Starks is a FA and wants a starting job so it's likely they draft a RB either way.Getting called out publicly by McCarthy + contract year = motivated Lacy in 1016. Motivated Lacy + much easier schedule + healthy offense = potential top 5 RB?...or Lacy will be in the same shape he currently is in April and Ted Thompson will select his replacement in round 3. Don't see much middle ground with this situation.tone1oc said:It sounds like Lacy might be taking his weight loss seriously..
http://www.tmz.com/2016/01/25/nfls-eddie-lacy-in-talks-with-p90x-creator-interested-in-training/
He looks great, good for himFaust said:
Off season strength and conditioning program starts soon. He'll bulk up I'm sure.I guess he can put some weight back on as we get closer to the season, but I'm a little worried that he's too skinny. The guy was a power back.
Anyone remember that other guy who didn't drink? It was Hitler. Just sayin'Anyone remember the RB who dropped "significant" weight last offseason? It was Doug Martin. How was his season? Just sayin'
I kept in one league, and "gave up" in another (where I was trying to make a playoff push) and traded him for Forte.Owners who own or take a gamble on Lacy will be largely rewarded. In his down year he still averaged 4 yards per carry and looked explosive when he wasn't winded. He will be an unstoppable force this year and I'm glad I own him. Almost gave up on him. Happy I came to my senses.
This is exactly my mindset too. I have a great feeling about Eddie this season.Owners who own or take a gamble on Lacy will be largely rewarded. In his down year he still averaged 4 yards per carry and looked explosive when he wasn't winded. He will be an unstoppable force this year and I'm glad I own him. Almost gave up on him. Happy I came to my senses.
You used the Hitler Card, an informal, red herring, guilt by association logical fail, so now I can't take anything you say seriously.Anyone remember that other guy who didn't drink? It was Hitler. Just sayin'
Wrong thread guy.
Correct thread with a foreign key to another thread, SuperGuy. Double stamped it, no erasies and you can't triple stamp a double stamp, LloydWrong thread guy.
Agree. In dynasty, if you didn't sell him off last year, you just weren't going to. You probably came real late to the party to accepting what was going on and, truth be told, it wasn't all Eddie Lacy. By the stats, people should have sold Rodgers too because his year was a dog year compared upon him self and that in itself is enough to wave the flag of reason. THe Packers were just "off" last year. Whatever reason doesn't really matter now and if someone wants to say the weight is a reason (and that's legit) then the counter is now (today) "what weight?" cause its being addressed.No one is selling him low if they suffered all through last season. If you want to buy him you are going to have pay a price close to bounce back level.
Maybe in redraft he will be at a discount but that seems unlikely with the positive press coming out lately.
This is still the wrong thread, guy. Happy to take the conversation over there but let's keep it out of here.Correct thread with a foreign key to another thread, SuperGuy. Double stamped it, no erasies and you can't triple stamp a double stamp, Lloyd
SO now we get to see "PHAT" Eddie Lacy. Choo choo mother f##$ersNFL.com's Albert Breer reports Eddie Lacy has undergone a "remarkable" physical transformation this offseason.
What Breer considers "remarkable" is Lacy's "redistribution of weight" from his midsection to his shoulders and arms. "I know the people around Eddie Lacy really feel like the Packers are going to be happy with what they see when Lacy reports for the offseason program next week," Breer said. It jibes with what everyone has been saying this offseason, including coach Mike McCarthy. Lacy appears to have gotten the message after his sluggish 2015.
In for a huge bounceback season.SO now we get to see "PHAT" Eddie Lacy. Choo choo mother f##$ers
Lacy played last year in the 260s. Still reportedly in the 240s but in much better shape. Packers want him in the low 230s so he's still got some work to do.
10 pounds over the next 2 months doesn't seem too toughLacy played last year in the 260s. Still reportedly in the 240s but in much better shape. Packers want him in the low 230s so he's still got some work to do.
Well if it took him 4 months to lose 15 lbs, then 10 lbs in 2 months looks harder.10 pounds over the next 2 months doesn't seem too tough
Good point! Though, I think he could be fine at 240. He's a bruiser of a RB, so I don't think you want him to lose any of that power. Anything has to be better than what he was playing at least season.Well if it took him 4 months to lose 15 lbs, then 10 lbs in 2 months looks harder.
My thought is that he probably turned a lot of that fat into muscle. The team probably doesn't want him to lose strength, so playing a bit heavier is probably going to be acceptable if it's muscle instead of flab.
Has 260 been confirmed? Haven't seen anything but guesses, but he was 231 at the combine, they think he's in the 240's now.MattFancy said:10 pounds over the next 2 months doesn't seem too tough
Weight loss wasn't their routine, stamina was one of the goals and that should help.MattFancy said:Good point! Though, I think he could be fine at 240. He's a bruiser of a RB, so I don't think you want him to lose any of that power. Anything has to be better than what he was playing at least season.
I have him in a keeper league and he'll cost me a late 2nd this year to keep. With many of the top guys being kept, it's a no-brainer for me to keep him this year.
Considering he's been on the Tim Horton's diet for the past 3 or 4 years....maybe switching to another Horton will help.
I agree. The issue has been identified. All the information coming from it seems to be indicating it is being handled in a positive way. The talent and ability is known. The dynamics of the running back group haven't changed a bit except Starks is now a little older in a position where that matters at some point close to the age he is. So its not like we are even sitting here saying "yeah, but they did just draft so and so in the 2nd and that could be a threat."I'm optimistic. Starks will always be a threat that puts a cap on his upside, but I put more stock in the two years where he was OROY in 2013 and despite the slow start in 2014, netted 1,140 yards and 9 TDs.
The weight issues, the ineffective and injury-riddled 2015 season happened -- it;s a risk. But I think Lacy is obviously doing what he can to right the ship, which I see as only positive. Hope more news about Packers wanting him to be lighter, etc. keep people shying away from Lacy, as I just have the feeling he is going to outproduce his ADP this year. His role, his opportunity, and his ability are still there.