Torrey Smith is a terrible comp. Smith can run one route and has bad hands.Another missed TD for the extremely overrated Cooper. Above average athlete with poor WR skills. Reminds me of Torrey Smith.
Kidding aside he has two bad drops this season. As a rookie he dropped 10 passes, last season he dropped 3. I think we need to slow our roll just a bit on the "he's overrated" talk.And poor ball skills.
And poor field awareness.
And poor hand-eye.
I stand by Torrey Smith![]()
No kidding here. He's made multiple mistakes along the sideline failing to get feet in when he could. Yesterday was a great example. He jumped, only to catch the ball below his neck. Jumping caused him to miss getting both feet inbounds by less than a foot. A "complete" WR doesn't jump there, he drags those feet and extends his arms (would still have caught it at face height) to make that catch. Chris Carter made about 80 of those in his career. Every elite WR makes them by the dozen. Not Cooper. He's had at least 4 that I can remember where he had similar opportunity but lack of concentration, or field awareness, to get feet inbounds and make the catch - three TD's and one was a key catch late in a game late last year - I even commented on it somewhere around here. He flat dropped two last week again. Those aren't "complete" WR performances. I can name 15 WR easily I would rather have on the field for us, and Crabtree is one of them by a mile.Kidding aside he has two bad drops this season. As a rookie he dropped 10 passes, last season he dropped 3. I think we need to slow our roll just a bit on the "he's overrated" talk.
Cooper is as complete a WR as there is in the league.
Crabtree led the league in drops last year.No kidding here. He's made multiple mistakes along the sideline failing to get feet in when he could. Yesterday was a great example. He jumped, only to catch the ball below his neck. Jumping caused him to miss getting both feet inbounds by less than a foot. A "complete" WR doesn't jump there, he drags those feet and extends his arms (would still have caught it at face height) to make that catch. Chris Carter made about 80 of those in his career. Every elite WR makes them by the dozen. Not Cooper. He's had at least 4 that I can remember where he had similar opportunity but lack of concentration, or field awareness, to get feet inbounds and make the catch - three TD's and one was a key catch late in a game late last year - I even commented on it somewhere around here. He flat dropped two last week again. Those aren't "complete" WR performances. I can name 15 WR easily I would rather have on the field for us, and Crabtree is one of them by a mile.
I don't mind drops per se. They are part of a function of targets and Crabtree had a monster 145 targets. TO had a lot of drops too. What I illustrated above goes way beyond drops.Crabtree led the league in drops last year.
I wouldn't say he has bad hands... more like inconsistent hands. He came make great catches and then make great drops.Torrey Smith is a terrible comp. Smith can run one route and has bad hands.
Cooper can run the entire route tree at a very high level...and has bad hands.
Agreed. Is there any other team that has 2 comprehensive wins to its name? The D is like a Boa Constrictor slowly crushing the opposing team through the game. Although they let up a bit yesterdayI`m just so damn proud of this Raiders team and its staff
Agree. Let's be real, here. The guy was not just successful by most measures in college (Biletnikoff Award? Unanimous All American? First Team SEC?) but is a 2x Pro Bowler. He is not Sammie Coates (true trouble with his hands) or a guy like Peter Warrick or Desmond Howard (bona fide studs in college, meh at the pro level). Cooper has "it" -- it's just that "it" is really inconsistent.I wouldn't say he has bad hands... more like inconsistent hands. He came make great catches and then make great drops.
Looked like a back shoulder lob to me. Seems a little unconventional but executed perfectly. To me it looked like the Jet's safety could have made a TD saving tackle if he would have hustled once he saw the ball thrown but was pretty lackadaisical coming over to help. If that was one of our guys I'd be calling for his head.Was that underthrown ball for Crabs' second TD purposely underthrown? Almost seems that way given timing. Either way Crabs made his coverage look stoopid.
It was garbage that they didn't give us those two games in a row. A 3-0 start with this schedule would be ridiculous.At least Washington will have travelled as much as us minus our trip out to Ten. At 1st glance of the schedule when it was released that seemed a bit rough, but the league usually is, on us. Now not so bad
I think we almost cut him (Seabass) but he agreed to a pay cut of about a million with chance to get a chunk back based on performance. The back opened the door for Linguine.... and he has been taking advantage of it being perfect so far. Seabass is old, now has a back problem, has not been as accurate or long as he use to be (see old thing), and is expensive (even with the pay cut). Right now- Fettuccine is on an extended job interview. If he continues to kick like he has been then I can easily see us either keeping Seabass on IR all year or when he is healthy cutting him. If Farfalle all of a sudden implodes then we have Seabass.Raiders fans, this kicker legit? A must add? Kicking on a team that scores 28+ a week. FBGs has him 26th going forward. SeaBass out the year or likely back?
100% legit. The guy's kicks from any yardage so far -- but especially the long ones -- have been consistent and crisp, right-down-the-middle attempts.Raiders fans, this kicker legit? A must add? Kicking on a team that scores 28+ a week. FBGs has him 26th going forward. SeaBass out the year or likely back?
Did we request it this time?It was garbage that they didn't give us those two games in a row. A 3-0 start with this schedule would be ridiculous.
Did we request it this time?It was garbage that they didn't give us those two games in a row. A 3-0 start with this schedule would be ridiculous.
Did we request it this time?It was garbage that they didn't give us those two games in a row. A 3-0 start with this schedule would be ridiculous.
I see the Jets as about as valuable as a pre-season game in terms of getting excited about how a player plays. As far as players to cover the best the Jets have is Kearse.... a guy that the less than stacked at WR Seahawks were more than happy to part with.... and then..... and..... you know, I watched the game and I still can't tell you who another Jets receiver is on the team. The Jet offense is putrid though I have more respect for their defense but come on, you can't seriously make any judgements about Conley based on one game against the Jets. It would have been HORRIBLE if he did not look against them and that is about as much value as it is.I can't believe nobody is talking about Conley. He didn't look like a rookie playing in his first game to me. Yeah it was the Jets, but it was the perfect team to get his feet wet. I thought he showed out and flashed 1st round talent, while Amerson was getting beat on the other side by the likes of Kearse. Sean Smith (Wally Pipp) may have just lost his job.
Thanks for enlightening me buddy. I had no idea the Jets were that bad. Geez, condescend much? Give the kid some credit. He sat out the whole preseason and he went out and played well, yes against a WR that would normally be on someone's practice squad. But who cares? He had the awareness to try and deflect the ball to Nelson on his first time defending an NFL pass from an NFL QB. I consider that impressive considering he's playing against professionals trying their best to win a game no matter how bad their team is.I see the Jets as about as valuable as a pre-season game in terms of getting excited about how a player plays. As far as players to cover the best the Jets have is Kearse.... a guy that the less than stacked at WR Seahawks were more than happy to part with.... and then..... and..... you know, I watched the game and I still can't tell you who another Jets receiver is on the team. The Jet offense is putrid though I have more respect for their defense but come on, you can't seriously make any judgements about Conley based on one game against the Jets. It would have been HORRIBLE if he did not look against them and that is about as much value as it is.
The Jets are a team we are suppose to beat badly and we did. The team took care of business, look to have good team chemistry and are focused (beating the teams you are suppose to beat shows me that they are not taking things for granted).
The Jets are in a race to the 1st overall pick with the Bears. So, yea, I am not talking about Conley........ yet.
I am going to side with Bruno on this. I am not sure how good Conley is going to be but he played well in his first game in the NFL. That counts for something. He is going to get burned a few times this season and will likely have some ugly games but it looks like he has a good future.Thanks for enlightening me buddy. I had no idea the Jets were that bad. Geez, condescend much? Give the kid some credit. He sat out the whole preseason and he went out and played well, yes against a WR that would normally be on someone's practice squad. But who cares? He had the awareness to try and deflect the ball to Nelson on his first time defending an NFL pass from an NFL QB. I consider that impressive considering he's playing against professionals trying their best to win a game no matter how bad their team is.
Conley got some serious reps out there at CB as far as I could see. And looked darn good. He didn't start but I thought I saw him as a main stay at CB from the 2nd quarter on, perhaps. His tip ball drill to try to get Nelson an INT was a great move.
Conley + Amerson as starting CBs, with Nelson and hard hitting Joseph actually could start being a, gulp, strength for the Raiders D. Whodathunk!
Bruno2 said:I can't believe nobody is talking about Conley. He didn't look like a rookie playing in his first game to me. Yeah it was the Jets, but it was the perfect team to get his feet wet. I thought he showed out and flashed 1st round talent, while Amerson was getting beat on the other side by the likes of Kearse. Sean Smith (Wally Pipp) may have just lost his job.
No condescending meant. Apologies for that impression.Bruno2 said:Thanks for enlightening me buddy. I had no idea the Jets were that bad. Geez, condescend much? Give the kid some credit. He sat out the whole preseason and he went out and played well, yes against a WR that would normally be on someone's practice squad. But who cares? He had the awareness to try and deflect the ball to Nelson on his first time defending an NFL pass from an NFL QB. I consider that impressive considering he's playing against professionals trying their best to win a game no matter how bad their team is.
Actually agree with this. Don't get me wrong, super psyched to see Conley out there and performing. But that's performing up to expectation. I hold any player to a higher standard than simply celebrating one great play. He'll need to show consistency and a level of high play before I start naming him and this squad the second coming of the Soul Patrol.No condescending meant. Apologies for that impression.
I am sorry, it just isn't anything to be excited about. There were good indications but I need to see much more than going up against the Jets receiving corp to really get excited or start talking him up.
He earned a "he did a good job against the Jets, here is to hoping he can play well against a good team" and that is about all I am willing to give at this point. I am not down on the kid- I think we got a steal for him at where we got him in the draft. It is more a commentary on the Jets and not getting excited about things until there is real reason to than anything else.
No worries man, we're all on the same side, we all want Conley to be the real deal. And I will admit I should temper my expectations a bit.No condescending meant. Apologies for that impression.
I am sorry, it just isn't anything to be excited about. There were good indications but I need to see much more than going up against the Jets receiving corp to really get excited or start talking him up.
He earned a "he did a good job against the Jets, here is to hoping he can play well against a good team" and that is about all I am willing to give at this point. I am not down on the kid- I think we got a steal for him at where we got him in the draft. It is more a commentary on the Jets and not getting excited about things until there is real reason to than anything else.
I don't see the Raiders D emerging as one of the best in the league in the near future. Maybe at the very end of the season but there are too many question marks at LB and in the secondary.Okay raider fans, question for you. Can this defense emerge as one of the best in the league? Mack is amazing but do they have enough other players on D? Seems like a good offense also takes the pressure of them a bit. Thoughts?
The effect of Pagano and a huge infusion of talent the last two seasons has been apparent to start this year, after an admittedly awful preseason. I am cautiously becoming a believer.Okay raider fans, question for you. Can this defense emerge as one of the best in the league? Mack is amazing but do they have enough other players on D? Seems like a good offense also takes the pressure of them a bit. Thoughts?
I'm not sold on the defense as a whole yet. Allowing 20 pts to the Jets is not something to brag about. If you look at the overall stats of the game, they were ok, not dominant by any means. They allowed 17 1st downs, 126 yds rushing and TOP was almost even, slightly in favor of the Raiders. And Amerson didn't have a great game either.Okay raider fans, question for you. Can this defense emerge as one of the best in the league? Mack is amazing but do they have enough other players on D? Seems like a good offense also takes the pressure of them a bit. Thoughts?
He's got Mike Haynes' number. I'd take him becoming half the player Mike Haynes was.I'm on board the Conley train. I'm hoping for the next Charles Woodson but would be happy with the next Nnamdi Asomugha.
No Fabian, no Fabian, no Fabian, no Fabian...!!!
Turns out he wasn't trying to tip the ball to Nelson.But that play, on the intermediate sideline ball, where he leaped, tipped it, and attempted to tip it to his teammate, was a big time play-versus ANYONE. Thanks to the magic of Twitter, here's the play. Check that out. Nelson was heading to where he thought the tipped ball was going, because he didn't think Conley would ever get his hands on it again. If Nelson hadn't swerved upfield, he had a pick, courtesy of Conley. For a kid with no camp, no offseason to speak of, I think we can be a little excited.
You can catch his response at the beginning of this clip. A little hard to hear but it's something like:That's asking an awful lot. The talent level seems to be close, but we still give up an awful lot of things we "shouldn't" based on the talent. We have pretty good pass rushers on paper with Mack, Irvin, Mario, Vanderdoes up and coming but don't seem to get a lot of pressure. The secondary on paper has promise too - Sean Smith was a huge UFA signing just a year ago and needs to bounce back, Conley is an elite rookie, Nelson a solid veteran and Joseph a heat-seeking missile. Nelson might need upgraded but he's not the liability he was at times in CIN. The LB's are the weakest link. We just haven't put any resources into them in terms of picks (5th's, 6th's, and UDFA, no significant Free Agents) so it's hard to expect much. Hopefully it's looked at next year.Okay raider fans, question for you. Can this defense emerge as one of the best in the league? Mack is amazing but do they have enough other players on D? Seems like a good offense also takes the pressure of them a bit. Thoughts?
24th in pass D last year, 23rd in rush D. I think top half in league in both would be a significant achievement. 12th and 17th now (moving them both up two notches because of teams two teams that have played only one game).Okay raider fans, question for you. Can this defense emerge as one of the best in the league? Mack is amazing but do they have enough other players on D? Seems like a good offense also takes the pressure of them a bit. Thoughts?
As you may have seen in some recent conversation about Conley. I am a bit cautiously reserved on what we have seen so far this season. With that said, I have been one of the biggest voices talking about how this defense is just brimming with potential to in fact end up being one of the best in the league.Okay raider fans, question for you. Can this defense emerge as one of the best in the league? Mack is amazing but do they have enough other players on D? Seems like a good offense also takes the pressure of them a bit. Thoughts?
This is it right here. We don't need the 85 Bears - just don't hurt us. Tenn moved ball well early & Jets were only down 14-10into half before the punt fumble. Then it seemed D settled in & our O put up points which then unleashes the rush. We are built around the O. The D just needs to keep things in control & eventually our OL & Carr will take over.Also, I am not really expecting this D to turn in shut outs. Our offense is a whole lot for any team to handle and that will put pressure on our D. I don't expect our D to do well in yards given up or points allowed. I do expect them to get a lot of 3 and outs and turnovers as they mature.