Well during the invasion (2003-2004) internet time was very limited. I was able to do a little surfing and set lineups for my team but that was about it.Right now things are much more built up and established here. The US Army did create the internet. We have it at work but some sites are blocked (like MFL). I have a ISP for my laptop that I can do anything on during my offtime. For people who don't want to pay for that service there is MWR where they can use a computer in 30 minute blocks. It's really not limited at all. I just work very long hours so I don't have time to focus on things like this while I am working. Right now (August) it is so hot here (120-130 degrees every day) that things have really slowed down a lot. So that convieniently has given more time to be online in the past few weeks.I will try to get Duckboys write up done today.Hey Bia,May I ask how much WWW time you get being active in the military? It's on a shared computer, ya each get X amount of time on, right? What's a normal day like for you over there?
ive wanted to ask bri's question too. interesting. u guys need anything over there?Well during the invasion (2003-2004) internet time was very limited. I was able to do a little surfing and set lineups for my team but that was about it.Right now things are much more built up and established here. The US Army did create the internet. We have it at work but some sites are blocked (like MFL). I have a ISP for my laptop that I can do anything on during my offtime. For people who don't want to pay for that service there is MWR where they can use a computer in 30 minute blocks. It's really not limited at all. I just work very long hours so I don't have time to focus on things like this while I am working. Right now (August) it is so hot here (120-130 degrees every day) that things have really slowed down a lot. So that convieniently has given more time to be online in the past few weeks.I will try to get Duckboys write up done today.Hey Bia,May I ask how much WWW time you get being active in the military? It's on a shared computer, ya each get X amount of time on, right? What's a normal day like for you over there?
I'm good but thanks for asking. I only have 40 more days here and this 15 months will finally be over. Soldiers in Afganistan are probably a lot more hard up getting things than those of us here in Iraq. So if you want to help out I would look at sending care packages that way. I want to thank folks for being so supportive of soldiers here as I think the feedback has been really positive regardless of the persons political leanings and opinions about the Wars. It's nice to know that so many Americans can seperate those things unlike some of the culture we saw during Vietnam.The Iraqi goverment and its Army have made a lot of progress this year as you may have been reading. That is very real and long lasting success in my opinion although there certainly will be issues with sectarian violence still to come, especially after we draw down forces here as has been being talked about by around 2010 timeframe. But those problems are persistent and will be a challenge no matter when we pull out of here. You see there is a lot of money being made on the oil that the tribes are still going to be fighting over. But now that the Iraqi Army has gotten strong enough to handle their own security and acting on behalf of the goverment I do think that time has come. For us to send the majority of our soldiers home and only leave soldiers here to support the Iraqi Army with intellegence, communications, logistics.If you are invested in any of the major contractors supporting here I would recomend moving those investments into something else. Because the Iraqi goverment has little interest in doing business with them and they still have expensive obligations to fufill that will hurt their bottom line during the transition. I feel so much sympathy for them.ive wanted to ask bri's question too. interesting. u guys need anything over there?Well during the invasion (2003-2004) internet time was very limited. I was able to do a little surfing and set lineups for my team but that was about it.Right now things are much more built up and established here. The US Army did create the internet. We have it at work but some sites are blocked (like MFL). I have a ISP for my laptop that I can do anything on during my offtime. For people who don't want to pay for that service there is MWR where they can use a computer in 30 minute blocks. It's really not limited at all. I just work very long hours so I don't have time to focus on things like this while I am working. Right now (August) it is so hot here (120-130 degrees every day) that things have really slowed down a lot. So that convieniently has given more time to be online in the past few weeks.I will try to get Duckboys write up done today.Hey Bia,May I ask how much WWW time you get being active in the military? It's on a shared computer, ya each get X amount of time on, right? What's a normal day like for you over there?
that's interesting, thanks for sharing.Well during the invasion (2003-2004) internet time was very limited. I was able to do a little surfing and set lineups for my team but that was about it.Right now things are much more built up and established here. The US Army did create the internet. We have it at work but some sites are blocked (like MFL). I have a ISP for my laptop that I can do anything on during my offtime. For people who don't want to pay for that service there is MWR where they can use a computer in 30 minute blocks. It's really not limited at all. I just work very long hours so I don't have time to focus on things like this while I am working. Right now (August) it is so hot here (120-130 degrees every day) that things have really slowed down a lot. So that convieniently has given more time to be online in the past few weeks.I will try to get Duckboys write up done today.Hey Bia,May I ask how much WWW time you get being active in the military? It's on a shared computer, ya each get X amount of time on, right? What's a normal day like for you over there?
Updated with 8/23 projections, obviously with the same caveats:2834.3 Just Win Baby2750.1 CalBear2716.0 Biabreakable2705.5 Anarchy992689.2 radballs2663.9 Old Milwaukee2651.0 Fiddles2648.2 Jiggyonthehut2644.5 nittanylion2638.0 Duckboy2573.1 joffer2551.5 There It Is2550.2 Captain Hook2463.8 Bri2460.9 Sinrman2285.0 Pimpin' Ain't EasyBia made a big move over the past several days, I'm guessing because of Perry and/or Bryant.FWIW, here is the Draft Dominator's view of the teams, based on latest (8/14) projections:2817.2 Just Win Baby2789.4 CalBear2746.1 Anarchy992667.9 radballs2663.2 Jiggyonthehut2657.2 Duckboy2654.1 Fiddles2652.8 Old Milwaukee2642.2 nittanylion2617.6 Biabreakable2601.2 joffer2537.3 There It Is2508.2 Captain Hook2502.0 Sinrman2478.5 Bri2247.7 Pimpin' Ain't EasyCaveats:1. I made no attempt to change projections from the defaults. Obviously many people will have different projections and thus will feel differently than what is shown by these numbers.2. DD does not factor in NFL playoff games, and thus those points are not accounted for.3. We use team QBs, so I added 4 rounds to the draft in order to add all backup QBs projected to score any points. So all teams have 4-6 individual QBs. This seems to be the only way to represent team QBs in DD.Despite the issues cited above, I think this is as good as any other quick view of the results. Injuries will obviously be the biggest factor, but this has done a decent job in past years of assessing the results in Anarchy drafts.
That's great stuff. Thanks for sharing! Let me also thank you, and everyone over there for all that you guys do. It's very hard for us back in the States to even fathom what's REALLY going on over there, how hot it is, how dangerous (thankfully a bit less now), etc. I don't have much faith in today's media to portray it the way it really is...I'm good but thanks for asking. I only have 40 more days here and this 15 months will finally be over. Soldiers in Afganistan are probably a lot more hard up getting things than those of us here in Iraq. So if you want to help out I would look at sending care packages that way. I want to thank folks for being so supportive of soldiers here as I think the feedback has been really positive regardless of the persons political leanings and opinions about the Wars. It's nice to know that so many Americans can seperate those things unlike some of the culture we saw during Vietnam.The Iraqi goverment and its Army have made a lot of progress this year as you may have been reading. That is very real and long lasting success in my opinion although there certainly will be issues with sectarian violence still to come, especially after we draw down forces here as has been being talked about by around 2010 timeframe. But those problems are persistent and will be a challenge no matter when we pull out of here. You see there is a lot of money being made on the oil that the tribes are still going to be fighting over. But now that the Iraqi Army has gotten strong enough to handle their own security and acting on behalf of the goverment I do think that time has come. For us to send the majority of our soldiers home and only leave soldiers here to support the Iraqi Army with intellegence, communications, logistics.If you are invested in any of the major contractors supporting here I would recomend moving those investments into something else. Because the Iraqi goverment has little interest in doing business with them and they still have expensive obligations to fufill that will hurt their bottom line during the transition. I feel so much sympathy for them.ive wanted to ask bri's question too. interesting. u guys need anything over there?Well during the invasion (2003-2004) internet time was very limited. I was able to do a little surfing and set lineups for my team but that was about it.Right now things are much more built up and established here. The US Army did create the internet. We have it at work but some sites are blocked (like MFL). I have a ISP for my laptop that I can do anything on during my offtime. For people who don't want to pay for that service there is MWR where they can use a computer in 30 minute blocks. It's really not limited at all. I just work very long hours so I don't have time to focus on things like this while I am working. Right now (August) it is so hot here (120-130 degrees every day) that things have really slowed down a lot. So that convieniently has given more time to be online in the past few weeks.I will try to get Duckboys write up done today.Hey Bia,May I ask how much WWW time you get being active in the military? It's on a shared computer, ya each get X amount of time on, right? What's a normal day like for you over there?
LOL maybe there is something to these predictions after all!! Sorry guys I been busy but I will try to get back to these write ups if I can find the time during this last week before the season starts, although that time might be better spent focusing my attention on HTH leagues that I can still possibly do something to improve my situation in. For this league whats done is done!! And thats one of the things I love about it!I will say this as preamble to commenting on Old Milwaukee's draft, I loved the early picks. His 1st 7 picks were very solid imo and many of them were terrific value to outperform other players drafted higher than them. It is his late draft choices that I don't like as much. But I may be overlooking what Fargas, Darling and Josh Reed are capable of. Fargas was a ADP pick that he didn't swap out.Overall I do think Old Milwaukee has one of the better teams and some solid strategy drafting from the middle.Updated with 8/23 projections, obviously with the same caveats:2834.3 Just Win Baby2750.1 CalBear2716.0 Biabreakable2705.5 Anarchy992689.2 radballs2663.9 Old Milwaukee2651.0 Fiddles2648.2 Jiggyonthehut2644.5 nittanylion2638.0 Duckboy2573.1 joffer2551.5 There It Is2550.2 Captain Hook2463.8 Bri2460.9 Sinrman2285.0 Pimpin' Ain't EasyBia made a big move over the past several days, I'm guessing because of Perry and/or Bryant.FWIW, here is the Draft Dominator's view of the teams, based on latest (8/14) projections:2817.2 Just Win Baby2789.4 CalBear2746.1 Anarchy992667.9 radballs2663.2 Jiggyonthehut2657.2 Duckboy2654.1 Fiddles2652.8 Old Milwaukee2642.2 nittanylion2617.6 Biabreakable2601.2 joffer2537.3 There It Is2508.2 Captain Hook2502.0 Sinrman2478.5 Bri2247.7 Pimpin' Ain't EasyCaveats:1. I made no attempt to change projections from the defaults. Obviously many people will have different projections and thus will feel differently than what is shown by these numbers.2. DD does not factor in NFL playoff games, and thus those points are not accounted for.3. We use team QBs, so I added 4 rounds to the draft in order to add all backup QBs projected to score any points. So all teams have 4-6 individual QBs. This seems to be the only way to represent team QBs in DD.Despite the issues cited above, I think this is as good as any other quick view of the results. Injuries will obviously be the biggest factor, but this has done a decent job in past years of assessing the results in Anarchy drafts.
bump for Brandon Marshall and Courtney Taylorbump for picking the wrong Saints PKAdded joffer to the write ups. For those who don't want to look back:
Joffer
1.05 Colts QB - Solid lock for 4000+ yards and 30 TD since the year 2000. Playoffs in the bag.
18.12 Atlanta QB - Not bad for the last round considering the weapons they have and likelihood that they will be playing catch up.
Solid production from Manning (as long as he is healthy.. Which he always has been) is one of the surest things in football. Ryan has played decently for a rookie and has weapons to work with. Not bad for the last pick of the draft. Grade lower than Anarchy’s just because Peyton is not Brady. Grade A-
2.12 Larry Johnson - Will get a lot of action. But the Oline is not any better than last year. LJ needs to stay healthy.
3.05 MJD - I actually like MJD slightly better than LJ for this season. I think his touches will increase and this guy is sensational every time he has the ball. Possible playoff team again.
10.12 Maurice Morris - Still locked in RBBC for now. But I think Morris is the better RB than Julius Jones and Morris could be the man and not look back. Great value pick for the 10th round. Doubtful to make playoffs.
14.12 Andre Hall - The other Denver RB for 2008. Great value this late as I expect him to put up some points no matter what and he has a chance to take over as the lead back if something should happen to Young.
I like the value of all of these picks. Joffer takes advantage of what fell to him and gets 2 sure RB performers then follows up with 2 RB later in the draft who will get points and have the upside to get a lot more than people expect from them. Grade B
4.12 Brandon Marshall - Great WR who fell in the draft due to off the field problems and at least a 2 week suspension causing him to miss time.Still as Denvers primary weapon I expect him to catch up quickly with other Wrs once he gets on the field.
5.05 Bobby Engram - Good value pick before he got injured. Now joffer has to deal with his 2 highest Wrs missing time. Doubtful to make playoffs.
7.05 Bernard Berrian - Deep threat WR signed by the Vikings for use on play action. Won’t get as many targets with the Vikings. Good chance of at least one playoff game.
11.05 Antwan Randle El - WR2 and target 3 for the Redskins although he may fit the WCO better than S.Moss does. That and special teams give him some upside. Still don’t expect a lot here. Playoffs are possible.
13.05 Derek Hagan - Starting WR with Pennington for the Dolphins who will likely be playing catch up for some decent garbage points.
16.12 Cortney Taylor - rumored to be Engrams replacement while he is out. We’ll see.
These WR would be a lot better if Marshall and Engram were not going to automatically miss quite a bit of time. I consider these players to be solid but unexciting picks except for Marshall who is a wild card. I would rate these Wr as average or middle of the pack if they were not missing time but I have to downgrade them for that. Grade D+
6.12 LJ Smith - Very active TE when he is healthy, but he has yet to be healthy for a full season. His QB has been injured several seasons in a row now also. There is some upside here but an awful lot of risk.
9.05 Ben Utecht - Primary TE now with Palmer. Bengals have no history of using the TE a lot from their current offense. But maybe that will change.
Not a very strong duo here. They do have enough upside to tread water and stop the bleeding for joffer at the position if LJ and McNabb stay healthy and Utect manages 40 catches. Grade C-
15.05 John Casay - Decent kicker for this late of a pick. Remains to be seen how improved the offense is. Unlikely to add anything for playoffs.
17.05 Taylor Mehlhaff - Not assured to win the job. Great value if his does kicking for the high power Saints offense but drawing zeros all year here if he doesn’t.
I like that joffer waited this late but if Mehlhaff doesn’t win the job he is going to lose over 100 some points to all teams that have 2 starters. Grade D (improves to B if Mehlahaff win the job)
8.12 San Diego Defense - Highest scoring defense in this format last year. High pick to get them but this is one of the few teams worth taking high.
12.12 Philly Defense - This defense is just ok now that many of its stars have gotten old. I would have taken the Saints or Colts with this pick because they are more sure to make the playoffs and they actually have more playmakers.
One top 3 defense and a average one. Both were drafted in the top 16. Grade B
I like what this team has at QB and RB. Unfortunately it doesent have enough at WR or TE to be competitive imo. The injury to Engram really hurts and it was too late in the draft for joffer to try to fix it. I don’t see this team competing this year although I don’t really fault joffers strategy for that. He just got bit by bad luck already. More injuries can even the playing field for him over time. Grade C
Next up Old Milwaukee...
Final update before the season (I assume the current Dodds projections are his final projections):2857.4 Just Win Baby2776.1 Biabreakable2756.4 CalBear2743.5 Anarchy992719.9 Duckboy2715.2 radballs2667.7 Old Milwaukee2655.5 Fiddles2642.9 Jiggyonthehut2610.2 There It Is2586.3 nittanylion2581.1 joffer2565.0 Captain Hook2499.4 Bri2416.4 Sinrman2323.5 Pimpin' Ain't EasyBia continues to move up.Updated with 8/23 projections, obviously with the same caveats:2834.3 Just Win Baby2750.1 CalBear2716.0 Biabreakable2705.5 Anarchy992689.2 radballs2663.9 Old Milwaukee2651.0 Fiddles2648.2 Jiggyonthehut2644.5 nittanylion2638.0 Duckboy2573.1 joffer2551.5 There It Is2550.2 Captain Hook2463.8 Bri2460.9 Sinrman2285.0 Pimpin' Ain't EasyBia made a big move over the past several days, I'm guessing because of Perry and/or Bryant.FWIW, here is the Draft Dominator's view of the teams, based on latest (8/14) projections:2817.2 Just Win Baby2789.4 CalBear2746.1 Anarchy992667.9 radballs2663.2 Jiggyonthehut2657.2 Duckboy2654.1 Fiddles2652.8 Old Milwaukee2642.2 nittanylion2617.6 Biabreakable2601.2 joffer2537.3 There It Is2508.2 Captain Hook2502.0 Sinrman2478.5 Bri2247.7 Pimpin' Ain't EasyCaveats:1. I made no attempt to change projections from the defaults. Obviously many people will have different projections and thus will feel differently than what is shown by these numbers.2. DD does not factor in NFL playoff games, and thus those points are not accounted for.3. We use team QBs, so I added 4 rounds to the draft in order to add all backup QBs projected to score any points. So all teams have 4-6 individual QBs. This seems to be the only way to represent team QBs in DD.Despite the issues cited above, I think this is as good as any other quick view of the results. Injuries will obviously be the biggest factor, but this has done a decent job in past years of assessing the results in Anarchy drafts.
Once again, you are confused. I haven't said anything about Becht in this or any other thread. at you coming back to talk trash after one game. Sure, Fasano had a great game for you... once. Meanwhile, how did Brian Leonard do for you?JWB, still think Becht is better than Fasano?
Oh right it was Alex Smith. I get those awesome tight ends mixed up. Still think Alex Smith is better than Fasano?Once again, you are confused. I haven't said anything about Becht in this or any other thread.JWB, still think Becht is better than Fasano?
it's part of the fun. If Fasano stunk you'd have let me have it tooat you coming back to talk trash after one game.
Jackson isn't hurt which is what I said might (or likely)happen, reason for drafting him etc.Sure, Fasano had a great game for you... once. Meanwhile, how did Brian Leonard do for you?
Once again, you are confused. I told you Alex Smith was a better flex pick than Leonard, especially 3 rounds later - see post 219. And so far I am right. Of course, it's a long season, so I'd typically wait at least several weeks to revisit it.And I made fun of you for saying that you wouldn't consider Smith in a 25 round draft even though you drafted Gaines. See post 228.If you're going to come in and gloat about something, at least get it right.By the way, how's that Cincy team QB looking?Oh right it was Alex Smith. I get those awesome tight ends mixed up. Still think Alex Smith is better than Fasano?Once again, you are confused. I haven't said anything about Becht in this or any other thread.JWB, still think Becht is better than Fasano?it's part of the fun. If Fasano stunk you'd have let me have it tooat you coming back to talk trash after one game.Jackson isn't hurt which is what I said might (or likely)happen, reason for drafting him etc.Sure, Fasano had a great game for you... once. Meanwhile, how did Brian Leonard do for you?
Awesome backtracking, maneuverring, sliding around the turns and trying to make it come across like you didn't rip the Fasano pick and praise Smith. You should run for presidentOnce again, you are confused. I told you Alex Smith was a better flex pick than Leonard, especially 3 rounds later - see post 219. And so far I am right. Of course, it's a long season, so I'd typically wait at least several weeks to revisit it.And I made fun of you for saying that you wouldn't consider Smith in a 25 round draft even though you drafted Gaines. See post 228.If you're going to come in and gloat about something, at least get it right.By the way, how's that Cincy team QB looking?Oh right it was Alex Smith. I get those awesome tight ends mixed up. Still think Alex Smith is better than Fasano?Once again, you are confused. I haven't said anything about Becht in this or any other thread.JWB, still think Becht is better than Fasano?it's part of the fun. If Fasano stunk you'd have let me have it tooat you coming back to talk trash after one game.Jackson isn't hurt which is what I said might (or likely)happen, reason for drafting him etc.Sure, Fasano had a great game for you... once. Meanwhile, how did Brian Leonard do for you?
And you should work on reading comprehension, as we have seen throughout this thread. I mean, I even cited the posts. It's all here in black and white.I criticized you for the following:1. Taking the Cincy team QB at 2.14.2. Discussing your picks and your team as if you did not understand the scoring system.3. Taking Harrison at 5.3.4. Taking Fasano and Gaines as your two mandatory TEs. If Fasano goes on to have a great season, then I will be proven at least partly wrong on that particular criticism.5. Taking Leonard in the 14th as your flex player. I cited Smith as an example of a better flex player taken in the 17th.So far, I think my overall commentary on your team looks pretty good, though as I already indicated, I think it takes at least several weeks to get a good feel on things. Edited to make this readable since the number of quotes has been restricted since it was posted.Awesome backtracking, maneuverring, sliding around the turns and trying to make it come across like you didn't rip the Fasano pick and praise Smith. You should run for president
I didn't expect Marshall to catch up that quickly!!bump for Brandon Marshall and Courtney Taylorbump for picking the wrong Saints PKAdded joffer to the write ups. For those who don't want to look back:
Joffer
1.05 Colts QB - Solid lock for 4000+ yards and 30 TD since the year 2000. Playoffs in the bag.
18.12 Atlanta QB - Not bad for the last round considering the weapons they have and likelihood that they will be playing catch up.
Solid production from Manning (as long as he is healthy.. Which he always has been) is one of the surest things in football. Ryan has played decently for a rookie and has weapons to work with. Not bad for the last pick of the draft. Grade lower than Anarchy’s just because Peyton is not Brady. Grade A-
2.12 Larry Johnson - Will get a lot of action. But the Oline is not any better than last year. LJ needs to stay healthy.
3.05 MJD - I actually like MJD slightly better than LJ for this season. I think his touches will increase and this guy is sensational every time he has the ball. Possible playoff team again.
10.12 Maurice Morris - Still locked in RBBC for now. But I think Morris is the better RB than Julius Jones and Morris could be the man and not look back. Great value pick for the 10th round. Doubtful to make playoffs.
14.12 Andre Hall - The other Denver RB for 2008. Great value this late as I expect him to put up some points no matter what and he has a chance to take over as the lead back if something should happen to Young.
I like the value of all of these picks. Joffer takes advantage of what fell to him and gets 2 sure RB performers then follows up with 2 RB later in the draft who will get points and have the upside to get a lot more than people expect from them. Grade B
4.12 Brandon Marshall - Great WR who fell in the draft due to off the field problems and at least a 2 week suspension causing him to miss time.Still as Denvers primary weapon I expect him to catch up quickly with other Wrs once he gets on the field.
5.05 Bobby Engram - Good value pick before he got injured. Now joffer has to deal with his 2 highest Wrs missing time. Doubtful to make playoffs.
7.05 Bernard Berrian - Deep threat WR signed by the Vikings for use on play action. Won’t get as many targets with the Vikings. Good chance of at least one playoff game.
11.05 Antwan Randle El - WR2 and target 3 for the Redskins although he may fit the WCO better than S.Moss does. That and special teams give him some upside. Still don’t expect a lot here. Playoffs are possible.
13.05 Derek Hagan - Starting WR with Pennington for the Dolphins who will likely be playing catch up for some decent garbage points.
16.12 Cortney Taylor - rumored to be Engrams replacement while he is out. We’ll see.
These WR would be a lot better if Marshall and Engram were not going to automatically miss quite a bit of time. I consider these players to be solid but unexciting picks except for Marshall who is a wild card. I would rate these Wr as average or middle of the pack if they were not missing time but I have to downgrade them for that. Grade D+
6.12 LJ Smith - Very active TE when he is healthy, but he has yet to be healthy for a full season. His QB has been injured several seasons in a row now also. There is some upside here but an awful lot of risk.
9.05 Ben Utecht - Primary TE now with Palmer. Bengals have no history of using the TE a lot from their current offense. But maybe that will change.
Not a very strong duo here. They do have enough upside to tread water and stop the bleeding for joffer at the position if LJ and McNabb stay healthy and Utect manages 40 catches. Grade C-
15.05 John Casay - Decent kicker for this late of a pick. Remains to be seen how improved the offense is. Unlikely to add anything for playoffs.
17.05 Taylor Mehlhaff - Not assured to win the job. Great value if his does kicking for the high power Saints offense but drawing zeros all year here if he doesn’t.
I like that joffer waited this late but if Mehlhaff doesn’t win the job he is going to lose over 100 some points to all teams that have 2 starters. Grade D (improves to B if Mehlahaff win the job)
8.12 San Diego Defense - Highest scoring defense in this format last year. High pick to get them but this is one of the few teams worth taking high.
12.12 Philly Defense - This defense is just ok now that many of its stars have gotten old. I would have taken the Saints or Colts with this pick because they are more sure to make the playoffs and they actually have more playmakers.
One top 3 defense and a average one. Both were drafted in the top 16. Grade B
I like what this team has at QB and RB. Unfortunately it doesent have enough at WR or TE to be competitive imo. The injury to Engram really hurts and it was too late in the draft for joffer to try to fix it. I don’t see this team competing this year although I don’t really fault joffers strategy for that. He just got bit by bad luck already. More injuries can even the playing field for him over time. Grade C
Next up Old Milwaukee...
The single wing offense has plenty of variations like this wildcat and wildhog one. The basic premise of the single wing is that the ball is snapped to a "non-quarterback" so TMQB shouldn't get any points.Philosophical question which doesn't matter in league 2 because I have them both: When Ronnie Brown lines up at QB and throws a TD, does the score go to Brown or to the TMQB? In this case it went to Brown, but I think it should go to the TMQB; he is playing QB for that play. Good to see Brown come alive, that will help pull me up the ranks. Hopefully I'll get Branch and Nugent back soon.
I wondered this too, but I'm guessing that MFL only scores players actually designated on NFL rosters as QBs. Technically, he was not under center (if that matters). I also think that points would not count as TMQB if a punter or kicker threw a TD pass.Philosophical question which doesn't matter in league 2 because I have them both: When Ronnie Brown lines up at QB and throws a TD, does the score go to Brown or to the TMQB? In this case it went to Brown, but I think it should go to the TMQB; he is playing QB for that play. Good to see Brown come alive, that will help pull me up the ranks. Hopefully I'll get Branch and Nugent back soon.
My comments and the DD projections I posted were based on a full season, not 3 weeks. We'll see.My team has definitely started off poorly though. Brady's injury has crushed Moss's value thus far, and my TEs are not producing. Rudi Johnson signing in Detroit has also hurt, since I have Kevin Smith. Plenty of time to turn it around, though.Bri said:JWB 459Bri 4543 weeks in and it's still neck and neck. Gotta love the closeness of that.
ducky puts up 250 pts this week damnmaybe well get some respite with him missing boldin. that was an ugly hitDuckboy, ya mind giving us a chance in this thing? Geesh you're up like 200 points on me already!
Yeah that didn't look very good. Will be affecting several of my teams, but hope more for his sake that everything's alright.Didn't have many byes this week so will be coming back to the pack as we go.Fiddles said:ducky puts up 250 pts this week damnmaybe well get some respite with him missing boldin. that was an ugly hitDuckboy, ya mind giving us a chance in this thing? Geesh you're up like 200 points on me already!
Interesting factoid: Duckboy is running away with the league right now, despite his RBs being taken in the 5th, 16th, 17th, and 18th rounds. He went TE-WR-TE-WR-RB-WR-WR.ducky puts up 250 pts this week damnmaybe well get some respite with him missing boldin. that was an ugly hitDuckboy, ya mind giving us a chance in this thing? Geesh you're up like 200 points on me already!
And you should work on reading comprehension, as we have seen throughout this thread. I mean, I even cited the posts. It's all here in black and white.I criticized you for the following:1. Taking the Cincy team QB at 2.14.2. Discussing your picks and your team as if you did not understand the scoring system.3. Taking Harrison at 5.3.4. Taking Fasano and Gaines as your two mandatory TEs. If Fasano goes on to have a great season, then I will be proven at least partly wrong on that particular criticism.5. Taking Leonard in the 14th as your flex player. I cited Smith as an example of a better flex player taken in the 17th.So far, I think my overall commentary on your team looks pretty good, though as I already indicated, I think it takes at least several weeks to get a good feel on things.Awesome backtracking, maneuverring, sliding around the turns and trying to make it come across like you didn't rip the Fasano pick and praise Smith. You should run for presidentOnce again, you are confused. I told you Alex Smith was a better flex pick than Leonard, especially 3 rounds later - see post 219. And so far I am right. Of course, it's a long season, so I'd typically wait at least several weeks to revisit it.And I made fun of you for saying that you wouldn't consider Smith in a 25 round draft even though you drafted Gaines. See post 228.If you're going to come in and gloat about something, at least get it right.By the way, how's that Cincy team QB looking?Oh right it was Alex Smith. I get those awesome tight ends mixed up. Still think Alex Smith is better than Fasano?Once again, you are confused. I haven't said anything about Becht in this or any other thread.JWB, still think Becht is better than Fasano?it's part of the fun. If Fasano stunk you'd have let me have it tooat you coming back to talk trash after one game.Jackson isn't hurt which is what I said might (or likely)happen, reason for drafting him etc.Sure, Fasano had a great game for you... once. Meanwhile, how did Brian Leonard do for you?
He certainly has had a very strong start. The strategy he employed was using a safe route in that early pick investment was in WR and TE. The non-guarunteed positions that get a benifit from the PPR. His high draft position did help him to get more solid picks from these positions also before they were all picked over.That being said it is still early and those positions scoring tend to have a higher level of variance compared to RBs and QBs. Also as he mentioned he has not had any players on bye yet. There was a lot of talent with playoff potential that rested in week 4.Interesting factoid: Duckboy is running away with the league right now, despite his RBs being taken in the 5th, 16th, 17th, and 18th rounds. He went TE-WR-TE-WR-RB-WR-WR.ducky puts up 250 pts this week damnDuckboy, ya mind giving us a chance in this thing? Geesh you're up like 200 points on me already!
maybe well get some respite with him missing boldin. that was an ugly hit
WRs do not have a higher level of variance compared to RBs. I didn't bother to study TEs, but I expect the finding would be just as strong or stronger; a TE who scores 200 points on the year will be equally as reliable as an RB who scores 200 points on the year.http://subscribers.footballguys.com/2007/07guest_holub1.phpThat being said it is still early and those positions scoring tend to have a higher level of variance compared to RBs and QBs. Also as he mentioned he has not had any players on bye yet. There was a lot of talent with playoff potential that rested in week 4.
Definitly a interesting conversation and worth tracking to see which strat/philosophy actually holds up in the end.
Interesting. I am not clear on if this study uses PPR or not? As that would level the variance between the positions more I think. I normaly play non-PPR where my observations (which could be incorrect) have been steadier production from RB than WR due to touches vs. targets being in favor of RB.Another thing about this variance study. The higher spiking for RB may have to do with the more common multiple TD games. This favorable variance would still show up in the deviation. Also RB tend to be injured more often and miss games which would again contribute to the deviation. And also the WRs used in the study was broken in tiers of the high scorers. WR performance is a bit harder to predict preseason than RB/QB who have more defined roles, but the study just takes all of the best and plots them.WRs do not have a higher level of variance compared to RBs. I didn't bother to study TEs, but I expect the finding would be just as strong or stronger; a TE who scores 200 points on the year will be equally as reliable as an RB who scores 200 points on the year.http://subscribers.footballguys.com/2007/07guest_holub1.phpThat being said it is still early and those positions scoring tend to have a higher level of variance compared to RBs and QBs. Also as he mentioned he has not had any players on bye yet. There was a lot of talent with playoff potential that rested in week 4.
Definitly a interesting conversation and worth tracking to see which strat/philosophy actually holds up in the end.
Duckboy managed to get QBs ranked #10 and #13; they're second-tier, but less than 40 points away from #1. Witten is more than 40 points ahead of the #2 TE.
Yeah, Moss will probably get hurt. Muhsin is interesting because teams just can't switch coverage away from Steve Smith to pay enough attention to Muhsin. I agree his #s will go down but it looks like he's going to have a far better year than expected.I think it is unlikely that Santana Moss and Mushin maintain their lofty status in the long run and will give way to other WRs and positions as the season goes on.
I have sluffed the TE position in previous drafts in this format before. Essentialy doing the same thing that you did. This was not really be design but because of the flow of the draft and how I reacted to it. Either last year or the year before there were something like 6 or more TE drafted in the 1st round! One team drafted TE with his 1st 3 picks IIRC. And as it turned out most of them were solid picks.That does not mean that you cannot pluck a solid sleeper TE to help you not get crushed at he position. But the chances of doing so and the risk you take on for the reward you get at other picks in most cases will not be a winning strategy.That is not to say that there are not many different paths to victory in this format, there are. But as Calbear and I are discussing (and I agree with Calbear more than it might seem) value due to the PPR is very much slanted towards the TE and WR positions. Of course figuring out who those WR and TE will be (besides the obvious ones) is the million $$ question. And how solid your projections are compared to anothers is often what makes the difference besides of course the biggest killer which is injuries.Michael Gaines is terrible, I was wrong on him.Fasano's 9th ranked TE, and the top 6 haven't had a bye yet. That one's working out
I grabbed those two TEs in several leagues and it's worked well. Without a waiver wire in this, it's a different story altogether. As you know, in redraft, Gaines is a gone in a couple clicks of the mouse. Stuck here though.I never thought Gaines was this terrific athlete with all this talent(like Bryant Johnson or Brandon Lloyd may be to some) that doesn't put it to use on the field. I thought I pegged an overachiever. If ya ever do get to see Gaines and he actually catches a pass, watch him just plow right into whomever is trying to tackle him. It's a fun collision. I think I called him something like an OL running with a fumble, still think that's a good comparison. In theory, that probably would wear down a D if some OL kept barrelling into them. However, their lack of athleticism is probably why they're in blocking and not doing that. Oh well, been wrong before, I'll be wrong again. It was a fun pick and discussion nonetheless.I have sluffed the TE position in previous drafts in this format before. Essentialy doing the same thing that you did. This was not really be design but because of the flow of the draft and how I reacted to it. Either last year or the year before there were something like 6 or more TE drafted in the 1st round! One team drafted TE with his 1st 3 picks IIRC. And as it turned out most of them were solid picks.That does not mean that you cannot pluck a solid sleeper TE to help you not get crushed at he position. But the chances of doing so and the risk you take on for the reward you get at other picks in most cases will not be a winning strategy.That is not to say that there are not many different paths to victory in this format, there are. But as Calbear and I are discussing (and I agree with Calbear more than it might seem) value due to the PPR is very much slanted towards the TE and WR positions. Of course figuring out who those WR and TE will be (besides the obvious ones) is the million $$ question. And how solid your projections are compared to anothers is often what makes the difference besides of course the biggest killer which is injuries.Michael Gaines is terrible, I was wrong on him.Fasano's 9th ranked TE, and the top 6 haven't had a bye yet. That one's working out
Jackson, Pittman, and Minor all hurting to some degree.....geeshIn preseason, I was sure Brian Leonard would get some time as a starter or significant contributor. It was Pittman and Minor last week as Jackson sat. Leonard on IR.....BTW in 06, he looked OK as a rook runner, both bad and good at times, but super useful that he could play FB too. I thought he'd get me some little stats each week subbing too-few carries, maybe couple catches.
Scored 409.1 points last year and was the #2 scorer. Wasn't expecting a repeat but thought 350 points was possible. Instead, he has only 125.9 points in 9 games, thanks to Brady's injury. Hopefully there is still potential for him to pick it up down the stretch. Playoff points almost certain.Now I'll comment on my team.
1.8 Randy Moss. Nobrainer. Last season, he was the #2 overall scorer. Could not hope for better value than this at 1.7. Should be in the playoffs.
Great pick, #2 WR and #10 overall scorer so far. No playoff points here.2.9 Andre Johnson. Surprised 8 other WRs went before him. Has a slim chance at playoff points.
I still think taking TEs early is the right strategy... if you pick the right TEs... which I obviously did not. Bad pick - only TE #26 so far. Hopefully his big game this past week indicates some potential to pick it up down the stretch. Playoff points possible.3.8 Todd Heap. Last year, he was only the #37 TE, but played only 6 games due to injuries. In 2007, he was the #4 TE, although that was with McNair and Billick, so his ceiling may be slightly lower with the Ravens' current QBs. Still, as long as he stays healthy, he stands an excellent chance of finishing in the top 10 at TE. His current preseason calf injury doesn't appear to be serious. To maximize scoring for my team in this format, I wanted to get two of the top 12 or so TEs. In order to do that with 7 TEs already gone, I figured I had to take one here and get another within the next 2 rounds. No playoff points here.
Bad pick, but at the time of the pick Hasselbeck was not injured, nor was Burleson, Engram, or any of the other WRs that got hurt later. Definitely some bad luck there, but still a bad pick in retrospect. Should have waited later on QB. Obviously no playoff points.4.9 Seattle Team QB. With 10 team QBs gone, I felt Seattle offered value. Last year, Seattle was the 6th best team QB; in 2006, Seattle was the 9th best team QB. The WRs are a bit of a concern, but I have faith that Holmgren and Hasselbeck will maintain a productive passing game. Seattle is a solid bet to make the playoffs, which will hopefully give 1-2 more games of ~20 ppg performance. I should also note that I got burned at QB last year in Anarchy 3 - I took Tennessee in the 5th as the 10th team QB off the board and Baltimore in the 9th as the 20th team QB off the board, and they finished 28th and 27th, respectively. So I wanted better performance from that spot this year and felt Seattle was a fairly safe pick.
Even worse than Heap so far - TE #30 so far. Ugh. Team will make the playoffs, but does it matter?5.8 Alge Crumpler. I was mildly surprised that Crumpler was still around at this point. He was hurt last year, but was the 6th best TE in 2006. That was with Atlanta, but as long as he is healthy, he is in a good situation. He is arguably Young's most talented target, and he is playing for Heimerdinger, whose offense featured productive TE play when he was the Titans' OC for Fisher in 2000-04. I feel good about his chances to be a top 10 TE. He has a chance to get playoff points.
Great pick - #3 team QB and overall scorer so far. Decent chance at playoff points, which would be very helpful, given how many points Cutler is typically good for... but as a Chargers fan, I hope they fail to win the division, which would mean missing the playoffs.6.9 Denver Team QB. Surprised 17 other team QBs were taken before Denver. Granted, they were only 17th best in this format last year, but Cutler should be better with that experience under his belt and with his medical condition diagnosed and treatable. His receiving options should be improved, though Marshall's suspension hurts. And the team should not face a repeat of the Travis Henry drama this year, which should also help. Playoff points are unfortunately unlikely here. I know some would argue that it is best to wait on QBs, given there is not necessarily a large spread between them... but I wanted to avoid getting stuck on the wrong end of a run that left me with a bottom performer.
Solid pick - #23 RB so far, and that is despite losing points to Rudi early after his unexpected signing... averaging 12 ppg over the past 4 weeks, so hopefully he'll score some points down the stretch. No playoff points, obviously.7.8 Kevin Smith. Good value as the 32nd RB taken. No playoff points, but given I waited 7 rounds for my first RB, I'm better off than I might have expected. Last year, I took Larry Johnson in the 1st round and didn't take another RB until Leon Washington in the 8th, and I ultimately finished 2nd in Anarchy 3. Smith should easily get me more points than Johnson did last year.
Only the #50 RB so far, thanks to missing 3 games to injury. Before that he was looking solid, and he should be back this week... so hopefully he'll score some points down the stretch, and he has a good chance at playoff points.8.9 Felix Jones. Good value as the 38th RB off the board. Will get playoff points here. Has been looking good this preseason, and I think he'll have a healthy part of the Dallas running and passing games. If Barber were to underperform or miss a few games, he could easily break the top 30. I felt there was another minor RB dropoff coming and wanted to get another RB before it.
Not a good pick... Defense #10 so far. And the remaining schedule doesn't look particularly favorable. Playoff points possible.9.8 Minnesota Team Defense. FBG has the Vikings as their top ranked team defense in this format. They only finished 12th last season, but the addition of Jared Allen and Madieu Williams should boost them into the top 5 range. Playoff points are possible.
Not a good pick, however he is WR #66 so far despite missing 3 games. It hasn't helped so far that Tennessee is running so well... hopefully teams will start stacking the box, and that will lead to more points for Gage down the stretch. His team will be in the playoffs, so if he is healthy, he should get some points there.10.9 Justin Gage. Was hoping Ray Rice would fall to me here, but he didn't. However, I like Gage here. He is a #1 WR for his team, and I got him as the 50th WR off the board. Heimerdinger's #1 WRs have typically been quite good, and Gage finished last season relatively strong. He has a chance to get playoff points. All that said, having the top two targets for Tennessee is a dubious distinction...
Terrible pick - WR #106 so far, with a measly 25.4 points. I obviously misjudged Muhammad. Hackett did miss a few games due to injury, so it's possible he'll put up some minimal points going forward... but it will probably take an injury to Smith or Muhammad for him to provide much value down the stretch. Team will probably be in the playoffs, but will it matter?11.8 D.J. Hackett. 56th WR off the board. If he stays healthy, should outperform this draft position... but that is a big if. Due to Smith's suspension, he will definitely start two games, and with Muhammad's age and Smith's recent concussion, as well as the possibility that he simply outplays Muhammad, he could start a lot more. Even if he is third on the depth chart, that will likely be because Muhammad is a good run blocker... but Hackett should be featured more than Muhammad as a receiving target. A bit of a gamble here, but there were no options without their own issues at this point. Slim chance of playoff points here.
Terrible pick - #30 K so far. Definitely did not foresee the demise of the Colts offense, nor the likelihood that the Colts will miss the playoffs.12.9 Adam Vinatieri. Unfortunately, I was well into my business trip at this point, and had no time to follow the draft or plan my picks. I saw that two kickers had gone and figured the initial run on kickers would be starting. Some feel that waiting on kickers is better, but this is not like team QBs - some teams will get stuck with part timers or guys that get cut or beat out... so IMO it is good to get your first kicker early enough to guard against getting stuck with a bad second kicker. I thought about taking the Redskins defense here, and hoped they'd come back to me. In retrospect, I should have gone the other way. Very likely to get playoff points here.
Disappointing pick - surprisingly, despite the success of the Chargers' offense, he is only the #18 K so far. At least playoff points are still possible.13.8 Nate Kaeding. With no other kickers having been taken, I decided to go back to back to lock up two top kickers rather than taking someone else I didn't particularly like. Should get playoff points here.
Excellent pick here - #44 WR so far, and has picked it up in recent weeks along with Ryan, so he could move up down the stretch. And playoff points are definitely possible.14.9 Michael Jenkins. Solid value as the 73rd WR taken, given he is a starter. He finished 61st last season, while missing one game. Even if his role is somewhat reduced from last year to make more room for Robinson, hoepfully that is overcome by improvement at QB and in offensive playcalling. No playoff points.
Horrible pick. Denver is the #31 defense... Any points I get from them are gravy. Playoff points possible.15.8 Denver Team Defense. Good value as the 24th team defense taken. They finished 17th last year, and have made changes that should improve the run defense.
This looked like the pick of the draft before he got hurt. As it is, he is the #38 RB so far, and hopefully he'll be back soon. He has already easily exceeded my hope for 50 points, and he'll get playoff points if he is healthy.16.9 Sammy Morris. At this point, all RBs remaining are long shots. Morris was the 61st RB taken. If Maroney gets hurt and/or if Jordan gets hurt and/or disappoints, Morris could get 50+ points. His team will be in the playoffs, though it remains to be seen whether his role will be substantial enough that it matters. The key for him is whether or not Jordan passes him on the depth chart. I think Morris can hold him off, meaning he'll get some carries even if Maroney is healthy.
At least I got one TE right. He is the #23 TE so far, and has helped offset the Crumpler/Heap picks a bit. Decent chance at playoff points.17.8 Alex Smith. Surprised to nab him here... He should get 100+ points, which is great value this deep in the draft. I considered taking him as early as 14.9. Hard to believe so many teams have gone with a RB at their flex position and passed up a player like Smith; I think the traditional RB bias is too hard for some to let go of (see the later posts about this with Bri). FBG has him as its 23rd ranked TE. On top of all that, he stands a good chance of getting playoff points.
Very good pick for this point in the draft - he already has 48.7 points, so he will exceed my initial expectations. Playoff points very possible.18.9 Fred Jackson. If Lynch gets hurt, Jackson showed last year that he can perform well. He played well enough last year, that he should get steady work this year and produce 50+ points even if Lynch is healthy. 67th RB off the board, so 50 points would be great production here. No playoff points.
Well, DD has been off so far. My team is 6th right now, but 287 points out of first...However, a lot of my players have been affected by injury (Moss, Hasselbeck, Jones, Gage, Hackett, Morris), and most of them should be back or have their situations improve down the stretch. And almost all of my players are still in the hunt for playoff points. I'm reasonably optimistic at this point.Per my previous post, DD shows my team as the top team right now. Of course, that comes with the caveats noted in that post, so I wouldn't be surprised if there are a few better teams.
The main key for this team is staying healthy, especially Johnson, Heap, and Crumpler, who are key players for this team and all missed time last year due to injuries. I also need at least one of my RBs to exceed expectations.
But at least I feel comfortable this team can contend. I think my team is likely to have several players make the playoffs, which should help.
Of course. In a league like this, at least a quarter of the teams are probably eliminated from contention by injuries independent of their drafts. That doesn't change what I posted about my team.JWB -This just in. Everybody gets affected by injuries. Good luck! And keep hope alive.
Except Fiddles, who still has ever player in the lineup producing. Duckboy's only missing one. That's a big part of winning these leagues, getting production from all your players.I'm annoyed that I lost Nugent and that they appear to be keeping him out even though he's healthy now. His production alone would have put me into the top 6--and he's a freaking kicker, what's he doing getting injured?But it mostly looks like five teams with a shot at this point, and then a whole lot of parity after that.JWB -This just in. Everybody gets affected by injuries.