I don't view these guys as sleepers, many are household names by now. Olsen should have a monster year in Chicago.Palmer *could* have a bounce back year in Cincy,depending on his arm. Benson would benefit from playing with Palmer as opposed to Fitzpatrick(08)Bulger is waste of time, St Louis figures to be one of the 3 worst teams in football this season, which never bodes well for fantasy stats. Coles should produce solid #'s.breakout players would include V. Jackson, Felix Jones, Julius Jones if you belive in Knapp and Mora, Jr ( Jones had a nice ypc avg last season ( 4.4), so you never know!), A. Gonzalez, Steve Smith NYG ( if you believe he can be a #1 - I don't), Jason Campbell ( it's now or never), Shaub (a full season at last year's pace would put him in the top 5 QBs), Derrick Ward ( Graham is a bust, Ward is the starting RB in TB), Miles AustinI couldn't find a thread on this subject, so thought I'd start one. Here is my list of potential sleepers for 2009:Carson PalmerMark BulgerCedrick BensonLaveruneus ColesGreg Olsen
Sleeper is such a nebulous term these days, but here are a few guys I think will seriously outperform their ADP (in Parenthesis):QB - Carson Palmer (75), Matt Hasselback (112)RB - Larry Johnson (52), Tim Hightower (104)(chalk me up as a non-believer in Beanie), Ryan Grant (33), Willie Parker (62)WR - Chad Ochocinqo (49), Braylon Edwards (45)
I like this list. I have most of these guys highlighted on my cheatsheet. Their projected points vs their ADP is very favorable. I would add Westbrook to the RBs. It's just a hunch, but I think he finishes all 16 games this year and has the potential to be a top 5 RB that is being drafted at RB 12. This is the first year you can get him for that cheap, and it's risky but could pay off.Edit to add that you can add McCoy late (pick 108 adp) and I think he could fill in very nice for Westy should he go down.OK, I'll take a stab, following Londo's methodology (people who will outperform their ADP). Note these aren't in any particular order:
QBs
C. Palmer (75)
M. Schaub (68)
D. Garrard (115)
K. Orton (119)
T. Edwards (122)
RBs
D. McFadden (43)
R. Brown (28)
D. Ward (56)
WRs
M. Colston (27)
D. Jackson (61)
K. Walter (92)
D. Avery (86)
D. Driver (94)
D. Mason (103)
TEs
G. Olsen (79)
J. Carlson (103)
D. Keller (118)
T. Scheffler (143)
Just my opinion...
I agree with your 1st few statements about Palmer, Olsen, Benson, Coles, and Bulger, but you completely lost me when you mentioned VJax as a breakout WR. Isn't an 1100 7 season already brokeout?Also, how in the world is a guy, that went undrafted, cut his teeth on the PS, special teams, and whatever he had to do to keep a roster spot, who finally got an opportunity and took full advantage, considered a bust in your eyes? Same guy who volunteered to play FB so he could block for Warrick Dunn when Askew went down last year. What is your definition of bust? I usually consider there to have to be some expectationsI don't view these guys as sleepers, many are household names by now. Olsen should have a monster year in Chicago.Palmer *could* have a bounce back year in Cincy,depending on his arm. Benson would benefit from playing with Palmer as opposed to Fitzpatrick(08)Bulger is waste of time, St Louis figures to be one of the 3 worst teams in football this season, which never bodes well for fantasy stats. Coles should produce solid #'s.breakout players would include V. Jackson, Felix Jones, Julius Jones if you belive in Knapp and Mora, Jr ( Jones had a nice ypc avg last season ( 4.4), so you never know!), A. Gonzalez, Steve Smith NYG ( if you believe he can be a #1 - I don't), Jason Campbell ( it's now or never), Shaub (a full season at last year's pace would put him in the top 5 QBs), Derrick Ward ( Graham is a bust, Ward is the starting RB in TB), Miles AustinI couldn't find a thread on this subject, so thought I'd start one. Here is my list of potential sleepers for 2009:Carson PalmerMark BulgerCedrick BensonLaveruneus ColesGreg Olsen
Thx Deuce's. I didn't even notice Westbrook's ADP of 16, I agree that looks like a bargain considering his talent...even assuming he misses a couple of games, I would be happy to get him at that spot.Deuce said:I like this list. I have most of these guys highlighted on my cheatsheet. Their projected points vs their ADP is very favorable. I would add Westbrook to the RBs. It's just a hunch, but I think he finishes all 16 games this year and has the potential to be a top 5 RB that is being drafted at RB 12. This is the first year you can get him for that cheap, and it's risky but could pay off.Edit to add that you can add McCoy late (pick 108 adp) and I think he could fill in very nice for Westy should he go down.OK, I'll take a stab, following Londo's methodology (people who will outperform their ADP). Note these aren't in any particular order:
QBs
C. Palmer (75)
M. Schaub (68)
D. Garrard (115)
K. Orton (119)
T. Edwards (122)
RBs
D. McFadden (43)
R. Brown (28)
D. Ward (56)
WRs
M. Colston (27)
D. Jackson (61)
K. Walter (92)
D. Avery (86)
D. Driver (94)
D. Mason (103)
TEs
G. Olsen (79)
J. Carlson (103)
D. Keller (118)
T. Scheffler (143)
Just my opinion...
Really like those two guys at their ADP's.I'd add to other 2nd year players:Felix Jones(68)DeSean Jackson(65)If the ADP's hold, I have a feeling all 4 of those guys will end up on any team I own.D. McFadden (43)D. Keller (118)
Douglas is a slot guy. Jenkins blocking will keep him on the outside. I actually expect Douglas to slump this year given that they can split Tony G out.here's a dynasty sleeper for you guys: Harry Douglas. Entering his 2nd year, he looked great at times. I can easily see him overtaking Michael Jenkins at some point this season or in 2010.
Not necessarily true. Calvin Johnson, Bowe, and MJD all had good FF stats last year playing on team that were 0-16, 2-14, and 5-11, respectively....St Louis figures to be one of the 3 worst teams in football this season, which never bodes well for fantasy stats.
Why does Avery seem to be the next Lee Evans in my mind? Big plays.....but sporatic statsMicheal BushBernard ScottD. AveryAvery!!!
I have that exact same feeling, only I don't think Avery is as talented as Evans.tdmills said:Why does Avery seem to be the next Lee Evans in my mind? Big plays.....but sporatic stats•TheRealMcCoy said:Micheal BushBernard ScottD. AveryAvery!!!
Other than he's currently fourth string and returning kicks nothing.I do agree that at his current acquisition costs he's worth a flyer, but I would not hold out hope that he will be a regular fantasy contributor.I still think Morris will have the most fantasy points for the Pats RBs this year.Maroney-11th round ADP, talented 24 year old competing with 32 and 33 year olds for playing time, on a team that is good at running the football. If he can stay healthy the Pats will likely use him as they always have giving him about 13 carries/game. Give him his career Y/R with a handful of touchdowns and you have 800-900 yard back with 4-7 TDs. I see no downside here.
I think that Ryan and TGonz will be the beneficiaries fantasy wise.Some of Jenkins and Douglas #s will go to TGonz.Douglas is a slot guy. Jenkins blocking will keep him on the outside. I actually expect Douglas to slump this year given that they can split Tony G out.here's a dynasty sleeper for you guys: Harry Douglas. Entering his 2nd year, he looked great at times. I can easily see him overtaking Michael Jenkins at some point this season or in 2010.
It will be interesting to see how Tony is used. I really like that offense this season.I think that Ryan and TGonz will be the beneficiaries fantasy wise.Some of Jenkins and Douglas #s will go to TGonz.Douglas is a slot guy. Jenkins blocking will keep him on the outside. I actually expect Douglas to slump this year given that they can split Tony G out.here's a dynasty sleeper for you guys: Harry Douglas. Entering his 2nd year, he looked great at times. I can easily see him overtaking Michael Jenkins at some point this season or in 2010.
It will be interesting to see how Tony is used. I really like that offense this season.I think that Ryan and TGonz will be the beneficiaries fantasy wise.Some of Jenkins and Douglas #s will go to TGonz.Douglas is a slot guy. Jenkins blocking will keep him on the outside. I actually expect Douglas to slump this year given that they can split Tony G out.here's a dynasty sleeper for you guys: Harry Douglas. Entering his 2nd year, he looked great at times. I can easily see him overtaking Michael Jenkins at some point this season or in 2010.
The #1 seed in the NFC? Because they added a TE? They play the NFC East and the AFC East this year (the two strongest divisions) instead of the NFC North and the AFC West (two of the weakest divisions). I could see them struggling to win 8 games this year.It will be interesting to see how Tony is used. I really like that offense this season.I think that Ryan and TGonz will be the beneficiaries fantasy wise.Some of Jenkins and Douglas #s will go to TGonz.Douglas is a slot guy. Jenkins blocking will keep him on the outside. I actually expect Douglas to slump this year given that they can split Tony G out.here's a dynasty sleeper for you guys: Harry Douglas. Entering his 2nd year, he looked great at times. I can easily see him overtaking Michael Jenkins at some point this season or in 2010.barring a bad sophomore slump by Ryan, Atlanta could be one of the best offenses in the NFL this year. They seriously should challenge for the 1 seed.
The #1 seed in the NFC? Because they added a TE? They play the NFC East and the AFC East this year (the two strongest divisions) instead of the NFC North and the AFC West (two of the weakest divisions). I could see them struggling to win 8 games this year.
[hijack]not just any TE, arguably the best TE ever to play in the NFL. Their D should be better as well. Hear me now, believe me later, the Falcons are a team on the rise that will soon be past the Vick saga. [/hijack]The #1 seed in the NFC? Because they added a TE? They play the NFC East and the AFC East this year (the two strongest divisions) instead of the NFC North and the AFC West (two of the weakest divisions). I could see them struggling to win 8 games this year.
I'd argue that the AFC South is stronger than the East.The #1 seed in the NFC? Because they added a TE? They play the NFC East and the AFC East this year (the two strongest divisions) instead of the NFC North and the AFC West (two of the weakest divisions). I could see them struggling to win 8 games this year.
I'd argue that the AFC South is stronger than the East.The #1 seed in the NFC? Because they added a TE? They play the NFC East and the AFC East this year (the two strongest divisions) instead of the NFC North and the AFC West (two of the weakest divisions). I could see them struggling to win 8 games this year.
Starting to really like Stafford, I think I could live with him as my QB2, assuming he beats out Daunte which sounds likely.I don't think anyone has really listed sleepers (a couple of you have) but when I see names like McFadden and Reggie Bush I have to![]()
Here is my list of SLEEPERS
QB Chris Simms
QB Mathew Stafford
RB Justin Forsett
RB Jerome Harrison
WR Chris Henry
WR Robert Meachem
WR Patrick Crayton
TE Martin Rucker
TE Chase Coffman
I think Dante will start probably around the first 6-8 games and then I think Stafford will get his shot. Anyone throwing to Calvin will put up good stats in the fantasy world.Starting to really like Stafford, I think I could live with him as my QB2, assuming he beats out Daunte which sounds likely.I don't think anyone has really listed sleepers (a couple of you have) but when I see names like McFadden and Reggie Bush I have to![]()
Here is my list of SLEEPERS
QB Chris Simms
QB Mathew Stafford
RB Justin Forsett
RB Jerome Harrison
WR Chris Henry
WR Robert Meachem
WR Patrick Crayton
TE Martin Rucker
TE Chase Coffman
4th on the depth chart...ok. But why is returning kicks looked down upon? Welker returns punts. Many playmakers around the league are used this way if only to get the ball in their hands. Who is the most talented RB on the roster? Maroney is the easy answer, so "IF" he can stay healthy moving up the depth chart to get his normal touches/game should be expected. I'm not saying he will become the workhorse for the Pats because if any other back is dressed they will see carries as well, but returning to his workload of approximately 13 carries/game is not a reach considering the other RBs ages and injury histories.Other than he's currently fourth string and returning kicks nothing.I do agree that at his current acquisition costs he's worth a flyer, but I would not hold out hope that he will be a regular fantasy contributor.I still think Morris will have the most fantasy points for the Pats RBs this year.Maroney-11th round ADP, talented 24 year old competing with 32 and 33 year olds for playing time, on a team that is good at running the football. If he can stay healthy the Pats will likely use him as they always have giving him about 13 carries/game. Give him his career Y/R with a handful of touchdowns and you have 800-900 yard back with 4-7 TDs. I see no downside here.
Not fan of Simms or Meachem especially paying Devery Henderson all that $$$ but like Stafford, Harrison and Henry.I don't think anyone has really listed sleepers (a couple of you have) but when I see names like McFadden and Reggie Bush I have toHere is my list of SLEEPERSQB Chris SimmsQB Mathew StaffordRB Justin ForsettRB Jerome HarrisonWR Chris HenryWR Robert MeachemWR Patrick CraytonTE Martin RuckerTE Chase Coffman
Most guys that get the ball a lot on offense do not return kicks . . . especially at running back. There are a few exceptions, most notably in New Orleans (both Reggie Bush and Pierre Thomas returned kicks last year), but generally speaking big cogs running the football don't usually return kicks.As for Maroney, saying that Maroney is "the most talented RB on the roster" has not played out in the statatistics.YPC over the past 3 years in New England:Kevin Faulk 5.26 Sammy Morris 4.61 LaMont Jordan 4.54 Laurence Maroney 4.31 (Fred Taylor in JAX 4.86)Touches per TD over the past 3 years in New England:Ben Jarvis Green Ellis 15.4Corey Dillon 16.3Kyle Eckel 17.0LaMont Jordan 20.0Heath Evans 21.5Sammy Morris 26.4Kevin Faulk 31.8Lawrence Maroney 31.8(Fred Taylor in JAX 53.8)As far as what to expect heading into this season, NE will be going full RBBC and they are not even trying to pretend that they are not.Faulk in on passing and third downsTaylor in first and second downs between the 20sMorris short yardage plays and GL with some series as first and second down backMaroney sharing time with Taylor on first and second downsFrom what I have heard, each week will start with a similar plan and the guy that performs the best will be given more work in the second half. One possibility is that each back gets a series (Taylor, then Morris, then Maroney). But it is unlikely that any one of these guys will get more than 10-12 carries on a regular basis.I won't review all of Maroney's shortcomings again, but long story short he may be a decent RB that just does not fit the Patriots system. He may be worth a flyer on, but I don't see him emerging into a big fantasy producer of a guy that sees the ball very much. He does not play very often on passing downs (which in NE is quite a bit) and won't see many GL looks. So fantasy wise, you are basically looking at 10-12 carries a game with limited receptions and limited TD opportunities. His value would come if the other guys got hurt (which certainly could happen), but IMO Maroney is as much an injury risk (if not more) than the other guys on the roster (even if they are much older).With Brady back, this is still a passing team that also runs fairly well. But this should turn out to be a situation where 4 or 5 backs all end up splitting the workload and there likely will not be a guy that gets many touches. We again may see the team leader in touches at 175 on the season. If that were to be Maroney, that could equate to 700 yards from scrimmage and 4 TD. I'm not sure that carries a lot of fantasy value.As I said earlier, Maroney may be worth a flyer on the chance that the other guys all get hurt with his role increasing as a result, but at this point I am pretty sure the team does not see him as the lead dog and likely does not plan on giving him the same workload as they have in the past.4th on the depth chart...ok. But why is returning kicks looked down upon? Welker returns punts. Many playmakers around the league are used this way if only to get the ball in their hands. Who is the most talented RB on the roster? Maroney is the easy answer, so "IF" he can stay healthy moving up the depth chart to get his normal touches/game should be expected. I'm not saying he will become the workhorse for the Pats because if any other back is dressed they will see carries as well, but returning to his workload of approximately 13 carries/game is not a reach considering the other RBs ages and injury histories.Other than he's currently fourth string and returning kicks nothing.I do agree that at his current acquisition costs he's worth a flyer, but I would not hold out hope that he will be a regular fantasy contributor.I still think Morris will have the most fantasy points for the Pats RBs this year.Maroney-11th round ADP, talented 24 year old competing with 32 and 33 year olds for playing time, on a team that is good at running the football. If he can stay healthy the Pats will likely use him as they always have giving him about 13 carries/game. Give him his career Y/R with a handful of touchdowns and you have 800-900 yard back with 4-7 TDs. I see no downside here.
Not to hijack but Colts < EaglesTitans < GiantsTexans < CowboysJags = or < RedskinsI'd argue that the AFC South is stronger than the East.The #1 seed in the NFC? Because they added a TE? They play the NFC East and the AFC East this year (the two strongest divisions) instead of the NFC North and the AFC West (two of the weakest divisions). I could see them struggling to win 8 games this year.I think the AFC South is the best division in football, even better than the NFC East. I'm confident that the two super bowl teams will come out of these two divisions.Looking at the schedule, I kind of think all AFC South players may be undervalued, its almost unfair that players the caliber of Manning, MJD, CJ3, AJ, Wayne and Clark draw the NFC West.
Interesting on Westbrook. I've got him on my radar as well, but have considered grabbing him a little earlier - say 2.1 or 2.2. I don't know that I can pull the trigger and take him ahead of one of the big 4 WRs, but it's tempting. I guess it would come down to IF I could get him at 16 overall or later, I would, otherwise if I have a later pick I'm probably passing on him and hoping Pierre Thomas or Ronnie Brown in the 3rd will be very close to his production and better value.Thx Deuce's. I didn't even notice Westbrook's ADP of 16, I agree that looks like a bargain considering his talent...even assuming he misses a couple of games, I would be happy to get him at that spot.I like this list. I have most of these guys highlighted on my cheatsheet. Their projected points vs their ADP is very favorable. I would add Westbrook to the RBs. It's just a hunch, but I think he finishes all 16 games this year and has the potential to be a top 5 RB that is being drafted at RB 12. This is the first year you can get him for that cheap, and it's risky but could pay off.Edit to add that you can add McCoy late (pick 108 adp) and I think he could fill in very nice for Westy should he go down.OK, I'll take a stab, following Londo's methodology (people who will outperform their ADP). Note these aren't in any particular order:
QBs
C. Palmer (75)
M. Schaub (68)
D. Garrard (115)
K. Orton (119)
T. Edwards (122)
RBs
D. McFadden (43)
R. Brown (28)
D. Ward (56)
WRs
M. Colston (27)
D. Jackson (61)
K. Walter (92)
D. Avery (86)
D. Driver (94)
D. Mason (103)
TEs
G. Olsen (79)
J. Carlson (103)
D. Keller (118)
T. Scheffler (143)
Just my opinion...
simmonjm said:Not to hijack but Colts < EaglesTitans < GiantsTexans < CowboysJags = or < Redskinstravdogg said:pizzatyme said:I'd argue that the AFC South is stronger than the East.gonzobill5 said:The #1 seed in the NFC? Because they added a TE? They play the NFC East and the AFC East this year (the two strongest divisions) instead of the NFC North and the AFC West (two of the weakest divisions). I could see them struggling to win 8 games this year.I think the AFC South is the best division in football, even better than the NFC East. I'm confident that the two super bowl teams will come out of these two divisions.Looking at the schedule, I kind of think all AFC South players may be undervalued, its almost unfair that players the caliber of Manning, MJD, CJ3, AJ, Wayne and Clark draw the NFC West.
Don't sleep on Austin Collie. He was stellar in OTAs. Just sayin...identikit said:Don't think he's been mentioned in this thread yetierre Garcon
Chase Coffman and what are you talkin about?All these Bengals on here (except the tight end - quick! Name him), and me playing in a league in Cincinnati.