They spent years suing their way into the ACC. Would the Big 12 even want them?ACC is 2-9 in bowl games. With a good chance to go 2-11. Embarrassing. Almost hope my Hokies slide to the Big 12.
Feels like every bowl game has been amazing and every playoff game a dud. Don’t know what that means, if anything.
I think the playoff games are bound to be duds until the final 4 teams are left. The difference in the #5 team and the #12 team is large. Then in the second week one team hasn't played in 3+ weeks. It's easy to come out flat like Boise State did. They were outmatched anyway, but definitely looked out of game mode. Then some conference champs simply aren't all that great to be top 4 seeds. I think they will fix it. ASU and BST should not have had byes IMO. Just rank them where the computer puts them. Then all the games become better.
ETA ... Saban is an excellent analyst.
Well he's not wrong about OSU fans.Feels like every bowl game has been amazing and every playoff game a dud. Don’t know what that means, if anything.
I think the playoff games are bound to be duds until the final 4 teams are left. The difference in the #5 team and the #12 team is large. Then in the second week one team hasn't played in 3+ weeks. It's easy to come out flat like Boise State did. They were outmatched anyway, but definitely looked out of game mode. Then some conference champs simply aren't all that great to be top 4 seeds. I think they will fix it. ASU and BST should not have had byes IMO. Just rank them where the computer puts them. Then all the games become better.
ETA ... Saban is an excellent analyst.
Saban is a good analyst, no question. But he's also full of crap. When he got pissed at Shane Gillis for calling him out. Come on, man. Or when he said Ohio State fans need to get a life. Did he forget about Harvey Updyke? His ability to forget about the stuff that happened at Alabama and believe in an alternate reality is impressive.
Hes garbage. Not nfl. But make no mistake these michigan guys aint ****. This means nothingAgree, Michigan D has his number. He can’t deal with exotic coverage schemes and disguised blitz packages.Michugan’s 10 best players also opted out. This was a lot of young UM guys who were given a big chance to prove themselves. Obviously they did quite well.What teams? Georgia, Texas, Alabama, and South Carolina.What teams got rewarded for strength of schedule? Half the teams in the playoff didn't beat a ranked team. Only 1 one team with more losses that beat ranked teams got in, Clemson, and only because they won a P5 conference.
Heck, BYU was 10-2, beat a ranked team, had a stronger strength of schedule than SMU, a higher CFB power index ranking than SMU, even beat SMU head to head, and wasn't even talked about as a playoff team.
The real screwjob in all of this is this insane idea that conference championship games can help you if you win, but not hurt you if you lose. Like some kind of freebie game. It's never worked like that before and no one had a problem with it. Why people started down that crusade this year is beyond me. College football is not a standardized schedule like the NFL. Every conference handles things differently. Some have more conference games, some play a championship game, etc. The committee's job is to pick the teams based on the games they play, not standardize schedule by removing games but then count those exact same games for other teams. It's absurd. The committee will walk back that statement next year because it was so, so ridiculous.
Tell me with a straight face that a 3-loss ACC or Big XII team would even be considered for a top 12 slot. The only reason Bama and South Carolina were considered is SOS.
People have short memories on Texas too. Their SEC schedule has them avoiding everyone but Georgia, who beat them twice. Who is Texas’ biggest win? A&M or Michigan I guess? But they are in because they played an SEC schedule and only lost twice and yet no one is calling them and their favorable schedule out.
Uh...but neither of those teams got in, and got left out for teams with soft schedules, so what did that get them? Nothing.
And Texas is absolutely an example of a team that played a trash schedule and got rewarded for it. And it's absolutely been pointed out in here. I've argued about it twice in here myself, as others have as well.
Texas had an easy schedule, beat no ranked teams, lost their last game, and got the 5th seed in the playoff
South Carolina beat two ranked teams, ended the season on a 6 game win streak and by beating a playoff team in their last game, and got left out of the playoffs.
How is that rewarding teams for playing a harder schedule, and factoring in when the losses/wins happened? South Carolina played a harder overall schedule (4 ranked teams versus 2), beat two ranked teams to Texas' zero, and finished the season out more strongly, yet finished like 9 spots behind Texas because they had one more loss.
Play an easy schedule, get fewer losses is 100% the optimal path the CFP.
There are 8 teams playing in the playoff this weekend and those 8 teams had a COMBINED three wins against ranked opponents this year.
Bama had more ranked wins than all those posers
Good showing by Bama today......
:crickets:
Crap, Milroe played in this and they still got worked? Did the rest of Bama opt out? Or was Bama just not that good all along?
Milroe should have opted out. Did himself no favors today.
ACC is 2-9 in bowl games. With a good chance to go 2-11. Embarrassing. Almost hope my Hokies slide to the Big 12.
No idea who is opting out for VT but they are bringing Bud Foster back to sit in the booth and call the defense.ACC is 2-9 in bowl games. With a good chance to go 2-11. Embarrassing. Almost hope my Hokies slide to the Big 12.
With one of the two wins being Louisville over the Huskies, who finished 11th in the Big Ten with a losing record. Washington lost on a failed potential game-winning two point conversion with 9 seconds left rather than going to OT with extra point. I don't know much about the Hokies but if Minnesota comes to play they will be a tough out. They beat USC and Illinois and really should have beat Penn St.
Feels like every bowl game has been amazing and every playoff game a dud. Don’t know what that means, if anything.
It's called TV Contracts/Money. That stuff is either going to have to get fixed or the P2 should just break away.Feels like every bowl game has been amazing and every playoff game a dud. Don’t know what that means, if anything.
It seems like something is off when two of the top four seeds/bye teams are double digit underdogs.
Apparently. That’s a local reporter and guys I know down there are already reacting as such.
You sure about this?
Feels like every bowl game has been amazing and every playoff game a dud. Don’t know what that means, if anything.
It seems like something is off when two of the top four seeds/bye teams are double digit underdogs.
Per 247's talent ranker, UGA is 2, OSU is 3, Oregon is 7, and ND is 9. Pretty close.OSU, ORE, UGA and ND are all around the same talent level and depth. I'd argue the underdogs ND and OSU have more talent this year than the teams they are playing.
Per 247's talent ranker, UGA is 2, OSU is 3, Oregon is 7, and ND is 9. Pretty close.OSU, ORE, UGA and ND are all around the same talent level and depth. I'd argue the underdogs ND and OSU have more talent this year than the teams they are playing.
You type very well for having webbed feet....Yeah the culture at Oregon since Lanning really makes me proud to be a Duck, for sure.
Per 247's talent ranker, UGA is 2, OSU is 3, Oregon is 7, and ND is 9. Pretty close.OSU, ORE, UGA and ND are all around the same talent level and depth. I'd argue the underdogs ND and OSU have more talent this year than the teams they are playing.
Thanks. Do you have the link for that?
CBS confirming : https://www.cbssports.com/college-f...ushes-georgia-vs-notre-dame-game-to-thursday/Apparently. That’s a local reporter and guys I know down there are already reacting as such.
You sure about this?
Word from them is “people are leaving in droves” so not terribly surprising if soon to be confirmed.
Well the ACC wasn't half falling apart at the time. B12 contacted them a couple of times already about coming over if the ACC folded. ACC less likely to fold now than 2 years ago, but VT would be a great school for them to expand further east (and into the DC market where >40% of VT alums live)They spent years suing their way into the ACC. Would the Big 12 even want them?ACC is 2-9 in bowl games. With a good chance to go 2-11. Embarrassing. Almost hope my Hokies slide to the Big 12.
Just confirmed on CNNCBS confirming : https://www.cbssports.com/college-f...ushes-georgia-vs-notre-dame-game-to-thursday/Apparently. That’s a local reporter and guys I know down there are already reacting as such.
You sure about this?
Word from them is “people are leaving in droves” so not terribly surprising if soon to be confirmed.
I agree. It's no loss to me having these games. I wasn't watching them as bowls especially with all the players sitting out.With some of these playoff games being lopsided I hope the talking sports heads don't jump on the bandwagon of "WE don't need 12 teams" in the playoffs. The talent level between some of these teams is crazy. We need a lower seed to get an upset quickly. I just want more playoff games regardless of the scores. win/win.
I agree. It's no loss to me having these games. I wasn't watching them as bowls especially with all the players sitting out.With some of these playoff games being lopsided I hope the talking sports heads don't jump on the bandwagon of "WE don't need 12 teams" in the playoffs. The talent level between some of these teams is crazy. We need a lower seed to get an upset quickly. I just want more playoff games regardless of the scores. win/win.
Sure. I probably wouldn't watch those just like I don't watch most of the 1st round of the bball tournament. But I find these close enough in the rankings to generate some excitement for me. I mean it's no loss I see if there's more games. It's just less bowls I ain't watching anyways bc there's nothing at stake.I agree. It's no loss to me having these games. I wasn't watching them as bowls especially with all the players sitting out.With some of these playoff games being lopsided I hope the talking sports heads don't jump on the bandwagon of "WE don't need 12 teams" in the playoffs. The talent level between some of these teams is crazy. We need a lower seed to get an upset quickly. I just want more playoff games regardless of the scores. win/win.
Well then we might as well go 64 deep so the networks have more content.
just like I don't watch most of the 1st round of the bball tournament
They don’t specifically, but the 4 highest ranked conference champs do. They were the 4th. ACC would have had the spot if it was SMU (or Miami had they not had some dumb losses)I don’t understand why the Big 12 gets an auto bid they’re basically on the same level as the WAC
maybe they'd be similar excitement if there were 32 do or die football games over 2 days. I mean most would be blowouts just like most bball games are but there would be some exciting ones. I don't know who watches those playin gamesjust like I don't watch most of the 1st round of the bball tournament
The 1st round is the best part. This doesn’t compute at all.
Boise did the same thing. These severely undermanned teams who think they are on the same level as their opponent so they should be kicking is insane. You are a two touchdown dog, you have to play and game plan that way.No idea why they are even lining up for a FG. Does 17-3 or 17-6 matter at half?
Thought the same thing last night. These guys should be coaching like Dan Campbell. 4th and one on their own 35? Boise state should have just given it to jeanty and live with the consequences. If you can't get 1 yard with your generational tail back, you're not winning anyway.Boise did the same thing. These severely undermanned teams who think they are on the same level as their opponent so they should be kicking is insane. You are a two touchdown dog, you have to play and game plan that way.No idea why they are even lining up for a FG. Does 17-3 or 17-6 matter at half?