Sand
Footballguy
I think that describes about 80% of my chess games.We had a decent match going and I made a colossal blunder that killed my chances and ruined the game.
I think that describes about 80% of my chess games.We had a decent match going and I made a colossal blunder that killed my chances and ruined the game.
Terrific! Abraham, you're welcome to play andyjayhawker right now. Otherwise, you both get one point going into round 2. Up to you, let me know.Just coming across this thread. I'll play if you still need people. If Abraham wanted to try to run through a quick game for Round 1 I'd be up for that, otherwise can join in for Round 2. My Chess Time username is also andyjayhawker.
Centre Game opening, castled on opposite sides.
Are you guys speaking English?That backwards pawn on an open file was going to fall eventually.
i think soCentre Game opening, castled on opposite sides.Are you guys speaking English?That backwards pawn on an open file was going to fall eventually.
Yes and I hope I get to play you next.Centre Game opening, castled on opposite sides.Are you guys speaking English?That backwards pawn on an open file was going to fall eventually.
Great, just sent him the invite.andyjayhawker, Abraham just confirmed that he will play you for round 1. Please invite him to a game.
I love shuke's "I have no idea what you're talking about" shtick.shuke said:Sand said:Centre Game opening, castled on opposite sides.Are you guys speaking English?joffer said:That backwards pawn on an open file was going to fall eventually.
Your move.Sand said:Now imagine if he was black.timschochet said:andyjayhawker is white.
Actually - it's your move. ;-)Your move.Sand said:Now imagine if he was black.timschochet said:andyjayhawker is white.
We do not have a way to clear everything out of your account. If you would like to start over and use the same email / username you would need to do the following:Anyone know how to clear the recent games lost? Slows my phone down and crashes sometimes
I don't think it's shtick...I love shuke's "I have no idea what you're talking about" shtick.shuke said:Sand said:Centre Game opening, castled on opposite sides.Are you guys speaking English?joffer said:That backwards pawn on an open file was going to fall eventually.
I only started playing recently. Don't know anything about any type of strategy. I just move the pieces around and see what happens.I love shuke's "I have no idea what you're talking about" shtick.shuke said:Sand said:Centre Game opening, castled on opposite sides.Are you guys speaking English?joffer said:That backwards pawn on an open file was going to fall eventually.
You did have a good thing going. Was a really interesting game until the queen incident. Even after dropping the knight early you came back strong.I only started playing recently. Don't know anything about any type of strategy. I just move the pieces around and see what happens.I love shuke's "I have no idea what you're talking about" shtick.shuke said:Sand said:Centre Game opening, castled on opposite sides.Are you guys speaking English?joffer said:That backwards pawn on an open file was going to fall eventually.
I thought I had a good attack laid out against Kutta and then just stupidly gave him my queen.
Was this another toilet move?I only started playing recently. Don't know anything about any type of strategy. I just move the pieces around and see what happens.I love shuke's "I have no idea what you're talking about" shtick.shuke said:Sand said:Centre Game opening, castled on opposite sides.Are you guys speaking English?joffer said:That backwards pawn on an open file was going to fall eventually.
I thought I had a good attack laid out against Kutta and then just stupidly gave him my queen.
Open file I get and I know which pawn you are talking about but what does "backwards" mean? And why was it inevitable (ignoring my huge blunder)?joffer said:gg. That backwards pawn on an open file was going to fall eventually.Joffer v AAA (1-0)
We had a decent match going and I made a colossal blunder that killed my chances and ruined the game.
Backward pawnOpen file I get and I know which pawn you are talking about but what does "backwards" mean? And why was it inevitable (ignoring my huge blunder)?joffer said:gg. That backwards pawn on an open file was going to fall eventually.Joffer v AAA (1-0)
We had a decent match going and I made a colossal blunder that killed my chances and ruined the game.
Just trying to learn. Obviously there's no learning for what I did - just stupid.
Just a heads up, Abraham hasn't accepted my invite yet. A lot of the other games seem to be wrapping up, so maybe the BYEs make more sense? Don't want to delay things too much.Great, just sent him the invite.andyjayhawker, Abraham just confirmed that he will play you for round 1. Please invite him to a game.
This was your first problem.I only started playing recently. Don't know anything about any type of strategy. I just move the pieces around and see what happens.I love shuke's "I have no idea what you're talking about" shtick.shuke said:Sand said:Centre Game opening, castled on opposite sides.Are you guys speaking English?joffer said:That backwards pawn on an open file was going to fall eventually.
I thought I had a good attack laid out against Kutta and then just stupidly gave him my queen.
Thanks. Makes sense - in this game we both had 5 pawns left - Joffer had two isolated pawns and I had the two together but one was backwards. I realize it's tough to say without knowing more about board position but which is preferable? And if I'm in this situation again should I just try to force a trade of pawns (if possible)?Backward pawnHTHOpen file I get and I know which pawn you are talking about but what does "backwards" mean? And why was it inevitable (ignoring my huge blunder)?joffer said:gg. That backwards pawn on an open file was going to fall eventually.Joffer v AAA (1-0)
We had a decent match going and I made a colossal blunder that killed my chances and ruined the game.
Just trying to learn. Obviously there's no learning for what I did - just stupid.
Connected pawns are usually better than isolated, unless the isolated pawn is passed. In this game, I had an overall positional advantage because your king had a hard time finding a safe home. It hurt your development.Thanks. Makes sense - in this game we both had 5 pawns left - Joffer had two isolated pawns and I had the two together but one was backwards. I realize it's tough to say without knowing more about board position but which is preferable? And if I'm in this situation again should I just try to force a trade of pawns (if possible)?Backward pawnHTHOpen file I get and I know which pawn you are talking about but what does "backwards" mean? And why was it inevitable (ignoring my huge blunder)?joffer said:gg. That backwards pawn on an open file was going to fall eventually.Joffer v AAA (1-0)
We had a decent match going and I made a colossal blunder that killed my chances and ruined the game.
Just trying to learn. Obviously there's no learning for what I did - just stupid.
Position of my king was why I knew I'd lose but let me ask this. In that situation is it best to just start trading pieces so you can eventually use your king in attack or is it better to find a safe place for him? The latter was my thinking and why I made that move to kind of protect him but left the pawn unprotected.Connected pawns are usually better than isolated, unless the isolated pawn is passed. In this game, I had an overall positional advantage because your king had a hard time finding a safe home. It hurt your development.Thanks. Makes sense - in this game we both had 5 pawns left - Joffer had two isolated pawns and I had the two together but one was backwards. I realize it's tough to say without knowing more about board position but which is preferable? And if I'm in this situation again should I just try to force a trade of pawns (if possible)?Backward pawnHTHOpen file I get and I know which pawn you are talking about but what does "backwards" mean? And why was it inevitable (ignoring my huge blunder)?joffer said:gg. That backwards pawn on an open file was going to fall eventually.Joffer v AAA (1-0)
We had a decent match going and I made a colossal blunder that killed my chances and ruined the game.
Just trying to learn. Obviously there's no learning for what I did - just stupid.
I didn't see the game, but if your king isn't protected very well it is usually a good idea to try to trade pieces and reach an endgame where it doesn't matter as much. Once there are just a few pieces left on the board, the king becomes a weapon and you actually want him out there in the fight.Position of my king was why I knew I'd lose but let me ask this. In that situation is it best to just start trading pieces so you can eventually use your king in attack or is it better to find a safe place for him? The latter was my thinking and why I made that move to kind of protect him but left the pawn unprotected.Sorry for what I assume are stupid questions.Connected pawns are usually better than isolated, unless the isolated pawn is passed. In this game, I had an overall positional advantage because your king had a hard time finding a safe home. It hurt your development.Thanks. Makes sense - in this game we both had 5 pawns left - Joffer had two isolated pawns and I had the two together but one was backwards. I realize it's tough to say without knowing more about board position but which is preferable? And if I'm in this situation again should I just try to force a trade of pawns (if possible)?Backward pawnHTHOpen file I get and I know which pawn you are talking about but what does "backwards" mean? And why was it inevitable (ignoring my huge blunder)?Just trying to learn. Obviously there's no learning for what I did - just stupid.joffer said:gg. That backwards pawn on an open file was going to fall eventually.Joffer v AAA (1-0)
We had a decent match going and I made a colossal blunder that killed my chances and ruined the game.
I think GM Andy Soltis is the one who came up with the rule about bringing your king out once the opponent has 13 pawns or less of piece value on the board. IOW Q+R = 14 pawns, don't bring him out. Rook + 2 minor pieces = 11 pawns, bring him out.joffer said:Agree with kutta. General rule to me is if the queens are still on the board, an exposed king is bad. Once the queens come off, every trade makes the king more powerful.
Not to pile on, but I'd say move 11 was the beginning of the end there.AAABatteries said:Here it is. I was black - obviously move 20 was just a total brain fart.
Probably - in my mind I felt like my line of pawns blocked off his Q and R - I felt he had me pinned down on that side and eventually would promote the pawn. But I suck soNot to pile on, but I'd say move 11 was the beginning of the end there.AAABatteries said:Here it is. I was black - obviously move 20 was just a total brain fart.
But doesn't it just make both kings more powerful? Where does the advantage come from?joffer said:Agree with kutta. General rule to me is if the queens are still on the board, an exposed king is bad. Once the queens come off, every trade makes the king more powerful.
Why are you giving Kutta a point already?Here is round 2:
Round 2 (1st team is white)
andyjayhawker (1) vs. Psychopav (1)
joffer (1) vs. Sand (1)
Abraham (1) vs. Charvik (1)
Unialias (1) vs. Nysfl2 (1)
kutta (1) vs. timschochet (1)
Wyld Stallyns (0) vs. rajincajun (0)
VA703 (0) vs. Eddie Spaghetti (0)
Joe T (0) vs. Bogart (0)
Shuke (0) vs. AAA Batteries (0)
My favorite chess axiom ever...."the king is a fighting piece" - Steinitz. Of course, bringing the king out to fight a little early can lead to disasterI think GM Andy Soltis is the one who came up with the rule about bringing your king out once the opponent has 13 pawns or less of piece value on the board. IOW Q+R = 14 pawns, don't bring him out. Rook + 2 minor pieces = 11 pawns, bring him out.joffer said:Agree with kutta. General rule to me is if the queens are still on the board, an exposed king is bad. Once the queens come off, every trade makes the king more powerful.
GM Kaufman says that kings have the equivalent fighting value of 4 pawns, which makes them more valuable than the minor pieces in the endgame.
if your king is better placed than your opponent (in a better square, more centered usually) that's where your advantage lies.But doesn't it just make both kings more powerful? Where does the advantage come from?joffer said:Agree with kutta. General rule to me is if the queens are still on the board, an exposed king is bad. Once the queens come off, every trade makes the king more powerful.
One of my personal favorite games....Short-Timman 1991.My favorite chess axiom ever...."the king is a fighting piece" - Steinitz. Of course, bringing the king out to fight a little early can lead to disasterI think GM Andy Soltis is the one who came up with the rule about bringing your king out once the opponent has 13 pawns or less of piece value on the board. IOW Q+R = 14 pawns, don't bring him out. Rook + 2 minor pieces = 11 pawns, bring him out.joffer said:Agree with kutta. General rule to me is if the queens are still on the board, an exposed king is bad. Once the queens come off, every trade makes the king more powerful.
GM Kaufman says that kings have the equivalent fighting value of 4 pawns, which makes them more valuable than the minor pieces in the endgame.![]()
im sorry- based on your comment I thought this game was over. Am I wrong? If so I apologize. Round 2 won't start until your game is finished.Why are you giving Kutta a point already?Here is round 2:
Round 2 (1st team is white)
andyjayhawker (1) vs. Psychopav (1)
joffer (1) vs. Sand (1)
Abraham (1) vs. Charvik (1)
Unialias (1) vs. Nysfl2 (1)
kutta (1) vs. timschochet (1)
Wyld Stallyns (0) vs. rajincajun (0)
VA703 (0) vs. Eddie Spaghetti (0)
Joe T (0) vs. Bogart (0)
Shuke (0) vs. AAA Batteries (0)
Still fighting, but it shouldn't be long.im sorry- based on your comment I thought this game was over. Am I wrong? If so I apologize. Round 2 won't start until your game is finished.Why are you giving Kutta a point already?Here is round 2:
Round 2 (1st team is white)
andyjayhawker (1) vs. Psychopav (1)
joffer (1) vs. Sand (1)
Abraham (1) vs. Charvik (1)
Unialias (1) vs. Nysfl2 (1)
kutta (1) vs. timschochet (1)
Wyld Stallyns (0) vs. rajincajun (0)
VA703 (0) vs. Eddie Spaghetti (0)
Joe T (0) vs. Bogart (0)
Shuke (0) vs. AAA Batteries (0)