We're doing much better. I'm also a rodgers owner and thinking of dumping him as one of my rookie draft drops. Just seems like Arod could care less about his TE.How have the raiders been doing vs TE's lately? Early in the season it was a no brainer to start one, but I'm wondering about using my flex on R. Rodgers or not.
They were probably right to go for two in that instance without a backup option at LS but the fact that they don't even have a backup seems overly risky. What if the game is tied late in the 4th and they have a 4th and long situation inside the opponent's 30? Only having the option to go for it is kind of crazy. And what Travis Goethel, who is out of the league, did in 2012 doesn't really seem that relevant.
Vernon Davis went 7-74 and would have had another 20 or so if he didn't have a horrible drop.We're doing much better. I'm also a rodgers owner and thinking of dumping him as one of my rookie draft drops. Just seems like Arod could care less about his TE.How have the raiders been doing vs TE's lately? Early in the season it was a no brainer to start one, but I'm wondering about using my flex on R. Rodgers or not.
Wrist injury that required a surgery, missed one game and has been playing with it casted since.Chaka said:I can't find any news on Smith's injury. Did it happen in game?krsone21 said:Lee Smith is the backup option, however he is injured as well and his hand is taped up which makes it tough to snap the ball.Chaka said:Softening my stance on the 2 point conversion. Condo was legitimately hurt but it's disappointing that there was no backup option. They must have at least one special teamer or backup player on the game day roster who gets reps long snapping.
Edit to add: One beat me to it.
i was at that game. it was a couple years ago and was the opening monday night game of the season. horribleI was going to post something along these lines. I don't remember the exact circumstances or when it was, but I remember the same general thing. Pretty poor planning not to have a viable option in case of an in game injury. Overall i have been pretty pleased with the coaching staff though.Our record with back up snappers not so good from recent memory.
Was it our last Monday night game where Condo got concussed and the back up messed up A LOT of his snaps against SD and I'm sure he was a linebacker but can't remember his name
The O is predictable and flat. The Raiders need to do something to put some life into it. Seems like I wrote this same thing a week or 2 ago. Maybe going to the hurry-up would jolt the O.DA RAIDERS said:why do they not run many bubble screens to cooper? i was screaming for one at the end of the last game when they kept just plugging murray up the middle. i know, don't risk stopping the clock, but that's a pretty safe throw. the offense is a tad predictable to me.
Agreed on all of the above points. Wouldn't mind seeing them sign another safety as well....Maybe Rashad Johnson from AZ is a possibility.From that list, my completely uninformed guesses as to whom they might like. All the top guys are in play, so having said that:
Casey Hayward--Green Bay history, slot guy. Quick inside stuff has killed us. Might not be a sexy addition, and may not be a starter, but I could see him being a nicely priced corner at a spot of need. If we signed two corners, and he was the 2nd, I would be fine with that.
Prince Amukamara--i could see this as a one year Crabtree deal, where he could join an up and coming team, and try for bigger deal. He has played some really good football.
Trumaine Johnson--FIts the physical mold, and won't command top, top dollar. I'll take him and Janoris Jenkins both from the Rams if you let me.
Josh Norman, I had no idea he was that old. Carolina would be smart to franchise him and let him go afterward.
You seriously cannot have too many corners. If they went out and paid $20 mill/year combined for three of them, I would dance a freaking jig
Totally agree on all counts. Watching the replay of the game Condo hurt his shoulder recovering the fumble and they scored 3 plays later.They were probably right to go for two in that instance without a backup option at LS but the fact that they don't even have a backup seems overly risky. What if the game is tied late in the 4th and they have a 4th and long situation inside the opponent's 30? Only having the option to go for it is kind of crazy. And what Travis Goethel, who is out of the league, did in 2012 doesn't really seem that relevant.
Yeah, that's a great read.Chaka said:Feliciano may be getting the start at RG.
Also has a brief update on every rookie draft pick in what is shaping up to be another good, to excellent, draft class.
''The good ...the bad ...and the ugly''No pulse on this thread after a pretty good game against a strong playoff team.
Started horribly. Persevered. Fought back. Showed character imo.
Sure GB isn't the power house most thought they'd be this year but still...they're going to the playoffs and we were close to knocking them off.
Looking forward to what happens this offseason both free agency and draft.
Building a contender for sure.
If you are going to have an undersized speedball at MLB, you better have big butts in front of him, and we do. Ellis and Dan Williams have been great all year, IMO. I love watching defensive tackles, and backs have been running into piles of bodies up the gut all year.Seth Roberts happenedWhat the hell happened to Rod Streater this year?
No disrespect to Al, but thisKhalil Mack now has more sacks than Richard Seymour got in 4 years.
Meh. Jason Cole is no insider.Any idea on who is leading the push to get rid of Davis?
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2601759-insider-buzz-extreme-opposition-among-nfl-owners-to-raiders-moving-to-la
Not much interest in Okung. Injury prone and, IMO, a bit overrated. Mitchell Schwartz is more intriguing to me.We need to finish strong to carry momentum into 2016. Because the last two games are divisional rivals it will be a battle. Quite honestly, if I had to choose I would rather the Raiders beat the Chiefs at KC and knock them out of the playoffs.
Early look at free agency.
Okung is an interesting proposition if the Raiders don't retain Penn.
Signing Berry would accomplish two goals--filling the CWood's void and weakening a divisional opponent.
Norman is flat out juicy. And Willkerson would be a very nice corner stone to a developing Dline. All of these might be pipe dreams but it is that time of year...
I wouldn't mind if they took a shot on E. Weddle as well. Could use a veteran type safety that tackles well.I also think they should look at Olivier Vernon or V. Miller. Can never have enough elite pass rushers.Not much interest in Okung. Injury prone and, IMO, a bit overrated. Mitchell Schwartz is more intriguing to me.Berry would be a great signing for exactly the reasons you stated.We need to finish strong to carry momentum into 2016. Because the last two games are divisional rivals it will be a battle. Quite honestly, if I had to choose I would rather the Raiders beat the Chiefs at KC and knock them out of the playoffs.
Early look at free agency.
Okung is an interesting proposition if the Raiders don't retain Penn.
Signing Berry would accomplish two goals--filling the CWood's void and weakening a divisional opponent.
Norman is flat out juicy. And Willkerson would be a very nice corner stone to a developing Dline. All of these might be pipe dreams but it is that time of year...
I would rather take a shot on a guy like Trumaine Johnson who is young and looks promising than loudmouth like Norman who I worry may ease up after his payday.
That sucks.Mario Edwards has been moved to the IR due to neck injury.
From Twitter: @VicTafur Del Rio said Edwards' neck injury is significant, may need surgery.
I think Penn is on the last year of his contract. I agree that he has played great... particularly for the amount of the contract. He is 32 but still has a few solid years left IMO. Somewhat strange they haven't offered him a contract yet.That does suck.
Thinking about Okung, I think the team is going to roll with what they have next year, for the most part. Penn/Howard/Watson as top 3 OT. In some manner.
Is the stud LT worth it any more? Is a $9 mill LT help your team better than a $5mill LT? In the day and age of quick passing, do you need a dominant LT?
Penn has been fine, and couldn't be happier to be a Raider. If one of these top guys drops in the draft, fine, take him. I'd wonder if Watson gets some reps there next summer.
Regarding Norman, I wonder if he can play this good again. It's weird that at his age, he became a player, and I can't pretend I have seen him much.
But if it was a deal with outs after two years, sure. I'll pay big dollars for two years of production.
The cautionary tale is Byron Maxwell. There's a good article I was just reading about bad contracts, and his contract is brutal. It would cost 16 mill to cut him next year. Match that with DeMarco Murray, who would cost a ton to cut. Chip Kelly the GM didn't have a great spring. In fact, the Eagles were a sexy team, he should have been able to get some team friendly deals. Those deals look a lot like Al Davis deals.
If Von Miller ends up a free agent Oakland should aggressively pursue him. Aldon Smith is out for most of next season and Miller/Mack would be an impressive pass rush....I wouldn't be upset if the Raiders use 4 of their draft picks on DBs and/or Safeties. Throw a bunch of darts and see what sticks. Use the huge amount of cap space to fill some key holes with free agents. But it's all about the defensive backfield imo.
Miller seemed pretty respectful towards Del Rio and Mack on the Rich Eisen show.http://oak.247sports.com/Bolt/Denver-Broncos-Von-Miller-doesnt-bite-on-Jack-Del-Rio-comments-37616642How close are del rio and miller? Or any other Den D FAs? Along those lines what is Sea D FA looking like?