Me and @Sinn Fein? I'm pretty sure our playing days are over.
Apparently a couple of our municipal golf courses have added some kind of Footie Golf - that I now want to go try...Me and @Sinn Fein? I'm pretty sure our playing days are over.
Apparently a couple of our municipal golf courses have added some kind of Footie Golf - that I now want to go try...Giroud and Benzema better not read this exchange.....But not your cuddling days, I hope.
I meant Mo and Sonny.
I have a more erotically charged relationship with my two red-hot French strikers. I would never sully sweet Sonny and Mo with carnal pleasures.Giroud and Benzema better not read this exchange.....
Did he get a yellow? I missed that.Son is going to miss the first leg of the Ajax match.
Early yellow - pulled De Bruyne back just outside the box.Did he get a yellow? I missed that.
Spurs are at home first, but will be without Son.Barca at home first. I like it. Should be some great semis.
Seems high.Semi odds:
- Barca 56/44 Liverpool
- Ajax 50/50 Spurs
- Barca/Pool winner will be something like 65/35 vs either of the other two.
Aguero's teammate was the one that flicked it to him and I don't think it gets there without the flick on.So rules question since everyone seems to be ignoring it, I must not know it (plus VAR reviewed), but....
Eriksen played the ball backwards and it was deflected to Aguero. Aguero was in an offside position. But his teammate didn't play him the ball.
In that same spot had Bernardo passed it forward and Eriksen deflected, it is remains offside (a deflection does not change that). I assumed the same applied when the attacker passes backwards and it is deflected so I was surprised they overruled the goal.
I never saw a good replay but it definitely didn't look like a "flick." They were pressing Eriksen and Bernardo (I think) deflected his pass with no real intention.Aguero's teammate was the one that flicked it to him and I don't think it gets there without the flick on.
Right, maybe unintentional "flick" may be better. Or deflection as you said.I never saw a good replay but it definitely didn't look like a "flick." They were pressing Eriksen and Bernardo (I think) deflected his pass with no real intention.
I’ve seen Barca fans already talking about them needing to score a lot at home. That’s not a good strategy for them. They should play cagey and try to nick a 1-0 at home. Then come to anfield needing just 1 goal.Barca at home first. I like it. Should be some great semis.
If Bernardo had whiffed but the ball somehow still found Aguero it would have stood.I never saw a good replay but it definitely didn't look like a "flick." They were pressing Eriksen and Bernardo (I think) deflected his pass with no real intention.
More like this, please.But Messi. Wow. Win or lose I’m just glad that I’m going to get to see my team play the best player of all time in the semi-finals.
That was my take as well - the flick was a deliberate play, not a deflection - thus a new phase of play.Aguero's teammate was the one that flicked it to him and I don't think it gets there without the flick on.
Hmmm...I clearly understand that. But no matter because I just looked up the law.If Bernardo had whiffed but the ball somehow still found Aguero it would have stood.
Yeah that's where I guess we were off as viewing on my phone it didn't appear that way. But it turns out it wouldn't matter either way.That was my take as well - the flick was a deliberate play, not a deflection - thus a new phase of play.
I don’t think his intent matters, just whether or not he touched itThat was my take as well - the flick was a deliberate play, not a deflection - thus a new phase of play.
It definitely has to be intentional to start a new phase of play - otherwise it goes back to Eriksen's pass.I don’t think his intent matters, just whether or not he touched it
VAR official ruled the deflection was a deliberate attempt to play the ball according to some mooks on the radio.So rules question since everyone seems to be ignoring it, I must not know it (plus VAR reviewed), but....
Eriksen played the ball backwards and it was deflected to Aguero. Aguero was in an offside position. But his teammate didn't play him the ball.
In that same spot had Bernardo passed it forward and Eriksen deflected, it is remains offside (a deflection does not change that). I assumed the same applied when the attacker passes backwards and it is deflected so I was surprised they overruled the goal.
Found this article on it which also has a slow motion replay in it. You can see it best starting at 20s.VAR official ruled the deflection was a deliberate attempt to play the ball according to some mooks on the radio.
It was definitely deliberate. Not deliberately to Aguero, but deliberately playing the ball.VAR official ruled the deflection was a deliberate attempt to play the ball according to some mooks on the radio.
I don’t think this is what you meant but to make sure I understand - where Aguero was standing when Eriksen hit the ball doesn’t matter. If you are in an offside position but the other team plays the ball to you it’s fine.It definitely has to be intentional to start a new phase of play - otherwise it goes back to Eriksen's pass.
By intentional - it does not mean that he intended the perfect flick, only that he intended to play the ball v. a ball deflecting off a player.
Its no different than any other offside call. When the Man City player (I think it was Silva) kicked out at the ball - that is a deliberate attempt to play the ball - then you freeze it, and by about 2 inches, Aguero is offside at that moment.I don’t think this is what you meant but to make sure I understand - where Aguero was standing when Eriksen hit the ball doesn’t matter. If you are in an offside position but the other team plays the ball to you it’s fine.
So does the video ref first have to determine if there was a deliberate attempt to play the ball - and then they look to see where Aguero was standing? Seems like a difficult way to do it imo.
I would hope Wijnaldum. Although Keita's improved play of late would make me comfortable as well. I don't want Milner against Barca. They will eat him alive.If Jordan Henderson is somehow the driving force as Liverpool claim a title, Tiger Woods' redemption arc becomes the second best comeback of the year. He's been fantastic for the last four games.
Not sure who the third midfielder will be at Barca, but I expect Fabinho and Henderson to start. Milner?
Coutinho, Messi and Suarez -- probably the one team on earth that shades the forward trio of Firmino, Salah and Mane.
"I asked Klopp if I would start against Barcelona. He said: 'No, James, not this time.' I told him that was a good decision."I would hope Wijnaldum. Although Keita's improved play of late would make me comfortable as well. I don't want Milner against Barca. They will eat him alive.
Seems like a really bad decision by Erickson, just judging from this clip.Found this article on it which also has a slow motion replay in it. You can see it best starting at 20s.
Couple of points I'd make upon seeing the replay:
- Silva definitely meant to touch it. He stretches out his leg.
- Silva definitely did not "flick" it to anyone in particular and had his back to the goal. It was just breaking up a pass.
So the ball deflects off Silva's shin of his outstretched leg. Does that make it deliberate? Thankfully the law is actually pretty clear and intent does not matter at all. Only the touch. VAR gets it right.
Agree with Fabinho, and Jordan is likely, the other is Gini for sure.If Jordan Henderson is somehow the driving force as Liverpool claim a title, Tiger Woods' redemption arc becomes the second best comeback of the year. He's been fantastic for the last four games.
Not sure who the third midfielder will be at Barca, but I expect Fabinho and Henderson to start. Milner? Keita?
Coutinho, Messi and Suarez -- probably the one team on earth that shades the forward trio of Firmino, Salah and Mane.
I feel that Pool will press Barca on the road as they haven’t pressed in quite some time. Klopp gets very aggressive on the road. He understands the importance of away goals.If Jordan Henderson is somehow the driving force as Liverpool claim a title, Tiger Woods' redemption arc becomes the second best comeback of the year. He's been fantastic for the last four games.
Not sure who the third midfielder will be at Barca, but I expect Fabinho and Henderson to start. Milner? Keita?
Coutinho, Messi and Suarez -- probably the one team on earth that shades the forward trio of Firmino, Salah and Mane.
sign this guy to the transfer committeeFor the first time all season we get the midfield I felt would be the best for Liverpool.
Kieta. Hendo
.............Fab
Popcorn
Rona fer sure...One of the big clubs will be in for Messi this summer.
ToLigt, too Liigt to quit...One of the big clubs is going to notice this DeLigt kid if he keeps playing like this.
Interesting factoid ...there is no more annoying word than "factoid "...thats a fact, jack.Interesting factoid - Since January 1, 2019, Man City have out-scored opponents at home, in all comps, 49-3 (not including today).
53-6 is still a good tally - just not good enough....
Wrong!!Interesting factoid ...there is no more annoying word than "factoid "...thats a fact, jack.
"Who else is going to commit 20 fouls and not get booked."