habsfan
Footballguy
For me, Reed is not one of those "if he's active, he's in my line-up" guys at this point. He needs to get back on the field, get through a game and play like Jordan Reed before I slot him in...but then again:
For me, Reed is not one of those "if he's active, he's in my line-up" guys at this point. He needs to get back on the field, get through a game and play like Jordan Reed before I slot him in...but then again:
Because going into the bye at 5-3 sounds much better than going into the bye at 4-4My gut says he doesn't play this week. In all reality why would the Redskins want him to play this week. I know Vernon Davis isn't the talent that Reed is but he's been filling in more than adequately and the Redskins have a bye week 9 which would give Reed another week of rest to fully and completely recover from his concussion. All games by the Redskins to hopefully get Cincinnati to game plan for Reed possibly coming back this week. We've seen teams play this game before with many players and then they end up not playing and we're probably not going to play in the first place.
There is no such thing as limited with concussion. This is not a soft tissue injury, you are either cleared and full go or you don't play.For me, Reed is not one of those "if he's active, he's in my line-up" guys at this point. He needs to get back on the field, get through a game and play like Jordan Reed before I slot him in...
When active, Reed plays like Reed. It's rare for him to be active and not have an impact.For me, Reed is not one of those "if he's active, he's in my line-up" guys at this point. He needs to get back on the field, get through a game and play like Jordan Reed before I slot him in...
Latest rotoworld blurb says that "Reed expects to play."When active, Reed plays like Reed. It's rare for him to be active and not have an impact.
Aikman.. has anyone continued a career with as many as he's had as severe as they've been ?
Reed had a long history of being active and playing one quarter or so. I've owned him forever and regretted it until last year.When active, Reed plays like Reed. It's rare for him to be active and not have an impact.
Would like to see the data on this.Reed had a long history of being active and playing one quarter or so. I've owned him forever and regretted it until last year.
The only TE's I like more than him this week for sure are Olsen, Gronk and Graham with Barnridge close..Who is starting?
Gruden also cautioned that they haven't been cleared to play yet per rotoworldBoth Norman and Reed cleared to travel with the team per Gruden.
I kind of think we already know, he'd have had to visited the independent doc before he gets on the flight and I can't see him getting on that flight if he's did not get cleared.Starting Reed for sure if he plays. Good thing is we'll know early if he isn't or not. But I think he plays.
Well so much for me previous post. Thanks, for real.Gruden also cautioned that they haven't been cleared to play yet per rotoworld
He was actually cleared by the independent neurologist to play so technically he's been cleared.that makes no sense. Why would they put him on the plane if not cleared to play?
Understanding the number of concussions Reed has had, I think Gruden is just taking the politically correct approach here.He was actually cleared by the independent neurologist to play so technically he's been cleared.
At this point the team wants to, or at least is saying they want to, see how he responds to the flight and Friday's practice. Big difference between needing to get cleared to play versus needing to avoid a setback to play. So when Gruden or reports state he's not been cleared to play that's technically not correct, they are just leaving the door open in case he has a setback.
Yeah, need the all clear. I'm looking to deal with other issues, but until we get the thumbs up, I have to keep V. Davis on speed dial.Sucks. I only have Hurns or Reed available, and Jax plays tonight. Sounds like we won't know until tomorrow's practice.
http://www.csnmidatlantic.com/washington-redskins/no-promise-playing-jordan-reed-josh-norman-traveling-london-redskins
You can pick up a FA for Hurns (say, LaFell) and decide later.Sucks. I only have Hurns or Reed available, and Jax plays tonight. Sounds like we won't know until tomorrow's practice.
http://www.csnmidatlantic.com/washington-redskins/no-promise-playing-jordan-reed-josh-norman-traveling-london-redskins
Tight end Jordan Reed, who missed the last two games with a concussion, appeared to take part in the walkthrough fully. He said earlier this week that he feels 100 percent and ready to play on Sunday. Reed will still have to get cleared by Redskins doctors in order to play.
"Likely" to play.
Why? He plays at 8:30. We'll all be able to make an educated decision."Likely" to play.
Hate that the door is left open here.
9:30?Why? He plays at 8:30. We'll all be able to make an educated decision.
correct9:30?
it is 9:30 and AM on ET ... sorry those of us on the Left Coast are not likely to get up at 6:30 AM to check lineupsWhy? He plays at 8:30. We'll all be able to make an educated decision.
If I lived on the west coast. I'd have to get up at 6 and make sure hes active tomorrowcorrect
it is 9:30 and AM on ET ... sorry those of us on the Left Coast are not likely to get up at 6:30 AM to check lineups
yeah fortunately I can sleep in (lucky if I get to 8) because my parter lives in CTIf I lived on the west coast. I'd have to get up at 6 and make sure hes active tomorrow
6:30 for me. Which is when I'll be at the Redskins bar. Starting him over the Houston guy in one league. Benching for Graham in my other. When I drafted Graham as a backup in the 10th I said "he should be back to normal right when Reed gets another concision" wait...Why? He plays at 8:30. We'll all be able to make an educated decision.
Me and in many leagues..
Anyone setting and forgetting Reed today?
Same here and that is pretty funny.If I lived on the west coast. I'd have to get up at 6 and make sure hes active tomorrow
ESPN's Adam Schefter reports Jordan Reed (concussion, questionable) is expected to play Week 8 against the Bengals.
As is Josh Norman (concussion, questionable). This is not a surprise after both traveled with the team to London, but it is good to get confirmation. Reed is a locked-in TE1 in a great matchup.
Source: Adam Schefter on Twitter
If you got 'em, smoke 'em. Reed's back in my lineup today. ??The Redskins have four options at TE so not expecting much from Reed this year, but he looked good in his brief action against the Bills. Big body with good quickness. Definitely should be on all deep dynasty rosters (20+ players per team)
What would you target in dynasty in a like-for-like swap? Eifert? Hunter Henry and a pick?
and a pick? I dont think you could get Hunter Henry.
Value change at all for you too?Maybe if the pick was with Reed for Henry.
Hope you listened.I'd buy low on reed in a redraft in a heartbeat. What's the risk? The TE position is absolutely horrible this year. Again if you are buying low you are not giving up much and the reward I'd a stud te.
Value is same for me for both Henry and Reed. Reed is dominant and people overreacted saying he was done. I also think people overreacted to Henry being a TE1 right now, Gates was always going to cloud up his situation. But in terms of dynasty. I own both of them a lot, in 3 different leagues I own both in same league and they are TE premium leagues. I still value Henry over Reed in dynasty, nothing for me changed on that over last 3 weeks.Value change at all for you too?
This isn't a troll or "told you so" posts (I don't do those). Serious. Now that he is back and balling like a beast, is it still smarter to trade him for a guy like Henry even if you have to throw in a pick? I' m back to holding. I just can't give those points up.
With him seemingly coming back strong, in dynasty I would trade him for Henry straight up if I could work it out.Sebowski said:Value change at all for you too?
This isn't a troll or "told you so" posts (I don't do those). Serious. Now that he is back and balling like a beast, is it still smarter to trade him for a guy like Henry even if you have to throw in a pick? I' m back to holding. I just can't give those points up.
Exactly. Anyone who owns Reed in TE-prem, knows the difference he provides. If my team was a couple years away, then well sure I'd sell.menobrown said:That last line of you wrote is the huge key however and why I continue to take a gamble on him. Jordan Reed wins you leagues. When he suits up he's as much of a weekly difference maker as exists, at least in TE premium leagues.
Even if he's used in a more limited way (red zone and "chain moving" scenarios), the way that offence is performing currently, he's still a better gamble than most.Numbers were great but strongly aided by garbage time. I'm very concerned with AC injury. That isn't going to get better this year. Could limit his snaps going forward.