It’s over my guy.Well, he showed up for the fake fourth down, so at least he's not dead.
This is me doing optimism.
Life is a gamble....but makes it worth living.Big gamble starting backups in a championship game, especially if they are the backup to the backup
He was a 3rd string running back that dominated the 4th quarter of a blowout vs a horrible chargers team. He shouldve been ranked as an rb2. Delusional to rank a 3rd stringer as an RB1.I didn't watch the game for feeling ill watching team likely lose. Why were we all so wrong on Boone? He looked solid last game and outplayed Abdullah in terms of snaps and carries.
Was Boone missing blocks or blowing assignments? Just running into walls? A complete decoy?
I improbably won my ship despite a host of ad performances including Boone. Just trying to dissect this to prevent me making the same call again in the future.
How were all.of us so very wrong on this?
Many are wishing they had heeded your fake news alert and pulled him.BREAKING:
Mike Boone slipped on a sheet of ice in the parking lot at US Bank Stadium, sprains ankle and will be inactive tonight.
fake news, been waiting for this update all day, it did not come. [\spoiler]
All three fbg experts had Boone in the top ten. I was faced with a decision of Boone Mack Gurley obj and drake. Boone was ranked significantly higher than all of them. Went Mack drake and Boone. Still won thanks to the opponent having guys like Winston and Moore. Picking up Indy d helped too.Miller and Fuller stunk this week. Gallup did well but had 9 yards the week before. OBJ scored but he has been a total disaster all year. Mack, yeah not sure why you played Boone over Mack.
Dodds has him 9thBloom really did a disservice to everyone ranking this guy 8th just because he had a hard on for this guy. Was never realistic to rank him as anything other than an rb2.
Some experts need to take their love affairs with players else where and rank players unbiased or not rank them at all.
You, I, others have been on this board for years, even decades. Those opinions are a datapoint, and you should NOT put a lot of stock in it. They know very little more, and arguably less, than you and I know.All three fbg experts had Boone in the top ten. I was faced with a decision of Boone Mack Gurley obj and drake. Boone was ranked significantly higher than all of them. Went Mack drake and Boone. Still won thanks to the opponent having guys like Winston and Moore. Picking up Indy d helped too.
Anyway, that’s why many people played booneBoone
He simply wasn't used much. The Packers D was on fire. IIRC the Vikings had 1 first down in the first half despite scoring 10 points. Their early lead was at the benefit of some turnovers. When the Packers had the ball, they went on a number of long drives. TOP was over 2:1 at one point I think. Ultimately Boone couldn't be used and Abdullah got more touches in the passing game.I didn't watch the game for feeling ill watching team likely lose. Why were we all so wrong on Boone? He looked solid last game and outplayed Abdullah in terms of snaps and carries.
Was Boone missing blocks or blowing assignments? Just running into walls? A complete decoy?
I improbably won my ship despite a host of ad performances including Boone. Just trying to dissect this to prevent me making the same call again in the future.
How were all.of us so very wrong on this?
The more information out there and the more access to it, the less time I spend on it. The less time I spend on it the more I talk myself into relying on the experts for an edge. It’s a vicious cycle.You, I, others have been on this board for years, even decades. Those opinions are a datapoint, and you should NOT put a lot of stock in it. They know very little more, and arguably less, than you and I know.
I didn't check his rankings but I usually do the opposite of what Bloom suggests on players I'm 50/50 on and it's served me well.Bloom really did a disservice to everyone ranking this guy 8th just because he had a hard on for this guy. Was never realistic to rank him as anything other than an rb2.
Some experts need to take their love affairs with players else where and rank players unbiased or not rank them at all.
You're right. A 3rd string running back is inherently going to be risky so he should have been lower than RB8. There was definitely some Kool-Aid quaffed. But it did look like Boone was entering an ideal situation. But it ended up being the situation that failed more than Boone.Predicting him as RB8 though, that's pretty crazy. RB12-15, that I could get behind due to workload and matchup but a RB1 in the Finals? Yeesh.
This was far less about Boon IMHO and far more about a terrible MN offense last night.I didn't watch the game for feeling ill watching team likely lose. Why were we all so wrong on Boone? He looked solid last game and outplayed Abdullah in terms of snaps and carries.
Was Boone missing blocks or blowing assignments? Just running into walls? A complete decoy?
I improbably won my ship despite a host of ad performances including Boone. Just trying to dissect this to prevent me making the same call again in the future.
How were all.of us so very wrong on this?
It's hard to know but he might have made a difference. He has excelled even when the Vikings offensive line has sputtered. And the defense would have paid more attention to Dalvin which would have opened things up a bit for Cousins. There aren't many game-changing running backs in the NFL but Dalvin is one.I'm not sure D. Cook would have made a difference.
S. Bloom updated his projections last night in PPR...ahead of the Cook news.
And wow...he's ranked #8 with 16 PPR points.
Name Team Opp RSH YD TD REC YD TD FPT
1 Christian McCaffrey CAR at IND 15 70 0.6 7.0 46 0.2 23.4
2 Ezekiel Elliott DAL at PHI 20 85 0.8 3.0 19 0.1 18.8
3 Joe Mixon CIN at MIA 20 94 0.5 3.0 21 0.1 18.1
4 Saquon Barkley NYG at WAS 19 90 0.5 3.0 22 0.1 17.8
5 Austin Ekeler LAC vs OAK 7 31 0.2 4.0 56 0.6 17.5
6 Chris Carson SEA vs ARI 21 91 0.7 2.0 11 0.1 17.0
7 Miles Sanders PHI vs DAL 16 61 0.3 4.0 26 0.3 16.3
8 Mike Boone MIN vs GB 18 81 0.7 2.0 11 0.1 16.0
9 Alvin Kamara NO at TEN 13 55 0.3 5.0 22 0.2 15.7
10 Mark Ingram II BAL at CLE 14 71 0.5 2.0 17 0.3 15.6
Dude had him ranked over Kamara, Ingram, Henry, Jones LMAOThis is lunacy
Well to be fair, Henry was hurt and didn't end up playing.Dude had him ranked over Kamara, Ingram, Henry, Jones LMAO
These guys have all been studs ALL year except maybe Kamara. Henry was top 3 RB, Jones had 17 TDs. How could anybody justify this ranking? There was not logical reason to rank him 8th.
Anyway, I started him over Chark at flex so it was the right choice lol but lost by 28 anyway so wouldn't have mattered.
Bloom and Lammy practically came in their pants hyping him on the podcast. They both went on and on about “this is why we watch so much preseason! Boone is a GREAT player and he’d be starting on many teams!”Bloom really did a disservice to everyone ranking this guy 8th just because he had a hard on for this guy. Was never realistic to rank him as anything other than an rb2.
Some experts need to take their love affairs with players else where and rank players unbiased or not rank them at all.
I don't see anything wrong with holding a paid fantasy football service accountable for their rankings. In this case, they weren't just wrong (it happens) but they were WAY OFF THE CHARTS WRONG.lol @ blaming Bloom
free?See no need to single the man out, especially as he gives free advice and a lot of his waking hours to this, and not just compensatory hours, I'm sure. Yeah, he blew this. I still can't believe so many of you were plugging and playing at this point and expecting it to work out right.
I also can't imagine that the base level salary to do this stuff is that outstanding, but I don't have any insider knowledge or say on that.
Some of it is free like the podcast and WDIS I think is what he means.free?
I'm sorry, I phrased that wrong. Yeah. The service subscription to get all access to rankings isn't free, but he answers a pretty demanding thread on Start/Sit on these boards (I'm assuming he runs it gratis) and seems always willing to give advice during Podcasts, on Twitter, etc.free?
Exactly.Some of it is free like the podcast and WDIS I think is what he means.
That's my problem. He fell in love with the guy watching him in preseason but looked at the whole situation with rose colored glasses. Never mind ignoring the obvious risks of Abdullah being the 3rd down RB, the fact that Cousins never won on MNF, the meaningless nature of the game for the Vikings, nor the whole fact that this guy was 3rd string all season and never got a sniff. There was a reason for that afterall.I'm sorry, I phrased that wrong. Yeah. The service subscription to get all access to rankings isn't free, but he answers a pretty demanding thread on Start/Sit on these boards (I'm assuming he runs it gratis) and seems always willing to give advice during Podcasts, on Twitter, etc.
Like I said, he blew this, but this is like people calling out Mike Clay for some stuff on ESPN about regressions to mean, etc. Clay trusts process, and I'm totally with him. That said, I understand the subscriber's lament here. The problem is that here there seemed to be no process, but a hunch and subsequent quantification.
Mike Boone played 18-of-54 offensive snaps in Minnesota's Week 16 loss to the Packers Monday night.
Boone initially got the start but rushed for 10/28 and 2.8 yards per carry through the first two quarters before riding the pine in favor of Ameer Abdullah following intermission. Boone failed to gain positive yardage on his only second-half touch. It was obviously a massive letdown (on Championship Week nonetheless) as many were depending on him in what was projected as a terrific spot on the ground against Green Bay. He may get another crack at the starting gig in Week 17, but Dalvin Cook (shoulder) and Alexander Mattison (ankle) will clearly be ahead of Boone in the pecking order when the Vikings return with all hands on deck for Wild Card weekend.
Dec 24, 2019, 8:16 AM ET