I didn't think it was a win for Biden, as another debate would simply be more of the same from Trump, and that was good.That’s a win for all of us, as I can’t imagine anything useful from a second debate in any format, after what we saw in the first debacle.
I'd be interested to know what he thinks debating is all about.“I’m not going to waste my time on a virtual debate. That’s not what debating is all about,” Trump said on Fox Business.
This is a townhall event that isn’t packed with hand picked Biden supporters and pre scripted questions like his NBC one last week, so no they won’t be having Biden “show up.”Can Biden still show up and get the free national TV audience? I mean, equal time is the rule, but if one refuses to show up, does that still apply?
Best for Trump to take his ball and go home with that format anyway; he'd get crushed --can't berate and interrupt town hall folkThis is a townhall event that isn’t packed with hand picked Biden supporters and pre scripted questions like his NBC one last week, so no they won’t be having Biden “show up.”
Maybe. If I were Biden, I’d make myself available.This is a townhall event that isn’t packed with hand picked Biden supporters and pre scripted questions like his NBC one last week, so no they won’t be having Biden “show up.”
What? You must have missed the Biden primary run.Best for Trump to take his ball and go home with that format anyway; he'd get crushed --can't berate and interrupt town hall folk
You think Trump is above berating town hall participants?Best for Trump to take his ball and go home with that format anyway; he'd get crushed --can't berate and interrupt town hall folk
@amandacarpenter
President who phones into cable TV interviews refuses virtual debate. Ok.
Ahh, a baseless conspiracy theory that it was all a set up for Biden last week.This is a townhall event that isn’t packed with hand picked Biden supporters and pre scripted questions like his NBC one last week, so no they won’t be having Biden “show up.”
Baseless conspiracy? Of course you guys here don’t know any of this. Should have known.Ahh, a baseless conspiracy theory that it was all a set up for Biden last week.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/nypost.com/2020/10/07/undecided-voters-at-nbc-town-hall-were-joe-biden-supporters/amp/Two “undecided” voters who appeared on an NBC News town hall with Joe Biden that has been described as an “infomercial” for the Democratic nominee had earlier voiced their support for the former vice president on MSNBC, according to a report.
Peter Gonzalez and Ismael Llano posed questions to the Democratic presidential nominee at the town hall Monday in Miami as part of an “audience of undecided Florida voters.”
Both Gonzalez and Llano appeared on MSNBC in August to show their support for Biden, the Washington Free Beacon reported on Tuesday.
“If we get four more years of Trump, good luck, and good luck with the future attracting younger voters,” Gonzalez said on MSNBC.
He and Llano were identified as “voting for Biden.”
“Something that Joe Biden said during his speech that resonated with me was what defines America is a possibility,” Llano said in the same broadcast.
Marc Caputo, writing on Politico, said the voters didn’t sound undecided.
This was a Biden-leaning crowd, if not a Biden crowd,” Caputo wrote. “So Biden had the equivalent of a one-hour infomercial that played to his strengths: engaging with respectful real voters (he’s been known to blow his stack with citizens who attack him) as he dished out anecdotes and one-liners accrued over decades in public life.”
Yes, I laughed at this because yes its the definition of a baseless conspiracy. Tabloid news man.Baseless conspiracy? Of course you guys here don’t know any of this. Should have known.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/nypost.com/2020/10/07/undecided-voters-at-nbc-town-hall-were-joe-biden-supporters/amp/
Tabloid news doing the work the MSM refuses to do. Probably fake interviews in August on MSNBC!Yes, I laughed at this because yes its the definition of a baseless conspiracy. Tabloid news man.
Peter Gonzalez and Ismael Llano posed questions to the Democratic presidential nominee at the town hall Monday in Miami as part of an “audience of undecided Florida voters.”
Both Gonzalez and Llano appeared on MSNBC in August to show their support for Biden, theWashington Free Beacon reported on Tuesday.
In his comments this morning he said that he was planning to be there.Can Biden still show up and get the free national TV audience? I mean, equal time is the rule, but if one refuses to show up, does that still apply?
“President Trump won the first debate despite a terrible and biased moderator in Chris Wallace, and everybody knows it. For the swamp creatures at the Presidential Debate Commission to now rush to Joe Biden’s defense by unilaterally canceling an in-person debate is pathetic. That’s not what debates are about or how they’re done. Here are the facts: President Trump will have posted multiple negative tests prior to the debate, so there is no need for this unilateral declaration. The safety of all involved can easily be achieved without canceling a chance for voters to see both candidates go head to head. We’ll pass on this sad excuse to bail out Joe Biden and do a rally instead.”
- Bill Stepien, Trump 2020 campaign manager
I know its just a small thing as there are huge things with this administration day after day after day. But can anyone read this official campaign statement and not feel like these are the biggest unprofessional simps around? Seriously, how does this stuff pass muster? This is the official campaign statement and reads like an angry 8th grader wrote it.
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/media/trump-campaign-statement-on-unilateral-decision-of-the-commission-on-presidential-debates/
Okay, gold star for anyone that can find a problem with this statement.Here are the facts: President Trump will have posted multiple negative tests prior to the debate, so there is no need for this unilateral declaration.
I mean, Trump is the ultimate simp. How much did he pay Stormy again?I know its just a small thing as there are huge things with this administration day after day after day. But can anyone read this official campaign statement and not feel like these are the biggest unprofessional simps around? Seriously, how does this stuff pass muster? This is the official campaign statement and reads like an angry 8th grader wrote it.
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/media/trump-campaign-statement-on-unilateral-decision-of-the-commission-on-presidential-debates/
One hundred grand or so....I mean, Trump is the ultimate simp. How much did he pay Stormy again?
If you're in a tough Senate race, how do you dance around all this?The GOP will get slammed for Trump going out to a rally while possibly still infected, ignoring protocols, most likely not wearing masks, and refusing to take part in the debate. That seems like a lot to overcome just to break even on the night, let alone gain voters.
Virtual rally, check.Rush Limbaugh: "I'm thrilled to announce that our commander in chief
@realDonaldTrump
will be right here tomorrow hosting the largest virtual rally in radio history. Be sure to tune in you don't want to miss this. It will be special and I am really looking forward to it."
Whatever the way McSally did it the other night, opposite of that.If you're in a tough Senate race, how do you dance around all this?
If you mean getting Trump involved, maybe he can find a tight Senate race in a state to host a rally that might push a Senate candidate into the lead, but at that point DJT might be just taking one for the team. I did see a couple of articles pondering some of the same things I was wondering about. Trump would be crazy to forgo 65-70 million debate viewers on multiple networks to go to a rally that won't get anywhere near the same coverage other than on Fox and Fox News. Trump needs more exposure to as many people as possible, not just his base.If you're in a tough Senate race, how do you dance around all this?
You're right of course. But what if -- I know this sounds crazy but hear me out here -- Trump just isn't that good at politics? I'm starting to suspect that this Trump fellow may be less than completely competent at his job.Trump would be crazy to forgo 65-70 million debate viewers on multiple networks to go to a rally that won't get anywhere near the same coverage other than on Fox and Fox News. Trump needs more exposure to as many people as possible, not just his base.
I think that he doesn't really want the job anymore and is consciously or subconsciously self-sabotaging.You're right of course. But what if -- I know this sounds crazy but hear me out here -- Trump just isn't that good at politics? I'm starting to suspect that this Trump fellow may be less than completely competent at his job.
Well, at least that’s a more reasonable schedule based on the suggested isolation period. Biden should move forward with the original schedule, and leave the virtual town hall invitation open to Trump.massraider said:Virtual rally, check.
Virtual debate? Nope, we have to move BOTH dates.
https://twitter.com/KellyO/status/1314241133791391745/photo/1
Bill Stepien certainly has gotten the hang of this campaign manager talk.
Using his legendary business acumen, I suspect he’ll declare political bankruptcy and start a new campaign.IvanKaramazov said:You're right of course. But what if -- I know this sounds crazy but hear me out here -- Trump just isn't that good at politics? I'm starting to suspect that this Trump fellow may be less than completely competent at his job.
Oh - they meant in person.Where are all the "if he doesn't debate he's a loser" guys?
Less than an hour after the Trump campaign says they want an in person debate on Thursday, Trump undercuts his team again by pushing a tweet that says he will skip the debate and hold a rally instead.
Hey, don't kink shame.screaming, and waving the Constitution around.
Imagine how many threads there would be right now if this was the other way around. Holy ####.The moderator needs to be replaced
HT - no schtick here. What is your interpretation of that tweet? I’ve read it a few times but I truly don’t understand what it means.The moderator needs to be replaced
I don't think he's up for that physically.Something that won't mean as much to us as women, but Mark Meadows violated GA state orders, and threw a big wedding for his daughter in May.
The story barely got coverage because of the parking lot full of burning dumpsters that is this administration, but Biden should absolutely bring it up at the Town Hall. Preferably if Trump is there to respond, because he won't care and will blow it off.
Every woman knows someone that had to cancel their wedding. I cannot imagine a Trump response that would do anything other than make them seeth.
If I'm Biden, it's all women, all the time for the next month.
I don't get what the excitement is all about. Trump called him an never-Trumper, so he asks someone who worked for Trump whether he should respond to that or ignore it.Imagine how many threads there would be right now if this was the other way around. Holy ####.
Yashar Ali@yashar
Steve is the moderator of the next presidential debate and he thinks he's DMing Scaramucci...but he's tweeting @ him. “Should I respond to Trump?”
https://twitter.com/yashar/status/1314391345994194945?s=21
He thought he was dm’ing in ScaramucciHT - no schtick here. What is your interpretation of that tweet? I’ve read it a few times but I truly don’t understand what it means.
There’s probably no doubt he hates Trump.