At least NewCastle didn't get trounced by Crystal Palace at homeguru_007 said:Newcastle deserves a point? Uhhhh not sure about that. Stats all point to a trouncing here
Plus it took ManU till the last 5 mins with an injured keeper on the other end to really get anything going. Newcastle was playing a pretty defensive effort trying more so to counter attack. If anything up until the 85" ManU was pretty disappointing at best and despite a 4-1 victory today they still have major question marks. A club like ManU shouldn't lose matches like CP and Spurs like they did and against a Newcastle Untied should've had this game well in hand by the half but didn't. Thats not to take away from the goals they scored as they were good goals but it's the fact it still took them to the 85" to get anything going.guru_007 said:Newcastle deserves a point? Uhhhh not sure about that. Stats all point to a trouncing here
You gonna take that one sitting down, guru?At least NewCastle didn't get trounced by Crystal Palace at homeguru_007 said:Newcastle deserves a point? Uhhhh not sure about that. Stats all point to a trouncing here![]()
ManU is the better quality Club no questions but Newcastle did play a very defensive battle. ManU had numerous chances & against a better club probably would've lost today and only managed to open things up after Darlow got injured in the 85". A better quality team would've put ManU away today. They missed a lot of chances to do so themselves in this one. Hardly convincing to stop the questions that surround ManU still.You gonna take that one sitting down, guru?![]()
I only watched some of the first half, but it was one way traffic
United’s been terribly I really have nothing to stand on. But they definitely deserved full points here. Plus the guys on a massive sugar rush with the derby win. Is all good. Any day Barca loses is a good dayYou gonna take that one sitting down, guru?![]()
I only watched some of the first half, but it was one way traffic
I didn't see NU ask any questions of the MU defense in the part I watched. Hopeful lobs downfield with no effect.it was all Manc.ManU is the better quality Club no questions but Newcastle did play a very defensive battle. ManU had numerous chances & against a better club probably would've lost today and only managed to open things up after Darlow got injured in the 85". A better quality team would've put ManU away today. They missed a lot of chances to do so themselves in this one. Hardly convincing to stop the questions that surround ManU still.
They lost? Hope it wasn't on Dest. Anybody watch?United’s been terribly I really have nothing to stand on. But they definitely deserved full points here. Plus the guys on a massive sugar rush with the derby win. Is all good. Any day Barca loses is a good day
Double wow. Cadiz? Is that a type of potato chip? Topsy turvy year across Europe so far.Wow...rangers won the old firm today. Nice to see them back on level ground with celtic after these rough years.
It was 3-0 at 81:50.Wow, Tottenham tied? It was 3-0 in the 75th last I looked.
And how are Aston Villa in 2nd place and the only team yet to drop any points after 5 weeks? They faced Liverpool and Leicester to boot.
Villa may have the best MF in the premier league.gianmarco said:Wow, Tottenham tied? It was 3-0 in the 75th last I looked.
And how are Aston Villa in 2nd place and the only team yet to drop any points after 5 weeks? They faced Liverpool and Leicester to boot.
That's a rather bold statement. Not saying you are wrong but you are wrongVilla may have the best MF in the premier league.
Frankly, I was surprised how poorly they fared last year as they spent a lot when promoted and have some decent players. Similar to Leeds this year.
Not saying it's going to last, but Villa in top 8 this year would not surprise me.
Bottom of the table is pretty solid right now, I don't think anyone outside the bottom four are in trouble for the drop.
And pretty sure I posted earlier there was nfw West Ham was in danger as there is so much talent on that team. FFS, they just shipped off Felipe Anderson to Porto who they spent over $40M on, and Haller who they spent over $50M on wasn't even dressed (and for some reason I cannot understand, seemingly only plays cup games for them). West Ham could challenge for Europe this year imho.
Certainly. However, Grealish starts for almost every top 6 club IMO and certainly gets significant playing time at all of them. The only reason Barkley wasn't starting at Chelsea was because Frank Lampard preferred Mount(which has been talked about a lot on the internet) and they added Havertz who is likely the best young 10 in the world. He'd also be getting big minutes at most of the top 6 teams, unless he was taking playing time from the boss's son of course.That's a rather bold statement. Not saying you are wrong but you are wrong![]()
I'd definitely take a few of the top 6 over them but they are very good.
Would have liked Graelish at United, but so far happy with Bruno and VdB has looked the part, just needs to play.Certainly. However, Grealish starts for almost every top 6 club IMO and certainly gets significant playing time at all of them. The only reason Barkley wasn't starting at Chelsea was because Frank Lampard preferred Mount(which has been talked about a lot on the internet) and they added Havertz who is likely the best young 10 in the world. He'd also be getting big minutes at most of the top 6 teams, unless he was taking playing time from the boss's son of course.
That's a great midfield and one that can flip from defense to attack in a heartbeat. I think AV will easily be top 10 this year and definitely push for Europe.
Sounds like a problem for a lot of the top teams. Wonder if United will compete with Chelsea for Declan Rice next summer.Would have liked Graelish at United, but so far happy with Bruno and VdB has looked the part, just needs to play.
And Actually, I think if United can get a true holding MF (younger and more dynamic then Matic, better then Fred), then a mf 3 of a DM, VdB and Bruno will be very good. And Pogba will be forced to put in an effort and dominate or he can go....
Rice was linked with United at the restart last season, then Chelsea in the window. But then again everyone is linked with United. A lot of the United fan base claims he isn't good enough because of who he plays for. I never understood why.Sounds like a problem for a lot of the top teams. Wonder if United will compete with Chelsea for Declan Rice next summer.
Again, I'm not saying they aren't good but they aren't considered as talented and definitely aren't as deep as most of the top 6. It's not necessarily a knock against them - it's just their spending isn't to the level of the MFs they would be compared too.Certainly. However, Grealish starts for almost every top 6 club IMO and certainly gets significant playing time at all of them. The only reason Barkley wasn't starting at Chelsea was because Frank Lampard preferred Mount(which has been talked about a lot on the internet) and they added Havertz who is likely the best young 10 in the world. He'd also be getting big minutes at most of the top 6 teams, unless he was taking playing time from the boss's son of course.
That's a great midfield and one that can flip from defense to attack in a heartbeat. I think AV will easily be top 10 this year and definitely push for Europe.
Who’s broadcasting the games this year?Didn't realize Champions League starts today.
Agreed. Especially combined with losing regular EPL coverage as well. All these different services each with their own cost is just bull####.This CBS all access is such incredible bull####.
For how expensive cable/satellite TV is (including being forced to pay for 100 channels you dont want to get the 12 that you do)......to require a separate purchase to watch a big time sporting event like this.....straight up garbage.
I refuse to participate. Next thing you know the NCAA final 4 will require a pay per view purchase. Complete nonsense.
Seriously, it took a whole 20 mins....It's about time United got a penalty.
Bmav/guru - how does Telles look?
I agree with TLEF - not paying for this.
I paid for this....
Yeah but when you need all these services to watch:Meh, I think CBS has a pretty good product for this. It is great to be able to watch any game and they don't have an annoying scroll spoiling the other games if you want to watch a couple. I probably prefer the a la carte of Bleacher Report.
We've come a lot way from having only one or two games available at the CL group stages and I think that is worth reflecting on. $7 a month doesn't bother me at all, but I realize that isn't true for everyone.![]()
It certainly does, I just prefer the standalones personally. Bein is a PITA to get this year for me. Can't imagine having cable/satellite again.B Maverick said:Yeah but when you need all these services to watch:
CBS All Access
Peacock
ESPN +
etc.... It adds up when already paying for cable/satelight
Desert_Power said:Meh, I think CBS has a pretty good product for this. It is great to be able to watch any game and they don't have an annoying scroll spoiling the other games if you want to watch a couple. I probably prefer the a la carte of Bleacher Report.
We've come a lot way from having only one or two games available at the CL group stages and I think that is worth reflecting on. $7 a month doesn't bother me at all, but I realize that isn't true for everyone.![]()