Is this for real???? The guy that was supposed to block Boykin completely missed him AND gave him the inside lane to the Punter. He had no chance....Faust said:
america's finest news source, dudeIs this for real???? The guy that was supposed to block Boykin completely missed him AND gave him the inside lane to the Punter. He had no chance....Faust said:
Same scenario. I was happier with Palmer and no clue what to do. WW options no good. I think I will roll with cutler...Cutler is my only qb now heading into the playoffs. Anyone else in the same boat. Im going to have to make a trade for a qb because I can't trust this guy at all
Give Cutler credit where it's due. At least he has the guts and humility to accept the fact that much of the blame for the team's poor performance falls squarely on other people.Is this for real???? The guy that was supposed to block Boykin completely missed him AND gave him the inside lane to the Punter. He had no chance....Faust said:
I'm hoping to get sanchez for ryan mathews....there's no way i'm rolling with cutler plus week 16 i think he plays the lionsSame scenario. I was happier with Palmer and no clue what to do. WW options no good. I think I will roll with cutler...Cutler is my only qb now heading into the playoffs. Anyone else in the same boat. Im going to have to make a trade for a qb because I can't trust this guy at all
Just step back and listen how awesome that sounds.I'm hoping to get sanchez for ryan mathews....there's no way i'm rolling with cutler plus week 16 i think he plays the lionsSame scenario. I was happier with Palmer and no clue what to do. WW options no good. I think I will roll with cutler...Cutler is my only qb now heading into the playoffs. Anyone else in the same boat. Im going to have to make a trade for a qb because I can't trust this guy at all
So you think the problem with the Bears are at RB and WR? Maybe that is why you should avoid posting here. You know who else was the best RB since AP? Trent Richardson.Lmao, reasons like this are why I avoid posting in the Shark Pool.So you're saying that if the Bears had a rookie RB and another WR, the defense would play better and that would help Cutler?okIf we're stuck with Cutler, you tank for Gurley and make your team a 'rock hard defensive / control the clock' type of team.
I'm anxious to see what our offseason is. We need to use Cutler like the Ravens use Flacco.
Bears would be quite pleased with a Brandin Cooks or Jarvis Landry right about now.
1.) Yes, a Rookie RB who may be the most talented RB since Adrian Peterson would help the Defense because it would keep them off the field.
2.) You obviously use this offseason to acquire a few core defensive guys and go with defense the rest of your draft.
3.) The point about Landry and Cooks has nothing to do with the defense. The Bears thought Marquess Wilson was going to be that 3WR to take advantage of matchups. But he's been unavailable and I don't think he has the goods.
You have issues man, lol.So you think the problem with the Bears are at RB and WR? Maybe that is why you should avoid posting here. You know who else was the best RB since AP? Trent Richardson.Lmao, reasons like this are why I avoid posting in the Shark Pool.So you're saying that if the Bears had a rookie RB and another WR, the defense would play better and that would help Cutler?okIf we're stuck with Cutler, you tank for Gurley and make your team a 'rock hard defensive / control the clock' type of team.
I'm anxious to see what our offseason is. We need to use Cutler like the Ravens use Flacco.
Bears would be quite pleased with a Brandin Cooks or Jarvis Landry right about now.
1.) Yes, a Rookie RB who may be the most talented RB since Adrian Peterson would help the Defense because it would keep them off the field.
2.) You obviously use this offseason to acquire a few core defensive guys and go with defense the rest of your draft.
3.) The point about Landry and Cooks has nothing to do with the defense. The Bears thought Marquess Wilson was going to be that 3WR to take advantage of matchups. But he's been unavailable and I don't think he has the goods.
Good point about the D though. I'm not sure why everyone doesn't build an elite defense to help their QB. GM's are so stupid.
What part of Matt Forte doing it by himself for quite a while now leads you to believe he can't do it by himself? Any time you draft a player including a high pick RB, you hope he turns into Forte. I like Gurley as much as the next guy, but your premise is ridiculous.You have issues man, lol.So you think the problem with the Bears are at RB and WR? Maybe that is why you should avoid posting here. You know who else was the best RB since AP? Trent Richardson.Lmao, reasons like this are why I avoid posting in the Shark Pool.So you're saying that if the Bears had a rookie RB and another WR, the defense would play better and that would help Cutler?okIf we're stuck with Cutler, you tank for Gurley and make your team a 'rock hard defensive / control the clock' type of team.
I'm anxious to see what our offseason is. We need to use Cutler like the Ravens use Flacco.
Bears would be quite pleased with a Brandin Cooks or Jarvis Landry right about now.
1.) Yes, a Rookie RB who may be the most talented RB since Adrian Peterson would help the Defense because it would keep them off the field.
2.) You obviously use this offseason to acquire a few core defensive guys and go with defense the rest of your draft.
3.) The point about Landry and Cooks has nothing to do with the defense. The Bears thought Marquess Wilson was going to be that 3WR to take advantage of matchups. But he's been unavailable and I don't think he has the goods.
Good point about the D though. I'm not sure why everyone doesn't build an elite defense to help their QB. GM's are so stupid.
That's literally the exact opposite of what I said. I'll say this one more time for you. Since the Bears are stuck with Jay Cutler, they need to change their Offense to a run-based attack. Matt Forte isn't cut out to do this all by himself. So you bring in Todd Gurley, who if you don't think is going to be a special Running Back then I'm wasting my time even responding to you.
This will limit Cutler's attempts, allow them to control the clock, and keep the defense fresh on the sidelines. I'm not sure where you got anything about the Bears and their skill players being the problem.
If you think Cutler going on there and going 3 and out or throwing an interception isn't hurting the defense, you're delusional.
If they wanted to become a running team, they should have drafted Teddy Bridgewater and traded Cutler for a promising linebacker. For now, they made their bed with Jay, gotta lie in it - even if it is infested with fleas that Trestman apparently has no treatment for.What part of Matt Forte doing it by himself for quite a while now leads you to believe he can't do it by himself? Any time you draft a player including a high pick RB, you hope he turns into Forte. I like Gurley as much as the next guy, but your premise is ridiculous.You have issues man, lol.So you think the problem with the Bears are at RB and WR? Maybe that is why you should avoid posting here. You know who else was the best RB since AP? Trent Richardson.Lmao, reasons like this are why I avoid posting in the Shark Pool.So you're saying that if the Bears had a rookie RB and another WR, the defense would play better and that would help Cutler?okIf we're stuck with Cutler, you tank for Gurley and make your team a 'rock hard defensive / control the clock' type of team.
I'm anxious to see what our offseason is. We need to use Cutler like the Ravens use Flacco.
Bears would be quite pleased with a Brandin Cooks or Jarvis Landry right about now.
1.) Yes, a Rookie RB who may be the most talented RB since Adrian Peterson would help the Defense because it would keep them off the field.
2.) You obviously use this offseason to acquire a few core defensive guys and go with defense the rest of your draft.
3.) The point about Landry and Cooks has nothing to do with the defense. The Bears thought Marquess Wilson was going to be that 3WR to take advantage of matchups. But he's been unavailable and I don't think he has the goods.
Good point about the D though. I'm not sure why everyone doesn't build an elite defense to help their QB. GM's are so stupid.
That's literally the exact opposite of what I said. I'll say this one more time for you. Since the Bears are stuck with Jay Cutler, they need to change their Offense to a run-based attack. Matt Forte isn't cut out to do this all by himself. So you bring in Todd Gurley, who if you don't think is going to be a special Running Back then I'm wasting my time even responding to you.
This will limit Cutler's attempts, allow them to control the clock, and keep the defense fresh on the sidelines. I'm not sure where you got anything about the Bears and their skill players being the problem.
If you think Cutler going on there and going 3 and out or throwing an interception isn't hurting the defense, you're delusional.
You said the Bears should have drafted an early round WR, and that they need a RB. You don't think that indicates that you think the skill position players are the problem?
Forte is great in this system. I'm suggesting that the Bears change their system to a traditional fullback / two tightend formation and wear down opposing defenses on the ground. If you watch Bears games, you'll notice Forte racks up a lot of his yardage in obvious passing situations. There's nothing wrong with Forte but he's not the kind of guy I would pick to lead an Offense like the one I think would suit Cutler.What part of Matt Forte doing it by himself for quite a while now leads you to believe he can't do it by himself? Any time you draft a player including a high pick RB, you hope he turns into Forte. I like Gurley as much as the next guy, but your premise is ridiculous.You have issues man, lol.So you think the problem with the Bears are at RB and WR? Maybe that is why you should avoid posting here. You know who else was the best RB since AP? Trent Richardson.Lmao, reasons like this are why I avoid posting in the Shark Pool.So you're saying that if the Bears had a rookie RB and another WR, the defense would play better and that would help Cutler?okIf we're stuck with Cutler, you tank for Gurley and make your team a 'rock hard defensive / control the clock' type of team.
I'm anxious to see what our offseason is. We need to use Cutler like the Ravens use Flacco.
Bears would be quite pleased with a Brandin Cooks or Jarvis Landry right about now.
1.) Yes, a Rookie RB who may be the most talented RB since Adrian Peterson would help the Defense because it would keep them off the field.
2.) You obviously use this offseason to acquire a few core defensive guys and go with defense the rest of your draft.
3.) The point about Landry and Cooks has nothing to do with the defense. The Bears thought Marquess Wilson was going to be that 3WR to take advantage of matchups. But he's been unavailable and I don't think he has the goods.
Good point about the D though. I'm not sure why everyone doesn't build an elite defense to help their QB. GM's are so stupid.
That's literally the exact opposite of what I said. I'll say this one more time for you. Since the Bears are stuck with Jay Cutler, they need to change their Offense to a run-based attack. Matt Forte isn't cut out to do this all by himself. So you bring in Todd Gurley, who if you don't think is going to be a special Running Back then I'm wasting my time even responding to you.
This will limit Cutler's attempts, allow them to control the clock, and keep the defense fresh on the sidelines. I'm not sure where you got anything about the Bears and their skill players being the problem.
If you think Cutler going on there and going 3 and out or throwing an interception isn't hurting the defense, you're delusional.
You said the Bears should have drafted an early round WR, and that they need a RB. You don't think that indicates that you think the skill position players are the problem?
If I were choosing a QB to run a defense-oriented, ball-control team, there are probably 20 NFL starters I'd choose before Jay Cutler, and 10 or 15 backups. Giving him fewer opportunities to make mistakes doesn't change the fact that he makes a lot of mistakes.Forte is great in this system. I'm suggesting that the Bears change their system to a traditional fullback / two tightend formation and wear down opposing defenses on the ground. If you watch Bears games, you'll notice Forte racks up a lot of his yardage in obvious passing situations. There's nothing wrong with Forte but he's not the kind of guy I would pick to lead an Offense like the one I think would suit Cutler.
That's not what I'm saying at all. All I'm saying is that clearly Jay Cutler is not going to win you any games with his arm. At this point, you're paying 50 million guaranteed to a game manager who is going to take his shots off play-action.After the worst defensive season in Chicago Bear history, and one of the best offensive seasons in Chicago Bear history, Eminence is suggesting they should've taken a WR with a high pick? At the same time he's arguing for a defensive minded/conservative offense philosophy?
Just wanted to make sure that's what I'm seeing...
That's literally all I said. Do you not think the Bears would be pleased with a Brandin Cooks or Jarvis Landry? If we were in the same room right now, you'd be asking to get hit for twisting my words around. That comment was completely unrelated to the previous comment.If we're stuck with Cutler, you tank for Gurley and make your team a 'rock hard defensive / control the clock' type of team.
I'm anxious to see what our offseason is. We need to use Cutler like the Ravens use Flacco.
Bears would be quite pleased with a Brandin Cooks or Jarvis Landry right about now.
The OnionIs this for real???? The guy that was supposed to block Boykin completely missed him AND gave him the inside lane to the Punter. He had no chance....
Yes....made a note to myself to not post while drinking excessive beer....The OnionIs this for real???? The guy that was supposed to block Boykin completely missed him AND gave him the inside lane to the Punter. He had no chance....
Been there, done that.Yes....made a note to myself to not post while drinking excessive beer....The OnionIs this for real???? The guy that was supposed to block Boykin completely missed him AND gave him the inside lane to the Punter. He had no chance....
Bennett is the security blanket over the middle, dude. That's not the problem and it wouldn't matter. And you ain't slapping ####.That's not what I'm saying at all. All I'm saying is that clearly Jay Cutler is not going to win you any games with his arm. At this point, you're paying 50 million guaranteed to a game manager who is going to take his shots off play-action.After the worst defensive season in Chicago Bear history, and one of the best offensive seasons in Chicago Bear history, Eminence is suggesting they should've taken a WR with a high pick? At the same time he's arguing for a defensive minded/conservative offense philosophy?
Just wanted to make sure that's what I'm seeing...
The second comment about taking a WR was in hindsight of the Marquess Wilson injury.
That's literally all I said. Do you not think the Bears would be pleased with a Brandin Cooks or Jarvis Landry? If we were in the same room right now, you'd be asking to get hit for twisting my words around. That comment was completely unrelated to the previous comment.If we're stuck with Cutler, you tank for Gurley and make your team a 'rock hard defensive / control the clock' type of team.
I'm anxious to see what our offseason is. We need to use Cutler like the Ravens use Flacco.
Bears would be quite pleased with a Brandin Cooks or Jarvis Landry right about now.
Besides, I've been saying the Bears need to get a shifty slot-guy for Jay Cutler for a few years now. I still think a security blanket over the middle would be Cutler's best friend, especially when you watch and see the way he utilizes Bennett.
he'll get in the ring with you right now for $25Bennett is the security blanket over the middle, dude. That's not the problem and it wouldn't matter. And you ain't slapping ####.That's not what I'm saying at all. All I'm saying is that clearly Jay Cutler is not going to win you any games with his arm. At this point, you're paying 50 million guaranteed to a game manager who is going to take his shots off play-action.After the worst defensive season in Chicago Bear history, and one of the best offensive seasons in Chicago Bear history, Eminence is suggesting they should've taken a WR with a high pick? At the same time he's arguing for a defensive minded/conservative offense philosophy?
Just wanted to make sure that's what I'm seeing...
The second comment about taking a WR was in hindsight of the Marquess Wilson injury.
That's literally all I said. Do you not think the Bears would be pleased with a Brandin Cooks or Jarvis Landry? If we were in the same room right now, you'd be asking to get hit for twisting my words around. That comment was completely unrelated to the previous comment.If we're stuck with Cutler, you tank for Gurley and make your team a 'rock hard defensive / control the clock' type of team.
I'm anxious to see what our offseason is. We need to use Cutler like the Ravens use Flacco.
Bears would be quite pleased with a Brandin Cooks or Jarvis Landry right about now.
Besides, I've been saying the Bears need to get a shifty slot-guy for Jay Cutler for a few years now. I still think a security blanket over the middle would be Cutler's best friend, especially when you watch and see the way he utilizes Bennett.
I'd be asking for what?? Are you high?That's not what I'm saying at all. All I'm saying is that clearly Jay Cutler is not going to win you any games with his arm. At this point, you're paying 50 million guaranteed to a game manager who is going to take his shots off play-action.After the worst defensive season in Chicago Bear history, and one of the best offensive seasons in Chicago Bear history, Eminence is suggesting they should've taken a WR with a high pick? At the same time he's arguing for a defensive minded/conservative offense philosophy?
Just wanted to make sure that's what I'm seeing...
The second comment about taking a WR was in hindsight of the Marquess Wilson injury.
That's literally all I said. Do you not think the Bears would be pleased with a Brandin Cooks or Jarvis Landry? If we were in the same room right now, you'd be asking to get hit for twisting my words around. That comment was completely unrelated to the previous comment.If we're stuck with Cutler, you tank for Gurley and make your team a 'rock hard defensive / control the clock' type of team.
I'm anxious to see what our offseason is. We need to use Cutler like the Ravens use Flacco.
Bears would be quite pleased with a Brandin Cooks or Jarvis Landry right about now.
Besides, I've been saying the Bears need to get a shifty slot-guy for Jay Cutler for a few years now. I still think a security blanket over the middle would be Cutler's best friend, especially when you watch and see the way he utilizes Bennett.
Former Bears quarterback Jim Miller unloaded on Cutler after the game on Comcast SportsNet’s “Bears Postgame Live,” noting that Cutler has turned the ball over 192 times in 112 career games, “coughs it up like a Pez [candy] dispenser.”
I think what you guys need is a receiver who operates on the near side of kyle long's head
Oh myStarting Ryan Mallett over Cutler this week with confidence.
Cutler hitting rock bottom.[SIZE=14.4444446563721px]Starting Ryan Mallett over Cutler this week with confidence.[/SIZE]
Your projections would say otherwise.[SIZE=14.4444446563721px]Starting Ryan Mallett over Cutler this week with confidence.[/SIZE]
lolYour projections would say otherwise.Starting Ryan Mallett over Cutler this week with confidence.
Ah yes, one of those Pez dispensers that costs $125 million to refill.Former Bears quarterback Jim Miller unloaded on Cutler after the game on Comcast SportsNet’s “Bears Postgame Live,” noting that Cutler has turned the ball over 192 times in 112 career games, “coughs it up like a Pez [candy] dispenser.”
In the past 5 years with the Bears he's turned the ball over 68 times (59 INT, 9 fumbles) in 60 games.Former Bears quarterback Jim Miller unloaded on Cutler after the game on Comcast SportsNet’s “Bears Postgame Live,” noting that Cutler has turned the ball over 192 times in 112 career games, “coughs it up like a Pez [candy] dispenser.”
Total pwnage there!Your projections would say otherwise.[SIZE=14.4444446563721px]Starting Ryan Mallett over Cutler this week with confidence.[/SIZE]
you mean besides the bears?thekidd2009 said:Is anyone starting cutler this week?
Of course.thekidd2009 said:Is anyone starting cutler this week?
Have him benched for McCown in the one league I own him in.thekidd2009 said:Is anyone starting cutler this week?
I am, over Russell Wilson. I am working on keeping my season long streak of starting the wrong one alive.thekidd2009 said:Is anyone starting cutler this week?