dickey moe
Fingerpicker
I'd say he's a sell in dynasty if you can get good value for him. In redraft I'll be looking to grab him about a round later than compared to recent years, if he's available.
Peyton Manning was the QB for Harrison and Joe Montana and/or Steve young was the QB for rice. To ignore the QB change is kind of foolish imo.DT has four consecutive seasons of at least 90 receptions and 1300 yards. The only other receivers in the history of the NFL to do that are Marvin Harrison and Jerry Rice.
I think DT is being very undervalued. The guy is elite and will put up numbers no matter who the QB is.
Rice had many good years after Montana and Young (of course, not saying DT is Rice). And no one is ignoring QB change. Of course it may be an issue. But the point was that DT is elite. Montana, Young, and Manning have thrown to some pretty good WR's, but no others have done what DT did. By all accounts he had a bad year last year - and he was still WR 10 in my PPR league, but was basically tied for 8th (265.7, 265.46, 265.4 were the total points for the 8, 9, and 10 WR). He was 10 FF pts. out of 7th place, and 25 out of 6th place. If he doesn't drop a couple passes, he's the 6th WR last year.Peyton Manning was the QB for Harrison and Joe Montana and/or Steve young was the QB for rice. To ignore the QB change is kind of foolish imo.
Not sure what all those other players have to do with thomas' production. You use the term over analyze but i just see it as analyze. Denver has a top 5 Defense and a bottom 5 offense. Denver ain't scoring a lot of points. He'll still be a decent player but i'm not seeing how he's gonna end up with big #'s.Rice had many good years after Montana and Young (of course, not saying DT is Rice). And no one is ignoring QB change. Of course it may be an issue. But the point was that DT is elite. Montana, Young, and Manning have thrown to some pretty good WR's, but no others have done what DT did. By all accounts he had a bad year last year - and he was still WR 10 in my PPR league, but was basically tied for 8th (265.7, 265.46, 265.4 were the total points for the 8, 9, and 10 WR). He was 10 FF pts. out of 7th place, and 25 out of 6th place. If he doesn't drop a couple passes, he's the 6th WR last year.
And his isn't the only situation that has changed. Of the WR's that finished ahead of him last year, two of them have potential QB changes too (Brandon Marshall and Hopkins). Jarvis Landry, AJ Green, and OBJ all get better talent surrounding them this year which could take away targets. Fitz is a year older and John Brown and Floyd are going to get a bigger share this year. The only two that really have about the same situations are Brown and Julio.
So if we are going to over analyze DT's QB change, we need to over analzye all the changes of the top WR's. We can't just assume they are all going to put up the same or better stats. Some of them will surely decline. And some lower guys will probably move up. But let's not dig DT's grave because he got a QB change when all these guys are facing change.
The point is that rarely do players score the exact same FF points from year to year. Things change all over. I'm just pointing out that most of the top WR's have change to deal with. If you are going to discount Thomas because of change, are you also discounting the other top guys because of change?Not sure what all those other players have to do with thomas' production. You use the term over analyze but i just see it as analyze. Denver has a top 5 Defense and a bottom 5 offense. Denver ain't scoring a lot of points. He'll still be a decent player but i'm not seeing how he's gonna end up with big #'s.
Some players value will go up and some down. The analysis of each players situation is independent of each other (unless players play on the same team). Whether Fitzpatrick is the Jets QB has no impact on how many yards and TD Thomas has.The point is that rarely do players score the exact same FF points from year to year. Things change all over. I'm just pointing out that most of the top WR's have change to deal with. If you are going to discount Thomas because of change, are you also discounting the other top guys because of change?
I don't know if you are just being obtuse or if you don't understand what I'm saying. I am simply asking a question. Let me just ask one. When you do your projections, are you discounting Hopkins because of his QB change?Some players value will go up and some down. The analysis of each players situation is independent of each other (unless players play on the same team). Whether Fitzpatrick is the Jets QB has no impact on how many yards and TD Thomas has.
I'm not disagreeing with your premise, but I think you picked a bad player to make your example.I don't know if you are just being obtuse or if you don't understand what I'm saying. I am simply asking a question. Let me just ask one. When you do your projections, are you discounting Hopkins because of his QB change?
I'm just trying to figure out what it is about DT's change that he should be so discounted, when no one seems to be discounting the other top WR's also who have change.
Right. But some of us think the QB situation in Denver may actually be improved from last year. And the overall point was that all these top WR's have change, some good, some bad. But for some reason everyone is super down on DT for his change but they seem to ignore all the other change.I'm not disagreeing with your premise, but I think you picked a bad player to make your example.
The accepted belief is that DTs QB situation changed for the negative (with either Sanchez or the rookie @QB). The accepted belief is also that Hopkins QB situation changed for the better (Osweiler is better than the QBs in Houston last year).
Using those accepted beliefs (which I don't necessarily agree with, but they seem to be the consensus), you wouldn't be discounting Hopkins b/c of "his" changes, while you would discount DT.
Agree with your last comment, but you missed the point of my post. Most people think DTs QB situation got worse, while Hopkins' got better. Based on that line of thinking, it makes perfect sense to discount DT, but not Hopkins.Right. But some of us think the QB situation in Denver may actually be improved from last year. And the overall point was that all these top WR's have change, some good, some bad. But for some reason everyone is super down on DT for his change but they seem to ignore all the other change.
I am perfectly happy with DT being undervalued. If I can grab him as my WR 2 a round later than I think he should go, yay for me.
I understand what you're saying perfectly. I just don't think it makes any sense.I don't know if you are just being obtuse or if you don't understand what I'm saying. I am simply asking a question. Let me just ask one. When you do your projections, are you discounting Hopkins because of his QB change?
I'm just trying to figure out what it is about DT's change that he should be so discounted, when no one seems to be discounting the other top WR's also who have change.
I get that. I disagree, maybe on both accounts. But again, it isn't just Hopkins. They all have change, and it isn't all good. I just don't think DT's change is so bad that he should be so discounted while we essentially ignore the change with most of the other WR's. But I get that others disagree.Agree with your last comment, but you missed the point of my post. Most people think DTs QB situation got worse, while Hopkins' got better. Based on that line of thinking, it makes perfect sense to discount DT, but not Hopkins.
OK.I understand what you're saying perfectly. I just don't think it makes any sense.
Understood; that's why I prefaced my initial post with " I'm not disagreeing with your premise, but I think you picked a bad player to make your example."I get that. I disagree, maybe on both accounts. But again, it isn't just Hopkins. They all have change, and it isn't all good. I just don't think DT's change is so bad that he should be so discounted while we essentially ignore the change with most of the other WR's. But I get that others disagree.
Not sure why so many think the qb is going to be so much worse this year.
Sanchez and a rookie don't inspire confidence.Not sure why so many think the qb is going to be so much worse this year.
I agree with everything here. With a couple more TD's, DT would have been WR 6 in my league. I see him finishing somewhere in the 5-10 range this year.Sanchez and a rookie don't inspire confidence.
That being said, Manning & Osweiler weren't good last year.
DT probably isn't going to put up the numbers he did in Manning's 1st 3 years in Denver, when he was a top-5 FF WR. Manning's accuracy & ability to make the right decisions led to DT being able to get a lot of TDs and YAC. I don't see Sanchez, Lynch, or Siemian being able to replicate Manning's production from '12-'14.
I could see DT getting similar numbers as last year, with 2-3 more TDs, though. Those extra TDs would have made DT the #9 WR in 15.
I've mentioned this in another thread, but from a FF standpoint, yes, there is a way the QB situation could be worse. Last year the DEN team QB ranked 22nd in passing fantasy points. It is entirely possible that this number is worse. The new QB could be asked to throw the ball less and/or could be less efficient per throw. Either way, I would not put money on the team QB totals to rank above 22nd in fantasy scoring. Combine the fact that DT finished WR13 last year (0ppr) and is being drafted as WR13 this year (0ppr ADP) and I don't see him as a value at all.theres almost no way his qb situation could be worse this year, he could lead the league in drops and still finish as a top 12 wr imo, the volume for him is not going away
eh, you can be down on him if you want, and its not impossible his production takes a nose diveI've mentioned this in another thread, but from a FF standpoint, yes, there is a way the QB situation could be worse. Last year the DEN team QB ranked 22nd in passing fantasy points. It is entirely possible that this number is worse. The new QB could be asked to throw the ball less and/or could be less efficient per throw. Either way, I would not put money on the team QB totals to rank above 22nd in fantasy scoring. Combine the fact that DT finished WR13 last year (0ppr) and is being drafted as WR13 this year (0ppr ADP) and I don't see him as a value at all.
I appreciate the permission, but his production doesn't have to take a nose dive for him to be overdrafted this year. If he gets the same volume and quality of targets, he's being drafted at his ceiling. If Denver QB ranks below last year's 22nd ranking (which is very possible) then he'll need an even greater slice of the pie to justify his ADP.eh, you can be down on him if you want, and its not impossible his production takes a nose dive
i think i see him as a potential value to target if people are gonna panic over a guy who has been as consistent as he has been for the last 3-4 seasons. People did this with Marshall a few years back as well. I feel like i would move him, where i own him if the price was right, but im not underselling him ever as some sort of shark move meta.
tells me citing the past is meaningless, right after he cites the past to make his point... coolFF Ninja said:I appreciate the permission, but his production doesn't have to take a nose dive for him to be overdrafted this year. If he gets the same volume and quality of targets, he's being drafted at his ceiling. If Denver QB ranks below last year's 22nd ranking (which is very possible) then he'll need an even greater slice of the pie to justify his ADP.
What I should be saying is "eh, you can draft him at WR13 if you want - it's not impossible his production sky rockets"
I think we can all agree he's unlikely to get more targets than last year and this QB crew is unlikely to be better than 22nd in the league. So the only way he even justifies his ADP, much less outproduces it, is if he gets more productive per touch.
Citing that he's been really consistent the last 3-4 years is meaningless at this point. In the past 4 years (1) DT has ranked 2nd in targets and (2) only New Orleans has had more fantasy points from passing and that's purely due to last year's 22nd ranking for Denver, otherwise Denver was way ahead of the competition from 2012-2014. You can't let 2012-2014 cloud your judgment on this guy. 2015 is the new reality. He has almost zero upside at WR13 which makes him an easy pass for redraft. I can understand keeping him if you own him in dynasty. That's a different conversation. If the market is poor in a certain league then options are limited and keeping him might be the best choice.
Wow. Please tell me you are being intentionally obtuse here to troll me.tells me citing the past is meaningless, then cites the past to make his point... cool
Not trolling really, but a new QB doesnt necessarily = a "new team", and I dont think that sanchez or lynch are going to be any worse than the ghost of peyton manning. The offense will likely be very similar in fact. Even if his targets go down a little, if he can cut down on the drops by even a little, I feel it will be close to a wash. If his TDs return to what they have been in the years leading to 2015, I see no reason to not think he will out perform his midsummer ADP of wr13, which is also a laughable reference to try and predict a player like DTs ceiling. I cannot name 12 wr who are better or more likely to out produce DT until I see his decline with my own eyesWow. Please tell me you are being intentionally obtuse here to troll me.
First of all, that's not what I said. Second, I'll simplify what I said in case you weren't trolling: citing DT's stats while on the #1 passing offense in the NFL is meaningless. He's essentially on a new team. Analyzing his stats while playing with sub-par QBs last year is a good place to start when projecting his potential 2016 outcomes unless you think Sanchez & Co. will be a top 20 passing unit.
I said essentially a new team and yes, he is essentially on a new team compared to the 2012-2014 Broncos. That was the #1 passing attack in the NFL. Those days are long gone and that's why you can't expect things like his TDs returning to "the years leading up to 2015."Not trolling really, but a new QB doesnt necessarily = a "new team", and I dont think that sanchez or lynch are going to be any worse than the ghost of peyton manning. The offense will likely be very similar in fact. Even if his targets go down a little, if he can cut down on the drops by even a little, I feel it will be close to a wash. If his TDs return to what they have been in the years leading to 2015, I see no reason to not think he will out perform his midsummer ADP of wr13, which is also a laughable reference to try and predict a player like DTs ceiling. I cannot name 12 wr who are better or more likely to out produce DT until I see his decline with my own eyes
Thinking they could be a top 20 unit and thinking they actually will be are two different things. If I'm drafting a guy at WR13, I need some confidence in his QB. Right now I think top 20 is a pipe dream for Denver. It could happen, but those are some long odds.Your concerns arent without merit, I get why some people are worried, I just havent seen proof yet and choose to believe that elite players will remain so until they arent. His qb situation doesnt scare me anymore than last years, so im less apt to shy away from him in redraft.
I do think Den could be a top 20 passing unit. The west is turning into a way more competitive division with some offenses that can put up points, even with that defensive unit, theyre not gonna be able to grind it out in 17-20 and 14-17 type games
Great post! Please post more often.All this for DT! Wow. What a guy!
Demaryius Thomas said he will "for sure have a better year."
Thomas has said he was distracted last season after earning a big contract and seeing his mom released from prison. Injuries to his hip, back, and neck certainly did not help either, but Thomas said all of those injuries have "healed up." Even with Peyton Manning gone and the Broncos likely to lean more run-heavy, Thomas should still finish near the top of the league in targets. He remains a fringe WR1.
Source: denverbroncos.com
Demaryius Thomas hopes to play at 222 pounds this season after checking in at 232 in 2015.
Thomas battled various minor injuries last year. "I wanted to come back a little lighter so I can get through the season," Thomas said. "Hopefully it’ll help with the injuries and everything, be quick on my feet, be in better shape. I think that’ll help my game." Thomas is presenting himself as having renewed focus following a distraction-filled 2015. He's on the WR1 borderline with Peyton Manning on the couch.
Source: Denver Post
Demaryius Thomas does not expect his target total to drop off this season.
The Broncos are expected to lean more run-heavy in the post-Peyton Manning era, but Thomas does not think the new approach will dramatically affect his numbers. "I think the targets will be the same," Thomas said. "If we run it better, we can make plays down the field." Thomas has seen at least 177 targets in each of the last two seasons. While that number might be unreachable, he is still a good bet to crack the 150-target mark. Despite the quarterback situation, Thomas is a nice pick in the third round.
Source: ESPN
Aug 15 - 10:12 AM
Thomas still has upside. Look at all the years of Andre Johnson with meh QBs under Kubiak. He's on one of the most prolific runs in the history the WR position and you sold cheap. Not great.So frustrating owning him last year. Glad to have dumped him some months ago, even if it was on the cheap (Josh Gordon and some picks... Give me the upside).
For PPR maybe, but standard has AJ in the top 10 and DT in mid to late 3rd.DT is really not in the early 3rd round anymore.
All the recent drafts I've done had him going early to mid 2nd.
What's his ceiling IYO?SameSongNDance said:hard time projecting DT as anything worse than a mid/high-end WR2
Here is my thought process, before I go into his ceiling..What's his ceiling IYO?
When asked if he thinks he'll play Week 2 against the Colts, Demaryius Thomas (hip) said, "I don't know. Taking it day by day."
Coach Gary Kubiak said earlier Monday that he believes Thomas will practice Wednesday and ultimately play Sunday, but Thomas was less optimistic. The Broncos had a light walkthrough Monday, but Thomas didn't participate, though he was in attendance. Thomas' status will be one of the bigger ones to monitor this week after ESPN reported he could miss some time.
Source: 9 News Denver
Sep 12 - 8:39 PM