What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

49rs sign Isaac Bruce (1 Viewer)

NoFBinLA

Footballguy
Moderator
That's what the man just said on the TV....

will follow with link when I confirm....

 
Last edited by a moderator:
http://rotoworld.com/content/playerpages/p...3449&id=414



49ers agreed to terms with WR Isaac Bruce on a two-year contract, according to NFL Network's Adam Schefter.
Blue-Kun with the Assist!Gracias!
Rotoworld has now added commentary to their post:
Isaac Bruce-WR- 49ers Feb. 29 - 7:51 pm et

49ers agreed to terms with WR Isaac Bruce on a two-year contract, according to NFL Network's Adam Schefter.

He's a No. 1 receiver again. Bruce, 35, isn't the sensationally reliable wideout he once was, but can still run routes with the best of them. He's averaged 65 catches and 915 yards per season in Scott Linehan's offense 2006-2007. Now back under Mike Martz's watch, it wouldn't be a surprise if his numbers improve. He's looking like a legitimate fantasy WR3/4 fantasy again.

Related: Rams
 
Makes perfect sense. Actually, it is the signing so far that makes the most sense in my opinion. Not an earth shattering move but one that benefits SF hugely.

 
Who gets benched? Battle or DJax?

Did Bruce play SE or flanker?

ETA: Djax and Bruce both played SE last year. Djax can also play flanker as he did in Sea. But SF has shown they love Battle at flanker with his blocking.

I am betting its Djax out of the starting lineup.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is like Joe Namath playing for the Rams or Jerry Rice playing for the Seahawks.

He's still a Ram and will always be remembered as a Ram.

 
Who gets benched? Battle or DJax?Did Bruce play SE or flanker?ETA: Djax and Bruce both played SE last year. Djax can also play flanker as he did in Sea. But SF has shown they love Battle at flanker with his blocking.I am betting its Djax out of the starting lineup.
My guess would be they cut Jackson, have Bruce play SE, Battle at Flanker and Hill in the slot. Just a guess though.
 
Why wouldn't he want to go to a contender?Im pretty sure Dallas,NE, GB, INDY, ect... would take him on the cheap.
With parity the way it is in the NFL, who would want to go to a contender for less $$. Two out of the Final Four teams were supposed to be crappy (GB and NY)...may as well take the dough and hope for the best.
 
In a Martz offense, most likely all three WRs will be starting.
:unsure: Martz runs three and four receiver sets. Rarely are there only two WRs on the field at a time, but it should be interesting how they utilize Vernon Davis.
VD? ON the field every play. :bag:Besides Gore, he's still the only playmaker on the offense. Battle, DJax, Battle...all WR2/3 type guys. Meh.
I was referring to where he would line up. Will he line up as a tight end? In the slot? I would like to see Martz move Davis around to take advantage of what he can do.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top