Yea im going to hold until Sunday morning at this point. Not sure about how fast information is released though.The OP on the Reddit website has clarified with his "source" that Bell has not failed a drug test yet, but rather is being called in to drug test. So just standard day to day I suppose. If Bell did test today and it was positive, would we have knowledge of this quickly? Seems like failed tests in the offseason are so delayed (by months sometimes), but maybe that's because it's the offseason? Not counting on Bell getting suspended at this point, but will hold Conner for now...
That sounds like someone totally making stuff up.The OP on the Reddit website has clarified with his "source" that Bell has not failed a drug test yet, but rather is being called in to drug test. So just standard day to day I suppose. If Bell did test today and it was positive, would we have knowledge of this quickly? Seems like failed tests in the offseason are so delayed (by months sometimes), but maybe that's because it's the offseason? Not counting on Bell getting suspended at this point, but will hold Conner for now...
Technically being told we will be there in X minutes IS being told in advance.That sounds like someone totally making stuff up.
How do you go from "he tested positive for marijuana" to "he's going to be tested".
And FWIW, guys in the program don't get notified in advance of any drug tests. Basically they call you and say "we'll be there within X minutes to test you".
So this smells like total to me.
That would be giving extra time to the evidence though.Technically being told we will be there in X minutes IS being told in advance.
According to the NFL testing procedure that I posted on the previous page:That sounds like someone totally making stuff up.
How do you go from "he tested positive for marijuana" to "he's going to be tested".
And FWIW, guys in the program don't get notified in advance of any drug tests. Basically they call you and say "we'll be there within X minutes to test you".
So this smells like total to me.
The Reddit poster specifically said his source mentioned that Bell had been called in to do a test. Therefore, he was notified he was selected and he had 3 hours to complete this test. Sounds pretty standard to me...Notification and Collection Procedures: Specimen collections occurring at a Club facility, stadium or scouting combine venue will be conducted at the discretion of the Medical Advisor and Collection Vendor without advance notice to the Player. Upon notification that he has been selected for testing, the Player shall furnish a specimen to the authorized specimen collector immediately or as soon as possible, but in no event more than three (3) hours following notification.
The Reddit poster said that Bell was "being called in within 48 hours to take another test."Technically being told we will be there in X minutes IS being told in advance.
Fake news as DT would sayThe Reddit poster said that Bell was "being called in within 48 hours to take another test."
That's just not how any of it works. A player in Stage 2 has to provide a sample within 3 hours of being contacted. If they are at any of the club facilities, the sample has to be provided immediately They provide one sample at that time that is divided into an A and a B sample. The player doesn't necessarily have to go anywhere either as collection agents are often sent to the player's home to collect the sample.
So:
Collecting a follow-up sample? Wrong
48 hours to provide a sample? Wrong
Being "called in"? Wrong
The whole thing is an obvious lie. Heck, the original Twitter poster had a whopping 32 followers.
No, the Reddit poster specifically said that Bell had 48 hours to provide a sample. He said that twice. That is incorrect.According to the NFL testing procedure that I posted on the previous page:
The Reddit poster specifically said his source mentioned that Bell had been called in to do a test. Therefore, he was notified he was selected and he had 3 hours to complete this test. Sounds pretty standard to me...
I don't know where you're getting this information. He clarified in the forums that he was called in for a test. called in... yes... how else do you think they should let him know? If he needs to be there within 3 hours would they e-mail? Text? maybe carrier pigeon?The Reddit poster said that Bell was "being called in within 48 hours to take another test."
That's just not how any of it works. A player in Stage 2 has to provide a sample within 3 hours of being contacted. If they are at any of the club facilities, the sample has to be provided immediately They provide one sample at that time that is divided into an A and a B sample. The player doesn't necessarily have to go anywhere either as collection agents are often sent to the player's home to collect the sample.
So:
Collecting a follow-up sample? Wrong
48 hours to provide a sample? Wrong
Being "called in"? Wrong
The whole thing is an obvious lie. Heck, the original Twitter poster had a whopping 32 followers.
I guess we can play word games with the actual term "call in" but the fact remains it's very possible he was asked to come in for a test (come into the bathroom, office, whatever- he doesn't piss on the field). Does that float your boat better? Why is it so hard to believe that an athlete would be asked for a drug test during the season? Sure, it's not news worthy unless he fails, and this original rumor has been corrected for stating the wrong things, but for someone like Bell who has failed in the past, to have another test... he's at a higher risk for failing than someone who has pissed clean in the past every time.No, the Reddit poster specifically said that Bell had 48 hours to provide a sample. He said that twice. That is incorrect.
Also, the Steelers are practicing today, so they wouldn't "call him in". They would notify him at the facility and require that he provide the sample immediately (they have up to 3 hours technically, but would be expected to provide it ASAP unless there were some compelling reason he couldn't).
I don't know where you're getting this information. He clarified in the forums that he was called in for a test. called in... yes... how else do you think they should let him know? If he needs to be there within 3 hours would they e-mail? Text? maybe carrier pigeon?
I have the Reddit forum open, and I'm looking at the OP's post now, where he clarified his original statement- he corrected the 48 hour statement. So your post above is reacting to a statement that he amended after speaking with his source. Your information is outdated.
but is getting called in to do so.
They test guys in Stage 2 up to 10 times a month. 10 doesn't typically happen, but multiple tests a month is not uncommon.I guess we can play word games with the actual term "call in" but the fact remains it's very possible he was asked to come in for a test (come into the bathroom, office, whatever- he doesn't piss on the field). Does that float your boat better? Why is it so hard to believe that an athlete would be asked for a drug test during the season? Sure, it's not news worthy unless he fails, and this original rumor has been corrected for stating the wrong things, but for someone like Bell who has failed in the past, to have another test... he's at a higher risk for failing than someone who has pissed clean in the past every time.
I can see you're heavily invested in Bell. They have 3 hours to submit a test. You said so yourself.Again, that is not how this works when players are in Stage 2 and at the facility. They don't get called in anywhere. A collection dude shows up and immediately collects the sample. Nobody is given advance notice. Nobody is "called in" anywhere.
This is stupid. The Twitter account was clearly lying. The Reddit guy is clearly lying and making it up as he goes along. None of the stuff being posted makes a bit of sense or is coming from anything remotely close to a legitimate source.
It's 4 games. After that would be 10. Then a year.He already had a 4 game suspension (reduced to 3 on appeal) in 2016. I think it would be a year.
It's all speculation now, but often when there is smoke, there is fire. Pun unintentional.
What if he has 33 though?Some unverified rando with 32 followers on twitter saying he heard a rumor that Bell failed a piss test should not be taken even remotely seriously.
This particular one sounds like bunk. That said, getting the jump on rumors like this is huge, and arguably the most valuable function of the shark pool.Some unverified rando with 32 followers on twitter saying he heard a rumor that Bell failed a piss test should not be taken even remotely seriously.
Sure, but also the truth is that if you have Bell you should probably be cuffing Conner anyway because Bell has been utilized an inordinate amount lately. 41 times last week is madness.This particular one sounds like bunk. That said, getting the jump on rumors like this is huge, and arguably the most valuable function of the shark pool.
Once Schefter tweets it, then everyone knows.
The Bell owner in my league has Elliott too. Those are the only Rbs on his roster. Talk about living dangerously.Sure, but also the truth is that if you have Bell you should probably be cuffing Conner anyway because Bell has been utilized an inordinate amount lately. 41 times last week is madness.
Bull ####https://www.reddit.com/r/fantasyfootball/comments/74nzez/rumor_leveon_bell_might_have_failed_a_drug_test/?ref=share&ref_source=embed&utm_content=title&utm_medium=post_embed&utm_name=039ff11d3d0a4287954dd525b3631167&utm_source=embedly&utm_term=74nzez
Not to create any panic or anything...
...don't shoot the messenger. Just ran into this conversation over on the rotoworld forums.
I've got Bell and Zeke in one league. And I have both DMC and A. Morris. I just can't deal with another freakin' handcuff. Jeesh.The Bell owner in my league has Elliott too. Those are the only Rbs on his roster. Talk about living dangerously.
how many shows?I have followed the Grateful Dead around this country.
I saw only 2 live dead shows, in the early 90's...how many shows?I have followed the Grateful Dead around this country.
Started in 89 at RFK. Saw somewhere between 50-60 Grateful Dead/Jerry shows, then somewhere between 15-20 more Furthur, Ratdog, The Dead shows. Saw the 3 Fare Thee Well shows in Chicago and that re-awoke something beautiful in me. Have seen Dead and Company 7 times. Have tix for the DC show in November, and 3 in Mexico in Feb. Oteil in October, and Phil in November. Cant really get enough of it right now. Putting what used to be money spent on watching my crappy sports teams all into the live music, and not looking back.how many shows?
Damn it! Hope he’s ok!After a hot start, Bell gets hit in the knee and limps off the field. Getting looked at by trainers now.
Wasn't a lateral hit, but it looks like at the very least he might have hyperextended it.
Link Showing the HitAfter a hot start, Bell gets hit in the knee and limps off the field. Getting looked at by trainers now.
Wasn't a lateral hit, but it looks like at the very least he might have hyperextended it.