What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2023-24 NBA (Playoffs!) Thread: Message board poster furiously types out one more horrible post before thread closes (5 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
was just bagging on you for calling borderline NBA rotation players as stars
Any nba player has a chance to be a star in this tourney.
Well sure, but we aren't preemptively calling anyone but SGA and Murray stars
How many guys on the US roster can be considered stars (besides Reaves of course)?
It's no Dream Team, but Edwards, JJJ, Brunson, Bridges, Haliburton, Ingram and Banchero are 7 all-star level guys.
 
I’m loopy on cold medicine, but I’m thinking about doing a draft for the mid-season tournament. The league will be announcing the matchup/schedules this upcoming week.

I figure we’ll draft the nba teams, and I’ll come up with some scoring system (pool play wins, knockout wins, champion).

Otherwise we can treat it like the World Cup or ncaa tourney, and everyone makes their predictions beforehand and we track who gets closest.

Anyway, I’m totally in on this stupid tourney.
 
was just bagging on you for calling borderline NBA rotation players as stars
Any nba player has a chance to be a star in this tourney.
Well sure, but we aren't preemptively calling anyone but SGA and Murray stars
How many guys on the US roster can be considered stars (besides Reaves of course)?
It's no Dream Team, but Edwards, JJJ, Brunson, Bridges, Haliburton, Ingram and Banchero are 7 all-star level guys.
Also their coaching roster is top notch - perhaps the top 3 coaches in the league

Kerr, Spo, Lue
 
was just bagging on you for calling borderline NBA rotation players as stars
Any nba player has a chance to be a star in this tourney.
Well sure, but we aren't preemptively calling anyone but SGA and Murray stars
How many guys on the US roster can be considered stars (besides Reaves of course)?
It's no Dream Team, but Edwards, JJJ, Brunson, Bridges, Haliburton, Ingram and Banchero are 7 all-star level guys.
Also their coaching roster is top notch - perhaps the top 3 coaches in the league

Kerr, Spo, Lue

Kerr and Spo, yes. I'm not sure I get why people seem to think Lue is one of the top few coaches in the NBA. Based on what?

I mean, Pop is still coaching. Is he not viewed as a top coach any more? What about Malone? I'm sure there are others I'm not thinking of.
 
was just bagging on you for calling borderline NBA rotation players as stars
Any nba player has a chance to be a star in this tourney.
Well sure, but we aren't preemptively calling anyone but SGA and Murray stars
How many guys on the US roster can be considered stars (besides Reaves of course)?
It's no Dream Team, but Edwards, JJJ, Brunson, Bridges, Haliburton, Ingram and Banchero are 7 all-star level guys.
Also their coaching roster is top notch - perhaps the top 3 coaches in the league

Kerr, Spo, Lue

Kerr and Spo, yes. I'm not sure I get why people seem to think Lue is one of the top few coaches in the NBA. Based on what?

I mean, Pop is still coaching. Is he not viewed as a top coach any more? What about Malone? I'm sure there are others I'm not thinking of.
I think the shine is off Pop a bit since it seems unclear how much he’s able to evolve with the new game, though to be fair, their rosters the past 4 years have been pretty wack and he has actually had more success statistically than a lot would.

Malone should probably be rising up the ranks.

The esteem for Nick Nurse and Bud has also worn off a bit, but they should probably at least be in the top 5 conversation.

I think that Lue’s main strengths are his willingness to try things and adjust in the playoffs and his supposedly high ability to communicate and connect with players. I can’t really speak to the latter obviously, but the former is probably a greater value-add for a lot of people. If you are taking in the entirety of the head coaching job, he is probably more toward the back half of the top 10.

Monty Williams, ime Udoka, and maybe even Mike Brown might have a case vs. Lue.
 
Hoop Central
@TheHoopCentral

REPORT: “(James Harden) no longer wants to play for Philadelphia and has no plans of taking part in training camp.”
Then he should not have opted into his contract.
Why? He took a team friendly pay cut last season. He should by any means necessary maintin any leverage he has in getting the team to square things up.
Yea I am not sure either party has any moral standing here. PHI got a bargain and there was likely a wink wink deal that he would get a longer deal this offseason. He once again had some horrific playoff moments and Morey was probably like "hey, let's just run it back one more time and use our max cap space in 2024". And now, here we are.

I bet he gets dealt still. Maybe a few months into the season. But someone will give something for him
 
Still don’t get why Morey is trying to hold leverage here when Harden could have walked for nothing a few months ago. I’m sure there was some kind of handshake deal along the way.
 
Hoop Central
@TheHoopCentral

REPORT: “(James Harden) no longer wants to play for Philadelphia and has no plans of taking part in training camp.”
Then he should not have opted into his contract.
Why? He took a team friendly pay cut last season. He should by any means necessary maintin any leverage he has in getting the team to square things up.
Signing a contract with intent to breach could be problematic. This isn’t a holdout at the end of a now non-market deal.
 
Still don’t get why Morey is trying to hold leverage here when Harden could have walked for nothing a few months ago. I’m sure there was some kind of handshake deal along the way.
100% there was something. But sixers got smacked for tampering last year so probably need to be careful.
 
Hoop Central
@TheHoopCentral

REPORT: “(James Harden) no longer wants to play for Philadelphia and has no plans of taking part in training camp.”
Then he should not have opted into his contract.
Why? He took a team friendly pay cut last season. He should by any means necessary maintin any leverage he has in getting the team to square things up.
Signing a contract with intent to breach could be problematic. This isn’t a holdout at the end of a now non-market deal.
It's not like he isn't a known quantity. They knew what they were getting into when they extended him. They should have just gave him market value and nixed the player option if they didn't want the drama.
 
Hoop Central
@TheHoopCentral

REPORT: “(James Harden) no longer wants to play for Philadelphia and has no plans of taking part in training camp.”
Then he should not have opted into his contract.
Why? He took a team friendly pay cut last season. He should by any means necessary maintin any leverage he has in getting the team to square things up.
Signing a contract with intent to breach could be problematic. This isn’t a holdout at the end of a now non-market deal.
It's not like he isn't a known quantity. They knew what they were getting into when they extended him. They should have just gave him market value and nixed the player option if they didn't want the drama.
Daryl does not care about the drama. That sucks for a lot of other people on the ground, but I'm sure that Daryl is not worried about it. He looks at like what's the point of trading him for very little. There's no chance that it increases their championship equity. On the other hand, there is a slight slight chance that by waiting, he could increase the Sixers' championship equity. Same playbook as Ben Simmons.
 
Still don’t get why Morey is trying to hold leverage here when Harden could have walked for nothing a few months ago. I’m sure there was some kind of handshake deal along the way.
100% there was something. But sixers got smacked for tampering last year so probably need to be careful.
Smacked? They lost two meaningless second round picks. Every team will tamper if that is the result
 
Hoop Central
@TheHoopCentral

REPORT: “(James Harden) no longer wants to play for Philadelphia and has no plans of taking part in training camp.”
Then he should not have opted into his contract.
Why? He took a team friendly pay cut last season. He should by any means necessary maintin any leverage he has in getting the team to square things up.
Signing a contract with intent to breach could be problematic. This isn’t a holdout at the end of a now non-market deal.
It's not like he isn't a known quantity. They knew what they were getting into when they extended him. They should have just gave him market value and nixed the player option if they didn't want the drama.
Daryl does not care about the drama. That sucks for a lot of other people on the ground, but I'm sure that Daryl is not worried about it. He looks at like what's the point of trading him for very little. There's no chance that it increases their championship equity. On the other hand, there is a slight slight chance that by waiting, he could increase the Sixers' championship equity. Same playbook as Ben Simmons.

That Ben Simmons thing didn't really workout that well.
 
Just curious how people felt about Basketball Reference's HOF chances for current players (minimum 10% chance). Who looks too high? Too low?

LeBron - 100%
KD - 100%
Chris Paul - 100%
Steph - 100%
Harden - 99.9%
Westbrook - 99.9%
AD - 98.6%
Dame - 93.6%
Giannis - 94.9%
Paul George - 93.6%
Kyrie - 93.4%
Jokic - 86.4%
Lowry - 85.7%
Kawhi - 77.6%
Draymond - 76.8%
Kevin Love - 73.4%
Butler - 72.9%
Klay - 70,2%
Blake - 54.8%
DeRozan - 42.4%
Wall - 32.3
Gobert - 21.6%
Kemba - 15.1%
Iguodala - 12.6%
Horford - 12.2%
KAT - 10.8%
Rose - 10.5%
 
Just curious how people felt about Basketball Reference's HOF chances for current players (minimum 10% chance). Who looks too high? Too low?

LeBron - 100% duh
KD - 100% duh
Chris Paul - 100% duh
Steph - 100% duh
Harden - 99.9% yea for sure, sucks
Westbrook - 99.9% yup
AD - 98.6% yes
Dame - 93.6% oh yes
Giannis - 94.9% he’s 100%
Paul George - 93.6% yup
Kyrie - 93.4% yup
Jokic - 86.4% should be 100%
Lowry - 85.7% don’t get this one
Kawhi - 77.6% he’s 100%
Draymond - 76.8% he’s 100%
Kevin Love - 73.4% this is where it starts to drop
Butler - 72.9% he’s in
Klay - 70,2% 100%
Blake - 54.8% no
DeRozan - 42.4% no
Wall - 32.3 nope
Gobert - 21.6% no
Kemba - 15.1% no
Iguodala - 12.6% has a case but no
Horford - 12.2% no
KAT - 10.8% lol
Rose - 10.5% nope

Imo
 
Just curious how people felt about Basketball Reference's HOF chances for current players (minimum 10% chance). Who looks too high? Too low?

LeBron - 100%
KD - 100%
Chris Paul - 100%
Steph - 100%
Harden - 99.9%
Westbrook - 99.9%
AD - 98.6%
Dame - 93.6%
Giannis - 94.9%
Paul George - 93.6%
Kyrie - 93.4%
Jokic - 86.4%
Lowry - 85.7%
Kawhi - 77.6%
Draymond - 76.8%
Kevin Love - 73.4%
Butler - 72.9%
Klay - 70,2%
Blake - 54.8%
DeRozan - 42.4%
Wall - 32.3
Gobert - 21.6%
Kemba - 15.1%
Iguodala - 12.6%
Horford - 12.2%
KAT - 10.8%
Rose - 10.5%

This post is a good example of why I don't care about the basketball HOF.

Paul George has put up a huge amount of empty stats. I don't see him as a HOFer, but he almost certainly will be. Can we tell the story of the league without him? Yes. Has he truly impacted the game? No. Does he have any signature moments? No. Any notable postseason success? No. WTF?

Lowry was a solid player who happened to be a very good player on a championship team, yet he was not the top player on that team. HOFer? Come on.

Blake Griffin? DeRozan? Wall? Gobert? Kemba? Horford? Rose? It's a joke if any of them get serious consideration.
 
Just curious how people felt about Basketball Reference's HOF chances for current players (minimum 10% chance). Who looks too high? Too low?

LeBron - 100%
KD - 100%
Chris Paul - 100%
Steph - 100%
Harden - 99.9%
Westbrook - 99.9%
AD - 98.6%
Dame - 93.6%
Giannis - 94.9%
Paul George - 93.6%
Kyrie - 93.4%
Jokic - 86.4%
Lowry - 85.7%
Kawhi - 77.6%
Draymond - 76.8%
Kevin Love - 73.4%
Butler - 72.9%
Klay - 70,2%
Blake - 54.8%
DeRozan - 42.4%
Wall - 32.3
Gobert - 21.6%
Kemba - 15.1%
Iguodala - 12.6%
Horford - 12.2%
KAT - 10.8%
Rose - 10.5%
Guys that I think have too high a %: AD, Dame, PG13, Lowry & Griffin. Dame & AD should get in, but they arent locks like the % would indicate.

Guys not at 100% but should be: Giannis, Jokic & Kawhi. Even if any of them don't play another game, they are locks.

Westbrook is where he should be. He's got the accolades and stats to justify it.

Rose will be the first MVP not to make it.
 
Hoop Central
@TheHoopCentral

REPORT: “(James Harden) no longer wants to play for Philadelphia and has no plans of taking part in training camp.”
Then he should not have opted into his contract.
Why? He took a team friendly pay cut last season. He should by any means necessary maintin any leverage he has in getting the team to square things up.
Signing a contract with intent to breach could be problematic. This isn’t a holdout at the end of a now non-market deal.
It's not like he isn't a known quantity. They knew what they were getting into when they extended him. They should have just gave him market value and nixed the player option if they didn't want the drama.
Daryl does not care about the drama. That sucks for a lot of other people on the ground, but I'm sure that Daryl is not worried about it. He looks at like what's the point of trading him for very little. There's no chance that it increases their championship equity. On the other hand, there is a slight slight chance that by waiting, he could increase the Sixers' championship equity. Same playbook as Ben Simmons.

That Ben Simmons thing didn't really workout that well.

Harden with his many faults is still better than Ben Simmons
 
Hoop Central
@TheHoopCentral

REPORT: “(James Harden) no longer wants to play for Philadelphia and has no plans of taking part in training camp.”
Then he should not have opted into his contract.
Why? He took a team friendly pay cut last season. He should by any means necessary maintin any leverage he has in getting the team to square things up.
Signing a contract with intent to breach could be problematic. This isn’t a holdout at the end of a now non-market deal.
It's not like he isn't a known quantity. They knew what they were getting into when they extended him. They should have just gave him market value and nixed the player option if they didn't want the drama.
Daryl does not care about the drama. That sucks for a lot of other people on the ground, but I'm sure that Daryl is not worried about it. He looks at like what's the point of trading him for very little. There's no chance that it increases their championship equity. On the other hand, there is a slight slight chance that by waiting, he could increase the Sixers' championship equity. Same playbook as Ben Simmons.

That Ben Simmons thing didn't really workout that well.

Harden with his many faults is still better than Ben Simmons

It wasn't just Harden for Simmons, and they had other teams interested and could have gotten a better return than Harden if Morey didn't make ridiculous offers.
 
The Harden situation is going to be fascinating to see how it plays out. If he opted in for the sole purpose of being traded and making that more of a possibility rather than trying to orchestrate a much more complicated sign and trade deal and then the Sixers DON'T trade him, that would be an interesting test of the CBA. PHI will likely fine and suspend him for failing to honor his contract. What a mess.
 
The Harden situation is going to be fascinating to see how it plays out. If he opted in for the sole purpose of being traded and making that more of a possibility rather than trying to orchestrate a much more complicated sign and trade deal and then the Sixers DON'T trade him, that would be an interesting test of the CBA. PHI will likely fine and suspend him for failing to honor his contract. What a mess.

NBA off-season never fails to deliver.
 
Opting in and demanding a trade is new territory, right? In the NFL, once the Franchise player signs the 1-year tag, they don't hold out. If he doesn't report to camp, they will need to fine and suspend him like they did Simmons -- and there is no injury or mental health thing this time for NBAPA to rely on.
 
Opting in and demanding a trade is new territory, right? In the NFL, once the Franchise player signs the 1-year tag, they don't hold out. If he doesn't report to camp, they will need to fine and suspend him like they did Simmons -- and there is no injury or mental health thing this time for NBAPA to rely on.
We are entering new territory on this one. If there were verbal promises and considerations made that aren't documented in a contract, who knows what that means. Harden could argue that he only opted in to expedite a trade, which would have allowed for PHI to recoup some assets that they would not have received if he simply signed elsewhere as a free agent. That's probably how that all went down and what was promised to Harden. But I have no idea what that means in terms of the NBAPA, a suspension, fines, etc. Like Simmons, I would guess eventually PHI will end up trading him, but it might take a while. The Sixers likely won't want to play him, as there is the potential that Harden would put forth very little effort, could gain 30 pounds, and otherwise be disinterested in playing while being a huge distraction.
 
James Harden is already in prime physical form to tank every minute he is forced to play with the Sixers. He's been hitting up the buffet at the strip club a little too often.
 
Just curious how people felt about Basketball Reference's HOF chances for current players (minimum 10% chance). Who looks too high? Too low?

LeBron - 100%
KD - 100%
Chris Paul - 100%
Steph - 100%
Harden - 99.9%
Westbrook - 99.9%
AD - 98.6%
Dame - 93.6%
Giannis - 94.9%
Paul George - 93.6%
Kyrie - 93.4%
Jokic - 86.4%
Lowry - 85.7%
Kawhi - 77.6%
Draymond - 76.8%
Kevin Love - 73.4%
Butler - 72.9%
Klay - 70,2%
Blake - 54.8%
DeRozan - 42.4%
Wall - 32.3
Gobert - 21.6%
Kemba - 15.1%
Iguodala - 12.6%
Horford - 12.2%
KAT - 10.8%
Rose - 10.5%
Guys that I think have too high a %: AD, Dame, PG13, Lowry & Griffin. Dame & AD should get in, but they arent locks like the % would indicate.

Guys not at 100% but should be: Giannis, Jokic & Kawhi. Even if any of them don't play another game, they are locks.

Westbrook is where he should be. He's got the accolades and stats to justify it.

Rose will be the first MVP not to make it.
There are something like 125 NBA players in the Basketball HOF - at any given time there are something like 25 players that are currently playing in the NBA that will make it to the HOF. Of the players above Griffin (whose probability feels a little low), I think nearly all of them are locks except Lowry (their algorithm is wonky with him) and Love. I think Love probably makes it and Lowry probably doesn't. The only player below Griffin that I think has anything of a chance is Gobert, but he needs to have another couple years of DPOY contention.
 
Just curious how people felt about Basketball Reference's HOF chances for current players (minimum 10% chance). Who looks too high? Too low?

LeBron - 100%
KD - 100%
Chris Paul - 100%
Steph - 100%
Harden - 99.9%
Westbrook - 99.9%
AD - 98.6%
Dame - 93.6%
Giannis - 94.9%
Paul George - 93.6%
Kyrie - 93.4%
Jokic - 86.4%
Lowry - 85.7%
Kawhi - 77.6%
Draymond - 76.8%
Kevin Love - 73.4%
Butler - 72.9%
Klay - 70,2%
Blake - 54.8%
DeRozan - 42.4%
Wall - 32.3
Gobert - 21.6%
Kemba - 15.1%
Iguodala - 12.6%
Horford - 12.2%
KAT - 10.8%
Rose - 10.5%
I'd put Gobert's odds at over 50%. His Minnesota tenure has taken a bit of the shine off, but he's one of four players to ever win DPOY 3+ times. Probably the most dominant rim protector of this era. That's a much better resume than, say, DeRozan's or Griffin's IMO.
 
Too early for Booker to be on the list?
They don't really consider the younger guys until they get to a certain point. Here are the active players in the 1-9% range . . .

Tatum - 6.9%
Mitchell - 6.6%
Sabonis - 4.0%
Jordan - 3.7%
Beal - 2.3%
Drummond - 1.9%
Middleton 1.7%
Cousins - 1.5%
Booker - 1.1%

Not sure why their algorithm shows those guys that way, but that's how they rank them.
 
Hoop Central
@TheHoopCentral

REPORT: “(James Harden) no longer wants to play for Philadelphia and has no plans of taking part in training camp.”
Then he should not have opted into his contract.
Why? He took a team friendly pay cut last season. He should by any means necessary maintin any leverage he has in getting the team to square things up.
Signing a contract with intent to breach could be problematic. This isn’t a holdout at the end of a now non-market deal.
It's not like he isn't a known quantity. They knew what they were getting into when they extended him. They should have just gave him market value and nixed the player option if they didn't want the drama.
Daryl does not care about the drama. That sucks for a lot of other people on the ground, but I'm sure that Daryl is not worried about it. He looks at like what's the point of trading him for very little. There's no chance that it increases their championship equity. On the other hand, there is a slight slight chance that by waiting, he could increase the Sixers' championship equity. Same playbook as Ben Simmons.

That Ben Simmons thing didn't really workout that well.

Harden with his many faults is still better than Ben Simmons

It wasn't just Harden for Simmons, and they had other teams interested and could have gotten a better return than Harden if Morey didn't make ridiculous offers.
what return could they have gotten?
 
Too early for Booker to be on the list?
They don't really consider the younger guys until they get to a certain point. Here are the active players in the 1-9% range . . .

Tatum - 6.9%
Mitchell - 6.6%
Sabonis - 4.0%
Jordan - 3.7%
Beal - 2.3%
Drummond - 1.9%
Middleton 1.7%
Cousins - 1.5%
Booker - 1.1%

Not sure why their algorithm shows those guys that way, but that's how they rank them.
The only guys on this list with a good chance are Tatum and Booker. Guys with an outside shot, Mitchell and maybe Sabonis. Everyone else is too old already and has no shot.
 
Just curious how people felt about Basketball Reference's HOF chances for current players (minimum 10% chance). Who looks too high? Too low?

LeBron - 100%
KD - 100%
Chris Paul - 100%
Steph - 100%
Harden - 99.9%
Westbrook - 99.9%
AD - 98.6%
Dame - 93.6%
Giannis - 94.9%
Paul George - 93.6%
Kyrie - 93.4%
Jokic - 86.4%
Lowry - 85.7%
Kawhi - 77.6%
Draymond - 76.8%
Kevin Love - 73.4%
Butler - 72.9%
Klay - 70,2%
Blake - 54.8%
DeRozan - 42.4%
Wall - 32.3
Gobert - 21.6%
Kemba - 15.1%
Iguodala - 12.6%
Horford - 12.2%
KAT - 10.8%
Rose - 10.5%
Guys that I think have too high a %: AD, Dame, PG13, Lowry & Griffin. Dame & AD should get in, but they arent locks like the % would indicate.

Guys not at 100% but should be: Giannis, Jokic & Kawhi. Even if any of them don't play another game, they are locks.

Westbrook is where he should be. He's got the accolades and stats to justify it.

Rose will be the first MVP not to make it.
There are something like 125 NBA players in the Basketball HOF - at any given time there are something like 25 players that are currently playing in the NBA that will make it to the HOF. Of the players above Griffin (whose probability feels a little low), I think nearly all of them are locks except Lowry (their algorithm is wonky with him) and Love. I think Love probably makes it and Lowry probably doesn't. The only player below Griffin that I think has anything of a chance is Gobert, but he needs to have another couple years of DPOY contention.

Not sure if Wikipedia is accurate, but it says:

In total, 177 or 178 players, depending on Nathaniel Clifton's classification, have been inducted into the Hall of Fame. Of these, 110 or 111, again depending on Clifton's classification, have played in the NBA.

The first NBA player inducted was Mikan in 1959. 110-111 players inducted in 64 years.

If there are 25 HOF players playing in the NBA at any given time, then these would be my 25 right now, in no particular order:
  1. Lebron
  2. Durant
  3. Curry
  4. Jokic
  5. Giannis
  6. Luka
  7. Embiid
  8. Lillard
  9. Harden
  10. Butler
  11. Tatum
  12. Thompson
  13. Draymond
  14. Booker
  15. Paul
  16. Westbrook
  17. Kawhi
  18. AD
  19. Edwards
  20. SGA
  21. Haliburton
  22. Banchero
  23. Holmgren
  24. Wembanyama
  25. Scoot
Obviously, some of these are probably wrong, since some of the players near the bottom are so early in their careers. As an example, if I made this list a year ago, Morant would clearly have been on it, but that seems much more in doubt now.

The point is, if it's a total of 25 at any given time, that includes players in their first, second, etc. years in the league, as well as players past their prime but still active, like Griffin. That, in turn, is why guys like Griffin, Lowry, et al. should not have much of a shot. Put George, Griffin, Lowry, Love, et al. in, and it's more like there are 30-35 HOF players playing at any given time. Which would be way too many IMO.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top