Sure. But for a 30 minute video following a person for a week, his prep, his travel, his activity and responsibility where there may be 3 to 5 minutes of him in the game day booth would you shoot 8 minutes of film from the booth without him in the shot at all? No, there would be film of him greeting other advanced scouts. Film of him hitting the buffet. Film of him setting up his laptop and his pregame notes, film of him looking down with his binoculars, but not 8 minutes without him at all. Sorry, not buying it. We are talking about maybe an anticipated 20 second shot of just the sideline where he is not also in the shot. No way they have 8 minutes of that for that type of shot. also, had they not been interrupted it seems like it would have been more.
Does not pass the smell test to me. Does it really pass to you? If it does I will have to rethink matters, deferring to your apparently greater knowledge base.
IMO, there is a major difference between cheating (intending or conspiring to get a competitive advantage) and a rules violation (breaking a league rule by accident, stupidity, or miscommunication). To me, this is the latter.
Based on what has come out . . .
- The Do Your Job web series has featured all types of people involved with the Patriots organization . . . trainers, equipment people, game day operations staff, scouting for draft prep, dieticians, video production, etc. (most of the people featured have NOTHING to do with coaching).
- It does not appear they have ever put anything together for the Do Your Job series at another stadium before. The crew in question had never shot any footage for the show that involved any team other than NE on game day before.
- The main Kraft Productions film crew was in NE for the Chiefs game and this was a contracted crew sent to put a piece together on an advanced scout.
- NE approached the Browns and got permission and credentials to bring in a crew, equipment, and to tape things from the press box.
- The advanced scout in the video was scouting the Bengals . . . which only makes sense seeing how that's who they were facing next. If they really wanted to covertly get an advantage over someone . . . wouldn't they have tried to do it against the Ravens or Chiefs rather than the Bengals?
- The press box in Cleveland is on the visiting side of the field . . . and anything a scout would see looking straight down would be of the visiting team not the home team.
- People apparently have done the research and found that the Patriots did not ask for video credentials to shoot at any other NFL game this season . . . so it does not appear that there was an ongoing scheme to pretend to send a fake video crew to tape the field from the press box.
- Some folks have reviewed the Browns / Bengals game and found that the Bengals called all their plays over the head set and they did not use secondary hand signals to audible plays or alignments. Essentially, everything that was observable on the NE taped footage was accessible through other legal videotape footage.
- If, as alleged by NE, the video crew was showing things from the perspective of the scout looking over the field, it would make sense that they wanted to show some of what happens in game and what they might be looking at. It makes sense to me that they would have some B roll footage to cut to when explaining what the scout sees. The production team likely should have known better, but a guy brought in just to shoot at a different stadium as a newbie contractor may not have known (but probably should have). The producer definitively should have known (seeing how he said he was involved shooting stuff for NE for 18 years.)
Blending all of that together, I happen to believe the story NE is selling . . . that it was miscommunication and was an isolated incident (as far as the Do Your Job crew goes) and was not something that came from or would be used by the coaching staff. Why the videographer was sent to Cleveland to shoot the footage he did seems like just a dumb decision.
That being said, NE lost the benefit of the doubt a long time ago, but to me this does not indicate a massive cover up and I don't think this was an attempt to intentionally cheat to gain a competitive advantage. Thus why I said I think it is a rules violation and not an on-going cheating scandal. Given other game day rules violations by other teams, if another team did something like this, I would expect a $250,000 fine and being docked a late round draft pick. Since it is NE, I would guess they will be fined double to triple the going rate and lose a middle round draft pick (ie, one of their compensatory picks). Maybe someone in the front office will also get fined or get pinned with a brief suspension. I don't think anything will happen to BB. That's my opinion, and everyone can have their own opinion and conclusions.