dickey moe
Fingerpicker
Ref spewing on Payton.
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
Saints vs 49ers week 14 (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Wingnut
- Start date
The General
Footballguy
Kittle
dickey moe
Fingerpicker
Kittle is a stud.
dickey moe
Fingerpicker
Kid n Play is like, "That's a full grown man."
The General
Footballguy
Was holding on for his life I think.that face mask was the most egregious call I've seen. He kept yanking it.
sho nuff
Footballguy
Thats just your opinion.
yes, Im kidding
G
Guest
Guest
Stupid 2 pt try gonna cost the Saints big
The Big Donkey
Footballguy
Was the over/under 45 in this game?
wgoldsph
Footballguy
It was a "I'll commit the penalty to block the touchdown" play
sho nuff
Footballguy
Meh....Packers can lose to about anyone at this point. Sure...if Rodgers can get hot and the D can get turnovers they have a shot...especially if they can get a bye and a home game.
Vikings, Saints, and 49ers definitely look like the class of the NFC
Insein
Footballguy
-OZ-
Footballguy
Cowboysfan8
Footballguy
Kittle is a monster
Pip's Invitation
Footballguy
Is Williams the same guy who blew the coverage for the game-winning Diggs TD in the 2017 playoffs?
Seattle is weird, they have fairly obvious flaws on their team, but they also play up to their competition and always have the 49ers number. NFC West has always been rock paper scissors with the Rams as paper, Seattle as Rock, and the 49ers as Scissors. Arizona tends to be eating glue off in the corner.
dickey moe
Fingerpicker
That was a beast mode category play by Kittle. They'll be talking about that one for awhile.
sho nuff
Footballguy
chinawildman
Footballguy
Yet ANOTHER game of the year for the niners... (until Seattle wk 17) good to see them finally come out ahead on this one. I know that was an offensively dominated game but Nick Bosa is awesome.
SaintsInDome2006
Footballguy
SaintsInDome2006
Footballguy
Officiating was pretty bad all the way around. Lot of penalties on both sides that should have been non-calls.
On the 2nd TD to Cook, #62 moved early. Pretty obvious, but no flag. Neither guy doing the game mentioned it and they kept showing the play, probably 5 times, and they never brought it up. How can multiple officials miss that when it’s right in front of them? I saw it on the original play and thought it would come back for sure. Terrible.
On the 2nd TD to Cook, #62 moved early. Pretty obvious, but no flag. Neither guy doing the game mentioned it and they kept showing the play, probably 5 times, and they never brought it up. How can multiple officials miss that when it’s right in front of them? I saw it on the original play and thought it would come back for sure. Terrible.
Mr.Pack
Footballguy
Doug B
Footballguy
My mistake. I thought an element of intent entered into it.
”Defenseless posture”, needless to say, is a wide swath of gray area. Dunno, that play was unobjectionable very recently. Hardly a Charles Martin or Vontaze Burfict move. The rules might be jacked up, but I concede that they’re still the rules. Still, just more judgments for officials to apply inconsistently.
CGRdrJoe
Footballguy
They still should have flagged defensive holding on that, I have a feeling the NFL made a point to highlight that play because the Rams just got penalized for holding the gunner on a punt return.It's the rule
Edit: it's not that hard, it's determined by formation. Like everything else.
SaintsInDome2006
Footballguy
Thanks. Obviously holding was still available, the defender had his wrapped around Smith’s jersey for 10 yards at least, and the funny thing is if that *was a punt they would have called holding on SF. The ref got confused and blew it and that’s pretty much the sum of it.
Last edited by a moderator:
Similar threads
