barackdhouse
Footballguy
I meant eventually. He isn't sitting out the whole season and eventually Anarchy will get to use him. Indeed a big risk.Gentle disagreement in that he may indeed not report and that's the hedge in Anarchy's bet.
I meant eventually. He isn't sitting out the whole season and eventually Anarchy will get to use him. Indeed a big risk.Gentle disagreement in that he may indeed not report and that's the hedge in Anarchy's bet.
The question remains - did you send a trade offer of Mack for Gordon?How does it work?
TEAM A: Would you do Mack for Gordon straight up?
TEAM B: I would rather give up Drake I offered you a trade with Mack in it.
TEAM A: Evans is too much to have to give up for Woods.
TEAM B: Not trading Hill.
So that's the non answer.
Good luck, Striker. We're all counting on you.But yes, we offered Gordon for Mack, which has not been rejected or accepted as of yet.
He just said he did.The question remains - did you send a trade offer of Mack for Gordon?
He is thinking about it...But yes, we offered Gordon for Mack, which has not been rejected or accepted as of yet.
Hit accept, fella. Hit accept. Unless Gordon is going to report.He is thinking about it...
I'm into Gordon for Mack, but I wouldn't hate just holding Gordon and seeing what happens. Not touching a deal with Evans included unless it knocks your socks off.Me and TheWinz and -X- and barackdhouse I think are all on the same page here, with barack being the least willing and TheWinz being the most.
We're on a spectrum here...
I not big on Mack but I’d move Gordon for him at this point.Not saying that I love them either, but you don't see a whole season of Drake or Mack being better than potentially 6 games of Gordon (who by then would be so far in the dog house that it would be hard to see him being in good graces by that point)?
+1I'm into Gordon for Mack, but I wouldn't hate just holding Gordon and seeing what happens. Not touching a deal with Evans included unless it knocks your socks off.
Yes, I'm almost positive that Hilliard is essentially his cuff. Depends on how risk-averse the guy is about Chubb in determining what you could get for him. Maybe throw Hilliard in with Gordon should he decline the Mack offer.Isn’t Hilliard Chubb’s cuff? You could work his name into the discussion as part of a larger deal.
Maybe. Rams homer announcer did comment that Brown did not see the field at all in the preseason, indicating he may be in for a bigger role than we know.+1
P.S. I think Gurley is gonna fall apart this season, and would hold onto Henderson & Brown. I just can't figure out the workload distribution, but I think Henderson will finish the season strong.
Yeah, very little is being said of Brown. If he had been healthy when Gurley's wheels fell off last year, he would've gotten those CJ Anderson stats, and his stock would be way higher.Maybe. Rams homer announcer did comment that Brown did not see they field at all in the preseason, indicating he may be in for a bigger role than we know.
That drives me nuts. I type really fast and edit while I'm typing. People will quote this garbled mass of garbage that I've put onto the screen. No fun.Dammit, Winz, you keep quoting me before I can fix my misspellings...
Yeah, the reports are that they'll be in something like anywhere from 65-35 Bell/Montgomery down to 50/50 to ease Bell back into game shape. I'll have to look again, but reports this week had it pretty even. Montgomery has looked awesome in the preseason. Running hard, violent. It's good stuff for the Jets. That said, Buffalo was 2nd overall in DVOA defense last year, though 14th against the rush. So Gase will use him plenty, but the competition will be stiff. It's not that great of a match-up.@rockaction
What’s the outlook for Ty Monty vs. the Bills and how much do you think Gase will use him?
Waiver claim #3.Since Gordon for Mack was declined I would just go with what you have for week 1. Do you know your waiver priority yet?
No, no not at all. That doesn't make a ton of sense for the Chargers, though. Could just be leverage.Already some chatter of Shady to the Chargers. That would not help matters.
Just hold tight. What's the likely week 1 lineup of your opponent? If you haven't already posted.Drake and McKinnon for Gordon has not be pulled, so we can drop a player and accept that one if we wanted. Then could drop McKinnon for someone else once trade goes through.
You've got a real fighting chance at that even if you stand pat.For whomever asked who we were facing in Week 1 . . .
Goff
Gurley, Carson
Edelman, Hilton, Boyd
Engram
Bardgley
Saints
It's too bad you're not matched up against Gurley later in the season.For whomever asked who we were facing in Week 1 . . .
Goff
Gurley, Carson
Edelman, Hilton, Boyd
Engram
Bardgley
Saints
I don’t feel good enough about drake splitting the load in that disaster of an offense.Drake and McKinnon for Gordon has not be pulled, so we can drop a player and accept that one if we wanted. Then could drop McKinnon for someone else once trade goes through.
Not available until tomorrow. Dump Crockett?Pick up or claim Ogunbowale ASAP.
Problem is, with that owner trading Drake, Mack is now likely off the table.I suspect nobody will like it, but one obvious compromise with that guy that clearly wants Evans: Evans for Mack and Woods. Leave Gordon out.
Not sure if I'd do it, but that seems like something that might possibly get across the finish line.
And drop CrockettI suspect nobody will like it, but one obvious compromise with that guy that clearly wants Evans: Evans for Mack and Woods. Leave Gordon out.
Not sure if I'd do it, but that seems like something that might possibly get across the finish line.
I am 99% sure we already offered Evans for Mack and Woods and that got shot down.I suspect nobody will like it, but one obvious compromise with that guy that clearly wants Evans: Evans for Mack and Woods. Leave Gordon out.
Not sure if I'd do it, but that seems like something that might possibly get across the finish line.
Yeah, he wants Gordon and Evans for Mack and Woods. I sense impasse. You might be able to sit tight and have Gordon and Montgomery come Week Two, sans trade. I'd lean that way at this point. I would not dump Gordon and Evans for that return. No way.I am 99% sure we already offered Evans for Mack and Woods and that got shot down.
In case we want to rehash any offers to the week 1 opponent.Goff
Gurley, Carson, Barber, Penny, Williams
Edelman, Hilton, Boyd, Gallup, Humphries, Watkins
Engram, Fant, Olsen
Badgley
Saints
Today of all days, this is not the post you want “next unread” to take you to when you’re reading forum news for cutdown tidbits.Kenyan Drake ended up getting traded for O.J. Howard, so he's no longer an option.
Is Crockett drop able? Is Scarlett worth picking up? Dare Ogunbowale also available.