What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

☞ Official SOPRANOS Thread (7 Viewers)

I can't speak about Young (maybe he just didn't want to take on a large role at this stage of his life), but as for Loggia, he was simply a pain in the ### for Chase. He was unprofessional, mainly in the form of showing up repeatedly without knowing his lines. He was scheduled to be in several more episodes, but Chase got so fed up with Loggia that he ended up writing Feech back to prison.

As far as Vincent, I'm a fan. He's a man's man. But you're right in that he won't be winning an Oscar anytime soon. I'm not angry that Loggia and Young had small roles. For me, as you know, I was PISSED they killed off David Proval so soon. Richie had so much more "antagonistic SOB" left in him. Not everyone had to be killed.

Janice lives and Richie gets whacked. Sheesh.
I had absolutely no idea about Loggia's conduct.I would imagine that if you were a bald, homely man in your 70's, that you would be enthusiastic about any acting role, let alone one of the greatest shows in history, but I guess Mr. Loggia didn't see it that way. Too bad.

I agree totally about Richie. He was great. BTW, he has also been an acting coach in his life, and one of his assignments was in "48 Hours" and getting Eddie Murphy ready for the famous bar scene.

 
Encyclopedia Brown said:
Raider Nation said:
I can't speak about Young (maybe he just didn't want to take on a large role at this stage of his life), but as for Loggia, he was simply a pain in the ### for Chase. He was unprofessional, mainly in the form of showing up repeatedly without knowing his lines. He was scheduled to be in several more episodes, but Chase got so fed up with Loggia that he ended up writing Feech back to prison.

As far as Vincent, I'm a fan. He's a man's man. But you're right in that he won't be winning an Oscar anytime soon. I'm not angry that Loggia and Young had small roles. For me, as you know, I was PISSED they killed off David Proval so soon. Richie had so much more "antagonistic SOB" left in him. Not everyone had to be killed.

Janice lives and Richie gets whacked. Sheesh.
I had absolutely no idea about Loggia's conduct.I would imagine that if you were a bald, homely man in your 70's, that you would be enthusiastic about any acting role, let alone one of the greatest shows in history, but I guess Mr. Loggia didn't see it that way. Too bad.

I agree totally about Richie. He was great. BTW, he has also been an acting coach in his life, and one of his assignments was in "48 Hours" and getting Eddie Murphy ready for the famous bar scene.
I don't care if he was a pain in the ###. Feech is definitely one of my favorite characters ever on the show.Feech: What's yours is your Pauly, but what ain't, belongs to anybody else.

Paulie Walnuts: Oh, what do you know about what belongs to who? You been in prison for twenty years.

Feech: Which entitles me to earn!

Paulie Walnuts: Which entitles you to ####! In my book, you get points for staying out.

Feech: Then it's a good thing, Paulie, that your book doesn't mean oogatz to me! Now get the hell out of my ####### office!

 
Encyclopedia Brown said:
In watching the last Season I have tried to realize why I didn't connect as strongly as I did in previous seasons.

I think I finally got it: Frank Vincent was the weak link.

He's just not a good actor. He was in way over his head in this role. He's a decent character actor with a famous one-liner (Go home and get your effin shinebox), and one memorable scene (Casino with the baseball bat in the Indiana cornfields), but he's got no range, and no depth.

Chase claims that he plotted the show in its entirety almost right from the start, and if that's so, why did he waste Burt Young and especially Robert Loggia in such brief roles?

Loggia would have been awesome as the aggrieved don who while wasting most of his life in the joint, finally got his big break and was never going to let this chubby Jersey upstart get in his way.
I think Chase probably meant he had a good idea of what he was going to do with Tony's character from the start, as well as maybe a lot of the other regulars, but in the case of Frank Vincent, he does the mob guy role just fine. No, he isn't a great actor by any stretch of the imagination, but he did the role of Phil just fine, and he did flash moments of really good acting at times, like at the end of "Stage 5" when he declares to Butch that he is done being passive. Burt Young was the classic case of a character who was awesome for one episode, but too much of that character coughing up a storm probably would have been too much.

Loggia not lasting long has already been discussed, but I think the way they got rid of his character was great, with Tony referencing Richie Aprile in the sense of an old-timer getting out of jail and not respecting him as boss of the family.

 
Encyclopedia Brown said:
In watching the last Season I have tried to realize why I didn't connect as strongly as I did in previous seasons.

I think I finally got it: Frank Vincent was the weak link.

He's just not a good actor. He was in way over his head in this role. He's a decent character actor with a famous one-liner (Go home and get your effin shinebox), and one memorable scene (Casino with the baseball bat in the Indiana cornfields), but he's got no range, and no depth.

Chase claims that he plotted the show in its entirety almost right from the start, and if that's so, why did he waste Burt Young and especially Robert Loggia in such brief roles?

Loggia would have been awesome as the aggrieved don who while wasting most of his life in the joint, finally got his big break and was never going to let this chubby Jersey upstart get in his way.
I think Chase probably meant he had a good idea of what he was going to do with Tony's character from the start
He did state that Tony and Livia would have mended fences had she not died. I would have liked to see that. :confused:
 
Encyclopedia Brown said:
In watching the last Season I have tried to realize why I didn't connect as strongly as I did in previous seasons.

I think I finally got it: Frank Vincent was the weak link.

He's just not a good actor. He was in way over his head in this role. He's a decent character actor with a famous one-liner (Go home and get your effin shinebox), and one memorable scene (Casino with the baseball bat in the Indiana cornfields), but he's got no range, and no depth.

Chase claims that he plotted the show in its entirety almost right from the start, and if that's so, why did he waste Burt Young and especially Robert Loggia in such brief roles?

Loggia would have been awesome as the aggrieved don who while wasting most of his life in the joint, finally got his big break and was never going to let this chubby Jersey upstart get in his way.
I think Chase probably meant he had a good idea of what he was going to do with Tony's character from the start
He did state that Tony and Livia would have mended fences had she not died. I would have liked to see that. :banned:
Yeah, the death of Nancy Marchand really changed the series. Season 3, more than any other season, would have been much different.
Long Term Parking = best episode ever.

If that ending doesn't get to you, you have no soul.
:thumbdown: Oh, and to go one further:

"Long Term Parking" = best episode of any television show EVER

 
Question. Maybe someone knows the answer to this.

Between seasons 5 & 6, Joe Gannascoli lost quite a significant amount of weight. Does anyone know if the script called for that, and Chase gave him several months to drop the pounds, or did the actor do it on his own, with the storyline subsequently adjusting to address Vito's weight loss?

Remember in the first episode of season 6.1 (before Tony got shot), they kept banging home the point that Vito was in better shape. To paraphrase, "I'm thinner... I'm healthier... I'll have longevity when I am running the family if anything ever happens to Tony, " etc. He's also talking about his exercise regimen and buying new suits, so it was a pretty big issue in the script. Just wondering if it was planned or not. Actors have certainly been asked to lose/gain weight in the past for a role.

 
Question. Maybe someone knows the answer to this.Between seasons 5 & 6, Joe Gannascoli lost quite a significant amount of weight. Does anyone know if the script called for that, and Chase gave him several months to drop the pounds, or did the actor do it on his own, with the storyline subsequently adjusting to address Vito's weight loss? Remember in the first episode of season 6.1 (before Tony got shot), they kept banging home the point that Vito was in better shape. To paraphrase, "I'm thinner... I'm healthier... I'll have longevity when I am running the family if anything ever happens to Tony, " etc. He's also talking about his exercise regimen and buying new suits, so it was a pretty big issue in the script. Just wondering if it was planned or not. Actors have certainly been asked to lose/gain weight in the past for a role.
It sounds like something he wanted to do himself. Found this from an interview with him:You dropped a ton of weight dieting a few years back. How hard has it been to keep off those pounds?I was thin. I was a ballplayer, opened a restaurant, and stopped going to the gym. By season six, I was in tremendous pain. My hips were shot from playing hockey, heredity, and whatever. As soon as I finished the show, I had double-hip replacement surgery. Now, I play racquet ball. I’m feeling great actually. But, it’s a constant battle.
 
This is probably a longshot, so I didn't want to start a new thread about it.

My g/f got me both S6 DVD box sets, parts I and II for my birthday. For part I (episode 1, "Members Only" through episode 12, "Kaisha"), she got me the HD DVDs. She probably thought she was doing me a favor, but I mainly watch the show when I'm on the road, using the in-dash DVD player. Long story short, the HD DVDs don't play in my car. You need an HD DVD player, obviously.

So, if anyone has the NON-HD box set of S6-1, I'll trade you straight up for my HD box set, which retails at a higher price.

PM me if interested.

 
This is probably a longshot, so I didn't want to start a new thread about it.

My g/f got me both S6 DVD box sets, parts I and II for my birthday. For part I (episode 1, "Members Only" through episode 12, "Kaisha"), she got me the HD DVDs. She probably thought she was doing me a favor, but I mainly watch the show when I'm on the road, using the in-dash DVD player. Long story short, the HD DVDs don't play in my car. You need an HD DVD player, obviously.

So, if anyone has the NON-HD box set of S6-1, I'll trade you straight up for my HD box set, which retails at a higher price.

PM me if interested.
ouch....doubt you find any takers...you do know that HD-DVD is... :lol:
 
This is probably a longshot, so I didn't want to start a new thread about it.

My g/f got me both S6 DVD box sets, parts I and II for my birthday. For part I (episode 1, "Members Only" through episode 12, "Kaisha"), she got me the HD DVDs. She probably thought she was doing me a favor, but I mainly watch the show when I'm on the road, using the in-dash DVD player. Long story short, the HD DVDs don't play in my car. You need an HD DVD player, obviously.

So, if anyone has the NON-HD box set of S6-1, I'll trade you straight up for my HD box set, which retails at a higher price.

PM me if interested.
ouch....doubt you find any takers...you do know that HD-DVD is... :popcorn:
They'll play in some other units, no? Gaming systems?
 
This is probably a longshot, so I didn't want to start a new thread about it.

My g/f got me both S6 DVD box sets, parts I and II for my birthday. For part I (episode 1, "Members Only" through episode 12, "Kaisha"), she got me the HD DVDs. She probably thought she was doing me a favor, but I mainly watch the show when I'm on the road, using the in-dash DVD player. Long story short, the HD DVDs don't play in my car. You need an HD DVD player, obviously.

So, if anyone has the NON-HD box set of S6-1, I'll trade you straight up for my HD box set, which retails at a higher price.

PM me if interested.
ouch....doubt you find any takers...you do know that HD-DVD is... :P
They'll play in some other units, no? Gaming systems?
no. Unless you have an HD-DVD player
 
From Perez Hilton:

Sopranos creator David Chase just landed a one picture deal with Paramount Pictures. This is Chase's first big screen adventure.The CEO of Paramount Pictures is Brad Gray. Gray was an executive producer on Sopranos before landing the CEO gig at Paramount.It's so heartwarming nauseating - friends helping friends.You know every other studio threw ####loads of money Chase's way in hopes of landing a picture deal with the Sopranos mastermind!No word if the pic is going to be a Sopranos flick. We're sure everyone is hoping so!
 
As much as I loved the show, I do not want to see a Sopranos movie. It would make the ending of the finale not as exciting or cool, and besides, what is the movie going to be? Tony on trial? Yeah, that would be exciting. There is really no where else to go with any of the characters, and with no Christopher or Silvio, it just wouldn't be the same. Let the show rest in peace.

 
For what its worth fellas, the owners of Satin Dolls, aka the Bada Bing, has been asked NOT to go through with a renovation planned for the club. Rumors are afoot in the NYC production community.

My personal hunch is that they're waiting to see how big the Sex in the City flick is. If its a monster, then I think this really gets the push.

David Chase and James Gandolfini can really turn down 20 million each?

 
Sopranos revisited:

I've started watching the series again on A&E....and even in it's edited mode....I really see the genius of the first two seasons; particularly compared to the last two. To me, although the show was better than 90% of what was on at the time, it really took a hit in the 4th, 5th and 6th seasons. There was nothing that could have been done about the Livia story arc.....but did we need Junior Soprano to become such a buffoon so quickly? In that first season, Tony was scared to go meet with his uncle after the death of Jackie. Junior should have been a strong fixture in the active family for at least a couple of more seasons. Did we really need Tony to cut through antagonists so quickly? Richie Aprile, Ralphie, Feech LaManna, Tony Blundetto aren't these all basically the same confrontation? I can live with the Jackie Jr. storyline,although it might have been nice to gradually bring the character in ala. Benny, Eugene or Vito, instead of just plopping him down (much like they did with Ralphie)......but I think that the writing got a little predictable after Season Two.

 
Sopranos revisited:I've started watching the series again on A&E....and even in it's edited mode....I really see the genius of the first two seasons; particularly compared to the last two. To me, although the show was better than 90% of what was on at the time, it really took a hit in the 4th, 5th and 6th seasons. There was nothing that could have been done about the Livia story arc.....but did we need Junior Soprano to become such a buffoon so quickly? In that first season, Tony was scared to go meet with his uncle after the death of Jackie. Junior should have been a strong fixture in the active family for at least a couple of more seasons. Did we really need Tony to cut through antagonists so quickly? Richie Aprile, Ralphie, Feech LaManna, Tony Blundetto aren't these all basically the same confrontation? I can live with the Jackie Jr. storyline,although it might have been nice to gradually bring the character in ala. Benny, Eugene or Vito, instead of just plopping him down (much like they did with Ralphie)......but I think that the writing got a little predictable after Season Two.
I agree with most of that. Killing off Ritchie Aprile was a huge mistake. Ritchie should have lived at least another full season. That would have been good dramatic fodder.
 
Sopranos revisited:I've started watching the series again on A&E....and even in it's edited mode....I really see the genius of the first two seasons; particularly compared to the last two. To me, although the show was better than 90% of what was on at the time, it really took a hit in the 4th, 5th and 6th seasons. There was nothing that could have been done about the Livia story arc.....but did we need Junior Soprano to become such a buffoon so quickly? In that first season, Tony was scared to go meet with his uncle after the death of Jackie. Junior should have been a strong fixture in the active family for at least a couple of more seasons. Did we really need Tony to cut through antagonists so quickly? Richie Aprile, Ralphie, Feech LaManna, Tony Blundetto aren't these all basically the same confrontation? I can live with the Jackie Jr. storyline,although it might have been nice to gradually bring the character in ala. Benny, Eugene or Vito, instead of just plopping him down (much like they did with Ralphie)......but I think that the writing got a little predictable after Season Two.
The overall consistency definitely tailed off a tad after the first two seasons, but those first two seasons were possibly the best two seasons of television ever, and many of their best moments and best episodes came later on, so I will forgive them for the occasional meh episode (except for maybe the terrible In Camelot). I couldn't agree more about Junior. He was basically either under House Arrest or in the psychiatric ward for five of the show's six seasons. And sure, him being there enabled Tony to be the Boss, but I would have liked to have seen him out there, mixing it up again for a bit before he descended in the final season. And I wouldn't say Tony cut through all of the antagonists quickly. Ralphie (my second favorite character after Christopher) hung around for almost two seasons. It would have been nice to see Richie hang around longer, I agree. Tony B. was never Tony's antagonist. And Feech was basically the same thing as Richie, so there was no need to basically replay that same storyline.
 
Sopranos revisited:I've started watching the series again on A&E....and even in it's edited mode....I really see the genius of the first two seasons; particularly compared to the last two. To me, although the show was better than 90% of what was on at the time, it really took a hit in the 4th, 5th and 6th seasons. There was nothing that could have been done about the Livia story arc.....but did we need Junior Soprano to become such a buffoon so quickly? In that first season, Tony was scared to go meet with his uncle after the death of Jackie. Junior should have been a strong fixture in the active family for at least a couple of more seasons. Did we really need Tony to cut through antagonists so quickly? Richie Aprile, Ralphie, Feech LaManna, Tony Blundetto aren't these all basically the same confrontation? I can live with the Jackie Jr. storyline,although it might have been nice to gradually bring the character in ala. Benny, Eugene or Vito, instead of just plopping him down (much like they did with Ralphie)......but I think that the writing got a little predictable after Season Two.
;) Been watching those first episodes on A&E also. Absolutely amazing, amazing television. That first season plays out as good, if not better than a 4 star movie.
 
Sopranos revisited:I've started watching the series again on A&E....and even in it's edited mode....I really see the genius of the first two seasons; particularly compared to the last two. To me, although the show was better than 90% of what was on at the time, it really took a hit in the 4th, 5th and 6th seasons. There was nothing that could have been done about the Livia story arc.....but did we need Junior Soprano to become such a buffoon so quickly? In that first season, Tony was scared to go meet with his uncle after the death of Jackie. Junior should have been a strong fixture in the active family for at least a couple of more seasons. Did we really need Tony to cut through antagonists so quickly? Richie Aprile, Ralphie, Feech LaManna, Tony Blundetto aren't these all basically the same confrontation? I can live with the Jackie Jr. storyline,although it might have been nice to gradually bring the character in ala. Benny, Eugene or Vito, instead of just plopping him down (much like they did with Ralphie)......but I think that the writing got a little predictable after Season Two.
The overall consistency definitely tailed off a tad after the first two seasons, but those first two seasons were possibly the best two seasons of television ever, and many of their best moments and best episodes came later on, so I will forgive them for the occasional meh episode (except for maybe the terrible In Camelot).
Keep in mind, Chase really only had one season of stories in mind when he pitched the show to NBC (and later HBO), so I'll give him a break on some boring storylines here and there. As far as Richie, I've made it clear how much I liked him. The decision to kill him off was the one I was the most pissed about.
I couldn't agree more about Junior. He was basically either under House Arrest or in the psychiatric ward for five of the show's six seasons. And sure, him being there enabled Tony to be the Boss, but I would have liked to have seen him out there, mixing it up again for a bit before he descended in the final season.
It was great theater watching Junior and Tony mix it up before Jackie, Sr. died. "Next time, come heavy or don't come at all." And then the whole diner scene after Jackie passed. "The Sopranos have been waiting a long time to take the reigns. That's why I want it to be you, Uncle June.""This is your decision?""It is.""You speak for the captains?""I can." :confused:
 
maybe mentioned before, but I was watching "Sentimental Education" from season 5 a couple weeks ago, which has this interesting little exchange:

Paulie Walnuts: Why do pissin, ####tin', and ####in' all happen within' a two-inch radius?

Christopher Moltisanti: Everybody asks that, Paulie. There's no answer for it.

Vito Spatafore: They're all sources of pleasure though.

Paulie Walnuts: Get the #### outta here!

 
A tad off topic, but who cares at this point. :confused:

Many times when the guys were eating pastry on the show, they would have sfogliatelle. Like when Christopher shot the kid in the foot and brought the pastry back to the Bing... there was sfogliatelle in the box. BTW, the guys on the show pronounce it SCHVOO-YA-DEL, in case you were wondering. Despite growing up with Italian grandmothers, I had never had this pastry in my life.

So I stopped at this little Italian bakery in my travels today. Place has been there for 1,000 years, and everyone raves about their pastry. So there, in front of me, was sfogliatelle. I bought a couple of them. It was just about the worst thing I've ever tasted. :X

I don't know if this particular bakery made them poorly (they were fresh and flaky, at least), or if it's just a severely overrated dessert.

Anyone a fan of these? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sfogliatella

 
A tad off topic, but who cares at this point. :goodposting:

Many times when the guys were eating pastry on the show, they would have sfogliatelle. Like when Christopher shot the kid in the foot and brought the pastry back to the Bing... there was sfogliatelle in the box. BTW, the guys on the show pronounce it SCHVOO-YA-DEL, in case you were wondering. Despite growing up with Italian grandmothers, I had never had this pastry in my life.

So I stopped at this little Italian bakery in my travels today. Place has been there for 1,000 years, and everyone raves about their pastry. So there, in front of me, was sfogliatelle. I bought a couple of them. It was just about the worst thing I've ever tasted. :X

I don't know if this particular bakery made them poorly (they were fresh and flaky, at least), or if it's just a severely overrated dessert.

Anyone a fan of these? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sfogliatella
Growing up in an italian family, I've always had a theory that they spend too much time on the actual food, so by the time dessert comes around, everyone says "screw it"
 
A tad off topic, but who cares at this point. :goodposting:

Many times when the guys were eating pastry on the show, they would have sfogliatelle. Like when Christopher shot the kid in the foot and brought the pastry back to the Bing... there was sfogliatelle in the box. BTW, the guys on the show pronounce it SCHVOO-YA-DEL, in case you were wondering. Despite growing up with Italian grandmothers, I had never had this pastry in my life.

So I stopped at this little Italian bakery in my travels today. Place has been there for 1,000 years, and everyone raves about their pastry. So there, in front of me, was sfogliatelle. I bought a couple of them. It was just about the worst thing I've ever tasted. :hifive:

I don't know if this particular bakery made them poorly (they were fresh and flaky, at least), or if it's just a severely overrated dessert.

Anyone a fan of these? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sfogliatella
Thats my favorite pastry. That could not have been made right if you hated it, I just refuse to believe it.
 
Just watched the finale from season 2. Wow, one of the best episodes ever. That scene on the boat with #### is probably the best scene in the history of the show.

Silvio highlight from that episode: Tony and #### show up to Vesuvio after having a huge Indian meal, sit with Furio and Sil who are eating. The two fatties proceed to order a plate of zuppa di mussels and the zuchinni flowers that Sil is raving about. When #### grabs a fork and reaches over to Sil's plate to grab one, Sil comes up with this gem:

"OHHHHHHH, help yaself ya fat degenerate"

:thumbup:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I just heard Francis Albert singing "It Was A Very Good Year" and it reminded me of the episode where Tony talks about mob movies.

Analyze This? That's an effin' comedy.

 
anyone ever watch the documentary the "Real Sopranos"? it made me lose ALOT of respect for Chase. especially, since he is so cocky and arrogant about "his ideas". he stole everything from the gay guy being outed to the pork/strip joints. i am a sopranos junkie and even DVR the AE episodes to watch at lunch (work at home). seeing episodes for the 100th time you catch little thing like references to "feetch" in earlier seasons (it was his card game tony and jackie robbed to get on the fast track). on the flip side it also made me realize Chase OVERUSED the dream sequences to try and put closure on other issues.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
anyone ever watch the documentary the "Real Sopranos"? it made me lose ALOT of respect for Chase. especially, since he is so cocky and arrogant about "his ideas". he stole everything from the gay guy being outed to the pork/strip joints.
I had heard that Joe Gannascoli (Vito) read about the gay mobster, and he pitched the idea to Chase to increase his storyline.
 
anyone ever watch the documentary the "Real Sopranos"? it made me lose ALOT of respect for Chase. especially, since he is so cocky and arrogant about "his ideas". he stole everything from the gay guy being outed to the pork/strip joints.
I had heard that Joe Gannascoli (Vito) read about the gay mobster, and he pitched the idea to Chase to increase his storyline.
that was just one. i know the lady who wrote "mafia wife" sued because they stole alot of her ideas about her life being the wife of a mob figure.they had everything from running out of a strip club to a pork store they owned. obviously, he did not copy 100% of "real events", but Chase is so arrogant when he discusses the show and his "ideas".
 
Chase definitely has a bit of an attitude about everything, but I think a part of him got pissy over the years at fans always questioning his methods of leaving some things open-ended (Melfi's rapist, the Russian, etc.), so his attitude is partially his way of saying, "Don't question my methods." Right or wrong, I think that has a lot to do with it.

 
A&E... Artie's about to get beat up by a 120 lb. Frenchie. :lmao:
Great illustration of just how bad this show got at points during the last 3-4 seasons
I like Johnny V, but you can see why there weren't more storylines revolving around him. Not the best actor in the world.Though I love how he "talks with his hands"... but not sure if that's his acting ability, or him being himself.
 
A&E... Artie's about to get beat up by a 120 lb. Frenchie. :thumbdown:
Great illustration of just how bad this show got at points during the last 3-4 seasons
I like Johnny V, but you can see why there weren't more storylines revolving around him. Not the best actor in the world.Though I love how he "talks with his hands"... but not sure if that's his acting ability, or him being himself.
I couldve listened to Artie talk about food all day, but I couldve done without the Adrianna storyline, this one, and then the Bennie one which was just ridiculous
 
Last edited by a moderator:
http://masterofsopranos.wordpress.com/the-...ion-of-the-end/

Sopranos fans, do yourselves a favor, and take 20-30 minutes and read that. It is a comprehensive breakdown of the final episode, as well as the final season. Some great stuff.
Very well written. And it does make a strong case that Tony is dead. Of course, if one were so inclined I think a case that Tony is alive could be made as well. One part I took exception with was: "The scene actually suggests the exact opposite, that Tony is too relaxed and too comfortable." I disagree. I think the entire scene felt uneasy and I think it was meant to represent the lack of comfort Tony had in his life and would always have. So to me, the scene could just as easily be broken down to reveal how he is still alive but will never have a life of comfort any longer.Of course, Chase could end all of this and just tell us whether Tony is dead or not. Frankly, it isn't asking for that much given the character's importance. At some point, it'd be nice if he stopped playing coy and just gave a direct answer.

 
A&E... Artie's about to get beat up by a 120 lb. Frenchie. :lmao:
Great illustration of just how bad this show got at points during the last 3-4 seasons
I disagree. I think that episode demonstrated how Artie was affected by constantly being surrounded by mobsters, as well as being good friends with the mob boss. It made Artie feel tougher and more important than he really was, in the grand scheme of things.
http://masterofsopranos.wordpress.com/the-...ion-of-the-end/

Sopranos fans, do yourselves a favor, and take 20-30 minutes and read that. It is a comprehensive breakdown of the final episode, as well as the final season. Some great stuff.
Very well written. And it does make a strong case that Tony is dead. Of course, if one were so inclined I think a case that Tony is alive could be made as well. One part I took exception with was: "The scene actually suggests the exact opposite, that Tony is too relaxed and too comfortable." I disagree. I think the entire scene felt uneasy and I think it was meant to represent the lack of comfort Tony had in his life and would always have. So to me, the scene could just as easily be broken down to reveal how he is still alive but will never have a life of comfort any longer.Of course, Chase could end all of this and just tell us whether Tony is dead or not. Frankly, it isn't asking for that much given the character's importance. At some point, it'd be nice if he stopped playing coy and just gave a direct answer.
Nah, I would rather he not. Heck, if he was going to tell us, then he might as well have had ended the actual episode with it, instead of leaving it open-ended. And there were definitely quite a few stretches in that long explanation (in the link I posted), but a lot of it is on the money.

 
http://masterofsopranos.wordpress.com/the-...ion-of-the-end/

Sopranos fans, do yourselves a favor, and take 20-30 minutes and read that. It is a comprehensive breakdown of the final episode, as well as the final season. Some great stuff.
Kid Charlemagne Says:

June 17, 2008 at 1:55 pm

An interesting and plausible analysis, but I’m willing to think that ambiguity must be allowed for, and that while the symbols and claustrophobia of the scene are portents of Tony’s future, it might not be an immediate one! The clear focus on the man in the Members Only jacket and his mimicking of Michael Corleone’s trip to the bathroom (prefigured in the coma sequence - “This is it”) seem to be almost too unsubtle for this to be a conclusive reading, more like devices leading towards a resolution we’re not allowed to take comfort in. And I think the quote from David Chase makes it clear that it’s not really important whether this is the last supper; some version of it probably will be. The scene can be interpreted less literally: no matter what happens, the Soprano family, and the rest of America, go on with their unthinking, guilt-free, mercenary life until some act of violence - maybe NOW! - brings an end to their own capsule version of the American Dream. Isn’t that a more ambitious artistic statement than “Tony gets killed”?

PS Re the Kennedy allusions, there was also Phil Leotardo’s comment in Series 5 episode on Tony S.’s claim that Tony B. was acting alone: “The lone gunman theory…”
Kid C is alive!
 
http://masterofsopranos.wordpress.com/the-...ion-of-the-end/

Sopranos fans, do yourselves a favor, and take 20-30 minutes and read that. It is a comprehensive breakdown of the final episode, as well as the final season. Some great stuff.
Very well written. And it does make a strong case that Tony is dead. Of course, if one were so inclined I think a case that Tony is alive could be made as well. One part I took exception with was: "The scene actually suggests the exact opposite, that Tony is too relaxed and too comfortable." I disagree. I think the entire scene felt uneasy and I think it was meant to represent the lack of comfort Tony had in his life and would always have. So to me, the scene could just as easily be broken down to reveal how he is still alive but will never have a life of comfort any longer.Of course, Chase could end all of this and just tell us whether Tony is dead or not. Frankly, it isn't asking for that much given the character's importance. At some point, it'd be nice if he stopped playing coy and just gave a direct answer.
Nah, I would rather he not. Heck, if he was going to tell us, then he might as well have had ended the actual episode with it, instead of leaving it open-ended. And there were definitely quite a few stretches in that long explanation (in the link I posted), but a lot of it is on the money.
I just scanned the link, but I think it's the same or along the same lines as one posted shortly after airing. I agree completely that Chase should not give a definitive answer. Quite frankly, from my perspective, he already has unless you just don't want to believe it, which I didn't for awhile.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top