What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2023 College football thread - That's A Wrap (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Once you get beyond the conference champs

Are you saying just the SEC and B1G champs or which conference champs get auto-bids?

That doesn't look terrible but kind of what I was getting at with Ole Miss, Penn State or Missouri in there. I mean what about those teams regular seasons says that they should play for a National Championship.

I guess this system may devalue the regular season a but (but I suppose you can say that about a lot of sports), but perhaps the playoff games will be fun.
Well, it's going to change now, but the initial approach was the top 6 ranked conference champions would get automatic bids (top four with round one byes) and the other 6 would be the next highest-rated teams regardless of conference alignment. In reality we are still bound by the whims of the committee and how they decide to rank teams so that part doesn't change. It's just more teams in their rankings now. Still going to be plenty of shenanigans to argue and get pissy about.
 
Last edited:
Just as we (most of us ;)) predicted ...


They have to prevail for it to matter. Then they actually have to be invited to join the SEC or B1G and get to full member payout status to make it worthwhile.

Also notable that the ACC sued FSU first, on Thursday.
 
Just as we (most of us ;)) predicted ...


They have to prevail for it to matter. Then they actually have to be invited to join the SEC or B1G and get to full member payout status to make it worthwhile.

Also notable that the ACC sued FSU first, on Thursday.
You're setting your own criteria, which is fine, but even if the B1G offered them half for the first 5 years, they'd be making pretty much the same thing they are making now plus they'd have access to literal billions in research money. Then they'd get full share moving forward. I think they'd be fine with that knowing how the ACC is viewed today and what it's ceiling is.
 
Just as we (most of us ;)) predicted ...


They have to prevail for it to matter. Then they actually have to be invited to join the SEC or B1G and get to full member payout status to make it worthwhile.

Also notable that the ACC sued FSU first, on Thursday.
You're setting your own criteria, which is fine, but even if the B1G offered them half for the first 5 years, they'd be making pretty much the same thing they are making now plus they'd have access to literal billions in research money. Then they'd get full share moving forward. I think they'd be fine with that knowing how the ACC is viewed today and what it's ceiling is.

Will the B1G add a 19th member that is not in the AAU?
 
Just as we (most of us ;)) predicted ...


They have to prevail for it to matter. Then they actually have to be invited to join the SEC or B1G and get to full member payout status to make it worthwhile.

Also notable that the ACC sued FSU first, on Thursday.
You're setting your own criteria, which is fine, but even if the B1G offered them half for the first 5 years, they'd be making pretty much the same thing they are making now plus they'd have access to literal billions in research money. Then they'd get full share moving forward. I think they'd be fine with that knowing how the ACC is viewed today and what it's ceiling is.

Will the B1G add a 19th member that is not in the AAU?
They took Nebraska. Prior to that Id have said no.
 
Just as we (most of us ;)) predicted ...


They have to prevail for it to matter. Then they actually have to be invited to join the SEC or B1G and get to full member payout status to make it worthwhile.

Also notable that the ACC sued FSU first, on Thursday.
You're setting your own criteria, which is fine, but even if the B1G offered them half for the first 5 years, they'd be making pretty much the same thing they are making now plus they'd have access to literal billions in research money. Then they'd get full share moving forward. I think they'd be fine with that knowing how the ACC is viewed today and what it's ceiling is.

Will the B1G add a 19th member that is not in the AAU?
Yes, the Big will be adding FSU, because Fox wants them to. AAU has nothing to do with this anymore it is not 2008.
 
Just as we (most of us ;)) predicted ...


They have to prevail for it to matter. Then they actually have to be invited to join the SEC or B1G and get to full member payout status to make it worthwhile.

Also notable that the ACC sued FSU first, on Thursday.
Denial doesnt look good on you ;)

Its going to happen, no reason to get caught up in specifics and details. FSU is leaving an "ironclad" agreement, period.
 
In FSU’s filing today it was revealed espn could cancel the deal with the ACC in 2027 but no ACC teams can move until 2036. That’s gonna be a big part of the out.
 
From Nicole Auerbach

FSU lawyer says that ESPN has a "unilateral" right to exercise a nine-year option to extend its media deal with the ACC from 2027 through 2036. (Which it hasn't yet.) Right now, there is no guaranteed media rights revenue for ACC members past 2027.


Absolutely crazy. Espn can just dump the ACC but the ACC can’t renegotiate with espn. FSU is the first one taking this on. If they succeed it will be an ACC bloodbath.
 
Just as we (most of us ;)) predicted ...


They have to prevail for it to matter. Then they actually have to be invited to join the SEC or B1G and get to full member payout status to make it worthwhile.

Also notable that the ACC sued FSU first, on Thursday.
You're setting your own criteria, which is fine, but even if the B1G offered them half for the first 5 years, they'd be making pretty much the same thing they are making now plus they'd have access to literal billions in research money. Then they'd get full share moving forward. I think they'd be fine with that knowing how the ACC is viewed today and what it's ceiling is.

Will the B1G add a 19th member that is not in the AAU?
They took Nebraska. Prior to that Id have said no.

Nebraska was in AAU at that time. Since then, I believe AAU changed their valuation of agriculture, which dropped Nebraska out. But they were in when added. FSU is not in AAU. To this point in time, the B1G has never added an expansion member not in AAU.
 
Just as we (most of us ;)) predicted ...


They have to prevail for it to matter. Then they actually have to be invited to join the SEC or B1G and get to full member payout status to make it worthwhile.

Also notable that the ACC sued FSU first, on Thursday.
Denial doesnt look good on you ;)

Its going to happen, no reason to get caught up in specifics and details. FSU is leaving an "ironclad" agreement, period.

We will see.
 
From Nicole Auerbach

FSU lawyer says that ESPN has a "unilateral" right to exercise a nine-year option to extend its media deal with the ACC from 2027 through 2036. (Which it hasn't yet.) Right now, there is no guaranteed media rights revenue for ACC members past 2027.


Absolutely crazy. Espn can just dump the ACC but the ACC can’t renegotiate with espn. FSU is the first one taking this on. If they succeed it will be an ACC bloodbath.
Eff BSPN
 
As a fan of another ACC university, I hope FSU prevails in court, pays a big settlement to get out, and then is not invited into SEC or B1G.

A point I saw made elsewhere is that if FSU prevails, opening the door for other universities to exit the ACC, there are other universities that would immediately jump FSU in priority. Not saying I necessarily agree, but UNC and UVA could be more appealing to B1G than FSU... both AAU universities, and two new market states. And some combo of UNC, NC State, VT, and UVA could be more appealing to SEC since those are new markets for SEC but FSU doesn't offer that.
 
Just as we (most of us ;)) predicted ...


They have to prevail for it to matter. Then they actually have to be invited to join the SEC or B1G and get to full member payout status to make it worthwhile.

Also notable that the ACC sued FSU first, on Thursday.
You're setting your own criteria, which is fine, but even if the B1G offered them half for the first 5 years, they'd be making pretty much the same thing they are making now plus they'd have access to literal billions in research money. Then they'd get full share moving forward. I think they'd be fine with that knowing how the ACC is viewed today and what it's ceiling is.

Will the B1G add a 19th member that is not in the AAU?
19th and 20th.
 
Part of FSU’s legal filing charges that the ACC violated the contractual, legal and fiduciary duties it owed to its members by admitting Cal, Stanford and SMU, which diluted the media rights and diminished the already inadequate strength of schedule.

I guess that will be part of their argument for why they should be let out.
 
Part of FSU’s legal filing charges that the ACC violated the contractual, legal and fiduciary duties it owed to its members by admitting Cal, Stanford and SMU, which diluted the media rights and diminished the already inadequate strength of schedule.

I guess that will be part of their argument for why they should be let out.

I don't know much about SMU but I bet Cal and Stanford lawyers are spending their holiday reading the fine print in whatever agreement they have with the ACC.
 
Part of FSU’s legal filing charges that the ACC violated the contractual, legal and fiduciary duties it owed to its members by admitting Cal, Stanford and SMU, which diluted the media rights and diminished the already inadequate strength of schedule.

I guess that will be part of their argument for why they should be let out.

Those members are getting trivial payouts for several years ($0 for SMU for 9 years and 30% payout to Stanford and Cal for 7 years IIRC), which undermines that argument IMO. Will be interesting to see what effect that has on this.
 
From Nicole Auerbach

FSU lawyer says that ESPN has a "unilateral" right to exercise a nine-year option to extend its media deal with the ACC from 2027 through 2036. (Which it hasn't yet.) Right now, there is no guaranteed media rights revenue for ACC members past 2027.


Absolutely crazy. Espn can just dump the ACC but the ACC can’t renegotiate with espn. FSU is the first one taking this on. If they succeed it will be an ACC bloodbath.
It's almost like FSU should have withdrawn from the conference before signing that contract.
 
As a fan of another ACC university, I hope FSU prevails in court, pays a big settlement to get out, and then is not invited into SEC or B1G.

A point I saw made elsewhere is that if FSU prevails, opening the door for other universities to exit the ACC, there are other universities that would immediately jump FSU in priority. Not saying I necessarily agree, but UNC and UVA could be more appealing to B1G than FSU... both AAU universities, and two new market states. And some combo of UNC, NC State, VT, and UVA could be more appealing to SEC since those are new markets for SEC but FSU doesn't offer that.
You want to talk new markets? I think GT has the biggest weenie in that discussion :)
 
Part of FSU’s legal filing charges that the ACC violated the contractual, legal and fiduciary duties it owed to its members by admitting Cal, Stanford and SMU, which diluted the media rights and diminished the already inadequate strength of schedule.

I guess that will be part of their argument for why they should be let out.

Those members are getting trivial payouts for several years ($0 for SMU for 9 years and 30% payout to Stanford and Cal for 7 years IIRC), which undermines that argument IMO. Will be interesting to see what effect that has on this.
Interestingly, FSU’s filing points out that very thing in order to bolster its case that the league’s media cache is diminished

 
Just as we (most of us ;)) predicted ...


They have to prevail for it to matter. Then they actually have to be invited to join the SEC or B1G and get to full member payout status to make it worthwhile.

Also notable that the ACC sued FSU first, on Thursday.
You're setting your own criteria, which is fine, but even if the B1G offered them half for the first 5 years, they'd be making pretty much the same thing they are making now plus they'd have access to literal billions in research money. Then they'd get full share moving forward. I think they'd be fine with that knowing how the ACC is viewed today and what it's ceiling is.

Will the B1G add a 19th member that is not in the AAU?
They took Nebraska. Prior to that Id have said no.

Nebraska was in AAU at that time. Since then, I believe AAU changed their valuation of agriculture, which dropped Nebraska out. But they were in when added. FSU is not in AAU. To this point in time, the B1G has never added an expansion member not in AAU.
They were losing their accreditation and the conference knew it when they accepted them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JAA
As a fan of another ACC university, I hope FSU prevails in court, pays a big settlement to get out, and then is not invited into SEC or B1G.
Would they even try to leave without knowing they had an invite?

I wouldn’t have any idea, but it would seem logically that if they want to leave it’s because they have a place to land.
 
As a fan of another ACC university, I hope FSU prevails in court, pays a big settlement to get out, and then is not invited into SEC or B1G.
Would they even try to leave without knowing they had an invite?

I wouldn’t have any idea, but it would seem logically that if they want to leave it’s because they have a place to land.

If it came out that either conference had offered an invite, they would be subject to being sued for tampering. No idea if that has any actual teeth, and thus whether they would care.
 
B1G network is already in the entire SE. Those wouldn't be new markets. They might be able to charge the service providers more since now there is a team local that people care about, but that would be seen in the new agreement the B1G signs after this 7 year, $7B one is up....unless they too renegotiate. I don't think there's any question the B1G would love a team or two as part of their conference be in the heart of SEC country.
 
As a fan of another ACC university, I hope FSU prevails in court, pays a big settlement to get out, and then is not invited into SEC or B1G.
Would they even try to leave without knowing they had an invite?

I wouldn’t have any idea, but it would seem logically that if they want to leave it’s because they have a place to land.

If it came out that either conference had offered an invite, they would be subject to being sued for tampering. No idea if that has any actual teeth, and thus whether they would care.
Maybe they’ve just got some strong hints.

Like I said, I have no real idea, but I have to imagine they’re not blindly jumping off a cliff, but I suppose they could just be super salty.
 
Might be a good read but...Paywall. :huh: And due to the way they do theirs, you can read just enough to get interested and then BAM a popup, I'll probably never subscribe.
Sorry. Should have prefaced my post.
No worries. Just annoys me about that site.

First few lines about the campus are true. Drove around it the other night after I dropped into the Costco nearby. Pretty impressive!

ETA: took them up on the $1/month deal. 👍
 
Just as we (most of us ;)) predicted ...


They have to prevail for it to matter. Then they actually have to be invited to join the SEC or B1G and get to full member payout status to make it worthwhile.

Also notable that the ACC sued FSU first, on Thursday.
You're setting your own criteria, which is fine, but even if the B1G offered them half for the first 5 years, they'd be making pretty much the same thing they are making now plus they'd have access to literal billions in research money. Then they'd get full share moving forward. I think they'd be fine with that knowing how the ACC is viewed today and what it's ceiling is.

Will the B1G add a 19th member that is not in the AAU?
They took Nebraska. Prior to that Id have said no.

Nebraska was in AAU at that time. Since then, I believe AAU changed their valuation of agriculture, which dropped Nebraska out. But they were in when added. FSU is not in AAU. To this point in time, the B1G has never added an expansion member not in AAU.
They were losing their accreditation and the conference knew it when they accepted them.

I thought their application was accepted in 2010, and it was about a year later when Nebraska was voted out of AAU after being in AAU for more than 100 years. I remember reading back then that it was unlikely they would have been accepted had they been out of AAU at the time they were accepted for B1G membership.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top