010.
Y'all see this, right?  This deal had to get approval from, let's count together - 

1.  Kazakh regulatory entities
2.  Canadian investment law
3.  Toronto stock exchange
4.  Johannesburg stock exchange
5.  The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS)

BUT WAIT!!!!  THAT'S NOT ALL!!!!

A Canadian mining company is close to finalizing a deal that will give a Russian company controlling interest in its uranium operations, which include a Utah town, a uranium mill and thousands of acres of claims.

In October, four members of Congress urged the U.S. Treasury Department to block plans by Uranium One to sell majority ownership to the mining company, Atomredmetzoloto (ARMZ), whose parent company is Rosatom, the Russian nuclear agency, to protect national security. Since then, the Treasury Department has approved Uranium One's plans, as has the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Utah Division of Radiation Control.
6.  Treasury Department
7.  US Nuclear Regulatory Commission
8.  Utah Division of Radiation Control

1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 - EIGHT - separate entities from over 4 countries had to approve this deal. 

But yeah, sure....blame Hillary.  :lmao:

In January 2013 Rosatom, the Russian state-owned uranium monopoly, through its subsidiary ARMZ Uranium Holding, purchased the company at a value of $1.3 billion
Okay, so Uranium One had a value of $1.3 B in Jan 2013.  Are we REALLY to believe that over 10% of the company's value was sent directly to the Clinton's simply to get approval of a sale of a Canadian company to a Russian entity - which, might I remind you - required approval from a total of 8 entities?  What sense does that make?  Shareholders would have revolted over this.  It is asinine to believe this, yet, here we are.  Again.  And here I am.  Again.  Bringing common sense and logic back to this beaten-to-death-horse-tripe story.  I mean, C'MON!  

 
This is from October, right after The Hill's bogus report job.  Why not post a more recent Newsweek article, like......the one I posted, for instance.

Also....
 

Y'all see this, right?  This deal had to get approval from, let's count together - 

1.  Kazakh regulatory entities
2.  Canadian investment law
3.  Toronto stock exchange
4.  Johannesburg stock exchange
5.  The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS)

BUT WAIT!!!!  THAT'S NOT ALL!!!!

6.  Treasury Department
7.  US Nuclear Regulatory Commission
8.  Utah Division of Radiation Control

1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 - EIGHT - separate entities from over 4 countries had to approve this deal. 

But yeah, sure....blame Hillary.  :lmao:

Okay, so Uranium One had a value of $1.3 B in Jan 2013.  Are we REALLY to believe that over 10% of the company's value was sent directly to the Clinton's simply to get approval of a sale of a Canadian company to a Russian entity - which, might I remind you - required approval from a total of 8 entities?  What sense does that make?  Shareholders would have revolted over this.  It is asinine to believe this, yet, here we are.  Again.  And here I am.  Again.  Bringing common sense and logic back to this beaten-to-death-horse-tripe story.  I mean, C'MON!  


"So we still don't know what really happened"

-Stealy Cat

 
This is from October, right after The Hill's bogus report job.  Why not post a more recent Newsweek article, like......the one I posted, for instance.

Also....
 

Y'all see this, right?  This deal had to get approval from, let's count together - 

1.  Kazakh regulatory entities
2.  Canadian investment law
3.  Toronto stock exchange
4.  Johannesburg stock exchange
5.  The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS)

BUT WAIT!!!!  THAT'S NOT ALL!!!!

6.  Treasury Department
7.  US Nuclear Regulatory Commission
8.  Utah Division of Radiation Control

1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 - EIGHT - separate entities from over 4 countries had to approve this deal. 

But yeah, sure....blame Hillary.  :lmao:

Okay, so Uranium One had a value of $1.3 B in Jan 2013.  Are we REALLY to believe that over 10% of the company's value was sent directly to the Clinton's simply to get approval of a sale of a Canadian company to a Russian entity - which, might I remind you - required approval from a total of 8 entities?  What sense does that make?  Shareholders would have revolted over this.  It is asinine to believe this, yet, here we are.  Again.  And here I am.  Again.  Bringing common sense and logic back to this beaten-to-death-horse-tripe story.  I mean, C'MON!  
Makes it that much more diabolical that Hillary got it done. Between this and all the people she murdered she was very busy. 

And, she did it all with Parkinson’s!

 
It is just.  So.  Stupid!
That it is, GB.

And we didn't even get into the part where all these supposed bribes to influence a fairly ordinary approval process that Hillary wasn't even really aware of for a deal that posed no national security risks weren't even all going into the Clinton's pockets. A lot of it was going to charity. Contrast that with the money that foreign governments and domestic businesses give to the for-profit Trump Org every day in amounts that are orders of magnitude greater than what the Foundation or Bill received, which for some mysterious reason doesn't seem to bother any of the Uranium One Truthers.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
"Right now, a number of state laws allow a baby to be born from his or her mother’s womb in the ninth month. It is wrong. It has to change."

"57 states"

 
What about paying hush money to a porn star to not reveal your sexual escapades outside of your marriage?

Does that make him unfit to hold the presidency?

 
Because he’s disingenuous and will never admit when he’s been corrected. :shrug:  
Well, he got dismantled pretty badly so I'm assuming he's posting today under a different alias after being humiliated like that.  He was very active up until that beat down so assuming he's posting under bradyfan today, Opie tomorrow and back as Bozeman Bruiser early in the week.

Like exterminating vermin in here one rat at a time.   

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well, he got dismantled pretty badly so I'm assuming he's posting today under a new alias after being humiliated like that.  He was very active up until that beat down so assuming he's posting under bradyfan today, Opie tomorrow and back as Bozeman Bruiser early in the week.

Like exterminating vermin in here one rat at a time.   
Nah.  He’s posting still. He just bounces from thread to thread.  He doesn’t understand “dismantling”.  

 
The President is 6 months late for his physical and mental exam.
 

It’s been more than six months since President Donald Trump claimed to have started his annual physical at Walter Reed hospital but the White House is declining to explain why he has yet to complete the yearly doctor’s examination.

Senior administration officials did not immediately respond to NBC News’ request for comment about the delay — despite Trump announcing this week he was taking an unproven and potentially dangerous drug after being exposed to an aide who tested positive for coronavirus.

Asked in early March about when he would complete his physical, the president told reporters, “I’m going probably over the next 90 days. I’m so busy, I can’t do it.”

A month later, as the coronavirus pandemic hospitalized UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson, Trump said he would finish the exam “at the appropriate time” adding, “but I feel very good.”

A president’s annual physical typically occurs at the beginning of a new year. Trump’s 2019 exam was conducted in February, and his 2018 physical was conducted in January. It is uncommon for a president to complete a routine physical exam months apart and in multiple stages.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top