What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2016 Oakland Raiders thread (1 Viewer)

Glaring weakness to me means it must be addressed or it will cost us games. Like I said before, there are certainly areas where we can improve and upgrade and we need more depth in a several spots. However, we are a more complete team than most NFL teams. There really aren't many NFL teams that don't have a weakness somewhere on their roster. Assuming health- I think we range from serviceable to damn good across the team. More work to do? Sure. But Reggie has placed the team in the best position during the draft to after the BPA for our scheme and team without being forced to address a "glaring weakness".
I agree Reggie has done a great job and we're in a much improved spot entering the draft.  But our secondary and LB have only gone from hot mess to not very good and can absolutely cost us games.  CB depth is suspect and safety is by no stretch strong let alone deep.  It took Nelson 3 weeks to get a job and Philly was thrilled to get rid of Allen.  Who's our SS?  God forbid Cooper get dinged because everyone else all of a sudden looks ordinary if the D can focus on them.  Good QB's and especially good coaches/game plans will attack our weakest points, and those are going to cost us.  Even if we were to get all those pieces in the draft it's going to take time for them to gel and develop.

I'll stress again - we're a LOT better off now than we were a month ago, and I don't even recognize the state of this team from just two short years ago.  Outstanding.  We just aren't done, that's all.  Reggie knows that, our coaches know that.  9-7 is a real possibility, up to 11-5 depending on schedule, health, and coaching/execution.

 
Hankmoody said:
I agree Reggie has done a great job and we're in a much improved spot entering the draft.  But our secondary and LB have only gone from hot mess to not very good and can absolutely cost us games.  CB depth is suspect and safety is by no stretch strong let alone deep.  It took Nelson 3 weeks to get a job and Philly was thrilled to get rid of Allen.  Who's our SS?  God forbid Cooper get dinged because everyone else all of a sudden looks ordinary if the D can focus on them.  Good QB's and especially good coaches/game plans will attack our weakest points, and those are going to cost us.  Even if we were to get all those pieces in the draft it's going to take time for them to gel and develop.

I'll stress again - we're a LOT better off now than we were a month ago, and I don't even recognize the state of this team from just two short years ago.  Outstanding.  We just aren't done, that's all.  Reggie knows that, our coaches know that.  9-7 is a real possibility, up to 11-5 depending on schedule, health, and coaching/execution.
If the secondary improved enough that it can muster enough effort to make the opposing QB hold onto the ball for 1/2 second longer than last season it will be a huge win.

Every team has a series of weaknesses that you are pointing out, it's just at different position groups for each team.  The league is designed to prevent teams from stocking up across the board and, when some teams manage to stockpile deep talent it is designed to prevent them from holding onto that talent.  The Raiders are significantly improved and will only get better talent through the draft.  But after that if they are truly going to take the next step it isn't going to be with the addition of more players it will be from the coaching staff scheming to put each group into position to succeed.  

And that is where I am still most skeptical because JDR has not done enough in his career to convince me that he is the kind of coach who can out scheme the opposition.  He is a perennial 7-9:9-7 coach with the occasional surprise 11-5 (or 5-11) season.

JDR hasn't had a winning season in his last 5 seasons and he is career 75-80.  In 10 seasons as a HC he has had two double digit win seasons, and only two back-to-back winning seasons (9-7 & 12-4 in '05-'06).  But I do give him credit for trying to bring the suit back to the sideline.

Musgrave coordinated teams are 46-65-1

So for all the accolades about this off season, and it has been a great off season, the biggest question mark talent wise IMO is still with the coaching staff.

 
Good point Chaka, and one that I hinted at when I posted that anything less than a winning season would be a disappointment. On the other hand, many of the same concerns you level against JDR could also be applied to Billichick in his first couple of years in New England. Head coaches learn on the job, and when they get a good QB they better cash in. I think Carr has the makings of a good QB so JDR better cash in...

As far as the draft goes,dI doubt EE falls, and Reggie doesn't trade up. That said I just want Reggie to hit it outta the park again in this coming draft. Defensive Playmakers. Offensive Playmakers. It doesn't matter! I do believe Noah Spencer fits that description to a tee and well worth the risk despite his off the field issues. I also think he is one of the surest things at that point in the draft...

Side note, a Raider fan on Sirius said he wanted nothing to do with Reggie Ragland because Ragland reminded him of McClain. I won't argue the merits of Ragland, but isn't that mindset similar to why Texans passed on Carr? They passed on Carr because he reminded them of his brother, David. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
As far as the draft goes,dI doubt EE falls, and Reggie doesn't trade up. That said I just want Reggie to hit it outta the park again in this coming draft. Defensive Playmakers. Offensive Playmakers. It doesn't matter! I do believe Noah Spencer fits that description to a tee and well worth the risk despite his off the field issues. I also think he is one of the surest things at that point in the draft...
Yeah, man, this.  Just get players that can help.  

I wanted a DL over a WR last year, because ''we can get a WR in the 2nd round.''   :no:

 
The Raiders and Amari Cooper will open the preseason with a game at the Arizona Cardinals. (Nhat V. Meyer/Bay Area News Group)
The NFL announced the preseason schedule on Thursday and the Raiders will host a nationally televised game during the third week of the exhibition season.

Oakland opens with two straight road games, playing at the Arizona Cardinals in the first week, Aug. 11-15 (exact game dates have not yet been set except for the national TV games and the final week). The Raiders then head to Green Bay to play the Packers sometime in the Aug. 18-22 range.

The first home game at the Coliseum comes Saturday, Aug. 27 when the Raiders play host to the Tennessee Titans. That game will air nationally on CBS.

The final preseason game is Thursday, Sept. 1 at home against the Seattle Seahawks — the second straight year the Raiders and Seahawks will meet to close out the preseason.

As for the rest of the Raiders’ offseason, their official offseason program begins Monday, April 18. Rookie mini-camp begins Friday, May 13, the first OTA session starts Tuesday, May 24, followed by another on Tuesday, May 31 and the last on Tuesday, June 7. The team’s mandatory mini-camp is June 14-16. The Raiders have not yet released the official start day for training camp.

 
Good point Chaka, and one that I hinted at when I posted that anything less than a winning season would be a disappointment. On the other hand, many of the same concerns you level against JDR could also be applied to Billichick in his first couple of years in New England. Head coaches learn on the job, and when they get a good QB they better cash in. I think Carr has the makings of a good QB so JDR better cash in...

As far as the draft goes,dI doubt EE falls, and Reggie doesn't trade up. That said I just want Reggie to hit it outta the park again in this coming draft. Defensive Playmakers. Offensive Playmakers. It doesn't matter! I do believe Noah Spencer fits that description to a tee and well worth the risk despite his off the field issues. I also think he is one of the surest things at that point in the draft...

Side note, a Raider fan on Sirius said he wanted nothing to do with Reggie Ragland because Ragland reminded him of McClain. I won't argue the merits of Ragland, but isn't that mindset similar to why Texans passed on Carr? They passed on Carr because he reminded them of his brother, David. 
How many times does a big 1st round trade up really pay off for a team vs what they could have done in the picks they gave up? Seems to me- much more often than not- the team trading up doesn't get the value.

 
That might be the main reason Reggie doesn't trade up.   :P
I am fine with staying put or moving back. I see no need to spend picks to move up.

I think history shows that the best way to approach a draft is to be true to your board, don't pick for need but by player talent and scheme fit and more picks the better. The teams that have been successful over long periods of time (GB, Pats, Steelers, etc) tend to not move up, they protect their picks or give them up to get more and don't draft need as much as players they think fit their system and are talented.

I want that.

 
all indications point to that we are more like the Pats, Steelers and Packers in our approach that any of us would dare to believe even a year ago.

pinch me.

Reggie, Call Donte. :)

 
Greg Papa on 95.7 the Game in Bay Area talking to a Cincy beat writer about Reggie Nelson. Definitely throwing a little cold water on signing. "Inconsistency in tackling", angles, range, age concerns, were mentioned. But he said Reggie has all the locker room intangibles. 

They also mentioned that JDR was his first coach and then he went off to Cincy. No mention, of course, of Nelson's own quote saying "I was a different player back then". media trying to build some kind of drama around that aspect of it  

After call, Papa questioned assessment of tackling, saying that he looked good to him when he saw him. 

Overall Papa sounded more positive on what Reggie brings to the table at this point than what the heat writer said  

Fwiw

 
Greg Papa on 95.7 the Game in Bay Area talking to a Cincy beat writer about Reggie Nelson. Definitely throwing a little cold water on signing. "Inconsistency in tackling", angles, range, age concerns, were mentioned. But he said Reggie has all the locker room intangibles. 

They also mentioned that JDR was his first coach and then he went off to Cincy. No mention, of course, of Nelson's own quote saying "I was a different player back then". media trying to build some kind of drama around that aspect of it  

After call, Papa questioned assessment of tackling, saying that he looked good to him when he saw him. 

Overall Papa sounded more positive on what Reggie brings to the table at this point than what the heat writer said  

Fwiw
Range seemed find. Not sure how you get 8 INT's if you have no range. Age was the big Cincy problem as they have a younger player that seems like he can step in but even so- they reportedly were still in talks with Nelson to the end. As much as tackling go- he is more of a cover guy from what I have gathered which is why he is a FS fit. They usually aren't the best tackler between the two safeties which is why I am fine if we went after Whitner as he is opposite to that with very good tackling/thumper skills while somewhere in the average area for coverage and hence he is a SS. I have seen some talk of Allen being SS but I think that is him out of position. Also seen Carrie but not sure about that either.

 
Another good signing with Nelson in the fold. He's our starting FS ideally but could handle SS in a pinch. I was never too comfortable with the idea of Allen being anyone we could rely on. We still have a glaring need at safety,  and it should be addressed during the draft. There's  plenty of good ones available,  but Karl Joseph seems to fit the bill perfectly to step into a starters role at strong safety. 

As for the draft,  we keep getting any number of choices any given day at pick 14. It's a lot more fluid than the last few years because we don't have a narrow list to choose from. And that's kind of fun and exciting.

I'm still partial to the DTRankins, but I'm warming up to the smallish, athletic LB Lee. 

 
Range seemed find. Not sure how you get 8 INT's if you have no range. Age was the big Cincy problem as they have a younger player that seems like he can step in but even so- they reportedly were still in talks with Nelson to the end. As much as tackling go- he is more of a cover guy from what I have gathered which is why he is a FS fit. They usually aren't the best tackler between the two safeties which is why I am fine if we went after Whitner as he is opposite to that with very good tackling/thumper skills while somewhere in the average area for coverage and hence he is a SS. I have seen some talk of Allen being SS but I think that is him out of position. Also seen Carrie but not sure about that either.
I think they should move McGill to safety.

 
I think they should move McGill to safety.
interesting...from his Wiki page....


College career


He played his freshman season at Cerritos College in 2009 as a free safety.[2] He posted 30 tackles and five interceptions. In 2010, he led the team with seven interceptions and posted 37 tackles, earning himself Northern Conference Defensive Player of the Year,[3] and was named to the first-team All-American by CCCFA following his sophomore season.[4]

He committed to Utah, after being named one of the best junior college prospects of his class by Rivals.com.[5][6]

In 2011, his first season with the Utes, he played in five games as a safety before suffering an injury during the Arizona State game that forced him to miss the rest of the season.[7] He missed the entire 2012 NCAA season due to lengthy, ongoing rehab of his shoulder surgery. As a senior, he started all 12 games at cornerback, amassing 37 total tackles, with 12 pass break ups and an interception returned for a touchdown, and was named an honorable mention All-Pac-12 selection.

 
Seems like there are three free safeties on the roster but nothing really at the strong safety spot.  McGill is really the only option there, he does have the size to be a thumper, but I don't think that is a great fit for his game.  But I could be wrong about that.

Why does Pro-Football-Reference have zero stats for McGill last year?  It says 13 games, 0 started, and 0s across the board for everything else.  Did that really happen?

 
Seems like there are three free safeties on the roster but nothing really at the strong safety spot.  McGill is really the only option there, he does have the size to be a thumper, but I don't think that is a great fit for his game.  But I could be wrong about that.

Why does Pro-Football-Reference have zero stats for McGill last year?  It says 13 games, 0 started, and 0s across the board for everything else.  Did that really happen?
From what I can tell he was out for 3 games. Available to play in 13 games and amassed 3 whole tackles on the season and that's it.

 
Seems like there are three free safeties on the roster but nothing really at the strong safety spot.  McGill is really the only option there, he does have the size to be a thumper, but I don't think that is a great fit for his game.  But I could be wrong about that.

Why does Pro-Football-Reference have zero stats for McGill last year?  It says 13 games, 0 started, and 0s across the board for everything else.  Did that really happen?
That could be special teams action.

 
Another good signing with Nelson in the fold. He's our starting FS ideally but could handle SS in a pinch. I was never too comfortable with the idea of Allen being anyone we could rely on. We still have a glaring need at safety,  and it should be addressed during the draft. There's  plenty of good ones available,  but Karl Joseph seems to fit the bill perfectly to step into a starters role at strong safety. 

As for the draft,  we keep getting any number of choices any given day at pick 14. It's a lot more fluid than the last few years because we don't have a narrow list to choose from. And that's kind of fun and exciting.

I'm still partial to the DTRankins, but I'm warming up to the smallish, athletic LB Lee. 
I am not seeing Nelson fitting SS. Unless we are asking our SS to cover more than usual for the position and not as much in run support. Which we very may well do. I don't know our scheme well enough to say but for the typical SS responsibilities Nelson would be a poor fit. I think Allen would be better there if we had too but he is not a good fit either.

 
Love the Nelson signing, represents a huge upgrade for our secondary that I thought was badly needed -- others here may have been more comfortable with our D given the front 7 upgrades, but solid D's are solid enough to not have glaring holes for an offense to attack, and glad Reggie agreed and filled ours. Nelson helps upgrade our whole defensive play. Totally appreciate the write-up that Nelson's range may have declined with age, it may be so -- any FA comes with some risk, but even if true, Nelson will still bring to the position more than what we had, IMO. And it's amazing what a change of scenery can do for a FA.

Agree with looking at the draft to upgrade MLB, RB, and DE, and longer term at WR (simply amazed at Crabtree's performance last year, but I fear he's not going to be consistent, and Seth Roberts is still developing. We could use depth here). 

Elliott falling to us would be great, and I like the prospects of Ragland potenitially being there at 14 if Elliott doesn't drop. Dominique Alexander might be a find later on, though he'll need to bulk up -- I like his rangy style to attack bootlegs and ability to drop back into coverage as well.

 
Reggie sees the teams needs and weaknesses the same way the fans do...its pretty obvious ...so many times teams make moves that leave every single fan scratching their heads ....not so the last 2 years ...thank god we have someone who is in touch with the fans ...and reality ...i have complete faith he will make us all proud at this years draft

 
How many times does a big 1st round trade up really pay off for a team vs what they could have done in the picks they gave up? Seems to me- much more often than not- the team trading up doesn't get the value.
The latest example I can think of is Julio Jones and the Atlanta Falcons (where at least the Falcons are happy and he has produced iike a stud). The Sammy Watkins trade is not looking nearly as rosy. Eli?

 
Reggie sees the teams needs and weaknesses the same way the fans do...its pretty obvious ...so many times teams make moves that leave every single fan scratching their heads ....not so the last 2 years ...thank god we have someone who is in touch with the fans ...and reality ...i have complete faith he will make us all proud at this years draft
Agree. I don't think Reggie has anything to prove to me, Raiders fans, the NFL, or anyone regarding the way he has approached rebuilding this team. He turned a team with no 1st or 2nd round picks and zero identity when he took over in 2012 to a team solidly poised to break out this year and set up to be contenders for years following. The salary cap situation is completely in our favor given the way he let go of dead weight and built with an eye towards both present and future. Always the chance we don't live up to everyone's (including our own) high expectations, but that won't be because of McKenzie. He deserved every kudos he gets.

Taking all that for what it's worth, I do want to see McKenzie be more consistent in his approach since 2014 and carry that into this year's draft. Let's not forget Reggie hasn't always made the best moves in his Raider career. It's impossible to hit on all (arguably most) picks in a draft, but Reggie has made mistakes. The good thing is he has seemed to learn from them and is able to move on, which is key, and exactly what I'd like to see Reggie continue to do consistently.

The past few years we were definitely drafting for need, had high picks and had the right players fall to us. We are now not in such a dire situation and the results of this draft will show more how McKenzie is an evaluator of talent, and is able to build players from within based on that talent. 

In 2012, we addressed a poor secondary bringing in FA CBs (Spencer and Bartell). We had no picks through round 3, and the only real highlight was Tony Bergstrom, who was more of a backup but did admirably when called upon.

In 2013, Reggie didn't exactly help the cap situation, bringing in Roach, Burnett, and Kaluka Maiava for ~9M guaranteed. He then drafted Hayden (yet to prove himself and more likely a liability), Menelik Watson (huge talent but not oft on the field given injuries), and Mychael Rivera (again fantastic talent, but never truly broke out and was made obsolete in last year's draft). On the plus side -- Latavius Murray. Nice.

In 2014, Reggie added Penn and Howard -- super solid. The signing of Tuck, Woodley, and Antonio Smith weren't great in that they were only stopgap solutions (and not as effective as one would hope), but you understood why Reggie did it -- bring in cheaper, veteran leadership and fill badly needed holes in our D. Choosing Mack then Carr began the run we see today, but to me, both were no-brainers at the pick spot based on our need. Reggie can be lauded for making these picks -- I view them as the obvious ones and was glad he didn't mess them up.

In 2015, Reggie nabbed a starter in Hudson, and got talent in Allen, Lofton, and Dan Williams. Yes, many aren't on the team anymore and arguably didn't live up to expectations, but the talent was there. Cooper was the right pick for us based on both need and talent, and we'll see if Mario can overcome injury to live up to the amazing talent he was coming out of college. Feliciano did well when called upon. Jury is out on Heeney. 

In 2016, we're rocking house in FA, shoring up a lot of need. We have some more, and can address them in the draft, but we're don't purely need to draft from need. In the above, Reggie has shown a steady learning curve and is trending better with each year -- just hoping he keeps this trend consistent and makes BPA selections that show he can continue to evaluate talent correctly where the team needs it. 

 
Supposedly Antoine Bethea is on the block by the Niners. He is a SS no? Prob could get him for a 7th being 31 and coming off injury. Might be worth it at that price. Wouldn't pay over that though for sure.

 
Agree. I don't think Reggie has anything to prove to me, Raiders fans, the NFL, or anyone regarding the way he has approached rebuilding this team. He turned a team with no 1st or 2nd round picks and zero identity when he took over in 2012 to a team solidly poised to break out this year and set up to be contenders for years following. The salary cap situation is completely in our favor given the way he let go of dead weight and built with an eye towards both present and future. Always the chance we don't live up to everyone's (including our own) high expectations, but that won't be because of McKenzie. He deserved every kudos he gets.

Taking all that for what it's worth, I do want to see McKenzie be more consistent in his approach since 2014 and carry that into this year's draft. Let's not forget Reggie hasn't always made the best moves in his Raider career. It's impossible to hit on all (arguably most) picks in a draft, but Reggie has made mistakes. The good thing is he has seemed to learn from them and is able to move on, which is key, and exactly what I'd like to see Reggie continue to do consistently.

The past few years we were definitely drafting for need, had high picks and had the right players fall to us. We are now not in such a dire situation and the results of this draft will show more how McKenzie is an evaluator of talent, and is able to build players from within based on that talent. 

In 2012, we addressed a poor secondary bringing in FA CBs (Spencer and Bartell). We had no picks through round 3, and the only real highlight was Tony Bergstrom, who was more of a backup but did admirably when called upon.

In 2013, Reggie didn't exactly help the cap situation, bringing in Roach, Burnett, and Kaluka Maiava for ~9M guaranteed. He then drafted Hayden (yet to prove himself and more likely a liability), Menelik Watson (huge talent but not oft on the field given injuries), and Mychael Rivera (again fantastic talent, but never truly broke out and was made obsolete in last year's draft). On the plus side -- Latavius Murray. Nice.

In 2014, Reggie added Penn and Howard -- super solid. The signing of Tuck, Woodley, and Antonio Smith weren't great in that they were only stopgap solutions (and not as effective as one would hope), but you understood why Reggie did it -- bring in cheaper, veteran leadership and fill badly needed holes in our D. Choosing Mack then Carr began the run we see today, but to me, both were no-brainers at the pick spot based on our need. Reggie can be lauded for making these picks -- I view them as the obvious ones and was glad he didn't mess them up.

In 2015, Reggie nabbed a starter in Hudson, and got talent in Allen, Lofton, and Dan Williams. Yes, many aren't on the team anymore and arguably didn't live up to expectations, but the talent was there. Cooper was the right pick for us based on both need and talent, and we'll see if Mario can overcome injury to live up to the amazing talent he was coming out of college. Feliciano did well when called upon. Jury is out on Heeney. 

In 2016, we're rocking house in FA, shoring up a lot of need. We have some more, and can address them in the draft, but we're don't purely need to draft from need. In the above, Reggie has shown a steady learning curve and is trending better with each year -- just hoping he keeps this trend consistent and makes BPA selections that show he can continue to evaluate talent correctly where the team needs it. 
Pretty much agree with most other than up to this year pretty much any position we picked except maybe K and P was a position of 'need'. We certainly had more needs than what Mack brought but he was BPA for sure and even more so by the time we picked. We could have skipped Carr if we did not believe in him and there were many who didn't because of his brother and the echoes of that in that USC vs Fresno game. Again, with Cooper- we easily could have gone elsewhere as well and even more so if we were going off of need. I am not taking any credit at all away from those selections.

 
Pretty much agree with most other than up to this year pretty much any position we picked except maybe K and P was a position of 'need'. We certainly had more needs than what Mack brought but he was BPA for sure and even more so by the time we picked. We could have skipped Carr if we did not believe in him and there were many who didn't because of his brother and the echoes of that in that USC vs Fresno game. Again, with Cooper- we easily could have gone elsewhere as well and even more so if we were going off of need. I am not taking any credit at all away from those selections.
Davis and Reggie made it clear the whole organization was going to be tore down and rebuilt. They restructured the front office, scouting department as well as dumping Al Davis' players and draft picks. It was a long process cleaning up Al's mess, and it took patience (I'll be the first to admit I whined enough on these boards the past 3 years just as much as anyone.) But it was something Raider fans weren't used to. Now the team is hopefully through the worst of it. I think Reggie has done a great job rebuilding the Raiders. I did become skeptical with the way he handled the QB situation before they landed Carr. Bringing in Flynn and Schaub were pretty awful moves. He basically threw money down the drain on those guys. I realize they were bridge QBs until they drafted a QB of the future, but there had to be better options, if I remember correctly Fitzpatrick might have been available. But who knows, maybe he didn't want to come to Oakland. It's all water under the bridge now. I'm most impressed by the way he has fortified the OL through free agency and the draft. Kudos to him for rebuilding through the trenches.I'll forgive the Hayden pick for now because I give Reggie a lot of credit for not screwing up the obvious picks (Mack, Carr and Coop). I imagine it would be easy to over think those picks because there were questions surrounding Mack and Carr, I don't think they were the obvious picks everyone makes them out to be or else Houston would have Mack and Watt coming off the edges. Scary how good that defense would be if that happened. 

Now it's up to the coaches to coach and players to execute. And stay healthy!!!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Davis and Reggie made it clear the whole organization was going to be tore down and rebuilt. They restructured the front office, scouting department as well as dumping Al Davis' players and draft picks. It was a long process cleaning up Al's mess, and it took patience (I'll be the first to admit I whined enough on these boards the past 3 years just as much as anyone.) But it was something Raider fans weren't used to. Now the team is hopefully through the worst of it. I think Reggie has done a great job rebuilding the Raiders. I did become skeptical with the way he handled the QB situation before they landed Carr. Bringing in Flynn and Schaub were pretty awful moves. He basically threw money down the drain on those guys. I realize they were bridge QBs until they drafted a QB of the future, but there had to be better options, if I remember correctly Fitzpatrick might have been available. But who knows, maybe he didn't want to come to Oakland. It's all water under the bridge now. I'm most impressed by the way he has fortified the OL through free agency and the draft. Kudos to him for rebuilding through the trenches.I'll forgive the Hayden pick for now because I give Reggie a lot of credit for not screwing up the obvious picks (Mack, Carr and Coop). I imagine it would be easy to over think those picks because there were questions surrounding Mack and Carr, I don't think they were the obvious picks everyone makes them out to be or else Houston would have Mack and Watt coming off the edges. Scary how good that defense would be if that happened. 

Now it's up to the coaches to coach and players to execute. And stay healthy!!!
There were questions if Mack should go one overall, but he was a no brainer at five.  Carr, on the other hand, there were a lot of questions about him and I have to give Reggie a lot of credit for hitting on him.

 
meh.  nonstop, shouldn't be that bad
Just did Spirit non-stop from Chicago to L.A. and back because I don't have extra cash on hand and needed to get out to see my little brother who was in a major motorcycle accident. Spirit is only good for getting somewhere as cheap as possible. I would never use it for a vacation or fun trip. Never. Rather pay Southwest a little bit extra on the ticket and enjoy that part of the trip as well.

 
The running backs coaches from the Oakland Raiders and Seattle Seahawks attended Utah RB Devontae Booker's (knee) personal Pro Day workout on Tuesday.
Both clubs are likely to draft a runner at some point. Booker wasn't able to perform for scouts at Utah's Pro Day last month due to ongoing recovery from meniscus surgery on Feb. 9. He's still not totally healthy, estimating he was 70-percent. Booker thus didn't perform testing drills on Tuesday. Instead, he ran a few pass routes at less than top speed. Booker will visit the Miami Dolphins and New England Patriots before the draft.
 
Me too.

What I don't doubt is that we will have a list of 5 name at are there in the 2nd that surprises us.  
I know it's not popular but if we take that LB from ND in the 2nd I'd be ok. I know the 2nd rd isn't for fliers but the potential upside seems huge. 

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top