pantherclub
Footballguy
Much like the sex trafficking and kraft thread, you are going all in here.Perhaps you could take another look at what I've said and consider that maybe there's an interpretation other than the one you've decided on.
Much like the sex trafficking and kraft thread, you are going all in here.Perhaps you could take another look at what I've said and consider that maybe there's an interpretation other than the one you've decided on.
An unrelated story but it goes to your point. A police officer was caught planting evidence by his own bodycam. This was found after an assistant district attorney started looking through his videos. She was told to stop and when she didn't she found direct evidence. She was then berated by her superior for doing so and she quit. They had to dismiss 119 cases. Some of those people sat in jail, some were able to make bond all now have to pay to try to get their record expunged. What happened to the cop? Surely there will be charges right? Nope. He was fired but he'll likely find his way back on a force somewhere. But it is obvious if he would blatantly do this and video himself while doing it there was no fear anyone would look at the video and if they did nothing would be done. That is a corrupt culture from top to bottom.You don't get 9500 members of a Facebook group for a LEO squad of 21000 if the culture that creates the mindset of the 9500 is discouraged.
Oh okPerhaps you could take another look at what I've said and consider that maybe there's an interpretation other than the one you've decided on.
I'm really not.Much like the sex trafficking and kraft thread, you are going all in here.
@OrtonToOlsen is a reverend. Looking forward to you believing everything he posts.believe AOC or believe a Hispanic reverend .... hmmmmmm
THANK YOUYou don't get 9500 members of a Facebook group for a LEO squad of 21000 if the culture that creates the mindset of the 9500 is discouraged.
This story can’t be true, because AOC released video, which I just saw on TV, from inside the facility. Or at least it’s not the whole truth. and what exactly is the difference between the facility and a “holding area”?She makes comments about the conditions inside the facility but she never went in.
The Examiner report claims Ocasio-Cortez refused to tour the facility, as well, choosing to stay with a family in a holding area instead. The freshman rep previously tweeted about her visit to border facilities, writing that people of all ages were being mistreated and were "drinking out of toilets" as the guards laughed at the migrants' plight right in front of her.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-border-agents-southern-border
I think you mean believe multiple Congressman and the DHS or believe a Hispanic reverend.believe AOC or believe a Hispanic reverend .... hmmmmmm
You are just begging him to cut the first three words from this very statement and to give it back to you as a quote, rather than a bastardized one. Fortunately John Blutarsky is not one to get caught up in back and forth, partisan, foolishness.I don't believe I said that members of Congress don't have political motivations. If I have, please quote it for me so that I can correct it.
Yes I’m aware. I basically recalibrated my views on this yesterday.Here's the problem for all the people claiming this is all made up and for @timschochet claims people don't do bad policy on purpose. There is a new report out from DHS itself that says yeah it's all on purpose. Yes the abuses are real and yes we are doing it on purpose as a deterrent. Oh and for all the Obama lap dogs his DHS was part of it as well.
So Trump just ratcheted up what Obama was already doing and all of it was on purpose Tim.
Castro took the videos that I saw. He snuck his phone in.This story can’t be true, because AOC released video, which I just saw on TV, from inside the facility. Or at least it’s not the whole truth. and what exactly is the difference between the facility and a “holding area”?
We’re getting very contradictory stories here and the problem is everybody that is offering them has a political axe to grind. I do as well, obviously. But at this point I’m not going to call anybody a liar, I just want the truth and go from there. It seems to me that the best way to accomplish that would be to allow media access to these camps. If ICE and the administration continue to refuse this, then that would make me more suspicious than ever that they are in the wrong here and trying to hide that fact. Is there anyone who disagrees with this assessment?
I would be surprised if many of these facilities did not have video surveillance of their interiors. Media access would be nice, but pre-existing video from before they know and can prepare for media access might be more informative.This story can’t be true, because AOC released video, which I just saw on TV, from inside the facility. Or at least it’s not the whole truth. and what exactly is the difference between the facility and a “holding area”?
We’re getting very contradictory stories here and the problem is everybody that is offering them has a political axe to grind. I do as well, obviously. But at this point I’m not going to call anybody a liar, I just want the truth and go from there. It seems to me that the best way to accomplish that would be to allow media access to these camps. If ICE and the administration continue to refuse this, then that would make me more suspicious than ever that they are in the wrong here and trying to hide that fact. Is there anyone who disagrees with this assessment?
What consequences, if any, should Obama face?Yes I’m aware. I basically recalibrated my views on this yesterday.
Personally I would like to see an investigation from Congress about President Trump’s role in this matter. If the reports are accurate I would regard this as an impeachable offense, worse than anything else he is currently accused of. But I know that won’t happen.
do you personally think that they are making the men, women and kids drink from the toilet?THANK YOU
Everyone else, keep selling yourself lies.
I don’t know. I need more information first about his involvement of lack of it.What consequences, if any, should Obama face?
Boy, I wish they wrote an article every time Trump intentionally misinforms the public. We'd have to get another internet.
nevermind wrong posterI don’t know. I need more information first about his involvement of lack of it.
Lets keep the sexism outta here buddy.I think you mean believe multiple Congressman and the DHS or believe a Hispanic reverend.
Yeah, she's 5'4" like Drew Brees is 6'I most definitely question her claim that she is 5'4", a claim made when she was describing the threats and intimidation of her. I just saw video of her sitting in an SUV and quite clearly she should be in a child booster seat if she wants the passive restraints to function properly. She is a tiny woman.
Many stay in Mexico. It's why the "caravans" are usually pretty anticlimactic. But Mexico is also insanely violent these days, which is why we're seeing more and more immigrants come all the way up.Honest question:
I've read repeatedly that most of these migrants are from Central & South America and are fleeing violence, and that is the reason they are seeking refuge. Are some of these folks also seeking refugee status in Mexico? Does Mexico have the ability to offer asylum? I haven't really seen that written about anywhere.
Note he hasnt popped in that thread in a while especially now when he is clearly and utterly wrong
Note he hasnt popped in that thread in a while especially now when he is clearly and utterly wrong
BUT THIS SITUATION IS DIFFERENTBoy, I wish they wrote an article every time Trump intentionally misinforms the public. We'd have to get another internet.
And as I've said you can't know for sure at that point. But they know now. And he has a solid base that has never wavered. They are complicit at this point.I'm not going to totally lay Trumps missteps and wrong doings during his tenure completely at the feet of those who voted him in in 2016. We vote on the expectations of an agenda the politican based on what he/she has campaigned.
I will...because this is always who he was and was going to be. These same criticisms were brought up in the primaries and the general election. They knew all of this and still voted for yom and still defend and support him.I'm not going to totally lay Trumps missteps and wrong doings during his tenure completely at the feet of those who voted him in in 2016. We vote on the expectations of an agenda the politican based on what he/she has campaigned.
I never voted for yom.I will...because this is always who he was and was going to be. These same criticisms were brought up in the primaries and the general election. They knew all of this and still voted for yom and still defend and support him.
You can’t know for sure but you can certainly draw reasonable conclusions, make reasonable predictions, based on the information available at that time. Most all civilized people knew what Trump was before the election: a low class lying con man who destroyed a lot of small businesses. Hell I can’t even remember the timeline anymore of his “grab them by the p****” comment. Was that before the election? I think it was. I’m not buying the free pass, those...people...knew what they were signing up for.And as I've said you can't know for sure at that point. But they know now. And he has a solid base that has never wavered. They are complicit at this point.
I believe I've said my peace in there repeatedly. And was asked to stop. I did so.Note he hasnt popped in that thread in a while especially now when he is clearly and utterly wrong
Preach it brother!Perhaps you could take another look at what I've said and consider that maybe there's an interpretation other than the one you've decided on.
I don't believe this is true.Here's the problem for all the people claiming this is all made up and for @timschochet claims people don't do bad policy on purpose. There is a new report out from DHS itself that says yeah it's all on purpose. Yes the abuses are real and yes we are doing it on purpose as a deterrent. Oh and for all the Obama lap dogs his DHS was part of it as well.
So Trump just ratcheted up what Obama was already doing and all of it was on purpose Tim.
There are a combination of laws at work relating to this. Under our own immigration laws (adopted during the Clinton administration) asylum seekers can be denied and returned to a "safe third country" under international burden-sharing laws that date back to the 50's. The thing is, we don't recognize Mexico as a safe third country. We arguably could try to enter an agreement with Mexico designating them as a safe third country, but it would likely violate international law since (1) Mexico isn't safe and (2) their asylum system is more overburdened than ours.Honest question:
I've read repeatedly that most of these migrants are from Central & South America and are fleeing violence, and that is the reason they are seeking refuge. Are some of these folks also seeking refugee status in Mexico? Does Mexico have the ability to offer asylum? I haven't really seen that written about anywhere.
Sorry to hear that but the truth doesn't require your belief. DHS laid it all out in a report that was very damning to Trump but it also pointed to similar issues under Obama. Just like Obama took W's drone program and ramped it up Trump ramped up the existing Obama program.I don't believe this is true.
Partially true. Obama's administration definitely had a deterrent component to its handling of Central American refugees, but it also had some long term solutions, including funding a UN program in Costa Rica before Trump cut off all funding.I don't believe this is true.
"In that last facility, I was not safe, from the officers. "The more I hear about this situation the more awful it sounds. If President Obama deserves some of the blame then let’s give it to him, but let’s also not use that argument to try and somehow excuse President Trump.
Those of you who have been attacking AOC, you might want to rethink it. I initially supposed that she was engaging in hyperbole, but it appears to be as terrible as she says it is.
Office of the Inspector General seems to disagree with you.This thread is a perfect example of confirmation bias.
Somebody claims to have visited the same facility and that none of the conditions matched what AOC and company describe. Immediately used as proof that the reports we heard are false or It is immediately pointed out that he is biased and a trump supporter so he cant be trusted depending on what side you started on.
Random unknown migrant that is in a detention facility allegedly tells a congressperson something and it is treated like it is was a video recorded event or that it was completely fabricated and that the migrant doesnt exist depending on what side you started on.
Did they say people were drinking out of toilets?Office of the Inspector General seems to disagree with you.
There are multiple court documents filed that back up AOC's claims. Confirmation bias, indeed.Did they say people were drinking out of toilets?
Didn't they release photos showing tons of water cups and several orange water jugs?
You don't see me arguing that the paces aren't overcrowded and I actually don't think anybody in this thread has argued that either.
This is are exactly the same units and the same conditions that have been and currently are subject to court filings.This was in fact the type of toilet we saw in the cell.
Except there was just one, and the sink portion was not functioning - @AyannaPressley smartly tried to open the faucet, and nothing came out.
So the women were told they could drink out of the bowl. https://twitter.com/dmartosko/status/1145794081660055553 …
Sure, but aren't you as much a victim of it as anyone else here?This thread is a perfect example of confirmation bias.
Somebody claims to have visited the same facility and that none of the conditions matched what AOC and company describe. Immediately used as proof that the reports we heard are false or It is immediately pointed out that he is biased and a trump supporter so he cant be trusted depending on what side you started on.
Random unknown migrant that is in a detention facility allegedly tells a congressperson something and it is treated like it is was a video recorded event or that it was completely fabricated and that the migrant doesnt exist depending on what side you started on.