barackdhouse
Footballguy
Who are they, though? Are they names we would associate with a WR1, whether for fantasy or for their own teams? I just don't think you can look at a rookie WR season (ever) and try to compare it to a vet season. There are simply too many other factors that go into the slow(er) development of a rookie in their rookie season. Maybe his rookie year really was a special Randy Moss type rookie season (it wasn't). I'm assuming Juju was on the list of rookies. If right he finished even higher the next season and came out ranked #1 overall WR by many (like me). So....is Juju is on the list as a rookie? Sorry if I missed you mentioning him earlier, I don't remember.Dr. BD said:They regressed a lot more than what you're suggesting (2.25 FPT)
Randy Moss is one of the only WRs I dont have a complete career data set for (because I only went back to 2000), his FPT arc is extremely interesting to look at, and he's a HOF WR... I was curious what his 1998 and 1999 were. He also scored a 2.43 YPT his rookie season. Then he followed it up with 2.09. 2.43 was his most efficient season of his career. He did score 2.41 in 2007, so he would be the only WR in this data set to have more than 1 outlier season. He also was a complete monster.
Point is, Randy Moss had a hard time doing this twice, and even Randy Moss regressed his 2nd year, even if it was 1/2 than the average. He also had a statistical profile that, IMO, lead to a more sustainable efficiency over his career.
As I've said repeatedly, I dont think AJB is a slouch. I just dont think hes deserving of a top 10 dynasty ranking. I realize people are excited about him, and I think that level of excitement is an over correction from a 2019 NFL draft hangover. Dynasty WR10 is a bit too high IMO, and if someone values him there, you could make out big time.
ETA: Brown would do pretty well if he had a 2.09 FPT and 120 targets. Not nearly what you suggest above, but it would be impressive. IMO this is a ceiling. If he can do this, or better, in a run first offense, then I would come down from this argument and agree that he is going to be an exceptionally special talent over the next decade. IMO scoring less than that is a better bet
AETA: my prediction would be 110 targets, 66 receptions, 1122 yards, 8 TDs.
I can't overstate the importance of the Tannehill splits here, too. That, combined with the nature of a rookie season vs a vet season, are enough to throw this method out, IMO. I also have quite a bit of trepidation about the run first nature of that offense, but I really think his talent and market share are going to win the day here. Plus, by your own projection above, he finishes high enough to maintain his top 10 status that you're asking about.
If I disagree with (part of) your method here, I do at least agree with a central conclusion, which is he will need to maintain a high level of efficiency, which is likely to go down. I think the main counterpoint, which could also be true at the same time, is that his target share is going to be going up more than you think it will. Both of these things could end up true. And as has been stated, he probably has quite a bit of insulation in value due to draft stock, a special (not Moss special) rookie season, and the likelihood he doesn't finish as low as he did last year. WR18 has *got* to be more likely than WR30, no?
ETA I'll concede this was before I adjusted the PPG metric and saw he would be WR25
Last edited by a moderator: