jbradford787
Footballguy
Chiefs working out Ben Tate and Pierre Thomas. Ray Rice rumors are flying around. People arguing West vs. Davis. This could be a huge mess.
In between the tackles running doesn't seem to be his strongest suit but I can confidently say Davis is worse in that regard. Davis has been one of the most inefficient RBs in between the tackles on his touches so the bar has been set pretty low.Mixed bag of production, but there's quite a bit to like there. I'm not a Xs & Os guy like some of you, but he seemed to get what was blocked most of the time, with a few very nice runs scattered in. Hopefully he gets better with more reps.Coaches film isn't available yet but I put together a small clip of all of his week 5 touches.
Here is coaches film of all his week 4 touches, however.
well they need depth, Im guessing after Knile & west they don't have another back rosteredChiefs working out Ben Tate and Pierre Thomas. Ray Rice rumors are flying around. People arguing West vs. Davis. This could be a huge mess.
So the guy they bring in would play the C-Mike role?Of course they need to bring someone else in, every team needs a 3rd backup.
Why is there an obsession with Tate amongst NFL teams...so odd.But Rotoworld just said the KCC are bringing in Ben Tate. Nobody thinks he's a difference maker, and they may just be kicking the tires on any kind of depth they can now; but that doesn't scream "we've got our guy locked in." It'll be a time share for the near term. I'm beginning to talk myself out of making a WW claim on West.I think that's a fair asking price just 24 hours away from the injury. But I can see this value varying wildly in just a week or so. Imagine West explodes during his next start, then you'll be asking for at least a 1st. But if it's immediately a time share as guys above have predicted, then may be lucky to get that 2d you mentioned.I picked him up last week with the news that he's now the #2. Then the Charles injury over the weekend. People have some interest in trading for him, but what's his value right now? A 2016 2nd round rookie pick?
Not nearly as well obviously, but yes.So the guy they bring in would play the C-Mike role?Of course they need to bring someone else in, every team needs a 3rd backup.
I think he's still on their roster, but just inactive most weeks.Why is there an obsession with Tate amongst NFL teams...so odd.But Rotoworld just said the KCC are bringing in Ben Tate. Nobody thinks he's a difference maker, and they may just be kicking the tires on any kind of depth they can now; but that doesn't scream "we've got our guy locked in." It'll be a time share for the near term. I'm beginning to talk myself out of making a WW claim on West.I think that's a fair asking price just 24 hours away from the injury. But I can see this value varying wildly in just a week or so. Imagine West explodes during his next start, then you'll be asking for at least a 1st. But if it's immediately a time share as guys above have predicted, then may be lucky to get that 2d you mentioned.I picked him up last week with the news that he's now the #2. Then the Charles injury over the weekend. People have some interest in trading for him, but what's his value right now? A 2016 2nd round rookie pick?
If we're going into the has-been pool to select a vet, Tim Hightower looked surprisingly good for the Saints this summer.
I still say have Thomas be 3rd down back(in addition to his WR role) and then use the position on somewhere else. Their CBs are not playing that well. Sign a CB. Can always use an extra DL or OL.
I really doubt whomever they sign does much of anything; these are two very good backups ready to play.
Nicely done.Coaches film isn't available yet but I put together a small clip of all of his week 5 touches.
Here is coaches film of all his week 4 touches, however.
Even if Davis gets the start, there's no way he gets the volume he needs to be productive unless he looks like a different player than he has been lately. Plus, West is the better pass catcher and that is here Charles got a lot of his points.Was watching NFL channel today, it seemed Reid talked mostly about Knile Davis after being asked about the status of Charles. With regards to West, he didn't say as much, other than he was "getting better". If I had to go on what Reid just said, and could only have one, I'd lean Davis as having the primary role. If I had to go on recent game action, I'd have to lean West.
Hightower was cut by the Saints on September 15th and has not signed with anyone since then.I think he's still on their roster, but just inactive most weeks.Why is there an obsession with Tate amongst NFL teams...so odd.If we're going into the has-been pool to select a vet, Tim Hightower looked surprisingly good for the Saints this summer.But Rotoworld just said the KCC are bringing in Ben Tate. Nobody thinks he's a difference maker, and they may just be kicking the tires on any kind of depth they can now; but that doesn't scream "we've got our guy locked in." It'll be a time share for the near term. I'm beginning to talk myself out of making a WW claim on West.I think that's a fair asking price just 24 hours away from the injury. But I can see this value varying wildly in just a week or so. Imagine West explodes during his next start, then you'll be asking for at least a 1st. But if it's immediately a time share as guys above have predicted, then may be lucky to get that 2d you mentioned.I picked him up last week with the news that he's now the #2. Then the Charles injury over the weekend. People have some interest in trading for him, but what's his value right now? A 2016 2nd round rookie pick?
I still say have Thomas be 3rd down back(in addition to his WR role) and then use the position on somewhere else. Their CBs are not playing that well. Sign a CB. Can always use an extra DL or OL.
I really doubt whomever they sign does much of anything; these are two very good backups ready to play.
Knile has been mediocre his entire career.Even if Davis gets the start, there's no way he gets the volume he needs to be productive unless he looks like a different player than he has been lately. Plus, West is the better pass catcher and that is here Charles got a lot of his points.Was watching NFL channel today, it seemed Reid talked mostly about Knile Davis after being asked about the status of Charles. With regards to West, he didn't say as much, other than he was "getting better". If I had to go on what Reid just said, and could only have one, I'd lean Davis as having the primary role. If I had to go on recent game action, I'd have to lean West.
Bleacher Report's Jason Cole reports Chiefs coach Andy Reid prefers Charcandrick West to Knile Davis as Jamaal Charles' (torn ACL) replacement.
West had taken over as Charles' backup leading up to the injury and should get the first crack at replacing the star runner. Cole cautions some in the organization believe Davis is a better fit as a featured runner, and Reid reportedly told both West and Davis they will see playing time. West is the better pickup of the two, but Davis needs to be added in most leagues as well.
Source: Bleacher Report
Oct 12 - 12:25 PM
I'm not disagreeing with you, but where are you getting your information that West is a better receiver? I seem to recall Davis being good himself as well.Even if Davis gets the start, there's no way he gets the volume he needs to be productive unless he looks like a different player than he has been lately. Plus, West is the better pass catcher and that is here Charles got a lot of his points.Was watching NFL channel today, it seemed Reid talked mostly about Knile Davis after being asked about the status of Charles. With regards to West, he didn't say as much, other than he was "getting better". If I had to go on what Reid just said, and could only have one, I'd lean Davis as having the primary role. If I had to go on recent game action, I'd have to lean West.
He stuck as long as Spiller was inactive, he did look good. Pierre is probably ready to go as well.Hightower was cut by the Saints on September 15th and has not signed with anyone since then.I think he's still on their roster, but just inactive most weeks.Why is there an obsession with Tate amongst NFL teams...so odd.If we're going into the has-been pool to select a vet, Tim Hightower looked surprisingly good for the Saints this summer.But Rotoworld just said the KCC are bringing in Ben Tate. Nobody thinks he's a difference maker, and they may just be kicking the tires on any kind of depth they can now; but that doesn't scream "we've got our guy locked in." It'll be a time share for the near term. I'm beginning to talk myself out of making a WW claim on West.I think that's a fair asking price just 24 hours away from the injury. But I can see this value varying wildly in just a week or so. Imagine West explodes during his next start, then you'll be asking for at least a 1st. But if it's immediately a time share as guys above have predicted, then may be lucky to get that 2d you mentioned.I picked him up last week with the news that he's now the #2. Then the Charles injury over the weekend. People have some interest in trading for him, but what's his value right now? A 2016 2nd round rookie pick?
I still say have Thomas be 3rd down back(in addition to his WR role) and then use the position on somewhere else. Their CBs are not playing that well. Sign a CB. Can always use an extra DL or OL.
I really doubt whomever they sign does much of anything; these are two very good backups ready to play.
No no. There is probably a 27 page thread here with people praising him.Knile has been mediocre his entire career.Even if Davis gets the start, there's no way he gets the volume he needs to be productive unless he looks like a different player than he has been lately. Plus, West is the better pass catcher and that is here Charles got a lot of his points.Was watching NFL channel today, it seemed Reid talked mostly about Knile Davis after being asked about the status of Charles. With regards to West, he didn't say as much, other than he was "getting better". If I had to go on what Reid just said, and could only have one, I'd lean Davis as having the primary role. If I had to go on recent game action, I'd have to lean West.
The only question on West is how much can he handle mentally (experience) and physically (size).
He was kind of good too when he filled in for mccoyBryce Brown is out there- Andy Reid connection
Can't remember where I read it, but it was at more than one source. Could always be wrong I guess.Edit: Now that I think about it, it's probably because most consider Davis to be more of a between the tackles runner, where West seems to be more comparable to Charles and better in space.I'm not disagreeing with you, but where are you getting your information that West is a better receiver? I seem to recall Davis being good himself as well.Even if Davis gets the start, there's no way he gets the volume he needs to be productive unless he looks like a different player than he has been lately. Plus, West is the better pass catcher and that is here Charles got a lot of his points.Was watching NFL channel today, it seemed Reid talked mostly about Knile Davis after being asked about the status of Charles. With regards to West, he didn't say as much, other than he was "getting better". If I had to go on what Reid just said, and could only have one, I'd lean Davis as having the primary role. If I had to go on recent game action, I'd have to lean West.
Reid's just trying to depress West's value so he can pick him up in his FF league.Was watching NFL channel today, it seemed Reid talked mostly about Knile Davis after being asked about the status of Charles. With regards to West, he didn't say as much, other than he was "getting better". If I had to go on what Reid just said, and could only have one, I'd lean Davis as having the primary role. If I had to go on recent game action, I'd have to lean West.
Chiefs are 1-4, why would they be trading for another 29 year old RB?Whomever is spending all their FAAB money on West could be in big trouble if a timeshare develops or if the Chiefs sign a free agent,,,i.e. Tate, Thomas, Ball or Bradshaw, plus the Bears are in a trading mood, maybe they'd deal Forte to the Chiefs.
Bump in case it's helpful or starts discussionThe Charles owner is a perennial contender. I'm a foster/west owner. A couple options I think are reasonableFoster/blue for Charles/DavisWe've focused a ton on West vs Knile as backups. What about the other option in dynasty: trading Charles for a short term piece for contenders or acquiring him for rebuilders. I'm a Charles owner and a contender. I immediately emailed the league letting folks know he's on the block and immediately received interest. That surprised me.
What type of player would you contenders target to trade for; and what should the rebuilders be looking to give? Does Charles have dynasty value anymore?
Foster/blue for player/picks
West for player/picks
Foster/west for significant upgrade
West/receiver for significant upgrade
Foster is almost exactly the same age as Charles, so trading for Charles is probably the least attractive option of the bunch, especially with some risk that he doesn't come back next year or comes back to the geriatric half of a time share. It would certainly have to include Davis to get the deal done.
As a potential charles buyer, my fear is that I'm giving up a valuable thing for a potentially valuable thing, and the potentially valuable thing is 29 and injured.
As a potential west seller, my fear is that I'm giving up a guy who could be the next Charles. I know some people were high on Charles coming out, but he was hardly a sure thing when he got his shot. West was undrafted, but he was a small school guy with plus speed, who seems to have good vision and decent moves. He's gotten positive press for blocking in his limited action, and he got more positive coach speak than you'd expect a third string rb to get as he leap frogged over Davis. He's a good fit for a system that has produced some dominant rbs over the years.
As a Charles seller, I'd want some kind of immediate help if I were a contender (most Charles owners probably were). It's a tough sell, though, because you know the upside, yet the market for 29 year old running backs doesn't usually overlap with rebuilding teams who are selling useful parts right now. You're probably looking for the team with the best receivers in your league.
As a west buyer, i would be thrilled to get him for a rookie second. He's got more short and long term upside than most rentals.
Not only that, but they could try to learn more about Denver, although the Broncos' offense hasn't been that tough to defend lately.No Montee Ball? He is definetely the best RB available IMO
lol...noNo Montee Ball? He is definetely the best RB available IMO
And Pierre Thomas, Ben Tate and Tim Hightower. These guys aren't going to be a threat to touches for West and Davis. Its their time to sink or swim.PatsWillWin said:The league has spoken on Ball. The fact that he was released weeks ago and hasn't been picked up speaks volumes IMO.
Not if they're listing Davis, no. It's probably content from the summerOn the Chiefs website they have Davis as the backup to Charles. Has that been recently changed?
I could have sworn last week they had West behind Charles on their depth chart. Now it has Davis.Not if they're listing Davis, no. It's probably content from the summerOn the Chiefs website they have Davis as the backup to Charles. Has that been recently changed?
Right now it's Davis. On Sept. 23rd it was Davis too. Note it also says "Unofficial" depth chart.I could have sworn last week they had West behind Charles on their depth chart. Now it has Davis.Not if they're listing Davis, no. It's probably content from the summerOn the Chiefs website they have Davis as the backup to Charles. Has that been recently changed?
I know it says unofficial. Last week wasn't Sept 23rd, and it had West as the backup. Just an observation.Right now it's Davis. On Sept. 23rd it was Davis too. Note it also says "Unofficial" depth chart.I could have sworn last week they had West behind Charles on their depth chart. Now it has Davis.Not if they're listing Davis, no. It's probably content from the summerOn the Chiefs website they have Davis as the backup to Charles. Has that been recently changed?
You shouldn't be using it like that in-season.I could have sworn last week they had West behind Charles on their depth chart. Now it has Davis.Not if they're listing Davis, no. It's probably content from the summerOn the Chiefs website they have Davis as the backup to Charles. Has that been recently changed?
It is just an observation. I don't own any of the Chiefs RBs. I read last week that West had jumped Davis on the depth chart, and I looked, and it had been changed. Now it has changed back. That is all.You shouldn't be using it like that in-season.I could have sworn last week they had West behind Charles on their depth chart. Now it has Davis.Not if they're listing Davis, no. It's probably content from the summerOn the Chiefs website they have Davis as the backup to Charles. Has that been recently changed?
Watch, look at play by play, read, ask another fan
There's too many variables and roles and coaches that think a 53 man roster is so limiting.
Find out who came in for who, when. After enough repetitions, you've got your answer.
Easiest example is probably TE. A stone hand blocking TE is rarely ever the replacement if the receiving TE gets hurt. In your scenario of using the depth chart, you'd be picking up the blocking TE when what you want is the "next up" receiving TE,
I think a relatively even RBBC may be the most likely scenario but certainly not best case. We really don't know what that is. Guys get opportunities and emerge all the time for stretches of the season that can have a major impact on FF. Look at Freeman and Dion Lewis for the early part of this year, Forsett and CJ Anderson last year. A guy like Moreno in 2013 or even the one great season Peyton Hillis had. Best case is that West or Davis emerge as a feature back and a viable FF play the rest of the season.I hate to be a wet blanket but I have a bad feeling about that backfield. I think the BEST case scenario is a two-man even RBBC but it could also end up where 3-4 guys (D. Thomas and a FA) are splitting carries. Also, there seems to be a rift in the organization where Reid loves West but upper management prefers Davis. Lastly, KC is absolutely terrible this year and were not putting up a ton of points even with JC back there.
Not much to get excited about imo.
When I said "best case" I was saying that a RBBC is the best I can actually see it turning out. I don't envision either Davis or West taking the job and running with it. It'll be a mostly even split ROS.I think a relatively even RBBC may be the most likely scenario but certainly not best case. We really don't know what that is. Guys get opportunities and emerge all the time for stretches of the season that can have a major impact on FF. Look at Freeman and Dion Lewis for the early part of this year, Forsett and CJ Anderson last year. A guy like Moreno in 2013 or even the one great season Peyton Hillis had. Best case is that West or Davis emerge as a feature back and a viable FF play the rest of the season.I hate to be a wet blanket but I have a bad feeling about that backfield. I think the BEST case scenario is a two-man even RBBC but it could also end up where 3-4 guys (D. Thomas and a FA) are splitting carries. Also, there seems to be a rift in the organization where Reid loves West but upper management prefers Davis. Lastly, KC is absolutely terrible this year and were not putting up a ton of points even with JC back there.
Not much to get excited about imo.
That said, I understand the caution. KC's offense has not looked great this year and Alex Smith is uninspiring to say the least. But there's a decent chance that there significant value here for the cost of a waiver wire pickup.
I already rostered West and have the #2 ww claim that I'm thinking about using on Davis who was just cut Sunday morning. I have a short bench in this league but to me its worth rostering both for a week or 2 to see how it plays out. Worst case is that neither looks to have sustainable value this season and you cut bait and move on.
Screencap or it didn't happen.I know it says unofficial. Last week wasn't Sept 23rd, and it had West as the backup. Just an observation.Right now it's Davis. On Sept. 23rd it was Davis too. Note it also says "Unofficial" depth chart.I could have sworn last week they had West behind Charles on their depth chart. Now it has Davis.Not if they're listing Davis, no. It's probably content from the summerOn the Chiefs website they have Davis as the backup to Charles. Has that been recently changed?
I'm expecting to see some 80% bids but I wouldn't go more than 50%.FAAB will be used for this guy. In the NFFC people are using 20-30% on worst players. Someone is going to use most of their FAAB I think on this guy, there aren't any players on the wire left basically.