No.In fact, Jacksonville is willing to make a deal if it results in us getting a 2010 2nd back.Any interest in this pick guys?
Updated OP...I had a hard time picking anyone for Dallas here too.Dallas at 3.05 HATES the board and eventually reaches and selects- OT - Troy Kropog - Tulane
No value here for what Dallas draft needs were:BPA-Rashad Johnson....I couldn't take him with just drafting Smith and projecting him to be a FS.Others I looked at were:Chip Vaughn - SSDanelle Ellerbe - ILBLouis Murphy - WR (As picked for me) was a consideration along with Jauquin Iglesais ***Hell I almost took Herman Johnson just for poops and giggles.Updated OP...I had a hard time picking anyone for Dallas here too.Dallas at 3.05 HATES the board and eventually reaches and selects- OT - Troy Kropog - Tulane
Atomic Punk and I have been talking about a trade, so please give him a little time to check in and for us to continue our discussion.
Assuming you don't take our guy, Jax is ready to rock.This would be so awesome.Thanks! Like I said in an earlier post, this team desperately needs talent on the DL. I think I accomplished that. Building the lines should be the first priority of the new FO. With the first pick, the way I look at it Monroe will be an ALL pro type player for the next 10 years while there are questions about Stafford. I'll take the more highly rated guy at the 2nd most important position on the field. I think the Lions will wait until next year to get their franchise signal caller.Lions3.01 The Detroit Lions select Fili Moala, DT, USC
Yet another building block for the DL. He can be a dominating presence inside and will fit in nicely with the other additions. Here's hoping the new head coach Schwartz will help him maximize his enormous potential.
2009 Detroit Lions Draft:
1.01 Eugene Monroe, OT Virginia
1.20 Larry English, DE/OLB Northern Illinois
2.01 Jarron Gilbert, DE San Jose State
3.01 Fili Moala, DT USC![]()
![]()
Great draft.
3.10 San Fran 49ers select Greg Toler, CB, St Paul's
This one may wind up the most bewildering pick of the mock, but I'll suffer the blows just to call the name of the first player ever to drafted to any professional sport from my alma mater. Heck, they only bought the football program back within the last 5-6 years. Toler is a SMALL school product, who has been making the circuit of visits and has been impressive. He's not likely to get drafted this high, but I don't expect the kid to last long the second day of the draft.
Not an awful pick actually. He's been getting alot of buzz in the last month. You might have been able to move down in the round, but this isn't ridicule inducing by any stretch.3.10 San Fran 49ers select Greg Toler, CB, St Paul's
This one may wind up the most bewildering pick of the mock, but I'll suffer the blows just to call the name of the first player ever to drafted to any professional sport from my alma mater. Heck, they only bought the football program back within the last 5-6 years. Toler is a SMALL school product, who has been making the circuit of visits and has been impressive. He's not likely to get drafted this high, but I don't expect the kid to last long the second day of the draft.
Denver trades 3.15 and 5.13 to the Jets to move up to this spot
3.12 Denver selects Rashad Johnson, S Alabama
Denver is fortunate to get Johnson here. He can come in and compete with Renaldo Hill at FS this year. He was Alabama's defensive leader and is a very smart player who could become a staple in Denver's defensive backfield.
Denver picks so far:
1.12 Tyson Jackson, DE LSU
1.18 Connor Barwin, DE/OLB Cincinnati
2.16 Coye Francies, CB San Jose State
3.12 Rashad Johnson, S Alabama

Yeah...actually I think we should try to get in as many picks as we can until Friday evening or Saturday morning as long as everyone else is on board. I just haven't copied and pasted the 4th round order yet.Do we want to try for 4 rounds?
The idea is to get in as many rounds as we can before the actual draft. IIRCDo we want to try for 4 rounds?
No offense man, but you should at least give the team the hour to pick that we had all agreed to. If I don't make it in an hour fine, but come on.And how can you possibly take Vaughn over R. Johnson at S? That makes it all that much worse.To keep things moving3.07 Oakland selects Chip Vaughn, SS Wake Forest
Sorry man I tried to make the right pick. I like Vaughn and I thought he would replace Gibril Wilson at SS where Johnson would not be a good fit. I gave you 50 minutes instead of the hour, sorry about that.No offense man, but you should at least give the team the hour to pick that we had all agreed to. If I don't make it in an hour fine, but come on.And how can you possibly take Vaughn over R. Johnson at S? That makes it all that much worse.To keep things moving3.07 Oakland selects Chip Vaughn, SS Wake Forest
I dont know, I have Vaughn (#60 player overall) ranked MUCH higher than Johnson (#82)No offense man, but you should at least give the team the hour to pick that we had all agreed to. If I don't make it in an hour fine, but come on.And how can you possibly take Vaughn over R. Johnson at S? That makes it all that much worse.To keep things moving3.07 Oakland selects Chip Vaughn, SS Wake Forest

Bankerguy said:Only to have the same person who made the Vaughn pick then trade to get up to get Johnson? I don't want to judge without all the facts, but it is a tiny bit fishy.Atomic Punk said:No offense man, but you should at least give the team the hour to pick that we had all agreed to. If I don't make it in an hour fine, but come on.And how can you possibly take Vaughn over R. Johnson at S? That makes it all that much worse.Buffaloes said:To keep things moving3.07 Oakland selects Chip Vaughn, SS Wake Forest
Seriously, if you want me to give him Johnson I will. No big deal. I made the Vaughn pick as I thought he was a better fit. Please don't insinuate that I am trying to manipulate this mock draft. I will gladly give Johnson to Oakland and take Vaughn instead. Like I said, I thought Oakland could use a SS rather than a FS...my bad.As I said to you after you PM'd me. I'm not judging or saying anything aout your intent. I can just see why he may of thought that. So easy big fella, I'm a fan you for all of your efforts with this mock. Can we just continue?Bankerguy said:Only to have the same person who made the Vaughn pick then trade to get up to get Johnson? I don't want to judge without all the facts, but it is a tiny bit fishy.Atomic Punk said:No offense man, but you should at least give the team the hour to pick that we had all agreed to. If I don't make it in an hour fine, but come on.And how can you possibly take Vaughn over R. Johnson at S? That makes it all that much worse.Buffaloes said:To keep things moving3.07 Oakland selects Chip Vaughn, SS Wake ForestSeriously, if you want me to give him Johnson I will. No big deal. I made the Vaughn pick as I thought he was a better fit. Please don't insinuate that I am trying to manipulate this mock draft. I will gladly give Johnson to Oakland and take Vaughn instead. Like I said, I thought Oakland could use a SS rather than a FS...my bad.
As I said to you after you PM'd me. I'm not judging or saying anything aout your intent. I can just see why he may of thought that. So easy big fella, I'm a fan you for all of your efforts with this mock. Can we just continue?Bankerguy said:Only to have the same person who made the Vaughn pick then trade to get up to get Johnson? I don't want to judge without all the facts, but it is a tiny bit fishy.Atomic Punk said:No offense man, but you should at least give the team the hour to pick that we had all agreed to. If I don't make it in an hour fine, but come on.And how can you possibly take Vaughn over R. Johnson at S? That makes it all that much worse.Buffaloes said:To keep things moving3.07 Oakland selects Chip Vaughn, SS Wake ForestSeriously, if you want me to give him Johnson I will. No big deal. I made the Vaughn pick as I thought he was a better fit. Please don't insinuate that I am trying to manipulate this mock draft. I will gladly give Johnson to Oakland and take Vaughn instead. Like I said, I thought Oakland could use a SS rather than a FS...my bad.

Had William Moore still been there who I was thinking should have been our choice in the 2nd (along with your choice and Duke) would you have still taken the Duke over Moore?The only thing about your trade ... the Duke won't make it past Pitt who wouldn't trade down.Not thrilled with the 3rd round choice after landing the Duke. Woulda been great to trade up and land Beckwith or farther down at that point.My ideal mock has Dallas getting Duke, William Moore, and one more player like Smith by trading up a few times and giving up some of their bulk picks later perhaps coupled by a slight trade down in the 2nd.2.32 Duke Robinson Analysis- I honestly would take him at 51, in this mock I went with Smith expecting to have Herman Johnson (Which I traded up for) and hence missed Robinson being still on the board as I kept checking to see if Johnson was still there.Duke Robinson is the best Guard in College Football. Great size and fits exactly what the Cowboys do in the tough NFC East. He immediately challenges Kyle Kosier for a starting job and allows Dallas to release Montrae Holland to save over 2 million on the cap. Road grater and even not bad on screens and in open space.I cannot believe he is still on the board. He should be a 40-50 pick.
We're at 3.13, correct?

I agree about your Pittsburgh comment, in real life Dallas will need to move up more to get Duke if they pass at 51. After Beckwith (and I'm not even that high on Beckwth anymore) went...I didn't like much and I didn't have time to look for a trade down. I do like Moore, but he is starting to look like a Roy Williams clone. I'm nervous about him.After doing this mock, I really hope we move up from 51 a few spots to see if we can snag Delmas. Then a few spots up from the third 3.05 into late second round land (Duke/Robeskie or other player that falls etc), as well as moving up from 4.01 to late third round were I start to see a huge decline from a talent to needs point of view .Had William Moore still been there who I was thinking should have been our choice in the 2nd (along with your choice and Duke) would you have still taken the Duke over Moore?The only thing about your trade ... the Duke won't make it past Pitt who wouldn't trade down.Not thrilled with the 3rd round choice after landing the Duke. Woulda been great to trade up and land Beckwith or farther down at that point.My ideal mock has Dallas getting Duke, William Moore, and one more player like Smith by trading up a few times and giving up some of their bulk picks later perhaps coupled by a slight trade down in the 2nd.2.32 Duke Robinson Analysis- I honestly would take him at 51, in this mock I went with Smith expecting to have Herman Johnson (Which I traded up for) and hence missed Robinson being still on the board as I kept checking to see if Johnson was still there.Duke Robinson is the best Guard in College Football. Great size and fits exactly what the Cowboys do in the tough NFC East. He immediately challenges Kyle Kosier for a starting job and allows Dallas to release Montrae Holland to save over 2 million on the cap. Road grater and even not bad on screens and in open space.I cannot believe he is still on the board. He should be a 40-50 pick.
3.08, Jacksonville Jaguars take Andy Levitre OG/OT, Oregon StateWe might have focused too much on offense, but we're happy with:1.04 - Matthew Stafford, QB Georgia2.39 - Percy Harvin, WR Florida3.72 - Andy Levitre, OT/G, Oregon StateFranchise QB, playmaker, and in some opinions, the best interior OL in the draft. We'll have to address D later or next year.

I am surprised you didn't get a WR at the Delmas or Beckwith picks. Do you like the guys on the roster, or not like the guys available?The Rams are happy getting the anchor on the oline and 2 nice playmakers on defense. I was really trying to move up in the second round to get Freeman when he was sliding but kind of glad I didn't. I think he would have been good value but I like the Boller signing by the Rams and maybe Buger won't be such a P_S_Y if he can get some protection. I also was trying to move up to target H. Nicks but wasn't able to. He was the only wr I was targting with my 2nd round pick but I thought Delmas, while maybe not a huge need currently, adds a great demension to the type of defense that we want to run.Jason SmithLouis DelmasDarry Beckwith
At the 2nd round pick there was a consideration of Nicks but after he got picked (after I was unable to trade down for him) there was no one I was targetting at the wr position. I really like Delmas, I think he is a tackling machine and someone you build your defense around. I think he is like a Bob Sanders alittle less talented though, but with that kind of attitude. I know right now we are set at the safety position but Atogwa is franchised this year and is getting overpaid. Delmas would be a great (Best Player Available) pick who will find the field soon enough.I like th e STL wr's. I relly liek Avery and Burton had some flashes last year as well. I really like the pside of L. Robinson but I think this team is going to be all about the run this year. I think their line is as good as it has been in years' and they want to run and play d. Therefore, my picks are following those thoughts. Then again if S. Jackson can' stay healthy those plans could get ruined quickly but one can always hope.I do think Nicks is a nice player but I also have my eye on another wr.I am surprised you didn't get a WR at the Delmas or Beckwith picks. Do you like the guys on the roster, or not like the guys available?The Rams are happy getting the anchor on the oline and 2 nice playmakers on defense. I was really trying to move up in the second round to get Freeman when he was sliding but kind of glad I didn't. I think he would have been good value but I like the Boller signing by the Rams and maybe Buger won't be such a P_S_Y if he can get some protection. I also was trying to move up to target H. Nicks but wasn't able to. He was the only wr I was targting with my 2nd round pick but I thought Delmas, while maybe not a huge need currently, adds a great demension to the type of defense that we want to run.Jason SmithLouis DelmasDarry Beckwith

They need O and D line help.Any suggestions for the Redskins?
Check your PM'sAny suggestions for the Redskins?
How about Kraig Urbik?They need O and D line help.Any suggestions for the Redskins?