I disagree with basically all of this as well. In 2015/2016 the U.S. networks used Toronto Blue Jays fans as the benchmark that other teams had to live up to "It's Toronto loud right now". Raptors game are much louder and have way more atmosphere than Leafs games as well, TFC too FWIW.Never been to a Raps game but it is the same with the Jays (with the only exception being if Joe Carter is hitting a 3-run dinger to win their second world series).
And you miss my point about the Yankee fan comparison. I can’t think of a wholly different fanbase in terms of how they vocalize feelings, but the passion and history and investment
in more other news, the Ducks allow 3 goals on the 3rd again and blow a lead to a crappy team for #12.
Krappo for Kappo .
Anaheim might be done, but they're not quite as done as Florida is. Good things the Panthers cleared out all those analytics guys (and Marchessault and Smith and...)In other news, Montreal gets 52 saves from their backup in a 5 1 win.
Tied with the B's 1 point behind the Gardiners. (Oh sure theyve played 3 more games but still worth pointing out)
they take over the X every year. but so do several fan bases. Minnesotans sit on their hands just like the home Leaf fans.Leafs home games are corporate. The loud fans are elsewhere.
Leafs fans really are the worst though.
hopefully they have a couple holdovers still to let them know that they're actually pretty good based on the underlying stats. they're the new Canes only the Canes are still kind of the Canes. Marchessault and Smith not exactly ripping it up this year either.Anaheim might be done, but they're not quite as done as Florida is. Good things the Panthers cleared out all those analytics guys (and Marchessault and Smith and...)![]()
not sure how Chiarelli hasn't been fired into the Sun yet.Chiarelli is already shopping Puljujarvi? this should end well. how many top picks can one organization screw up?
And I disagree with using a year when Toronto was Top 3 in MLB attendance as your yardstick.I disagree with basically all of this as well. In 2015/2016 the U.S. networks used Toronto Blue Jays fans as the benchmark that other teams had to live up to "It's Toronto loud right now". Raptors game are much louder and have way more atmosphere than Leafs games as well, TFC too FWIW.
You're moving the goalposts again. We weren't talking about attendance, obviously the Leafs get great attendance. We were talking about if Toronto fans make noise and Jays fans (like Raptors and TFC fans) do, even when the crowds are smaller.And I disagree with using a year when Toronto was Top 3 in MLB attendance as your yardstick.
Prior to 2015 back to 2003, they averaged out to 22nd overall in attendance. Which I'd argue is more the team norm.
Their forwards are, Carolina has about 10 defencemen better than anyone past Florida's #3, and that's being kind and assuming Matheson will find his game.hopefully they have a couple holdovers still to let them know that they're actually pretty good based on the underlying stats. they're the new Canes only the Canes are still kind of the Canes. Marchessault and Smith not exactly ripping it up this year either.
You don't correlate noise generated by fans by the number of fans in the building? OK then. Next time I'm at games I'll bring my decibel reader and generate a longitudinal study. Better than illustrating a trend using a single data point.You're moving the goalposts again. We weren't talking about attendance, obviously the Leafs get great attendance. We were talking about if Toronto fans make noise and Jays fans (like Raptors and TFC fans) do, even when the crowds are smaller.
Not with Maple Leafs fans, that's the whole point. There are the same number of fans there as in Montreal, Boston, Chicago etc... or as Raptors, small crowd Blue Jays, Toronto FC... and the Maple Leafs are the quietest and ####tiest of all by a mile.You don't correlate noise generated by fans by the number of fans in the building?
yeah. their goaltending numbers have taken a lot of heat but if you watch that team they give up so many quality chances. but the goaltending isn't great either.Their forwards are, Carolina has about 10 defencemen better than anyone past Florida's #3, and that's being kind and assuming Matheson will find his game.
Florida would kill to have the Oilers (healthy) defense at this point.
Wait, Your not from Texas?Stompin' Tom Connors said:Hey, I can be as vocally self-critical as the next Canuck.
Stompin Tom brought this gem to the worldWait, Your not from Texas?
Why do people have such deceiving names and avatars?
wasn't playing any defense. -11 in his last 8 games with only 1 pt. maybe the latter also.So why did Anaheim scratch Aberg last 4 games? Defense really that bad? Or is it a personality thing?
former Gopher who was awesome in college. tweener in the pros that is great in the A but probably never will get a consistent top 6 look to stick in the NHL, especially since he’s already 25.wasn't playing any defense. -11 in his last 8 games with only 1 pt. maybe the latter also.
@Bill Brasky what's the story on Kloos?
Edm and Ana said the same thing, and then both coaches got so pissed at him, they got rid of him.former Gopher who was awesome in college. tweener in the pros that is great in the A but probably never will get a consistent top 6 look to stick in the NHL, especially since he’s already 25.
free Aberg. why not? no risk move.
Wild having lots of problems scoring lately and no cap room. worth the free dice roll even if he’s a flawed player.Edm and Ana said the same thing, and then both coaches got so pissed at him, they got rid of him.
Good analysis. Aberg never seemed to come to fruition as a "real gud pro" -- the first half of the season might have just been a smokeshow, he seemed lacking in areas a wingman shoudl be solid at (such as the dump and chase), and his scoring dried up. First Nashville dumps him, then Edmonton, now with the Ducks trying anything to salvage anything this season, and able to dump him pretty much for free -- why not shake it up?former Gopher who was awesome in college. tweener in the pros that is great in the A but probably never will get a consistent top 6 look to stick in the NHL, especially since he’s already 25.
free Aberg. why not? no risk move.
Fenton was a part of the team that drafted him so I expect he'll get a decent look. they always can use more skill/creativity so hopefully it gives them a bit of a spark because despite playing pretty well over the last couple months they have not been able to finish consistently. this is nothing new for this group though.Good analysis. Aberg never seemed to come to fruition as a "real gud pro" -- the first half of the season might have just been a smokeshow, he seemed lacking in areas a wingman shoudl be solid at (such as the dump and chase), and his scoring dried up. First Nashville dumps him, then Edmonton, now with the Ducks trying anything to salvage anything this season, and able to dump him pretty much for free -- why not shake it up?
The only thing that concerns me is that one of the biggest knocks against Fletcher was that he stayed in love with his own draft picks for way too long and would never let go. Now we bring in a new GM and his only move to date is to bring in one of his old draft picks that has now been moved three times already. Oh, but with his apparent lack of effort, he'll fit well in the Wild locker room.Wild having lots of problems scoring lately and no cap room. worth the free dice roll even if he’s a flawed player.
why would you be concerned about a move that cost nothing and carries zero risk? even if he plays 4th line for three games and is put on waivers it doesn’t hurt anything. it only has upside.The only thing that concerns me is that one of the biggest knocks against Fletcher was that he stayed in love with his own draft picks for way too long and would never let go. Now we bring in a new GM and his only move to date is to bring in one of his old draft picks that has now been moved three times already. Oh, but with his apparent lack of effort, he'll fit well in the Wild locker room.
Not concerned in the sense that the move will hurt the team. Obviously it doesn't have any risk, as you said. My concern was more about that all Fenton has done so far is go grab one of his old rejects. It's hard to tell what he thinks of this team since he basically won't even talk to the media off the record. But word from other teams is that his offers are just ridiculous so far. He's apparently way overvaluing his players. And he doesn't seem to have a real grasp on contracts, salary cap and no-trade clauses, etc. We'll see what happens. They need to rip the band aid off and blow this thing up. Team is going nowhere. Rebuild is going to take years. Might as well get started by selling Staal and others at the deadline. Sure hope they don't go trying to add anything that would require them giving up picks or young players.why would you be concerned about a move that cost nothing and carries zero risk? even if he plays 4th line for three games and is put on waivers it doesn’t hurt anything. it only has upside.
link to word from the other teams? I'm not sure what you're referencing.BeTheMatch said:Not concerned in the sense that the move will hurt the team. Obviously it doesn't have any risk, as you said. My concern was more about that all Fenton has done so far is go grab one of his old rejects. It's hard to tell what he thinks of this team since he basically won't even talk to the media off the record. But word from other teams is that his offers are just ridiculous so far. He's apparently way overvaluing his players. And he doesn't seem to have a real grasp on contracts, salary cap and no-trade clauses, etc. We'll see what happens. They need to rip the band aid off and blow this thing up. Team is going nowhere. Rebuild is going to take years. Might as well get started by selling Staal and others at the deadline. Sure hope they don't go trying to add anything that would require them giving up picks or young players.
Yeah i honestly thought MDZ had retired.Northern Voice said:Michael Del Zotto for Luke Schenn is really quite a trade.
Those guys feel so much older than Pietrangelo, Gardiner, Karlsson, Bogosian and the other guys drafted in the 2008 draft.
Not Doughty though, probably because he's looked like a 35 year old vet for most of his career.
Russo's podcast and tweetslink to word from the other teams? I'm not sure what you're referencing.
I'm not sure how you can glean so much from a guy who has virtually no track record yet and has been on the job for 6 months. and probably doesn't get hired by Leipold if he tells him he does want to blow it up.
blowing it up is fine since the window as it is currently structured is closing. but again, guy isn't getting hired if he recommends that. and if you don't blow it up coming in then standing pat was the best scenario because there isn't much you could do coming into this year since many of the guys you can move would be selling low and you don't have any cap room to buy. hockey trades were pretty tough to pull off with what he was tied to (NMC and guys you can move coming off low point seasons) and you don't see a lot of blockbusters this time of year because most teams are pretty locked into what they got.
maybe Fenton sucks, who knows. but at this point I think your frustrations are in the wrong guy.
Is it to dump salary and years? Nino has been HORRIBLE. If Rask doesn't have years, I love the move.Not sure what the point of that trade is for the Wild but certainly seems like Fenton is getting ready to blow things up.
I see he's got three years left after this with a modified NTC the final two. Now I'm not as happy.Is it to dump salary and years? Nino has been HORRIBLE. If Rask doesn't have years, I love the move.
not even one example? the one rumored deal that was public was the Domi deal which even in hindsight with Domi's strong season looked like low return back. in the offseason it appeared that Fenton was getting lowballed because teams knew the pressure was on him, not the other way around. so I'm not sure what specific deals you're referring to.Russo's podcast and tweets