Stompin' Tom Connors
Footballguy
Any love for the Giants this week against a continuously variable Rams team?
Seems like a coin flip - Keenum developing a good rapport with his receivers lately. Gurley still stuck in the mud, but Rams have been putting up points. And the Giants D is kinda hit & miss too.Any love for the Giants this week against a continuously variable Rams team?
As a Giants fan, I can tell you I would not trust them unless I was desperate. They nearly blew the game last week, can't sack anyone, and this secondary clearly is not healthy.Stompin' Tom Connors said:Any love for the Giants this week against a continuously variable Rams team?
They're a truly lousy defense. Vegas had them as the second-lowest scoring game of the week last Sunday against an injury-ravaged Ravens' offense and they needed Beckham to go completely bonkers in the final quarter just to narrowly escape with a win because their defense kept getting gashed. At some point Todd Gurley is going to off against somebody. Hasn't happened on US soil yet. Would be fitting if it happened overseas against this sorry excuse for a defense.Stompin' Tom Connors said:Any love for the Giants this week against a continuously variable Rams team?
Same, and yes. We should have known better than to take them with Norman leaving but they are even worse than we could have thought.Crappy year to have gone all in on the Panthers, a D I thought was just going to be plug and play all year.
A lot of people are picking up Oakland defense this week.Thanks for the thoughts on the Giants, men -- makes a lot of sense. For me, cupboard is bare.
SF, Atlanta, TB, Oakland, Detroit, Miami, Jacksonville, Colts, Skins, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Chargers are the choices I have.
So while the Giants may not be trustworthy, I am not sure there is a better option out there. If anything, would guess the Raiders given match up, but they are way less trustworthy this year.
Crappy year to have gone all in on the Panthers, a D I thought was just going to be plug and play all year.
The Raiders D looks good on paper. They give up a ton of yards and points every week though. Be careful.A lot of people are picking up Oakland defense this week.
Yep. I am more comfortable rolling the dice on the Giants than the Raiders. Neither are good options, just hoping I am right about the lesser of two evils.The Raiders D looks good on paper. They give up a ton of yards and points every week though. Be careful.
They looked good the first two weeks but have done nothing since. They get no sacks and force no turnovers and like I posted earlier last week they were expected to hold a suspect offense down in a low-scoring game and couldn't even do that. So if you're getting points for points allowed you can't even trust them there right now. This week they get the Rams who recently have been putting up points so I wouldn't view them as a weak offense by any means. We can all laugh at Keenum but he has been making plays with Britt as well as Quick and we know Gurley is way overdue for a huge game.Yep. I am more comfortable rolling the dice on the Giants than the Raiders. Neither are good options, just hoping I am right about the lesser of two evils.
Dodds/Norton seem high on the Giants this week for some reason- 6th overall with my league's scoring. Not sure I agree, but there's that.
I like the Titans at home v the Colts. They have racked up 12 sacks in the last two games and no team gives up sacks at a higher rate than Indianapolis. There should be some big play opportunities.this week is awful.
i have the titans from last week in one league, and my best option in the other is the eagles.
not much on the wire. bears? texans? jags? raiders? pretty bad
It's more likely the fact that the Rams have no offense. I haven't looked recently but they were ranked last not too long ago. Looks like they are 28th now in both passing and rushing. Paltry. Gurley, as good as he is, is having trouble. And Case Keenum doesn't help things.I'm surprised they're a 3-point favorite in the game this week and I'm guessing that's based only on the fact they have Beckham. If his injury turns out to be serious in any way I would expect the line to shift closer and closer to the Pick 'em side.
I'm rolling with the Giants this week, but be aware that Case Keenum had one of his best games as a pro last week. If he carries any momentum into this week, this could be a trap.It's more likely the fact that the Rams have no offense. I haven't looked recently but they were ranked last not too long ago. Looks like they are 28th now in both passing and rushing. Paltry. Gurley, as good as he is, is having trouble. And Case Keenum doesn't help things.
Small Sample Size Alert: The last two times the Rams have faced a beatable defense (Lions and Bucs) the Rams put up some major points on them. I don't consider the Giants defense to be a very good one. Could they rise up for one game against a below-average QB like Keenum? Absolutely. He's pretty terrible. But again this is a defense that hasn't shown the slightest ability to get sacks or force turnovers since Week 2. That's a pretty significant amount of time. Meanwhile, Kenny Britt suddenly looks like a world beater, Brian Quick flashes big-play ability every once in awhile, Lance Kendricks pulls a big play out of his behind when you least expect it and Todd Gurley is so overdue for a Todd Gurley game it's ridiculous.It's more likely the fact that the Rams have no offense. I haven't looked recently but they were ranked last not too long ago. Looks like they are 28th now in both passing and rushing. Paltry. Gurley, as good as he is, is having trouble. And Case Keenum doesn't help things.
My post was in response to that. When facing a below-average defense recently the Rams' offense has put up points. I think the Rams' offense can put up points this week so I'm surprised they're an underdog. I would look at this as more of a Pick Em game. As I first said, I think the difference may be Beckham but if his injury is more serious than expected the line could shift toward LA as we get closer to Sunday.Packersfan, I agree with you on the Giants defense. That's not what I was addressing. Moreso the part about why the Giants are favored in this matchup.
Imma genius.running with the Pack this week
Jets were my target but the only other guy in the league that streams like me went ahead and grabbed them Sunday morning for next week. Hadn't considered SD, I'll have to look at that oneIm rolling with NYJ vs CLE (if Hogan starts) or SD vs DEN. Not a lot of great options.
Couple of owners in my 12 team are holding two defenses, I keep checking every hour to see if any are getting dropped. Somebody like NE hitting the wire would be gold for me right nowMaybe something much better falls to the wire....
Yep -- my situation is compounded by being in a 14 team league, but of the D's that could *potentially* fall to the wire this week to cover byes, will be scooping up the following if the fall:Couple of owners in my 12 team are holding two defenses, I keep checking every hour to see if any are getting dropped. Somebody like NE hitting the wire would be gold for me right now
I think Minnesota was averaging one point a game to opposing defenses coming into last week. Worst match-up in the league last week and Philly still put up 25-30 points per league. Just saying...Can PHI D be trusted vs DAL?
Dallas doesn't turn the ball over, but it'll likely be a low-scoring affair. Would you rather have KC vs IND (who does turn the ball over) or NYJ vs CLE (with a backup QB)?
If Darius Slay is out, Hopkns might finally break out.DET v HOU -- Detroit is by far not an option a trust, but HOU's offense ranks 31st overall in points per game and 29th in yards per game.
I've thought of TN a couple times and decided against...thankfully.Titans were disappointing last week, but I might stick with them again this week. Jags offense has been inept and Thursday games tend to be pretty sloppy.
I'm definitely considering Dallas.Cupboard really bare still. From my options, here is what I am looking at:
DAL v PHI -- risky as PHI ranks 6th over all in PPG, but Dallas is 7 overall in least points allowed. Coming off a bye in a tough divisional game? Let's see what happens.
The 2 weeks prior to this past week were pretty good for TN.I've thought of TN a couple times and decided against...thankfully.
This time around I think I'm in. It's a short week, Thursday night clunker, at home, and the JAX offense has shown absolutely nothing.
If this is the week JAX offense gets it together I'm quitting this hobby.
Picked up Carolina to host Arizona. Did you see Palmer's stats in only road start this year? I know Panthers have disappointed but with slim pickings this week I dumped Buffalo and will take a chance with rested Panthers.
Yeah 6 sacks two weeks in a row against bad teams. But they couldn't get off the field v. IND. JAX offense gives up the 11th most points to DSTs in our format.The 2 weeks prior to this past week were pretty good for TN.
Debating this as well but I think it's too dangerous. For one, while they are still holding up against the run, their pass D has been a complete sieve. And this is the one area that the Cards have the personnel with which to attack. They also have allowed tons of points -- I drafted them thinking they could be some semblance of their former selves even without Norman, and so that I could just hold a D through the year.Picked up Carolina to host Arizona. Did you see Palmer's stats in only road start this year? I know Panthers have disappointed but with slim pickings this week I dumped Buffalo and will take a chance with rested Panthers.
I'm holding the Rams through their bye for their cake matchups over the next 3 weeks, but I just had a look at San Diego's schedule AFTER this week and it's looking mighty nice outside of that Week 15 matchup against the Raiders. They handled Trevor Siemian just fine two weeks ago and after that they draw TEN, MIA, BYE, @HOU, vs. TB, @CAR, vs. OAK, @CLE. There isn't a scary opponent in that bunch outside of Oakland.wlwiles said:Jets were my target but the only other guy in the league that streams like me went ahead and grabbed them Sunday morning for next week. Hadn't considered SD, I'll have to look at that one
I am wondering the same thing. I have been running with PHI for several weeks now and they have been fantastic every week but 1. DAL doesnt turn the ball over but we would have said the same thing about MINN last week. So what do you guys expect from PHI this week? Would you play them? They are getting multiple sacks every week...ATB said:Can PHI D be trusted vs DAL?
Dallas doesn't turn the ball over, but it'll likely be a low-scoring affair. Would you rather have KC vs IND (who does turn the ball over) or NYJ vs CLE (with a backup QB)?