What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2013 Off Season Dynasty Trade Thread (for completed trades) (3 Viewers)

Another big deal from the same league mentioned above, 12 team PPR

Trent Richardson, Kenny Britt, Kendall Wright, 2014 3rd, 2014 4th

For

Demaryius Thomas, Stevan Ridley, Jonathan Stewart, Two 2014 2nd rounders

Again, pretty even, but I prefer the side getting T. Rich by a little even though I don't like the 2 Titans WRs much.

 
QB/2RB/3WR/TE/Flex/Superflex

Romo/Gonzalez>Gordon/1.03 in a Superflex (Might get lucky and land Geno)

Welker>>>>>>>>>>>>3.03
For a rebuilding team this is a good trade.
Romo has a while left.

I also seem to be behind on Gordon a bit... I LIKE him, but many are touting him pretty wildly, which I haven't gotten on board with yet.

It's pretty much two top 3 picks in a weak upper draft for a stud QB and two valuable albeit old commodities. Would prefer the stud QB in a vacuum, but we don't know the rest of the rosters, so...
I'm team B and have been rebuilding my team. I've traded away Roddy, Romo, Welker, Gonzo, Harvin and Charles in last few months.

Team B:

RGIII, Stafford, Rivers, Palmer

JStewart/Quiz

Gordon/Maclin/Floyd/Jeffrey/DAlexander/RRandle/AJ Jenkins

Hernandez/Jordan Cameron

also have picks 3, 4, 17, 22 and 23 in a 10 team league. Now it's time to work on my RB's...

Team A:

Luck/Romo/Gabbert/Sanchez/

Martin/AMorris/FJax/Bradshaw

Welker/Amendola/ESanders/Hilton/BQuick

Gonzo/Fleener

 
QB/2RB/3WR/TE/Flex/Superflex

Romo/Gonzalez>Gordon/1.03 in a Superflex (Might get lucky and land Geno)

Welker>>>>>>>>>>>>3.03
For a rebuilding team this is a good trade.
Selling low is never a good trade, even if it technically helps your team.

 
QB/2RB/3WR/TE/Flex/Superflex

Romo/Gonzalez>Gordon/1.03 in a Superflex (Might get lucky and land Geno)

Welker>>>>>>>>>>>>3.03
For a rebuilding team this is a good trade.
Selling low is never a good trade, even if it technically helps your team.
I've been trying to trade Gonzo and Welker for over a year now, pretty hard to get what they're worth to a team. Thanks for the input though.

 
QB/2RB/3WR/TE/Flex/Superflex

Romo/Gonzalez>Gordon/1.03 in a Superflex (Might get lucky and land Geno)

Welker>>>>>>>>>>>>3.03
For a rebuilding team this is a good trade.
Romo has a while left.

I also seem to be behind on Gordon a bit... I LIKE him, but many are touting him pretty wildly, which I haven't gotten on board with yet.

It's pretty much two top 3 picks in a weak upper draft for a stud QB and two valuable albeit old commodities. Would prefer the stud QB in a vacuum, but we don't know the rest of the rosters, so...
I'm team B and have been rebuilding my team. I've traded away Roddy, Romo, Welker, Gonzo, Harvin and Charles in last few months.

Team B:

RGIII, Stafford, Rivers, Palmer

JStewart/Quiz

Gordon/Maclin/Floyd/Jeffrey/DAlexander/RRandle/AJ Jenkins

Hernandez/Jordan Cameron

also have picks 3, 4, 17, 22 and 23 in a 10 team league. Now it's time to work on my RB's...

Team A:

Luck/Romo/Gabbert/Sanchez/

Martin/AMorris/FJax/Bradshaw

Welker/Amendola/ESanders/Hilton/BQuick

Gonzo/Fleener
Harvin and Charles are the main issues here. You we're plenty good enough at QB in my opinion. Personally think WR needs a good injection from somewhere as well. Given the pieces you traded away, you would hope for a few more established pieces across RB and WR.

Alas, if you felt like you needed a rebuild.

 
cstu said:
Kree said:
CR69 said:
QB/2RB/3WR/TE/Flex/Superflex

Romo/Gonzalez>Gordon/1.03 in a Superflex (Might get lucky and land Geno)

Welker>>>>>>>>>>>>3.03
For a rebuilding team this is a good trade.
Seems like a steal to me. Rebuild or not.

 
bengalbuck said:
Big trade in my favorite league. 12 team PPR, 1.5 for TEs 1/2/3/1 and 1 flex:Rob Gronkowski, Larry Fitzgerald, 3.01, 4.02ForDez Bryant, Kyle Rudolph, 1.06. 1.12Looks pretty even to me. I think you have to discount Gronk just a little due to the arm. If so, Gronk is pretty close to Dez in value even in this format. Rudolph and the two 1s is pretty close for Fitz. I like the Gronk side a little bit more, but if the other owner hits on the draft picks, lots of upside for him.Looking at both rosters, should be win-win. The guy trading Gronk has Witten and some very good flex options. Other than Witten, his roster is really young and now adds 4 more good young players. The guy getting Gronk gets the potentially huge TE upgrade and may not lose too much at WR. In talking trades with him, I know he didn't value the rookie picks too highly this year.
This is awesome in 1.5 for TE. I like the Dez/Rudolph/picks side but balls on both ends.

 
werdnoynek said:
Concept Coop said:
Ray Finkle said:
Keep 6, 2 QB, 6 Flex, 4 Player Practice Squad

Team 1 trades: Matt Ryan and Adrian Peterson

Team 2 trades: Ryan Tannehill (practice squad), Sam Bradford (practice squad), Carson Palmer
Veto-worthy.
i'm generally against vetoing ANY trade but this is ridiculous even in 2QB league.
It is very bad but not veto-worthy IMO and we have seen much worse.

 
bengalbuck said:
Another big deal from the same league mentioned above, 12 team PPRTrent Richardson, Kenny Britt, Kendall Wright, 2014 3rd, 2014 4thForDemaryius Thomas, Stevan Ridley, Jonathan Stewart, Two 2014 2nd roundersAgain, pretty even, but I prefer the side getting T. Rich by a little even though I don't like the 2 Titans WRs much.
I'll actually take the other side in this one.

 
12 Team PPR - 1 QB, 1 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 3 RB/WR

Team A Gave: D Brees, J Witten, K Moreno

Team B Gave: D Wilson

 
Concept Coop said:
Ray Finkle said:
Keep 6, 2 QB, 6 Flex, 4 Player Practice Squad Team 1 trades: Matt Ryan and Adrian PetersonTeam 2 trades: Ryan Tannehill (practice squad), Sam Bradford (practice squad), Carson Palmer
Veto-worthy.
No it's not. Team 1 is probably trying to upgrade in other positions and will use his QBs to do so. I'm glad some of you guys aren't in my leagues telling me how to manage my team.
 
Concept Coop said:
Ray Finkle said:
Keep 6, 2 QB, 6 Flex, 4 Player Practice Squad Team 1 trades: Matt Ryan and Adrian PetersonTeam 2 trades: Ryan Tannehill (practice squad), Sam Bradford (practice squad), Carson Palmer
Veto-worthy.
No it's not. Team 1 is probably trying to upgrade in other positions and will use his QBs to do so. I'm glad some of you guys aren't in my leagues telling me how to manage my team.
You honestly wouldn't have a problem with this deal if it went down in your league? I call b.s. This trade is horrible. Bradford and Palmer have been in the league long enough to show their true colors...QB 15-20 is their upside...tops. And with the influx of QB talent the last few years I'd even call that a pipe dream. Realistically I'd say either would be lucky to crack the top 20. Tannehill has the highest upside of these 3 and even then I'm not sure his upside is that of Matt Ryan. So he's trading 3 QB's who aren't as and likely never will be as good as Matt Ryan (who's still a young QB) for a top 10 QB and oh yeah the best RB in the league since Barry Sanders. Horrible trade. I'd like to see that other teams roster beforehand but there must have been another option for him to acquire a 2nd viable QB. Way too early to panic which is what he appeared to do here...unless he's cheating.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Concept Coop said:
Ray Finkle said:
Keep 6, 2 QB, 6 Flex, 4 Player Practice Squad Team 1 trades: Matt Ryan and Adrian PetersonTeam 2 trades: Ryan Tannehill (practice squad), Sam Bradford (practice squad), Carson Palmer
Veto-worthy.
No it's not. Team 1 is probably trying to upgrade in other positions and will use his QBs to do so. I'm glad some of you guys aren't in my leagues telling me how to manage my team.
You honestly wouldn't have a problem with this deal if it went down in your league? I call b.s. This trade is horrible. Bradford and Palmer have been in the league long enough to show their true colors...QB 15-20 is their upside...tops. And with the influx of QB talent the last few years I'd even call that a pipe dream. Realistically I'd say either would be lucky to crack the top 20. Tannehill has the highest upside of these 3 and even then I'm not sure his upside is that of Matt Ryan. So he's trading 3 QB's who aren't as and likely never will be as good as Matt Ryan (who's still a young QB) for a top 10 QB and oh yeah the best RB in the league since Barry Sanders. Horrible trade. I'd like to see that other teams roster beforehand but there must have been another option for him to acquire a 2nd viable QB. Way too early to panic which is what he appeared to do here...unless he's cheating.
Part of me wonders if the Practice squad can carry players year to year without counting against the 6 keeper limit. Another part of me wonders about the size of the league. In a 12 team 2 QB league, all three of those guys would have started games at some point during the year. A keep 6 league also is tremendously different than a true dynasty.

 
12 Team PPR - 1 QB, 1 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 3 RB/WR

Team A Gave: D Brees, J Witten, K Moreno

Team B Gave: D Wilson
thats an interesting one. if the Wilson owner was a contender and needed pieces like that I can see it if his RB depth is good.
You would hope he Team B was more competitive last year than he was pre-Brees/Witten/Moreno side (aside, he owns Hillman/McGahee). I think dude just had enough of finishing 1.5 every year, although post-trade, he still probably ends up about 1.5 again.

 
12 Team IDP 0.5 PPR - 1 QB, 2 RB, 3 WR, 1 TE, 1 Flex, 2 DL, 3 LB, 2 DB, 1 Flex

Team A gave:

Bilal Powell

Cliff Avril

2.11

Team B gave:

Coby Fleener

2.05

Powell and Avril are arguably my RB5 and DL4 respectively. I only have Moeaki and Gresham as my TE and think Fleener might take a step up in his production. Felt like I had the depth to make this move.

 
12 team PPR dynasty league. I needed a RB pretty badly.

I gave: Andre Johnson and 2.9

I got: 1.4 and 2.4

Not sure about you guys leagues, but people were just NOT interested in AJ or Colston, the 2 WRs I was shopping for picks or RB depth. Best offer I had gotten so far was 1.11 for AJ (no way I do that). After trade still feel like I have a solid WR core: Julio, Fitz, Nelson, Colston, Givens, Lance Moore, Hawkins.

Now have the 1.4, 1.8, 1.9, 2.4, 2.8 picks to improve my RB core and get some WR depth back too.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
12 team PPR dynasty league. I needed a RB pretty badly.

I gave: Andre Johnson and 2.9

I got: 1.4 and 2.4

Not sure about you guys leagues, but people were just NOT interested in AJ or Colston, the 2 WRs I was shopping for picks or RB depth. Best offer I had gotten so far was 1.11 for AJ (no way I do that). After trade still feel like I have a solid WR core: Julio, Fitz, Nelson, Colston, Givens, Lance Moore, Hawkins.

Now have the 1.4, 1.8, 1.9, 2.4, 2.8 picks to improve my RB core and get some WR depth back too.
So, how did you help yourself at RB? Who's to say the top 3 RBs don't go 1-2-3 in your draft? All in all, with your WR depth it's an OK dynasty move, but if Julio or Fitz or Nelson (assuming you roll with 3 WRs each week) have a longish term injury, you'll likely be kicking yourself.

 
I feel like having multiple darts per say (1.4, 1.8, 1.8, 2.4, 2.8) give me a better odds at landing a RB that might be able to help. And if a great WR falls at 1.4, then I can always draft that WR, and try trading a different WR or player. I just know in my leagues at least, youth and picks are sometimes far more coveted than proven players in their 30s, whether that is smart or not.

 
12 team PPR dynasty league. I needed a RB pretty badly.

I gave: Andre Johnson and 2.9

I got: 1.4 and 2.4

Not sure about you guys leagues, but people were just NOT interested in AJ or Colston, the 2 WRs I was shopping for picks or RB depth. Best offer I had gotten so far was 1.11 for AJ (no way I do that). After trade still feel like I have a solid WR core: Julio, Fitz, Nelson, Colston, Givens, Lance Moore, Hawkins.

Now have the 1.4, 1.8, 1.9, 2.4, 2.8 picks to improve my RB core and get some WR depth back too.
AJ production over the next 3 seasons will be worth more than 1.04...people get hung up in dynasty......there is a cliff for RB's at 30.....not WR's...so people thinks a player like AJ is old is crazy.....he was a top 5 WR in 2012 and top 20 overall.....he is an uber stud(uber studs seem to be relvant longer)....1.04 is a total crap shoot

 
12 team PPR dynasty league. I needed a RB pretty badly.

I gave: Andre Johnson and 2.9

I got: 1.4 and 2.4

Not sure about you guys leagues, but people were just NOT interested in AJ or Colston, the 2 WRs I was shopping for picks or RB depth. Best offer I had gotten so far was 1.11 for AJ (no way I do that). After trade still feel like I have a solid WR core: Julio, Fitz, Nelson, Colston, Givens, Lance Moore, Hawkins.

Now have the 1.4, 1.8, 1.9, 2.4, 2.8 picks to improve my RB core and get some WR depth back too.
AJ production over the next 3 seasons will be worth more than 1.04...people get hung up in dynasty......there is a cliff for RB's at 30.....not WR's...so people thinks a player like AJ is old is crazy.....he was a top 5 WR in 2012 and top 20 overall.....he is an uber stud(uber studs seem to be relvant longer)....1.04 is a total crap shoot
I'm an Andre Johnson owner and noticed he's in a strange spot in dynasty circles. He seems to overproduce what his current going price is and I tend to get offers for him that are far below what I would expect. That said, I'm still in the camp of "a year too early instead of a year too late" for trading and if I can get solid value for him and have the depth (in this league I don't feel I do: Cobb, Crabtree, Gordon, Britt) I'll pull the trigger. I know what you mean about the shelf life of WRs but their trade value above 30 falls off quickly. I'd rather extract the value than ride him for the next three years and then get nothing, with the exception of if I feel I'm pushing for a championship.

 
In a 12 team PPR IDP dynasty,

Team A gave up Pettis, Austin STL WR; Year 2013 Draft Pick 1.05;Year 2013 Draft Pick 1.11Team B gave up Brown, Andre NYG RB,Nicks, Hakeem NYG WR; Year 2013 Draft Pick 2.12

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Gave: Demaryius Thomas, 1.07

Got: Jamaal Charles, Larry Fitzgerald, DuJuan Harris
Charles and Fitz.

JC and DT are pretty close in value, but Fitz >>>>>>>>> 1.07
I was on the other end of this, and personally feel the gap between Charles and DT is quite significant. I now start Stafford -- Spiller -- Dez, DT, Julio, Calvin -- Hernandez, with potential short-term starters DMC/DWilson/Rudolph, so a bit of consolidation with limited starters.Rob got the better value end, and also now has a better chance of competing this season than he did previously, so seems it works out for both.

 
12 Team PPR - 1 QB, 1 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 3 RB/WR

Team A Gave: D Brees, J Witten, K Moreno

Team B Gave: D Wilson
Hmmm. If I didnt have a top tier QB and TE........................I would give up Wilson to take this VERY easily. It seems like the 3 year benefit of it would vastly outweight what Wilson will give you year 4 from now till year 6 or 7.

 
In a 12 team PPR IDP dynasty,

Team A gave up Pettis, Austin STL WR; Year 2013 Draft Pick 1.05;Year 2013 Draft Pick 1.11Team B gave up Brown, Andre NYG RB,Nicks, Hakeem NYG WR; Year 2013 Draft Pick 2.12
I'd take the Nicks side even without Brown.

 
Gave: Demaryius Thomas, 1.07

Got: Jamaal Charles, Larry Fitzgerald, DuJuan Harris
Charles and Fitz.

JC and DT are pretty close in value, but Fitz >>>>>>>>> 1.07
I was on the other end of this, and personally feel the gap between Charles and DT is quite significant. I now start Stafford -- Spiller -- Dez, DT, Julio, Calvin -- Hernandez, with potential short-term starters DMC/DWilson/Rudolph, so a bit of consolidation with limited starters.Rob got the better value end, and also now has a better chance of competing this season than he did previously, so seems it works out for both.
Given that you have Spiller I like it for you and it's probably a win for both sides. DT should outproduce Charles in the long-term and it might be a little rich to give up Fitz but you may be able to turn the 1.07 into a nice player in this draft.

 
12 team ppr. Start 1 QB, 1 RB, 1 WR, 3 FLEX, 1 TE.

Gave: TE Kyle Rudolph, 2015 3rd round pick

Got: 2014 1st round pick (probably not top 3-4)

 
I didn't say finished or anything, but Brees discounted because of age. Nothing wrong with that.
He should still fetch more than pick 7 in this draft and a 2014 1st.
I need a QB bad in a few leagues would love to pay this for Brees but that deal is still light years better than the deal I seen for Brees 2 years ago in my league that ended up like this.

Bress + what now looks like a projected near lock top 3 pick in 2014 1st

for

Flacco, 1.08 (this year), a 2nd, two 3rds and a 4th in 2011

 
12 team ppr. Start 1 QB, 1 RB, 1 WR, 3 FLEX, 1 TE.

Gave: TE Kyle Rudolph, 2015 3rd round pick

Got: 2014 1st round pick (probably not top 3-4)
I'll take rudolph over a mid 2014 1st. Will be real good if he ever sees good QB play
Maybe. I took him with the 3.01 pick a couple years ago and felt like it made sense to move him considering that I don't value him as highly as most people. He's a good red zone threat, but slow (4.8 speed) with minimal explosiveness or big play skills. Rather draft a top 12 rookie next year than take the small edge he'd give me.

 
12 team ppr. Start 1 QB, 1 RB, 1 WR, 3 FLEX, 1 TE.

Gave: TE Kyle Rudolph, 2015 3rd round pick

Got: 2014 1st round pick (probably not top 3-4)
I'll take rudolph over a mid 2014 1st. Will be real good if he ever sees good QB play
Maybe. I took him with the 3.01 pick a couple years ago and felt like it made sense to move him considering that I don't value him as highly as most people. He's a good red zone threat, but slow (4.8 speed) with minimal explosiveness or big play skills. Rather draft a top 12 rookie next year than take the small edge he'd give me.
Can't argue realy strongly either way on this deal, but I just pick Rudy here if I am pretty sure the pick wont be top 5

 
12 team ppr. Start 1 QB, 1 RB, 1 WR, 3 FLEX, 1 TE.

Gave: TE Kyle Rudolph, 2015 3rd round pick

Got: 2014 1st round pick (probably not top 3-4)
I'll take rudolph over a mid 2014 1st. Will be real good if he ever sees good QB play
Maybe. I took him with the 3.01 pick a couple years ago and felt like it made sense to move him considering that I don't value him as highly as most people. He's a good red zone threat, but slow (4.8 speed) with minimal explosiveness or big play skills. Rather draft a top 12 rookie next year than take the small edge he'd give me.
Can't argue realy strongly either way on this deal, but I just pick Rudy here if I am pretty sure the pick wont be top 5
Probably able to get Seferian-Jenkins with a later 1st who will be a more elite prospect, and QB situation can't be much worse.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top