HULLOBUDMAN
Footballguy
barely hanging on tonight. looks like I might need Randle-El to do something tomorrow night.
This happens if you enter your team after at least one week has already been played. The note below is on the site, and clicking the column header for each week will take care of this for you.* If your previous weekly scores haven't processed, click on the column header labeled W1, W2 etc..*I did it. All of the scores from week 1 - week 9 are the same. I am assuming the scores are from week 9 and are just filling in the rest. It says I am at 158.30 which should be enough. Next week is when I am going to be worried due to Barber and Portis on bye. Maybe the emergence of Rice will help out though.Sign up at FantasyStar and put your players in the Matrix.Fantasy StarWhere are you getting the numbers for the players today? I know all of you are not adding them up yourselves. I am curious where I stand.
QB - Matt Schaub - 13
QB - Kurt Warner - 5
QB - Matt Ryan - 4
RB - Marion Barber - 40
RB - Clinton Portis - 33
RB - Maurice Morris - 11
RB - Ray Rice - 4
RB - Steve Slaton - 1
WR - Larry Fitzgerald - 35
WR - Calvin Johnson - 25
WR - Jerricho Cotchery - 23
WR - Ted Ginn - 13
WR - Darrell Jackson - 5
WR - Muhsin Muhammad - 5
WR - Nate Washington - 3
TE - Randy McMichael - 12
TE - Visanthe Shiancoe - 4
PK - Matt Stover - 2
PK - Mike Nugent - 1
TD - Minnesota Vikings - 8
TD - New Orleans Saints - 2
TD - St. Louis Rams - 1
The Matrix has you...
My guess is not too many.Drinen wrote an article on another site that showed how teams that had some scrub WR (C Taylor I think?) who hasn't scored at all this year were still surviving in very high numbers - the point being that owners who played the contest well were paying attention to Seattle's WR situation, and with that level of attention and knowledge probably (actually provably did) put together better teams.So I'd guess the same dynamic is in play with teams that drafted Smith and Marshall - I'm sure some will bow out this week, but probably most of them will survive because they are strong in other positions.Just a guess.180 plus or minus with S Holmes (-8.7) and Portis (-19.8) still to play. Survived without the Steve Smith, DeAngelo Williams and a no-show from Brandon Marshall.Curious as to how many teams with both S Smith and Marshall get eliminated this week.
This happens if you enter your team after at least one week has already been played. The note below is on the site, and clicking the column header for each week will take care of this for you.* If your previous weekly scores haven't processed, click on the column header labeled W1, W2 etc..*I did it. All of the scores from week 1 - week 9 are the same. I am assuming the scores are from week 9 and are just filling in the rest. It says I am at 158.30 which should be enough. Next week is when I am going to be worried due to Barber and Portis on bye. Maybe the emergence of Rice will help out though.Sign up at FantasyStar and put your players in the Matrix.Fantasy StarWhere are you getting the numbers for the players today? I know all of you are not adding them up yourselves. I am curious where I stand.
QB - Matt Schaub - 13
QB - Kurt Warner - 5
QB - Matt Ryan - 4
RB - Marion Barber - 40
RB - Clinton Portis - 33
RB - Maurice Morris - 11
RB - Ray Rice - 4
RB - Steve Slaton - 1
WR - Larry Fitzgerald - 35
WR - Calvin Johnson - 25
WR - Jerricho Cotchery - 23
WR - Ted Ginn - 13
WR - Darrell Jackson - 5
WR - Muhsin Muhammad - 5
WR - Nate Washington - 3
TE - Randy McMichael - 12
TE - Visanthe Shiancoe - 4
PK - Matt Stover - 2
PK - Mike Nugent - 1
TD - Minnesota Vikings - 8
TD - New Orleans Saints - 2
TD - St. Louis Rams - 1
The Matrix has you...
i'm done. 120.5.Marshall/Sjax/Witten killed me. (yes, smith on bye)My guess is not too many.Drinen wrote an article on another site that showed how teams that had some scrub WR (C Taylor I think?) who hasn't scored at all this year were still surviving in very high numbers - the point being that owners who played the contest well were paying attention to Seattle's WR situation, and with that level of attention and knowledge probably (actually provably did) put together better teams.So I'd guess the same dynamic is in play with teams that drafted Smith and Marshall - I'm sure some will bow out this week, but probably most of them will survive because they are strong in other positions.Just a guess.180 plus or minus with S Holmes (-8.7) and Portis (-19.8) still to play. Survived without the Steve Smith, DeAngelo Williams and a no-show from Brandon Marshall.Curious as to how many teams with both S Smith and Marshall get eliminated this week.
Fantasystar says 124.10 right now156.80 with Nate Washington needing to score more than 3.20 to count.142.9 with Santonio (-4.4) and Cooley ( -4.9 ) leftHows the Sunday cut looking?
oh, i know. i am just hoping it doesn't get too far away from me.FYI the cutoff isn't "projected" at 124, that is where the cutoff was as of the end of the afternoon games, based on the database entries at fantasystar. It will go up from there based on tonight as well as tomorrow.i am sitting at 108 right now with marvin harrison, portis, randel el, and suisham. current cutoff projected at 124. i think i am going to need a bit of luck here.
I don't understand why it says this in the rules. The scores reset every week.Did this rule change over the years? This is my first go-round in the contest.Boot said:All 250 teams that advance to the final will have their scores reset so only the results from weeks 14 through 16 will count.
Unofficial pre-MNF cut = 128.00
C'mon Holmes, Portis and Suisham!!It's just clarification, since the scores do not reset after Week 13.I don't understand why it says this in the rules. The scores reset every week.Did this rule change over the years? This is my first go-round in the contest.Boot said:All 250 teams that advance to the final will have their scores reset so only the results from weeks 14 through 16 will count.
Unofficial pre-MNF cut = 128.00
150 with FWP & Santana (-5.9 at WR or 6.7 at Flex). Safe enough that I can cheer for the Steelers to shut Moss down.I was kidding! It was a joke!Boot said:Those odds were just for this week, not for the whole contest.Sol D said:147 pts with some guys still going. This should be enough to move on... see ya next week. 98.3% chance to win the whole thing?![]()
Works for me. In fact, I wouldn't mind if the Redskins sat him out so he can get well-rested for Week 11.Signed,Mike TomlinThere are 981 remaining Portis owners. Of those 981...- 787 also have Slaton- 696 also have Warner- 542 also have Rice- 482 also have Warner and Slaton- 447 also have Slaton and Rice- 383 also have Warner and Rice- 325 also have Warner, Slaton, and RiceI fall into the group that owns Warner, Slaton and Rice. It looks as though a large portion of the Portis owners may not need him to score alot of points to advance. I'm already sitting at 166.40, so I am hoping he simply doesn't get injured before his bye week. Ten carries for 50 yards and no TD's would be fine by me.
)In the Ward 1.7%Live owner percentages for tonight's playersortis - 31.6Holmes - 18.3Moss - 17.5Randle El - 12.9Suisham - 12.2Cooley - 11.8Parker - 9.3Miller - 5.8Campbell - 5.0Betts - 4.4PIT D - 4.1Reed - 3.1Sweed - 2.6Roethlisberger - 2.4Wilson - 2.3Ward - 1.7Washington - 1.7WAS D - 1.2Mendenhall - 1.1Kelly - 0.3Thomas - 0.1Looking at those figures, it won't be QB's, K's, or D's that raise the cutoff by much. Cutoff should shoot up quite a decent amount with good games from RB's, WR's and TE's.

I've got both and I'm in serious trouble. I think I'm only like 15 points about the current projected cutoff, not accounting for tonight. I guess if it's a low scoring night I still have a chance.My RB position was tough this week, with Bush and Gore both on BYE weeks. Ray Rice came through with a nice game, and Slaton was decent, but the rest of my team just may not get it done.I knew coming in that week 9 would be my toughest hurdle. If I can get past this I think I have as good a shot as anyone.Boot said:My guess is not too many.Drinen wrote an article on another site that showed how teams that had some scrub WR (C Taylor I think?) who hasn't scored at all this year were still surviving in very high numbers - the point being that owners who played the contest well were paying attention to Seattle's WR situation, and with that level of attention and knowledge probably (actually provably did) put together better teams.So I'd guess the same dynamic is in play with teams that drafted Smith and Marshall - I'm sure some will bow out this week, but probably most of them will survive because they are strong in other positions.Just a guess.rzrback77 said:180 plus or minus with S Holmes (-8.7) and Portis (-19.8) still to play. Survived without the Steve Smith, DeAngelo Williams and a no-show from Brandon Marshall.Curious as to how many teams with both S Smith and Marshall get eliminated this week.
Aaron Rodgers 21.80Ray Rice 19.10Steve Slaton 15.80Anquan Boldin 21.30Mark Bradley 18.35Jerricho Cotchery 13.00Desmond Clark 9.60Dustin Keller 4.90Joe Nedney 0.00N.Y. Jets Defense 17.00Total Points: 140.85Projected Cutoff: 125.80
I will be very curious to see where the 800 eliminated teams come from this week.731 - 90-99.9% survival probabilityOK, so I have a lot more to say about the comments from BuckeyeArt and others. But what I'm about to show you might change the nature of the conversation somewhat, so I'll hold off.
I spent some time working on a simulation engine that will "play" the week's games 1000 times and then figure out how many of those 1000 weeks result in advancement for each contest team.
Note that, unlike the other set of power rankings, these are for this week only, and completely ignore future weeks.
Here it is.
I'll probably keep tweaking it in the coming weeks, so it should probably be considered beta, but I think it's solid enough to get your thoughts on it.
I need big nights from Portis, Moss, and Randle El so I can get eliminated next week during the Redskin's bye.Unofficial pre-MNF cut = 128.00C'mon Holmes, Portis and Suisham!!