Only Joe "The Mastermind" Schoen knows for sure....or does he?The fifth-year option for Thibodeaux would cost the Giants $14.751 million, per Over The Cap. The fifth-year option for Neal would cost $16.685 million.
I assume they will pick up Thibodeaux's option but not Neal's.
This should be an easy one for him to get right. That said, I thought keeping the team's best home grown players like Barkley or McKinney or at least trading them so he can get some value in return would also be an easy decision. Letting them leave for nothing wasn't something I thought was under consideration.Only Joe "The Mastermind" Schoen knows for sure....or does he?The fifth-year option for Thibodeaux would cost the Giants $14.751 million, per Over The Cap. The fifth-year option for Neal would cost $16.685 million.
I assume they will pick up Thibodeaux's option but not Neal's.
The draft is ThursdayThis should be an easy one for him to get right. That said, I thought keeping the team's best home grown players like Barkley or McKinney or at least trading them so he can get some value in return would also be an easy decision. Letting them leave for nothing wasn't something I thought was under consideration.Only Joe "The Mastermind" Schoen knows for sure....or does he?The fifth-year option for Thibodeaux would cost the Giants $14.751 million, per Over The Cap. The fifth-year option for Neal would cost $16.685 million.
I assume they will pick up Thibodeaux's option but not Neal's.
It'll be Carter and when that happens does that put the wheels in motion to move KT?It's Hunter or Carter and the decision will be made for them
Anything but should be considered a disaster
I think they would/should explore that possibility and if a good offer comes their way they should move him. But if not he stays and hopefully becomes part of a "Nascar Pass Pass" part two.It'll be Carter and when that happens does that put the wheels in motion to move KT?It's Hunter or Carter and the decision will be made for them
Anything but should be considered a disaster
Agree. But what IF The Browns take Sanders and both Carter and Hunter are there at #3?It's Hunter or Carter and the decision will be made for them
Anything but should be considered a disaster
Not happenin'Agree. But what IF The Browns take Sanders and both Carter and Hunter are there at #3?It's Hunter or Carter and the decision will be made for them
Anything but should be considered a disaster
Who ya drafting?
But....what IF it does?Not happenin'Agree. But what IF The Browns take Sanders and both Carter and Hunter are there at #3?It's Hunter or Carter and the decision will be made for them
Anything but should be considered a disaster
Who ya drafting?
I take Hunter because this draft is loaded with Dline and OLBsBut....what IF it does?Not happenin'Agree. But what IF The Browns take Sanders and both Carter and Hunter are there at #3?It's Hunter or Carter and the decision will be made for them
Anything but should be considered a disaster
Who ya drafting?
It should but only for a fair return ... You cant have too many Dline Oline options ... Load the trenches !It'll be Carter and when that happens does that put the wheels in motion to move KT?It's Hunter or Carter and the decision will be made for them
Anything but should be considered a disaster
I think the Giants will take Hunter but I would still prefer Carter. Pass rusher is the most important position on the field besides QB. Not that it needed to be proven, but PHI proved that last year. Plus, while Hunter is undeniably versatile and unique, people aren't really talking about Carter's versatility too. He started out as an off-ball LB. He's a complete defensive player and can rush the passer and defend against the run, which the Giants need. It won't be hard for them to find ways to have Carter, Burns and KT on the field at the same time and if it's not working, then they can trade KT and get a day 2 pick, which can be used to find a starting Guard, which the Giants really need to upgrade.But....what IF it does?Not happenin'Agree. But what IF The Browns take Sanders and both Carter and Hunter are there at #3?It's Hunter or Carter and the decision will be made for them
Anything but should be considered a disaster
Who ya drafting?
I don’t understand why so many people think the Giants should move off KT if they draft Carter.It should but only for a fair return ... You cant have too many Dline Oline options ... Load the trenches !It'll be Carter and when that happens does that put the wheels in motion to move KT?It's Hunter or Carter and the decision will be made for them
Anything but should be considered a disaster
To me KT is worth a 2nd rd pick or packaged to move back into the 1st
Spending balance- keeping KT assumes he's being re-upped, so the amount committed to OLB's (let alone adding Lawrence too) within the next couple years will exceed that of an elite QB. It'd be one thing if this were a team in a window trying to take advantage of a franchise QB on a rookie contract, but that ain't the Giants.I don’t understand why so many people think the Giants should move off KT if they draft Carter.
The Giants aren’t paying a QB now and won’t be for the next 4 or 5 seasonsSpending balance- keeping KT assumes he's being re-upped, so the amount committed to OLB's (let alone adding Lawrence too) within the next couple years will exceed that of an elite QB. It'd be one thing if this were a team in a window trying to take advantage of a franchise QB on a rookie contract, but that ain't the GiantsI don’t understand why so many people think the Giants should move off KT if they draft Carter.
While true, the team is operating with no cap space this year and middle of the pack next year. That's not a good situation for a bad team with no QB. You've got the 2nd most important position on offense locked up (alpha WR), but nothing around him and a bad OL. Long-term, assuming this team drafts Carter, freeing up $ to spend (the $ you're not spending on KT) and either a cost effective OL or complimentary weapon to Nabers (the pick you get for KT) may be a better use of resources than committing to 3 high priced OLB's.The Giants aren’t paying a QB now and won’t be for the next 4 or 5 seasonsSpending balance- keeping KT assumes he's being re-upped, so the amount committed to OLB's (let alone adding Lawrence too) within the next couple years will exceed that of an elite QB. It'd be one thing if this were a team in a window trying to take advantage of a franchise QB on a rookie contract, but that ain't the GiantsI don’t understand why so many people think the Giants should move off KT if they draft Carter.
I dont think KT is worth what he will command fro his 2nd contract ... he's ok but nothing specialI don’t understand why so many people think the Giants should move off KT if they draft Carter.It should but only for a fair return ... You cant have too many Dline Oline options ... Load the trenches !It'll be Carter and when that happens does that put the wheels in motion to move KT?It's Hunter or Carter and the decision will be made for them
Anything but should be considered a disaster
To me KT is worth a 2nd rd pick or packaged to move back into the 1st
KT is only 24 years old, he won’t be 25 until December. I believe he is improving.
Any defensive coordinator worth anything (I get that Bowen may not qualify) should be able to make Burns, Carter and KT work.
Carter offers them position flexibility because he can also play (and had played) "off ball" LB.
I say pick up KT's 5th year option and roll all three of those guys out there with Dex and see what the defense can be
1.5 high priced OLBWhile true, the team is operating with no cap space this year and middle of the pack next year. That's not a good situation for a bad team with no QB. You've got the 2nd most important position on offense locked up (alpha WR), but nothing around him and a bad OL. Long-term, assuming this team drafts Carter, freeing up $ to spend (the $ you're not spending on KT) and either a cost effective OL or complimentary weapon to Nabers (the pick you get for KT) may be a better use of resources than committing to 3 high priced OLB's.The Giants aren’t paying a QB now and won’t be for the next 4 or 5 seasonsSpending balance- keeping KT assumes he's being re-upped, so the amount committed to OLB's (let alone adding Lawrence too) within the next couple years will exceed that of an elite QB. It'd be one thing if this were a team in a window trying to take advantage of a franchise QB on a rookie contract, but that ain't the GiantsI don’t understand why so many people think the Giants should move off KT if they draft Carter.
Do you expect the same return if you put KT on the market March 2026 as you would now?1.5 high priced OLB
Burns is high priced
KT isn't yet but will be if you pick up his 5th-year option
Carter will be on a rookie deal
Let the 3 of them play a year together and see what you have.
I don’t know what to expect in return for KT now.Do you expect the same return if you put KT on the market March 2026 as you would now?1.5 high priced OLB
Burns is high priced
KT isn't yet but will be if you pick up his 5th-year option
Carter will be on a rookie deal
Let the 3 of them play a year together and see what you have.
It's time for another trade, this one with the third quarterback coming off the board.
In this deal, the Giants would send pick Nos. 34 and 99 to the Rams to move up to No. 26. And crucially, New
York
would keep its original third-round pick -- No. 65 -- to continue to add talent to its roster.
I'd rather keep 34 and 99 and target Tyler Shough somewhere in the 2nd or 3rd rdFor what it's worth here is Peter Schrager's mock
https://www.espn.com/nfl/draft2025/...ns-32-picks-trades-buzz-qbs-sanders-ward-dart
He has the Giants taking Carter at 3, then trading up to 26 to take Dart
It's time for another trade, this one with the third quarterback coming off the board.
In this deal, the Giants would send pick Nos. 34 and 99 to the Rams to move up to No. 26. And crucially, New
York
would keep its original third-round pick -- No. 65 -- to continue to add talent to its roster.
I'd rather keep 34 and 99 and target Tyler Shough somewhere in the 2nd or 3rd rdFor what it's worth here is Peter Schrager's mock
https://www.espn.com/nfl/draft2025/...ns-32-picks-trades-buzz-qbs-sanders-ward-dart
He has the Giants taking Carter at 3, then trading up to 26 to take Dart
It's time for another trade, this one with the third quarterback coming off the board.
In this deal, the Giants would send pick Nos. 34 and 99 to the Rams to move up to No. 26. And crucially, New
York
would keep its original third-round pick -- No. 65 -- to continue to add talent to its roster.
If they are going to take a swing at a developmental QB, I'd rather Milroe over Dart.I'd rather keep 34 and 99 and target Tyler Shough somewhere in the 2nd or 3rd rdFor what it's worth here is Peter Schrager's mock
https://www.espn.com/nfl/draft2025/...ns-32-picks-trades-buzz-qbs-sanders-ward-dart
He has the Giants taking Carter at 3, then trading up to 26 to take Dart
It's time for another trade, this one with the third quarterback coming off the board.
In this deal, the Giants would send pick Nos. 34 and 99 to the Rams to move up to No. 26. And crucially, New
York
would keep its original third-round pick -- No. 65 -- to continue to add talent to its roster.
One analyst actually has Shough as the number one QB in the draftI'd rather keep 34 and 99 and target Tyler Shough somewhere in the 2nd or 3rd rdFor what it's worth here is Peter Schrager's mock
https://www.espn.com/nfl/draft2025/...ns-32-picks-trades-buzz-qbs-sanders-ward-dart
He has the Giants taking Carter at 3, then trading up to 26 to take Dart
It's time for another trade, this one with the third quarterback coming off the board.
In this deal, the Giants would send pick Nos. 34 and 99 to the Rams to move up to No. 26. And crucially, New
York
would keep its original third-round pick -- No. 65 -- to continue to add talent to its roster.
Shough is a waste of a draft pick. Giants should wait until 2026 to target a QB.
Milroe's ceiling could be Lamar jackson or better ... the problem I heard is his machanics are so bad that he may not be fixable and someone is going to grab him late 1st early secondIf they are going to take a swing at a developmental QB, I'd rather Milroe over Dart.I'd rather keep 34 and 99 and target Tyler Shough somewhere in the 2nd or 3rd rdFor what it's worth here is Peter Schrager's mock
https://www.espn.com/nfl/draft2025/...ns-32-picks-trades-buzz-qbs-sanders-ward-dart
He has the Giants taking Carter at 3, then trading up to 26 to take Dart
It's time for another trade, this one with the third quarterback coming off the board.
In this deal, the Giants would send pick Nos. 34 and 99 to the Rams to move up to No. 26. And crucially, New
York
would keep its original third-round pick -- No. 65 -- to continue to add talent to its roster.
I think Dart has the higher floor, Milroe has the higher ceiling
Okey dokeyMilroe's ceiling could be Lamar jackson or better
I swear, 80 years from now people will be criticizing the grass on Lamar's grave. It'll be too athletic or something.Okey dokeyJackson's won 2 MVPs and didn't win a 3rd after one of the best passing seasons in NFL history. I guess you and/or I have higher ceilings, too, because we haven't done anything.
One analyst actually has Shough as the number one QB in the draftI'd rather keep 34 and 99 and target Tyler Shough somewhere in the 2nd or 3rd rdFor what it's worth here is Peter Schrager's mock
https://www.espn.com/nfl/draft2025/...ns-32-picks-trades-buzz-qbs-sanders-ward-dart
He has the Giants taking Carter at 3, then trading up to 26 to take Dart
It's time for another trade, this one with the third quarterback coming off the board.
In this deal, the Giants would send pick Nos. 34 and 99 to the Rams to move up to No. 26. And crucially, New
York
would keep its original third-round pick -- No. 65 -- to continue to add talent to its roster.
Shough is a waste of a draft pick. Giants should wait until 2026 to target a QB.
He's one of the only QBs with Size and an NFL arm
ESPN and NFL.com has him ranked 4th at almost the same grade as Dart
In terms of physical qualities he's bigger , faster , stronger and has a stronger arm then Lamar so yes He has an etremely high ceiling ... is he likely to reach that ceiling ... NoOkey dokeyMilroe's ceiling could be Lamar jackson or betterJackson's won 2 MVPs and didn't win a 3rd after one of the best passing seasons in NFL history. I guess you and/or I have higher ceilings, too, because we haven't done anything.
Or maybe just ... He sucked in the Playoffs ???I swear, 80 years from now people will be criticizing the grass on Lamar's grave. It'll be too athletic or something.Okey dokeyJackson's won 2 MVPs and didn't win a 3rd after one of the best passing seasons in NFL history. I guess you and/or I have higher ceilings, too, because we haven't done anything.
I have seen a lot of recent mock that have the Giants trading up to get Dart. I don’t mind the player, even though I prefer Milroe, but I do mind trading up to get him.
It seems like the only other QB hungry team is Cleveland. Is Dart so far ahead of Milore that they should give up assets to get him? I believe one of those two will be there at 34
Yes and noI have seen a lot of recent mock that have the Giants trading up to get Dart. I don’t mind the player, even though I prefer Milroe, but I do mind trading up to get him.
It seems like the only other QB hungry team is Cleveland. Is Dart so far ahead of Milore that they should give up assets to get him? I believe one of those two will be there at 34
If you're drafting a QB, doesn't it make sense to trade back into the 1st round to get that 5th year option?
Yeah, way too many other needs. Plus, there needs to be a QB worth taking at 3 and there isn't this year.Yes and noI have seen a lot of recent mock that have the Giants trading up to get Dart. I don’t mind the player, even though I prefer Milroe, but I do mind trading up to get him.
It seems like the only other QB hungry team is Cleveland. Is Dart so far ahead of Milore that they should give up assets to get him? I believe one of those two will be there at 34
If you're drafting a QB, doesn't it make sense to trade back into the 1st round to get that 5th year option?
If they didn't have sooooo many other holes to fill I would say yes.
Yeah, way too many other needs. Plus, there needs to be a QB worth taking at 3 and there isn't this year.Yes and noI have seen a lot of recent mock that have the Giants trading up to get Dart. I don’t mind the player, even though I prefer Milroe, but I do mind trading up to get him.
It seems like the only other QB hungry team is Cleveland. Is Dart so far ahead of Milore that they should give up assets to get him? I believe one of those two will be there at 34
If you're drafting a QB, doesn't it make sense to trade back into the 1st round to get that 5th year option?
If they didn't have sooooo many other holes to fill I would say yes.
In general, the 5th year option is still useful, but it's not as useful as people think. IMO it's mainly useful for players who's teams aren't sure they want to extend, especially at the expected asking price. If it's a player they do want to keep, many teams try to get an extention done before the 5th year option is taken. It's teams like DAL who use that option, then the franchise tag and then drag their feet on players they know they want to keep, which results in huge contracts that could have been much smaller if they had taken care of it before all of that.
With team leadership as it is, I'm happy they simply didn't do something stupid, like take Sanders at 3.Abdul Carter is the pick at #3
They still need to add a run stuffing DT on day 2 or 3 next to Dex but I like how it's shaping upD Line will be nasty.
The fifth-year option for Thibodeaux would cost the Giants $14.751 million, per Over The Cap. The fifth-year option for Neal would cost $16.685 million.
I assume they will pick up Thibodeaux's option but not Neal's.
I'm ok with what they gave up, which was a lot less than ATL gave to get the pick after. I'm mainly relieved it wasn't Sanders but Dart has upside and there's no pressure to play him this year so it seems like a good fit.Giants traded up to take Jaxson Dart QB Ole Miss
So far this pick makes me want to puke ... I have to look at Dart a lot more to see what he's about but at the moment this looks like an Aryan Ole Miss Hail MaryI'm ok with what they gave up, which was a lot less than ATL gave to get the pick after. I'm mainly relieved it wasn't Sanders but Dart has upside and there's no pressure to play him this year so it seems like a good fit.Giants traded up to take Jaxson Dart QB Ole Miss