shadrap
Footballguy
If you do start both it will be an easy decision on which game to watch.Grabbed em both in my draft on Monday. Considering starting both against the hapless jags
If you do start both it will be an easy decision on which game to watch.Grabbed em both in my draft on Monday. Considering starting both against the hapless jags
There are enough touches for both Taylor and Mack to be fantasy relevant IMO. Having said that, one cannot expect it NOT to affect both in fantasy. Plan accordingly.No doubt about the talent difference. I just see the situation similar to Ingram/Dobbins and Gordon/Lindsay where the incumbent may be more difficult to unseat than many people think. Makes FF fun.
Could be that kind of situation for sure. Personally, I see Mack as a very middling talent and think the situation is closer to somewhere in between Adrian Peterson/Chester Taylor and Nick Chubb/Carlos Hyde.No doubt about the talent difference. I just see the situation similar to Ingram/Dobbins and Gordon/Lindsay where the incumbent may be more difficult to unseat than many people think. Makes FF fun.
Ah. Thanks for pointing this one out.Could be that kind of situation for sure. Personally, I see Mack as a very middling talent and think the situation is closer to somewhere in between Adrian Peterson/Chester Taylor and Nick Chubb/Carlos Hyde.
Not that he’s as good as Taylor but the Lions we’re reluctant to give Kerryon a big workload over Blount. Ditto with Miles Sanders and Jordan Howard.Ah. Thanks for pointing this one out.
I was struggling to remember a recent situation that took much longer for the rookie to take over than the talent discrepancy implied. That was it. Game 7 before Hyde was traded and Chubb took over.
JONATHAN TAYLOR RB, INDIANAPOLIS COLTS
The Athletic's Zak Keefer said the Colts drafted RB Jonathan Taylor to "spell [Marlon] Mack mid-game, keeping him fresher for the fourth quarter."
It's enough to make Taylor drafters sick. But we've known for a while Mack wouldn't be completely phased out of Indy's offense, and that Taylor would have to assert himself to take over the backfield. Head coach Frank Reich has pledged to "ride the hot hand" this season. Those who drafted Mack could get solid usage out of the back this year, including this week against what should be a bad Jacksonville defense.
RELATED:
Marlon Mack
SOURCE: The Athletic
Sep 10, 2020, 9:01 AM ET
It's scary how stupid some of the reporters are.If that was actually the case, Indianapolis should have just used Jordan Wilkins and his 6 yds/carry or kept Jonathan Williams and his 2 straight 100 yard games after Mack's injury rather than trade up in the second round for Taylor.
I'm starting both of them. I would expect one or the other to have a huge game, too early in the season to guess which one.For those with shares of both I think we gotta go Mack.
I'll never get this criticism.I remember another big Wisco RB everyone fawned over, what's his name? oh yeah, Ron Dayne.
He also touched the ball a ton. His per touch rate is still poor but the volume does make it a bit easier to stomach. Early season fumbles killing his opportunity remain my biggest concern.with his repeated fumbleitis , it's hard to envision him fixing it overnight, ESPECIALLY from a training camp without preseason games. 18 fumbles in 3 seasons at Wisco, SIX of them coming last season. IT's going to be a rocky road in year one. Mack isn't going to just disappear , he's going to be a huge factor all season long.
I remember another big Wisco RB everyone fawned over, what's his name? oh yeah, Ron Dayne.
If Sanders is downgraded further, I'm going with both.I'm starting both of them. I would expect one or the other to have a huge game, too early in the season to guess which one.
Over who?I'm starting both of them. I would expect one or the other to have a huge game, too early in the season to guess which one.
Not to mention he had to go back 20 years for Ron Dayne when there's been Montee Ball, James White, and Melvin Gordon inside of this decade.I'll never get this criticism.
That's like not taking Saquon Barkley because of DJ Dozier or Curtis Enis.
It occasionally carries over, but the majority of the time these fumble problems do indeed disappear overnight when a guy enters the NFL.with his repeated fumbleitis , it's hard to envision him fixing it overnight, ESPECIALLY from a training camp without preseason games. 18 fumbles in 3 seasons at Wisco, SIX of them coming last season. IT's going to be a rocky road in year one. Mack isn't going to just disappear , he's going to be a huge factor all season long.
I remember another big Wisco RB everyone fawned over, what's his name? oh yeah, Ron Dayne.
I don't know how I missed this one. I was so focused on scooping up Doyle everywhere because Rivers loves his TEs I somehow didn't even consider that he loves throwing to his RBs even more. Kind of surprising that Hines didn't have any hype this offseason with the way Rivers targets RBs, I guess it snuck up on all of us.Rivers has his Woodhead. Oh well.
HInes had total hype if you follow FBGs on Twitter. Not to contradict you, but I was aware through them.Hines didn't have any hype this offseason with the way Rivers targets RBs, I guess it snuck up on all of us.
Mack off on a cart. Things change quickly.I definitely called out Hines as a big problem for Taylor owners. The colts love him & Rivers is check-down Charlie.
that said, things do change - everyone who drafted Taylor was targeting a week 3-4 takeover. I remain skeptical, but I wish y’all luck.
Yeah fair. I mostly meant message board hype and more importantly league hype. Not many people rushing to pick him up or draft him in drafts that included vets. Still on the waiver wire in a lot of leagues without large rosters. Not really much momentum for him on the forum, etc. Thinking back now I'm surprised there wasn't a bunch of hype for him being the next Ekeler.HInes had total hype if you follow FBGs on Twitter. Not to contradict you, but I was aware through them.
Yeah, I was aware he was, in their words, all over the practice field, but I picked him up nowhere, either.Yeah fair. I mostly meant message board hype and more importantly league hype. Not many people rushing to pick him up or draft him in drafts that included vets. Still on the waiver wire in a lot of leagues without large rosters. Not really much momentum for him on the forum, etc. Thinking back now I'm surprised there wasn't a bunch of hype for him being the next Ekeler.
Mostly just kicking myself for not taking a flyer on him when it seemed like such an obvious flyer.
Just saw the replay. He got up immediately and limped off the field. I know that happens sometimes with major injuries like torn ACLs but correct me if I'm wrong aren't achilles tears typically EXTREMELY painful injuries that leave the guy unable to put any weight at all on it?Layman's analysis is that Mack tore his achilles
I’ve been operating on the same assumption. In the only league where I drafted Taylor I was sure to retain Hines (carried him over from previous season). I also tried to get him in FA drafts (only succeeded in one). I think Hines was always going to siphon a lot of the receiving work. But maybe there’s a little extra in his role. Of course if Mack misses a lot of time Taylor and Hines could both be really valuable in that offenseI definitely called out Hines as a big problem for Taylor owners. The colts love him & Rivers is check-down Charlie.
Another dude I wanted but missed in my redraft league.I’ve been operating on the same assumption. In the only league where I drafted Taylor I was sure to retain Hines (carried him over from previous season). I also tried to get him in FA drafts (only succeeded in one). I think Hines was always going to siphon a lot of the receiving work. But maybe there’s a little extra in his role. Of course if Mack misses a lot of time Taylor and Hines could both be really valuable in that offense
There's been plenty of Achilles tears that had the player trying to walk it off.Just saw the replay. He got up immediately and limped off the field. I know that happens sometimes with major injuries like torn ACLs but correct me if I'm wrong aren't achilles tears typically EXTREMELY painful injuries that leave the guy unable to put any weight at all on it?
Yeah - if he put weight on it it’s not an Achilles. I didn’t see it, so I have no idea, but from descriptions it just doesn’t match.Just saw the replay. He got up immediately and limped off the field. I know that happens sometimes with major injuries like torn ACLs but correct me if I'm wrong aren't achilles tears typically EXTREMELY painful injuries that leave the guy unable to put any weight at all on it?
Bummer.The #Colts fear that RB Marlon Mack has a torn Achilles, sources tell me and @MikeGarafolo.
- Tom Pelissero
premature it seems.Yeah - if he put weight on it it’s not an Achilles. I didn’t see it, so I have no idea, but from descriptions it just doesn’t match.
Yes and people posting in the injury thread as if it is a fact. Fear not equal fact. He may ver well have torn it, but some guy on Twitter saying he fears a tear doesn’t make it so.premature it seems.
Like I said, I didn’t see the play but that description usually doesn’t match Achilles. He must have been “limping” very lightly.premature it seems.
They’re calling it torn on Rotoworld too. Maybe based on Twitter.Yes and people posting in the injury thread as if it is a fact. Fear not equal fact. He may ver well have torn it, but some guy on Twitter saying he fears a tear doesn’t make it so.