Ministry of Pain
Footballguy
Funny and Kat Dennings is superb
Unfortunately, she's about the only reason to watch. I'll give it a couple of more shows to see if the rest of the cast can start holding their own against her.Funny and Kat Dennings is superb
Everyone is a critic when it comes to comedies.
i would like to do some absolutely filthy things with dennings.
Meant to catch that and missed it.Too many new shows that look at least mildly entertaining this year.Gave Free Agents and Up All Night a chance.They were ok, going to see how they develop.Just don't see anything as funny as Modern Family to me yet.Enjoyed "The New Girl" on Fox tonite, but then i could watch Zooey Deschanel read a Massengill box & be entertained.
I was gonna watch just for Kat Dennings rack, but then I realized google is a lot less of a waste of time and most likely returns better rewards
you should check out her pics...Wow. You guys seriously think the star of this show is hot? She's thick and not very pretty. She has manish features, and her voice is awful. She's better than her overhyped anorexic co-star, but that's not saying much.
I have. She looks like her new co-star..that horse.I see many girls daily that are more attractive than her. She does have a unique down to earth quality about her, but she pretty much acts the same way in any movie/show I've seen her in.you should check out her pics...Wow. You guys seriously think the star of this show is hot? She's thick and not very pretty. She has manish features, and her voice is awful. She's better than her overhyped anorexic co-star, but that's not saying much.
She only looked thick in one spot then.She's not pretty enough for chicks to feel threatened by her and she has assets / goth look that some men wouldn't mind having fun with. That's a recipe for success / popularity in the biz.I have. She looks like her new co-star..that horse.I see many girls daily that are more attractive than her. She does have a unique down to earth quality about her, but she pretty much acts the same way in any movie/show I've seen her in.you should check out her pics...Wow. You guys seriously think the star of this show is hot? She's thick and not very pretty. She has manish features, and her voice is awful. She's better than her overhyped anorexic co-star, but that's not saying much.
If there was a thread on the TV season, i wouldnt hijack. Up All night was pretty awful - mystified as to how all that comedy acting talent fails to understand that urgent delivery is the opposite of funny. I'll give it another chance, though. I actually laughed out loud three times at Free Agents - Azaria & Hahn are engaging performers & have built a good tension, but the show was pretty rough.'sho nuff said:Meant to catch that and missed it.Too many new shows that look at least mildly entertaining this year.Gave Free Agents and Up All Night a chance.They were ok, going to see how they develop.Just don't see anything as funny as Modern Family to me yet.Enjoyed "The New Girl" on Fox tonite, but then i could watch Zooey Deschanel read a Massengill box & be entertained.
'Gr00vus said:'saintfool said:i would like to do some absolutely filthy things with dennings.Surprised she's made it this far in the industry given her overall thickness.Unfortunately the show wasn't very funny or creative. A couple of decent lines, but that's it. Hopefully Mel Sharples and Flo join the cast of characters in the next couple of episodes.
"Thick", does not equal "fat". She's built ok, no better than a typical woman I see everyday. And her face is not pretty. I would give it a 6, and that's being generous.For those hating on Kat Dennings, what do you think she is in a dress size? I'm curious what defines fat chick to you. Size 8 with curves?Size 12 with curves?Where do you draw the line?
I am from Pittsburgh and no way this is true. I love Pittsburgh girls, but no way this is true."Thick", does not equal "fat". She's built ok, no better than a typical woman I see everyday. And her face is not pretty. I would give it a 6, and that's being generous.For those hating on Kat Dennings, what do you think she is in a dress size? I'm curious what defines fat chick to you.
Size 8 with curves?
Size 12 with curves?
Where do you draw the line?
I know of at least 8 women in my office (of about 40 or so, which include numerous older women) that are built as good or better than this woman. Not sure what "Pittsburgh" even has to do with this..Cripes, some of you must think this woman is model material or something...I am from Pittsburgh and no way this is true. I love Pittsburgh girls, but no way this is true."Thick", does not equal "fat". She's built ok, no better than a typical woman I see everyday. And her face is not pretty. I would give it a 6, and that's being generous.For those hating on Kat Dennings, what do you think she is in a dress size? I'm curious what defines fat chick to you.
Size 8 with curves?
Size 12 with curves?
Where do you draw the line?
Agreed on Free Agents.Up all Night...I had higher expectations for it for sure. There were funny lines (loved the cussing bit)...but so far, as you said, the delivery is awful.If there was a thread on the TV season, i wouldnt hijack. Up All night was pretty awful - mystified as to how all that comedy acting talent fails to understand that urgent delivery is the opposite of funny. I'll give it another chance, though. I actually laughed out loud three times at Free Agents - Azaria & Hahn are engaging performers & have built a good tension, but the show was pretty rough.'sho nuff said:Meant to catch that and missed it.Too many new shows that look at least mildly entertaining this year.Gave Free Agents and Up All Night a chance.They were ok, going to see how they develop.Just don't see anything as funny as Modern Family to me yet.Enjoyed "The New Girl" on Fox tonite, but then i could watch Zooey Deschanel read a Massengill box & be entertained.
Or successful actress of something... I know. crazy.I know of at least 8 women in my office (of about 40 or so, which include numerous older women) that are built as good or better than this woman. Not sure what "Pittsburgh" even has to do with this..Cripes, some of you must think this woman is model material or something...I am from Pittsburgh and no way this is true. I love Pittsburgh girls, but no way this is true."Thick", does not equal "fat". She's built ok, no better than a typical woman I see everyday. And her face is not pretty. I would give it a 6, and that's being generous.For those hating on Kat Dennings, what do you think she is in a dress size? I'm curious what defines fat chick to you.
Size 8 with curves?
Size 12 with curves?
Where do you draw the line?
I'm not buying it. Take someI know of at least 8 women in my office (of about 40 or so, which include numerous older women) that are built as good or better than this woman. Not sure what "Pittsburgh" even has to do with this..Cripes, some of you must think this woman is model material or something...I am from Pittsburgh and no way this is true. I love Pittsburgh girls, but no way this is true."Thick", does not equal "fat". She's built ok, no better than a typical woman I see everyday. And her face is not pretty. I would give it a 6, and that's being generous.For those hating on Kat Dennings, what do you think she is in a dress size? I'm curious what defines fat chick to you.
Size 8 with curves?
Size 12 with curves?
Where do you draw the line?
If I say no, then in your world they don't exist. I can't compete with that type of mindset while arguing/discussing a point.I'm not buying it. Take someI know of at least 8 women in my office (of about 40 or so, which include numerous older women) that are built as good or better than this woman. Not sure what "Pittsburgh" even has to do with this..Cripes, some of you must think this woman is model material or something...I am from Pittsburgh and no way this is true. I love Pittsburgh girls, but no way this is true."Thick", does not equal "fat". She's built ok, no better than a typical woman I see everyday. And her face is not pretty. I would give it a 6, and that's being generous.For those hating on Kat Dennings, what do you think she is in a dress size? I'm curious what defines fat chick to you.
Size 8 with curves?
Size 12 with curves?
Where do you draw the line?of these girls in your office and post in thread. TIA
We get your point. We don't care. Go oggle one of the 2146 awesome looking women in your cubicle right now and leave Kat Dennings to us poor lost souls who appreciate what she has to offer. You're not going to convince us that we actually don't find her spoo worthy.I can't compete with that type of mindset while arguing/discussing a point.
Willing to bet in the entire city he lives in there aren't 8 women with measurements 40-27-34 let alone in his office.We get your point. We don't care. Go oggle one of the 2146 awesome looking women in your cubicle right now and leave Kat Dennings to us poor lost souls who appreciate what she has to offer. You're not going to convince us that we actually don't find her spoo worthy.I can't compete with that type of mindset while arguing/discussing a point.
If you like horse faces with thick bodies who will be as big as a house in a couple years, and sounds like fingernails on a chalkboard when she speaks, oggle away!..who appreciate what she has to offer.I can't compete with that type of mindset while arguing/discussing a point.
So you have at least 8 women in your office who are built like this: 40-27-34No way in hell.If I say no, then in your world they don't exist. I can't compete with that type of mindset while arguing/discussing a point.I'm not buying it. Take someI know of at least 8 women in my office (of about 40 or so, which include numerous older women) that are built as good or better than this woman. Not sure what "Pittsburgh" even has to do with this..Cripes, some of you must think this woman is model material or something...I am from Pittsburgh and no way this is true. I love Pittsburgh girls, but no way this is true."Thick", does not equal "fat". She's built ok, no better than a typical woman I see everyday. And her face is not pretty. I would give it a 6, and that's being generous.For those hating on Kat Dennings, what do you think she is in a dress size? I'm curious what defines fat chick to you.
Size 8 with curves?
Size 12 with curves?
Where do you draw the line?of these girls in your office and post in thread. TIA
Check out the link I provided and go look at her nekkid pics. I think you are confusing her with someone else.If you like horse faces with thick bodies who will be as big as a house in a couple years, and sounds like fingernails on a chalkboard when she speaks, oggle away!..who appreciate what she has to offer.I can't compete with that type of mindset while arguing/discussing a point.![]()
Here is oneand a few othersWilling to bet in the entire city he lives in there aren't 8 women with measurements 40-27-34 let alone in his office.We get your point. We don't care. Go oggle one of the 2146 awesome looking women in your cubicle right now and leave Kat Dennings to us poor lost souls who appreciate what she has to offer. You're not going to convince us that we actually don't find her spoo worthy.I can't compete with that type of mindset while arguing/discussing a point.
Never said that. I said at least that many that are better looking/built than her.So you have at least 8 women in your office who are built like this: 40-27-34No way in hell.If I say no, then in your world they don't exist. I can't compete with that type of mindset while arguing/discussing a point.I'm not buying it. Take someI know of at least 8 women in my office (of about 40 or so, which include numerous older women) that are built as good or better than this woman. Not sure what "Pittsburgh" even has to do with this..Cripes, some of you must think this woman is model material or something...I am from Pittsburgh and no way this is true. I love Pittsburgh girls, but no way this is true."Thick", does not equal "fat". She's built ok, no better than a typical woman I see everyday. And her face is not pretty. I would give it a 6, and that's being generous.For those hating on Kat Dennings, what do you think she is in a dress size? I'm curious what defines fat chick to you.
Size 8 with curves?
Size 12 with curves?
Where do you draw the line?of these girls in your office and post in thread. TIA
I saw them. A couple nice ones. Too bad they're older pics.Check out the link I provided and go look at her nekkid pics. I think you are confusing her with someone else.If you like horse faces with thick bodies who will be as big as a house in a couple years, and sounds like fingernails on a chalkboard when she speaks, oggle away!..who appreciate what she has to offer.I can't compete with that type of mindset while arguing/discussing a point.![]()
![]()
Not ONE is built like that in your office. She's not thick if her waist is 27 with 40 cans and 34 caboose. HTHNever said that. I said at least that many that are better looking/built than her.So you have at least 8 women in your office who are built like this: 40-27-34No way in hell.If I say no, then in your world they don't exist. I can't compete with that type of mindset while arguing/discussing a point.I'm not buying it. Take someI know of at least 8 women in my office (of about 40 or so, which include numerous older women) that are built as good or better than this woman. Not sure what "Pittsburgh" even has to do with this..Cripes, some of you must think this woman is model material or something...I am from Pittsburgh and no way this is true. I love Pittsburgh girls, but no way this is true."Thick", does not equal "fat". She's built ok, no better than a typical woman I see everyday. And her face is not pretty. I would give it a 6, and that's being generous.For those hating on Kat Dennings, what do you think she is in a dress size? I'm curious what defines fat chick to you.
Size 8 with curves?
Size 12 with curves?
Where do you draw the line?of these girls in your office and post in thread. TIA
You're really bringing me over, man.If you like horse faces with thick bodies who will be as big as a house in a couple years, and sounds like fingernails on a chalkboard when she speaks, oggle away!..who appreciate what she has to offer.I can't compete with that type of mindset while arguing/discussing a point.![]()
Here's 2011 pics. Thick?http://www.fanpix.net/picture-gallery/kat-dennings-picture-16694066.htmhttp://www.fanpix.net/picture-gallery/kat-dennings-picture-16694065.htmhttp://www.fanpix.net/picture-gallery/kat-dennings-picture-16694071.htmI saw them. A couple nice ones. Too bad they're older pics.Check out the link I provided and go look at her nekkid pics. I think you are confusing her with someone else.If you like horse faces with thick bodies who will be as big as a house in a couple years, and sounds like fingernails on a chalkboard when she speaks, oggle away!..who appreciate what she has to offer.I can't compete with that type of mindset while arguing/discussing a point.![]()
![]()
Not thick in those, wonder why she looks thick in the new show? And many other recent pics I saw? Maybe because those pics weren't taken from a photographer/photo shoot.Doesn't distract from the horse face though. And the voice.Here's 2011 pics. Thick?http://www.fanpix.net/picture-gallery/kat-dennings-picture-16694066.htmhttp://www.fanpix.net/picture-gallery/kat-dennings-picture-16694065.htmhttp://www.fanpix.net/picture-gallery/kat-dennings-picture-16694071.htmI saw them. A couple nice ones. Too bad they're older pics.Check out the link I provided and go look at her nekkid pics. I think you are confusing her with someone else.If you like horse faces with thick bodies who will be as big as a house in a couple years, and sounds like fingernails on a chalkboard when she speaks, oggle away!..who appreciate what she has to offer.I can't compete with that type of mindset while arguing/discussing a point.![]()
![]()
It's too cold.Next up, Copeman tells us why we shouldn't like ice cream.
If you have kids, Up All Night on NBC with Christina Applegate is worth checking out. Brought some good chuckles.i have watched four new comedies in 2011 ... none of them are good.