timschochet
Footballguy
I already addressed this. I certainly don’t believe she is making this up “100%” as you wrote. That’s demonstrably false.so you believe her?
I already addressed this. I certainly don’t believe she is making this up “100%” as you wrote. That’s demonstrably false.so you believe her?
I was referring to the 100% claim in regards to drinking out of the toilet. Sorry for the confusion.I already addressed this. I certainly don’t believe she is making this up “100%” as you wrote. That’s demonstrably false.
But we know she didn’t make that up either.I was referring to the 100% claim in regards to drinking out of the toilet. Sorry for the confusion.
members of congress saw this? Do tell.
None of them actually saw this they just heard a rumor and ran to the cameras.Rep. Norma Torres (D-Calif.) was among the delegation visiting several holding facilities near El Paso.
"I did not see women drinking out of the toilet," Torres told CNN's "New Day" on Tuesday.
exactly, which is not helpingNone of them actually saw this they just heard a rumor and ran to the cameras.
She was told about it by some woman (per Para’s account, which I have no reason not to believe.) She didn’t make it up.::sigh::
She said that little packet of shampoo is the only thing they have to wash their entire body. It wasn't that long of a tweet to read and get right.She’s yapping about shampoo and the lack of conditioner on twitter
Of course she didThey may have yelled at each other, or snapped at each other. She says she felt threatened.
I agree with @parasaurolophusbroadly, yes a single, freshman, super-progressive woman from a deep blue district Congressman does not deserve this much attention and draws away from the serious issues at hand and makes it worse with hyperbole, so much so that it's almost an advantage for Republicans. - I probably differ in that alternatively ultimately the GOP promoting her like this constantly will bite them in the ### one day. She's often persuasive IMO.And fascinating in itself if true.
Again we are confronted with the chicken or egg theory regarding this woman: is she a political celebrity right now because she represents what a lot of liberals believe? Or because conservatives are paying way too much attention to her?
We know for a fact there have been detainees raped in custody, but these allegations are just too much to believe?100%
I don’t recall anyone saying people were actually drinking out of the toilet. I recall a story of a woman being told to and the agents laughing. Is that not what was relayed by AOC? And Joaquin Castro as well, by the way?None of them actually saw this they just heard a rumor and ran to the cameras.
"When we went into the cell, it was clear the water was not running," Castro said. "One of the women said she was told by an agent to drink water out of the toilet. These are the conditions folks are facing."
Yes, apparently you are confused. Multiple members of Congress were told by women at the facility that they were told to drink out of toilets.I was referring to the 100% claim in regards to drinking out of the toilet. Sorry for the confusion.
Clearly AOC is the real problem here.Joaquin Castro must have helped make it all up with AOC.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/ocasio-cortez-detained-migrants-being-told-drink-out-toilets-n1025431
It's just guys having fun and telling a few jokes. No big deal.Just going to re-post this here. Again.
The posts on the private [Facebook] group, which says it is for current and former Border Patrol agents, included caustic remarks about the deaths of migrants, sexually explicit images edited to include Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and xenophobic asides and comments, according to ProPublica.
---
One commenter talked about starting a fundraising site to support a Border Patrol agent to throw burritos at Ocasio-Cortez and another lawmaker, Rep. Veronica Escobar (D-Tex.), who were part of a Democratic delegation that visited immigration facilities and detention centers in Texas on Monday.
Well, a brown lady is allegedly doing it now, soooo.....maybe at least for a few minutes?Wait, we now care about lying?
Except if it's a joke that actually makes people angry. Then AOC made it up with the help of Julian Castro and the CIA.It's just guys having fun and telling a few jokes. No big deal.
If AOC said "while we were visiting a detention facility one of the women told us that she was previously told by a guard to drink out of a toilet" nobody in here would accuse her of making anything up. She would be relaying an account of what somebody told her.Except if it's a joke that actually makes people angry. Then AOC made it up with the help of Julian Castro and the CIA.
Dishonesty in tweets is called being transparent.If AOC said "while we were visiting a detention facility one of the women told us that she was previously told by a guard to drink out of a toilet" nobody in here would accuse her of making anything up. She would be relaying an account of what somebody told her.
I didn't take issue with Chu's account of the situation(well maybe the parsed quote, but she explianed herself in her video). It was her video that I saw that made me realize AOC was being very dishonest in her tweets.
Well sure. There are multiple reasons.And do I think detention guards had a special antipathy for Cortez that they did not have for other Congressmen? Yeah, that's possible.
"Officers were keeping women in cells w/ no water & had told them to drink out of the toilets."If AOC said "while we were visiting a detention facility one of the women told us that she was previously told by a guard to drink out of a toilet" nobody in here would accuse her of making anything up. She would be relaying an account of what somebody told her.
I didn't take issue with Chu's account of the situation(well maybe the parsed quote, but she explianed herself in her video). It was her video that I saw that made me realize AOC was being very dishonest in her tweets.
Yep. That was her only tweet. You nailed it."Officers were keeping women in cells w/ no water & had told them to drink out of the toilets."
"Had told." How is that dishonest?
Oh, cool. Thanks.Yep. That was her only tweet. You nailed it.
My goodness. Well, I can't imagine Samuel Rodriguez, the man who delivered the prayer at Donald Trump's inauguration, having political motivations.https://www.foxnews.com/politics/immigration-border-facility-aoc-hispanic
Hispanic pastors tour border facility lambasted by AOC and say they are ‘shocked by misinformation’
Who's lying and who isn't ?
Rev. Samuel Rodriguez was "full of indignation" when he saw the reports and heard from politicians about the deplorable and inhumane conditions for illegal immigrants at an El Paso County, Texas migrant detention center. But what he saw at the same facility toured by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y. with a group of pastors was "drastically different."
The president of the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference, the world's largest Hispanic Christian organization, and senior pastor of New Seasons Christian Worship Center in Sacramento shared his firsthand experience touring a migrant detention center during a press briefing Monday.
AOC ALLEGEDLY SCREAMS AT FEDS DURING TEXAS VISIT, CLAIMS DETAINEES FORCED TO DRINK OUT OF TOILETS
“I read the reports, saw the news clips. I just wanted to see what was actually happening in order to better enable our efforts to find a fair and a just solution to our broken immigration system," Rodriguez, who has advised President Trump and both Presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush on immigration reform, noted. “To my surprise, I saw something drastically different from the stories I’ve been hearing in our national discourse. Even as a veteran of immigration advocacy in the U.S., I was shocked at the misinformation of the crisis at the border."
“We found no soiled diapers, no deplorable conditions and no lack of basic necessities,” Rodriguez remarked, adding he specifically asked border agents if they staged the facility in response to the negative press. “They unequivocally denied it — we were witnessing the identical conditions the attorneys saw when they toured the facility days earlier."
In fact, some told him the sources from whom the negative coverage originated “never toured the areas of the facility that we toured” and speculated they might have had political motivations.
So you are saying both of them are lying?My goodness. Well, I can't imagine Samuel Rodriguez, the man who delivered the prayer at Donald Trump's inauguration, having political motivations.
I don't believe I've said either of them are lying.So you are saying both of them are lying?
believe AOC or believe a Hispanic reverend .... hmmmmmmMy goodness. Well, I can't imagine Samuel Rodriguez, the man who delivered the prayer at Donald Trump's inauguration, having political motivations.
Or, conversely, believe AOC, Joaquin Castro, Madeleine Dean, and the other half dozen members of Congress who were there or the guy who delivered Trump's inaugural address.believe AOC or believe a Hispanic reverend .... hmmmmmm
At which facility? She went to more than one on the same day.She makes comments about the conditions inside the facility but she never went in.
The Examiner report claims Ocasio-Cortez refused to tour the facility, as well, choosing to stay with a family in a holding area instead. The freshman rep previously tweeted about her visit to border facilities, writing that people of all ages were being mistreated and were "drinking out of toilets" as the guards laughed at the migrants' plight right in front of her.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-border-agents-southern-border
Why would it matter?At which facility? She went to more than one on the same day.
So you think these members of Congress don’t have political motivations but Rodríguez does.Or, conversely, believe AOC, Joaquin Castro, Madeleine Dean, and the other half dozen members of Congress who were there or the guy who delivered Trump's inaugural address.
So then I assume you want to see something done about the armed militias that threatened the state legislature in Oregon? Or the Republican state rep who made it clear he would be willing to kill any law enforcement officer who tried to apprehend him?Yes I think she’s all making it up and I think she’s legit unhinged. Did you see her hanging out the car? These attacks on federal law enforcement are outrageous. Just horrifying how awful this person is.
Because if she was talking about the interior conditions at the other one, or relaying information about interior conditions from one of the other dozen lawmakers who toured, both parties can be telling the truth. Which would be nice.Why would it matter?
I don't believe I said that members of Congress don't have political motivations. If I have, please quote it for me so that I can correct it.So you think these members of Congress don’t have political motivations but Rodríguez does.
So typicalI don't believe I said that members of Congress don't have political motivations. If I have, please quote it for me so that I can correct it.
That I would point out that you're claiming I said things I didn't say? Yes, that is how our conversations usually go. Fortunately, you can fix that. Unfortunately, I don't believe you will.So typical
It’s obvious what you were saying and this act isn’t a good look for you. Nice try.That I would point out that you're claiming I said things I didn't say? Yes, that is how our conversations usually go. Fortunately, you can fix that. Unfortunately, I don't believe you will.
You don't get 9500 members of a Facebook group for a LEO squad of 21000 if the culture that creates the mindset of the 9500 is discouraged.Here's the problem for all the people claiming this is all made up and for Tim's claims people don't do bad policy on purpose. There is a new report out from DHS itself that says yeah it's all on purpose. Yes the abuses are real and yes we are doing it on purpose as a deterrent. Oh and for all the Obama lap dogs his DHS was part of it as well.
So Trump just ratcheted up what Obama was already doing and all of it was on purpose Tim.
Perhaps you could take another look at what I've said and consider that maybe there's an interpretation other than the one you've decided on.It’s obvious what you were saying and this act isn’t a good look for you. Nice try.