14 Killed in Shooting in San Bernardino (2 Viewers)

[urbanhack]

So how long before the "It's my right to open carry an AR-15" guys meet up with the "I thought it was a terrorist so we started shooting" guys?

When minorities start openly exercising their Constitutional rights under the 2nd Amendment is my guess.

interestingly enough, the militant black protestors of the 60's were at the forefront of gun rights/open carry. The argument at the time was the need for self defense. I don't see how that has changed, at all, in the last 50 years.

Don't tell folks that blacks in the 50s and 60s were much more aligned to GOP principles, you'll start riots.

oh lord.

 

[Officer Pete Malloy]

We are going to head down the usual road where folks line up:

Why do we need guns? (see constitution, etc)

Citizens aren't as well trained as elite military? (citizens are frequently in a better position to respond quickly, not to mention deterrent factor)

Why don't we just ban guns? (look at the war on drugs)

What about improving background checks? (little reasonable argument against this, but let's start with better enforcement of existing laws)

etc etc etc....

Same debates... same questions...same answers....

Sorry but I'm never going to trust some redneck with a gun who thinks he's Chuck Norris trying to diffuse a situation.

Chuck Norris would never need to use a gun. All rednecks know this.

Plus for every redneck with a gun, there is a ex/current LEO/MIL or sport shooter with as much or more training and is a better shot than most cops.

Not going to say there's not an occasional jethro or cletus screwing things up.... but the vast majority of CCW weapons holders are not only extremely competent with firearms, but that are an "important crime deterrent" per the CDC.

However, continue with cliche derogatory name-calling if it makes you feel better... just remember to buy Jethro a beer if he ever saves your ###.

Dude...that article is horrible. It twists and spins what the CDC report actually said to fit the CNS's slant.

 

[SaintsInDome2006]

So how long before the "It's my right to open carry an AR-15" guys meet up with the "I thought it was a terrorist so we started shooting" guys?

When minorities start openly exercising their Constitutional rights under the 2nd Amendment is my guess.

Wait they don't? They do here.

 

[Doctor Detroit]

So how long before the "It's my right to open carry an AR-15" guys meet up with the "I thought it was a terrorist so we started shooting" guys?

When minorities start openly exercising their Constitutional rights under the 2nd Amendment is my guess.

interestingly enough, the militant black protestors of the 60's were at the forefront of gun rights/open carry. The argument at the time was the need for self defense. I don't see how that has changed, at all, in the last 50 years.

Don't tell folks that blacks in the 50s and 60s were much more aligned to GOP principles, you'll start riots.

oh lord.

It happened.

 

[The Commish]

And I absolutely dispute your claim. There are no equivalent "clowns" as you call them on the Democrat side. You may disagree with Hillary and Bernie but they're serious people and their political positions are not based on ignorance fear or bigotry.

This is astonishing.

yea, even coming from Tim that is a....WHAT?!?!? :whoosh:

I'm pretty sure this is some variation of TGunz "they are exactly alike" shtick. To suggest that ignorance and fear aren't used to form positions by Democrats is silly. I don't consider them as bigoted as the GOP, but that's not setting a very high bar either. Fear and ignorance are the hallmarks of "policy" in our government. They don't discriminate based on sides of the isle.

 

[ArbyMelt]

It's perfectly fine to report suspicious behavior. But what is suspicious behavior? If one of the components to that behavior is the appearance of the person doing it (Middle Eastern in this discussion) then it's not fine.

In other words if you report a Middle Eastern looking person doing something you regard as suspicious, but would not report a white person that was doing the EXACT SAME THING, then you're acting in a bigoted manner, and it's not OK.

In this case someone saw a few Middle eastern men enter an apartment .. and now feels guilty because he feels he should have reported it..

Reported what.. some middle eastern guys going into an apartment.. How many middle eastern people can gather before it becomes "suspicious" .. 2, 3.. ???

As I stated above, middle eastern people soon will not be able to gather for Birthday Parties, to watch Sports, or gather in any groups larger then 2 before people feel they need to report "suspicious" activity..

after that, who's next?? Russians, Jews...

the Irish

You wouldn't be suspicious of a house where noone really lives there, but many packages are shipped there and a bunch of people only show up at night and work late in the garage?

 

[Ministry of Pain]

Trump's numbers are high because a loud minority of Republicans, around 45%, are susceptible to fear, bigotry, and ignorance.

Tim's infamous F.B.I.Fear-Guns are killing people so we must outlaw them



Bigotry-Black Lives Matter



Ignorance-We can tax our way out of this debt.



What was the opinion you wanted to project as known fact?

Hmm. I'm genuinely interested MOP: have you read any of my posts on gun control? (As recently as this morning?) How about the thread I started on Black Lives Matter? Have you read any of my thoughts about taxes?Just curious.

Tim you said 45% of GOP voters are a mix of the 3 things you listed. You make it sound like a fact and I'm pointing out the Left or DNC has their clowns as well. It's mind boggling for folks who tend to sway GOP and while labeled as such I am not, but GOP supporters before they even open their mouths are usually labeled a certain way by folks on the Left.You introduce to me a stranger and also divulge they are democrat, I don't instantly start hitting the talking points. But you introduce a Leftist to a stranger and mention they vote Republican, instant label of bigot. Now how is that fair? I remember in California when I was openly Republican how embarrassed my wife would get at functions when people discovered I didn't vote Democrat as the husband of a non profit profiteer.

I would be interested in reading it Tim but at the same time I don't have the time to invest in some of your topics and posts.

My 45% figure was based on adding up the numbers for Trump and Cruz. If I add Carson it gets even higher.And I absolutely dispute your claim. There are no equivalent "clowns" as you call them on the Democrat side. You may disagree with Hillary and Bernie but they're serious people and their political positions are not based on ignorance fear or bigotry.

Tim I have always treated you with respect even when not deserving but I need to call you out here. This is simply an opinion, one you are free to enjoy but your ammo and it been this way for a long time is to discredit the opposing poster rather than simply stating your facts and letting whatever the outcome roll with that. You try and shape the discussion to your advantage at every turn. This board is a board game of fun for you and by all means have at it but like others post, you can keep posting your opinions till your blue in the face again and again and again but that doesn't make you right except to yourself. My bet is in the last 20 years that person hasn't been wrong about much in his head be it reality or not. And I imagine it holds true for many in the world.

You posted above that I am a bigot...how am I or anyone that doesn't a timeout supposed to respond? I can tell you this, you would never mutter those words face to face with me or with a lot of folks on here, I can assure you that. You talk a lot of spit behind that safe comfy keyboard Tim, I have been gone a good while and just came back recently when the Paris attacks hit, it was comforting to post here and I make no apologies for this. You need to get out of the house more friendo. I don't believe you would debate the way you do with others in person, if you did it wouldn't last long which is why you fuel it here on the boards.

Cheers and for the record I am not a bigot and I resent that you would even insinuate it but also recognize it covers up a lot of holes in your arguments hence the name calling. I work for a Title I school with 85% of my class African American, bigot? You come to my class and say that out loud in front of any one of my Middle School students, I wouldn't even have to respond, they would take care of it for me. That was really a bottom of the barrel post from you, Tim.

 

[belljr]

Good gun owners will still be good gun owners regardless of the law.

Changing things may prevent the fringe people from getting them

Responsible people will always be responsible. All the safety measures and laws and rules and bull#### aren't made for the normal responsible folk.

They are made for the other 70% of the population.

 

[tommyboy]

What are the odds this is classified as an 'act of terrorism' if the suspects aren't Muslim?

If they are, it'll be called workplace violence

Verdict: True

 

[SaintsInDome2006]

Good gun owners will still be good gun owners regardless of the law.

Changing things may prevent the fringe people from getting them

Responsible people will always be responsible. All the safety measures and laws and rules and bull#### aren't made for the normal responsible folk.

They are made for the other 70% of the population.

Guys, terrorism is not a gun control issue. YWIA.

 

[BroncoFreak_2K3]

And I absolutely dispute your claim. There are no equivalent "clowns" as you call them on the Democrat side. You may disagree with Hillary and Bernie but they're serious people and their political positions are not based on ignorance fear or bigotry.

This is astonishing.

Delusional

 

[kOOk]

Why is it that this timshochet guy and ministry of pain are the headliners in here?

 

[[icon]]

We are going to head down the usual road where folks line up:

Why do we need guns? (see constitution, etc)

Citizens aren't as well trained as elite military? (citizens are frequently in a better position to respond quickly, not to mention deterrent factor)

Why don't we just ban guns? (look at the war on drugs)

What about improving background checks? (little reasonable argument against this, but let's start with better enforcement of existing laws)

etc etc etc....

Same debates... same questions...same answers....

Sorry but I'm never going to trust some redneck with a gun who thinks he's Chuck Norris trying to diffuse a situation.

Chuck Norris would never need to use a gun. All rednecks know this.

Plus for every redneck with a gun, there is a ex/current LEO/MIL or sport shooter with as much or more training and is a better shot than most cops.

Not going to say there's not an occasional jethro or cletus screwing things up.... but the vast majority of CCW weapons holders are not only extremely competent with firearms, but that are an "important crime deterrent" per the CDC.

However, continue with cliche derogatory name-calling if it makes you feel better... just remember to buy Jethro a beer if he ever saves your ###.

Dude...that article is horrible. It twists and spins what the CDC report actually said to fit the CNS's slant.

Meh, I just quickly cut and paste. Should have been more thorough in screening. My apologies.

The primary point of the article stands... There are studies on both sides and I've been down this road of swapping studies that interpret different data sets in different ways. I have no desire to go down that road again. Bottom line of my post stands, however.

 

[SaintsInDome2006]

The Situation Room Verified account ‏@CNNSitRoom

Video: Cop leads workers to safety, "I'll take a bullet before you do, that's for damn sure" http://cnn.it/1lyAYqu

- Heroes.

 

[Loan Sharks]

I have been to this regional center.

Just in case you don't know what the regional center is. It is a non profit that helps people with developmental disabilities. They treat a lot of children with autism. downs and asbergers etc. Most times for free.

So in case you weren't angry enough these people shot up a building full of disabled kids, specifically killing people who help disabled kids.

You know it is always weird when you were at a spot where something like this has happened. I used to drive through the Reginald Denny intersection, I had been in the twin towers, this one is too much.

You always think what would you do if you were there?

Regional center surprisingly is a very secure facility. It has many one way doors and none that will let you directly out without a passcode. This is due to the nature of dealing with disabled adults and kids. Many autistic kids will elope. They just take off. Some adults will just wander off if not contained.

The only reason that guy got in there was he was an employee, it would have been extremely difficult for anyone to get out. Impossible if you were there for treatment and didn't have a card.

What?

His company was having a holiday party there, as of now the only people targeted that we know of are those that were at that party. The party was for County personnel that had rented out the room. They are still douchebags of the highest level but they didn't target those that help the disabled.

My understanding is the party was for health department people. Regional center is DDS which is part of the health department.

 

[kOOk]

We are going to head down the usual road where folks line up:

Why do we need guns? (see constitution, etc)

Citizens aren't as well trained as elite military? (citizens are frequently in a better position to respond quickly, not to mention deterrent factor)

Why don't we just ban guns? (look at the war on drugs)

What about improving background checks? (little reasonable argument against this, but let's start with better enforcement of existing laws)

etc etc etc....

Same debates... same questions...same answers....

Sorry but I'm never going to trust some redneck with a gun who thinks he's Chuck Norris trying to diffuse a situation.

Chuck Norris would never need to use a gun. All rednecks know this.

Plus for every redneck with a gun, there is a ex/current LEO/MIL or sport shooter with as much or more training and is a better shot than most cops.

Not going to say there's not an occasional jethro or cletus screwing things up.... but the vast majority of CCW weapons holders are not only extremely competent with firearms, but that are an "important crime deterrent" per the CDC.

However, continue with cliche derogatory name-calling if it makes you feel better... just remember to buy Jethro a beer if he ever saves your ###.

Dude...that article is horrible. It twists and spins what the CDC report actually said to fit the CNS's slant.

Meh, I just quickly cut and paste. Should have been more thorough in screening.

lofl

 

[Spin]

It's perfectly fine to report suspicious behavior. But what is suspicious behavior? If one of the components to that behavior is the appearance of the person doing it (Middle Eastern in this discussion) then it's not fine.

In other words if you report a Middle Eastern looking person doing something you regard as suspicious, but would not report a white person that was doing the EXACT SAME THING, then you're acting in a bigoted manner, and it's not OK.

In this case someone saw a few Middle eastern men enter an apartment .. and now feels guilty because he feels he should have reported it..

Reported what.. some middle eastern guys going into an apartment.. How many middle eastern people can gather before it becomes "suspicious" .. 2, 3.. ???

As I stated above, middle eastern people soon will not be able to gather for Birthday Parties, to watch Sports, or gather in any groups larger then 2 before people feel they need to report "suspicious" activity..

after that, who's next?? Russians, Jews...

the Irish

You wouldn't be suspicious of a house where noone really lives there, but many packages are shipped there and a bunch of people only show up at night and work late in the garage?

You just perfectly described a house some of my friends and I had in college. The guy who rented it rarely actually lived there and instead crashed on the fraternity couch. We used the garage to build all sorts of stuff, mainly for sorority philanthropy events. We built a dune buggy once, a pumpkin launcher, countless stupid floats for parades, a trebuchet to launch a watermelon etc.

 

[snogger]

It's perfectly fine to report suspicious behavior. But what is suspicious behavior? If one of the components to that behavior is the appearance of the person doing it (Middle Eastern in this discussion) then it's not fine.

In other words if you report a Middle Eastern looking person doing something you regard as suspicious, but would not report a white person that was doing the EXACT SAME THING, then you're acting in a bigoted manner, and it's not OK.

In this case someone saw a few Middle eastern men enter an apartment .. and now feels guilty because he feels he should have reported it..

Reported what.. some middle eastern guys going into an apartment.. How many middle eastern people can gather before it becomes "suspicious" .. 2, 3.. ???

As I stated above, middle eastern people soon will not be able to gather for Birthday Parties, to watch Sports, or gather in any groups larger then 2 before people feel they need to report "suspicious" activity..

after that, who's next?? Russians, Jews...

the Irish

You wouldn't be suspicious of a house where noone really lives there, but many packages are shipped there and a bunch of people only show up at night and work late in the garage?

Did I miss the story that the house where everything was found was NOT their residence? and also that people only showed up at night..

If so, sorry.. please provide a link as I have not seen or heard that at all. TIA

 

[SaintsInDome2006]

Why is it that this timshochet guy and ministry of pain are the headliners in here?

- Well if we're talking about events we will have to know that Trump feasts on baby blood so he can stay alive and we have a poster who is supposedly a bigot, because that will help us understand what happened. Easy.

 

[ericttspikes]

If you see a middle eastern guy carrying a gun assault rifle... Id call it in

How about just end open carry. It is truly one of the dumbest movements going. I frankly don't feel comfortable with anyone strapped with guns walking around public places. I don't care what color/race/gender they are, anybody walking around Target or McDonald's with guns is threatening. We're supposed just assume by looking at them what their intentions, training, or mental state is? So dumb.

 

[snogger]

It's perfectly fine to report suspicious behavior. But what is suspicious behavior? If one of the components to that behavior is the appearance of the person doing it (Middle Eastern in this discussion) then it's not fine.

In other words if you report a Middle Eastern looking person doing something you regard as suspicious, but would not report a white person that was doing the EXACT SAME THING, then you're acting in a bigoted manner, and it's not OK.

In this case someone saw a few Middle eastern men enter an apartment .. and now feels guilty because he feels he should have reported it..

Reported what.. some middle eastern guys going into an apartment.. How many middle eastern people can gather before it becomes "suspicious" .. 2, 3.. ???

As I stated above, middle eastern people soon will not be able to gather for Birthday Parties, to watch Sports, or gather in any groups larger then 2 before people feel they need to report "suspicious" activity..

after that, who's next?? Russians, Jews...

the Irish

You wouldn't be suspicious of a house where noone really lives there, but many packages are shipped there and a bunch of people only show up at night and work late in the garage?

You just perfectly described a house some of my friends and I had in college. The guy who rented it rarely actually lived there and instead crashed on the fraternity couch. We used the garage to build all sorts of stuff, mainly for sorority philanthropy events. We built a dune buggy once, a pumpkin launcher, countless stupid floats for parades, a trebuchet to launch a watermelon etc.

During the summer time up here people actually put screens over their Garage openings so they have a "screened in Porch" to hang out in to drink/party/hang out away from bugs.. when it gets later, they'll take down the screen and close the door so as to cut down on the noise..

Never thought I should be suspicious of that..

 

[TobiasFunke]

We are going to head down the usual road where folks line up:

Why do we need guns? (see constitution, etc)

Citizens aren't as well trained as elite military? (citizens are frequently in a better position to respond quickly, not to mention deterrent factor)

Why don't we just ban guns? (look at the war on drugs)

What about improving background checks? (little reasonable argument against this, but let's start with better enforcement of existing laws)

etc etc etc....

Same debates... same questions...same answers....

Sorry but I'm never going to trust some redneck with a gun who thinks he's Chuck Norris trying to diffuse a situation.

Chuck Norris would never need to use a gun. All rednecks know this.

Plus for every redneck with a gun, there is a ex/current LEO/MIL or sport shooter with as much or more training and is a better shot than most cops.

Not going to say there's not an occasional jethro or cletus screwing things up.... but the vast majority of CCW weapons holders are not only extremely competent with firearms, but that are an "important crime deterrent" per the CDC.

However, continue with cliche derogatory name-calling if it makes you feel better... just remember to buy Jethro a beer if he ever saves your ###.

Dude...that article is horrible. It twists and spins what the CDC report actually said to fit the CNS's slant.

Meh, I just quickly cut and paste. Should have been more thorough in screening. My apologies.

The primary point of the article stands... There are studies on both sides and I've been down this road of swapping studies that interpret different data sets in different ways. I have no desire to go down that road again. Bottom line of my post stands, however.

No it does not. The primary point of the article and of your post was that "the vast majority of CCW weapons holders are not only extremely competent with firearms, but that are an important crime deterrent." There is zero consensus on that, if anything there's consensus that it has no effect at all.

 

[Arizona Ron]

I'm actually surprised we haven't had an incident where someone with CCW tries to stop an active shooter situation and ends up getting shot by the cops.

 

[Andy Dufresne]

I've been around guns my whole life. I took a CCL class with people who hadn't ever touched one. At the end of the class (about 8 hours later) we were both eligible for our license.

I am not comfortable with the idea that some of those people are likely carrying today.

 

[Kid_kong]

Tips if you ever confronted with a terrorist in the building you work.

1. Try and find an escape route. This seems obvious but those big red exit signs come in very handy when you and almost everyone around you is panicking and lost their minds.

2. If you cannot get out of the building find a hiding spot like your office and try to lock the door. If the door will not lock try to put something in front of the door or use your belt and tie it around the door hinge especially if there is a big one above the door.

3. Hide under a desk

4. If you cannot hide or your hideout is being busted thru you must grab a pair of scissors and be ready to fight whatever comes thru that door. Stab them in the arm, neck, eyes whatever it takes until help arrives.

I dunno I saw it on one of the overly caffeinated morning shows like GMA or Today.

Shoot them?

 

[coyote5]

The Situation Room Verified account ‏@CNNSitRoom

Video: Cop leads workers to safety, "I'll take a bullet before you do, that's for damn sure" http://cnn.it/1lyAYqu

- Heroes.

And of course somebody's gotta have their phone out, recording. I mean they're being evacuated from a mass shooting and someone can't help but whip out the ole iphone to video it

 

[Black Box]

From this article.

Mr. Farook, a United States citizen, was born in Illinois to Pakistani immigrant parents. Family members said he had been a devout Sunni Muslim, and on a dating website several years ago, he listed Urdu as his mother tongue. He had gone to Saudi Arabia multiple times, including a 2013 trip for the annual hajj, the trip to Mecca that all Muslims are expected to complete at least once, federal officials said.

Mr. Bowdich said that Mr. Farook visited Pakistan last year, and that he and Ms. Malik entered the United States from Pakistan in July 2014. She traveled on a Pakistani passport and entered the United States on a K-1 visa, a 90-day visa given to fiancés planning to marry Americans. The couple applied on Sept. 30, 2014, for a permanent resident green card for Ms. Malik, which requires passing pass criminal and national security background checks using F.B.I. and Department of Homeland Security databases, and she was granted a conditional green card in July 2015.

I am pretty sure anyone who passes this stuff will be able to legally buy guns, unless (1) no one can buy guns or (2) we don't let immigrants buy guns or (3) we discriminate based on race or religion.

Am I missing any other options?

 

[Ditka Butkus]

I kinda feel bad for the folks who commented that they saw suspicious activity but were afraid to report it for seeming like they were profiling....

Imagine they feel some burden from yesterday's events. :(

And Icon that's why even though the party I was with kind of poked fun at me for reporting a couple suspicious folks at the Clevelander a week or so ago but later on in the night several retracted and said they simply never would be looking for that kind of activity. That's what these idiots plan on, that we won't react.

Shortly after 9/11 I was on a plane, one of the last times I have flown in the last 15 years and the uniformed crew member came on the intercom asking if (Insert Arabic Name) was on board. Everyone looking around and then relieved that nobody came forward and that nobody seemed to match that description. I was seated next to a Hollywood writer(no idea the name now) but he wrote and murmured next to me "Did Sheik's luggage make it on board?" and that was enough and I asked the lady to come back to our row immediately and got her involved in the the thinking. Pilot heard and immediately stopped the plane, we stayed like that for a good 30-45 minutes until they could verify neither he nor his luggage was anywhere on that plane.

People are typically ridiculed for profiling or speaking out, I've started to get over that feeling and just be ready to verbally attack back anyone who who raises an eyebrow when anyone starts asking questions.

And that is the epitome of the old adage....Better Safe Than Sorry!

 

[CowboysFromHell]

Again for the gun control crowd....

This shooting was in a "Gun Free Zone" in the state that has among the strictest (if not the strictest) gun control laws in the country.

Planned Parenthood? Gun Free Zone.

They're not all there, but anyone pretending spree-shooters don't disproportionately target places where a disarmed populace of "sitting ducks" reside are kidding themselves.

Here's the obvious counterpoints; admittedly from a biased website, but the facts cited there stand.

I really don't think gun-free or not gun-free makes a damn bit of difference. The fact that most of these events happen in gun-free zones is not a result of some careful selection by otherwise insane people, but is probably just because most public areas across the country happen to be "gun free zones," including the schools that seem to be most frequently targeted, so of course a large number of the targets will be gun free.

It's like claiming that spree killers are targeting no-smoking zones because many of the targets don't allow smoking, which is of course true because most schools, government buildings, office buildings and large indoor public spaces don't allow smoking and those are the places usually targeted. There's an obvious explanation of the correlation and zero evidence of causation.

He hates these cans! Stay away from the cans!

 

[Ministry of Pain]

interestingly enough, the militant black protestors of the 60's were at the forefront of gun rights/open carry. The argument at the time was the need for self defense. I don't see how that has changed, at all, in the last 50 years.

Don't tell folks that blacks in the 50s and 60s were much more aligned to GOP principles, you'll start riots.

oh lord

And that's Lord Vader to you.

 

[saintsfan]

Trump's numbers are high because a loud minority of Republicans, around 45%, are susceptible to fear, bigotry, and ignorance.

Tim's infamous F.B.I.Fear-Guns are killing people so we must outlaw them



Bigotry-Black Lives Matter



Ignorance-We can tax our way out of this debt.



What was the opinion you wanted to project as known fact?

Hmm. I'm genuinely interested MOP: have you read any of my posts on gun control? (As recently as this morning?) How about the thread I started on Black Lives Matter? Have you read any of my thoughts about taxes?Just curious.

Tim you said 45% of GOP voters are a mix of the 3 things you listed. You make it sound like a fact and I'm pointing out the Left or DNC has their clowns as well. It's mind boggling for folks who tend to sway GOP and while labeled as such I am not, but GOP supporters before they even open their mouths are usually labeled a certain way by folks on the Left.You introduce to me a stranger and also divulge they are democrat, I don't instantly start hitting the talking points. But you introduce a Leftist to a stranger and mention they vote Republican, instant label of bigot. Now how is that fair? I remember in California when I was openly Republican how embarrassed my wife would get at functions when people discovered I didn't vote Democrat as the husband of a non profit profiteer.

I would be interested in reading it Tim but at the same time I don't have the time to invest in some of your topics and posts.

My 45% figure was based on adding up the numbers for Trump and Cruz. If I add Carson it gets even higher.And I absolutely dispute your claim. There are no equivalent "clowns" as you call them on the Democrat side. You may disagree with Hillary and Bernie but they're serious people and their political positions are not based on ignorance fear or bigotry.

Tim, I usually give you a break, but C'mon Man!!!

How is claiming that Republicans don't like immigrants, minorities, or women NOT using fear or ignorance?? What about claiming the apocalypse will happen if we don't cripple our economy to fight global warming??

Just because you agree with these points of view, doesn't mean they aren't crazy...

 

[jonessed]

Trump's numbers are high because a loud minority of Republicans, around 45%, are susceptible to fear, bigotry, and ignorance.

Tim's infamous F.B.I.

Fear-Guns are killing people so we must outlaw them

Bigotry-Black Lives Matter

Ignorance-We can tax our way out of this debt.

What was the opinion you wanted to project as known fact?

Trump is running around 20%-25% anyway.

He just likes bashing Republicans.

 

[tommyboy]

I'm actually surprised we haven't had an incident where someone with CCW tries to stop an active shooter situation and ends up getting shot by the cops.

. That almost happened recently. Guy was a FBI agent or vet, but he almost got shot by cops

 

[jonessed]

It's perfectly fine to report suspicious behavior. But what is suspicious behavior? If one of the components to that behavior is the appearance of the person doing it (Middle Eastern in this discussion) then it's not fine.

In other words if you report a Middle Eastern looking person doing something you regard as suspicious, but would not report a white person that was doing the EXACT SAME THING, then you're acting in a bigoted manner, and it's not OK.

That's horse####.

 

[Arizona Ron]

I'm actually surprised we haven't had an incident where someone with CCW tries to stop an active shooter situation and ends up getting shot by the cops.

. That almost happened recently. Guy was a FBI agent or vet, but he almost got shot by cops

Pretty big difference, don't you think?

 

[Bucky86]

I'm actually surprised we haven't had an incident where someone with CCW tries to stop an active shooter situation and ends up getting shot by the cops.

A guy interviewed last night was there and armed. He ran out when he heard the commotion and ended up hiding. He claims they drove past him and he pulled out his gun ,but decided not to shoot because he wasn't sure who was inside.

 

[Ministry of Pain]

Trump's numbers are high because a loud minority of Republicans, around 45%, are susceptible to fear, bigotry, and ignorance.

Tim's infamous F.B.I.Fear-Guns are killing people so we must outlaw them



Bigotry-Black Lives Matter



Ignorance-We can tax our way out of this debt.



What was the opinion you wanted to project as known fact?

Hmm. I'm genuinely interested MOP: have you read any of my posts on gun control? (As recently as this morning?) How about the thread I started on Black Lives Matter? Have you read any of my thoughts about taxes?Just curious.

Tim you said 45% of GOP voters are a mix of the 3 things you listed. You make it sound like a fact and I'm pointing out the Left or DNC has their clowns as well. It's mind boggling for folks who tend to sway GOP and while labeled as such I am not, but GOP supporters before they even open their mouths are usually labeled a certain way by folks on the Left.You introduce to me a stranger and also divulge they are democrat, I don't instantly start hitting the talking points. But you introduce a Leftist to a stranger and mention they vote Republican, instant label of bigot. Now how is that fair? I remember in California when I was openly Republican how embarrassed my wife would get at functions when people discovered I didn't vote Democrat as the husband of a non profit profiteer.

I would be interested in reading it Tim but at the same time I don't have the time to invest in some of your topics and posts.

My 45% figure was based on adding up the numbers for Trump and Cruz. If I add Carson it gets even higher.And I absolutely dispute your claim. There are no equivalent "clowns" as you call them on the Democrat side. You may disagree with Hillary and Bernie but they're serious people and their political positions are not based on ignorance fear or bigotry.

Tim, I usually give you a break, but C'mon Man!!!

How is claiming that Republicans don't like immigrants, minorities, or women NOT using fear or ignorance?? What about claiming the apocalypse will happen if we don't cripple our economy to fight global warming??

Just because you agree with these points of view, doesn't mean they aren't crazy...

The best part is how I have been MIA for the better part of a year and he already posts "MOP is not worth my time"

Way to put himself on the Mt Rushmore of posters here at the FFA. His FFA ego is so big I can't even wrap my head around it or how you all have allowed this to reach this pinnacle if you will. But then I saw his self titled 183 page thread and I don't think I have to say much more.

When you know you have no chance of winning an argument with someone simply dispatch them as incredible and not worthy of your time. Tim's outrageous elitism is almost unbridled here at FBG. He makes no apologies for it I give him that.

 

[tommyboy]

I'm actually surprised we haven't had an incident where someone with CCW tries to stop an active shooter situation and ends up getting shot by the cops.

. That almost happened recently. Guy was a FBI agent or vet, but he almost got shot by cops

Pretty big difference, don't you think?

Not much. A high pct of ccw holders are former or current law/military/security types.

 

[Ministry of Pain]

Trump's numbers are high because a loud minority of Republicans, around 45%, are susceptible to fear, bigotry, and ignorance.

Tim's infamous F.B.I.

Fear-Guns are killing people so we must outlaw them

Bigotry-Black Lives Matter

Ignorance-We can tax our way out of this debt.

What was the opinion you wanted to project as known fact?

Trump is running around 20%-25% anyway.

He just likes bashing Republicans.

He fires his preposition pop gun anyways, whether you actually vote Republican or not.

 

[Arizona Ron]

I'm actually surprised we haven't had an incident where someone with CCW tries to stop an active shooter situation and ends up getting shot by the cops.

. That almost happened recently. Guy was a FBI agent or vet, but he almost got shot by cops

Pretty big difference, don't you think?

Not much. A high pct of ccw holders are former or current law/military/security types.

You really don't think this changes things in this situation?

 

[tommyboy]

Do people actually believe Trump is a republican. Bwahahahaaaa

 

[Joe Summer]

Do people actually believe Trump is a republican. Bwahahahaaaa

What % of Republicans (including Trump's supporters) believe Trump is a Republican?Or, to put it another way: What % of Republicans are gullible fools?

 

[tommyboy]

I'm actually surprised we haven't had an incident where someone with CCW tries to stop an active shooter situation and ends up getting shot by the cops.

. That almost happened recently. Guy was a FBI agent or vet, but he almost got shot by cops

Pretty big difference, don't you think?

Not much. A high pct of ccw holders are former or current law/military/security types.

You really don't think this changes things in this situation?

would it matter if you were a current or former black belt in karate in a bar fight? not much.

 

[Arizona Ron]

Do people actually believe Trump is a republican. Bwahahahaaaa

What % of Republicans (including Trump's supporters) believe Trump is a Republican?Or, to put it another way: What % of Republicans are gullible fools?

He's a Republican. He's just not one of those wacko Tea Party types. He's not talking about abortion or getting Christianity back in school so he's not "republican enough" for some.

 

[BroncoFreak_2K3]

It's perfectly fine to report suspicious behavior. But what is suspicious behavior? If one of the components to that behavior is the appearance of the person doing it (Middle Eastern in this discussion) then it's not fine.

In other words if you report a Middle Eastern looking person doing something you regard as suspicious, but would not report a white person that was doing the EXACT SAME THING, then you're acting in a bigoted manner, and it's not OK.

That's horse####.

This guy really can't be real with this ####, can he?

 

[tommyboy]

Do people actually believe Trump is a republican. Bwahahahaaaa

What % of Republicans (including Trump's supporters) believe Trump is a Republican?Or, to put it another way: What % of Republicans are gullible fools?

He's a Republican. He's just not one of those wacko Tea Party types. He's not talking about abortion or getting Christianity back in school so he's not "republican enough" for some.

i don't know, he holds or has held some pretty Democratic views over the years.

I don't think he's anything other than an egotistical blowhard opportunist and i'm not a supporter. I find him amusing.

 

[Buzzbait]

And I absolutely dispute your claim. There are no equivalent "clowns" as you call them on the Democrat side. You may disagree with Hillary and Bernie but they're serious people and their political positions are not based on ignorance fear or bigotry.

You can't be serious (but I know you are). Wow. "All the bad apples are on the Republican side and none of the same exists on my side"

Priceless

 

[Arizona Ron]

Do people actually believe Trump is a republican. Bwahahahaaaa

What % of Republicans (including Trump's supporters) believe Trump is a Republican?Or, to put it another way: What % of Republicans are gullible fools?

He's a Republican. He's just not one of those wacko Tea Party types. He's not talking about abortion or getting Christianity back in school so he's not "republican enough" for some.

i don't know, he holds or has held some pretty Democratic views over the years.

I don't think he's anything other than an egotistical blowhard opportunist and i'm not a supporter. I find him amusing.

I support him because I don't want this show to end.

 

[[icon]]

I've been around guns my whole life. I took a CCL class with people who hadn't ever touched one. At the end of the class (about 8 hours later) we were both eligible for our license.

I am not comfortable with the idea that some of those people are likely carrying today.

I agree. Classes/training isn't quite thorough enough, IMO.

 

[tommyboy]

And I absolutely dispute your claim. There are no equivalent "clowns" as you call them on the Democrat side. You may disagree with Hillary and Bernie but they're serious people and their political positions are not based on ignorance fear or bigotry.

You can't be serious (but I know you are). Wow. "All the bad apples are on the Republican side and none of the same exists on my side"

Priceless

hey now, he's a centrist moderate remember?