Good point. I also think that if they hope to continue to attract women fans, they can't afford to be viewed as treating these issues as less than priority #1.Not sure of that, but I do think the NFL is going to do everything to clean up its act. The problem that the league has always had is if one team took a stand and released a guy who beat his wife, or killed someone while driving drunk another team would sign that player the next day. I am not sure that is going to happen as much anymore.Not discounting the seriousness of these topics, but have NFL's ratings suffered as a result?
Doubt it. This particular issue is a fairly simple one, and ultimately shouldn't hurt the NFL. Goodell screwed up in handling this, but the overall point is that fans now want the NFL to give a #### and punish these guys. They are and will continue to do so.Not discounting the seriousness of these topics, but have NFL's ratings suffered as a result?
Right now getting off is the least of Petersons worries. AP has already been convicted in the court of public opinion, and convicted by his peers on all the pre-games shows. I have never seen so many ex-players bash a player like they did AP yesterday. For the NFL and AP this could not have come out at a worse time. The ex-players on the pregames were all imploring the NFL and Goodell to take the harshest stand possible against Peterson including removing him from the league.If memory serves, he also got Arthur Anderson's criminal conviction overturned after the Enron scandal.If he got Clemons off he must be a great lawyer.By the way, Rusty Hardin is AP's lawyer. Recall that Rusty successfully represented Roger Clemens, as well as Warren Moon. The guy is good.
as we have seen over and over, it is very difficult to convict celebrities of crimes. Not only do the hire the very best lawyers, juries more often than not are eager to give them the benefit of the doubt.If he got Clemons off he must be a great lawyer.By the way, Rusty Hardin is AP's lawyer. Recall that Rusty successfully represented Roger Clemens, as well as Warren Moon. The guy is good.
short term no, but long term i think people will begin to change there viewing and appetite for other things, we are just on the cusp of this changing.Not discounting the seriousness of these topics, but have NFL's ratings suffered as a result?
minus the airplanes crashing in to the buildings by Islamic terrorists and the thousands of innocent people dying and the wars that followed. Other than that its exactly like 9/11.Da Guru is right. As bad as what Peterson did, if the Rice video had never happened the situation would be entirely different. That video has changed everything; it's like 9/11 for the NFL.
nice hyperboleDa Guru is right. As bad as what Peterson did, if the Rice video had never happened the situation would be entirely different. That video has changed everything; it's like 9/11 for the NFL.
We are nearing the month of pink jerseys. All will be forgiven.Good point. I also think that if they hope to continue to attract women fans, they can't afford to be viewed as treating these issues as less than priority #1.Not sure of that, but I do think the NFL is going to do everything to clean up its act. The problem that the league has always had is if one team took a stand and released a guy who beat his wife, or killed someone while driving drunk another team would sign that player the next day. I am not sure that is going to happen as much anymore.Not discounting the seriousness of these topics, but have NFL's ratings suffered as a result?
You guys are eager to jump on every remark and take it to the most literal extreme. All I meant is that, like 9/11, the Rice video changed the culture of the NFL, and we will see this specifically in terms of how they handle bad behavior from now on. I used 9/11 because there are very few clear cut examples of single incidents which create a before and after dividing line, not because of the magnitude of events which aren't in any way comparable.minus the airplanes crashing in to the buildings by Islamic terrorists and the thousands of innocent people dying and the wars that followed. Other than that its exactly like 9/11.Da Guru is right. As bad as what Peterson did, if the Rice video had never happened the situation would be entirely different. That video has changed everything; it's like 9/11 for the NFL.
Yes..and the Breast Cancer Foundation will get their 5% of the scraps that is left over from all the Pink NFL Gear sales. There is a lot of fingers in that pie.We are nearing the month of pink jerseys. All will be forgiven.Good point. I also think that if they hope to continue to attract women fans, they can't afford to be viewed as treating these issues as less than priority #1.Not sure of that, but I do think the NFL is going to do everything to clean up its act. The problem that the league has always had is if one team took a stand and released a guy who beat his wife, or killed someone while driving drunk another team would sign that player the next day. I am not sure that is going to happen as much anymore.Not discounting the seriousness of these topics, but have NFL's ratings suffered as a result?
On the list of worries, I wouldn't say that going to prison is least among them.Right now getting off is the least of Petersons worries. AP has already been convicted in the court of public opinion, and convicted by his peers on all the pre-games shows. I have never seen so many ex-players bash a player like they did AP yesterday. For the NFL and AP this could not have come out at a worse time. The ex-players on the pregames were all imploring the NFL and Goodell to take the harshest stand possible against Peterson including removing him from the league.If memory serves, he also got Arthur Anderson's criminal conviction overturned after the Enron scandal.If he got Clemons off he must be a great lawyer.By the way, Rusty Hardin is AP's lawyer. Recall that Rusty successfully represented Roger Clemens, as well as Warren Moon. The guy is good.
It's really more like the holocaust and WWII combined.Da Guru is right. As bad as what Peterson did, if the Rice video had never happened the situation would be entirely different. That video has changed everything; it's like 9/11 for the NFL.
I don't think a lot of people can envision themselves punching their wife in the face with a left hook. I think many, many parents (myself included) have found themselves in a situation where their anger and frustration got the best of them and resulted in them taking the punishment with their kids too far. Now, I never broke skin or anything like that, but I know that I went to a place that I wasn't comfortable with once I had calmed down.I've been really stunned with the response of so many people to this compared to the Rice thing.
I'm seeing most people standing up for AP. And saying that yeah, hey went over the line, but don't you dare tell me how to beat my kids effectively.
People suck.
Oooh boy. The proverbial #### is going to hit the fan.Announced he's playing this weekend vs New Orleans![]()
It's really more like the holocaust and WWII combined.Da Guru is right. As bad as what Peterson did, if the Rice video had never happened the situation would be entirely different. That video has changed everything; it's like 9/11 for the NFL.
Thats a Lie.Ray Rice is like the Hitler of the NFL right now.
couldnt resist could ya?It's really more like the holocaust and WWII combined.Da Guru is right. As bad as what Peterson did, if the Rice video had never happened the situation would be entirely different. That video has changed everything; it's like 9/11 for the NFL.
who announced this please?Announced he's playing this weekend vs New Orleans![]()
Goodell could step in here and make a statement. With all that has transpired the last couple of weeks and ex-players calling for him to suspend Peterson that would not be surprising.AP is playing next week: The Vikings. I guess he's not done yet.
This statement was already posted.EDEN PRAIRIE, Minn. — The Minnesota Vikings are reinstating Adrian Peterson this week after he was charged with child abuse and say he will play on Sunday against the New Orleans Saints.
Vikings owners Zygi and Mark Wilf made the announcement Monday, one day Peterson was benched during a 30-7 loss to the New England Patriots after he was charged for striking his 4-year-old son with a tree branch this summer.
The Vikings say they take the issue very seriously and have given it considerable thought. But they also say they want the legal process to take its course before making any final decisions.
Peterson’s lawyer says the star player was just disciplining his child and did not mean to cause harm.
Here is the Vikings statement:
‘Today’s decision was made after significant thought, discussion and consideration. As evidenced by our decision to deactivate Adrian from yesterday’s game, this is clearly a very important issue. On Friday, we felt it was in the best interests of the organization to step back, evaluate the situation, and not rush to judgment given the seriousness of this matter. At that time, we made the decision that we felt was best for the Vikings and all parties involved.’
‘To be clear, we take very seriously any matter that involves the welfare of a child. At this time, however, we believe this is a matter of due process and we should allow the legal system to proceed so we can come to the most effective conclusions and then determine the appropriate course of action. This is a difficult path to navigate, and our focus is on doing the right thing. Currently we believe we are at a juncture where the most appropriate next step is to allow the judicial process to move forward.’
‘We will continue to monitor the situation closely and support Adrian’s fulfillment of his legal responsibilities throughout this process.’
I'm surprised he just posted it and didn't start a new thread with it.This statement was already posted.EDEN PRAIRIE, Minn. — The Minnesota Vikings are reinstating Adrian Peterson this week after he was charged with child abuse and say he will play on Sunday against the New Orleans Saints.
Vikings owners Zygi and Mark Wilf made the announcement Monday, one day Peterson was benched during a 30-7 loss to the New England Patriots after he was charged for striking his 4-year-old son with a tree branch this summer.
The Vikings say they take the issue very seriously and have given it considerable thought. But they also say they want the legal process to take its course before making any final decisions.
Peterson’s lawyer says the star player was just disciplining his child and did not mean to cause harm.
Here is the Vikings statement:
‘Today’s decision was made after significant thought, discussion and consideration. As evidenced by our decision to deactivate Adrian from yesterday’s game, this is clearly a very important issue. On Friday, we felt it was in the best interests of the organization to step back, evaluate the situation, and not rush to judgment given the seriousness of this matter. At that time, we made the decision that we felt was best for the Vikings and all parties involved.’
‘To be clear, we take very seriously any matter that involves the welfare of a child. At this time, however, we believe this is a matter of due process and we should allow the legal system to proceed so we can come to the most effective conclusions and then determine the appropriate course of action. This is a difficult path to navigate, and our focus is on doing the right thing. Currently we believe we are at a juncture where the most appropriate next step is to allow the judicial process to move forward.’
‘We will continue to monitor the situation closely and support Adrian’s fulfillment of his legal responsibilities throughout this process.’
OMG! The FFA police are here. ####### arrest me already.This statement was already posted.EDEN PRAIRIE, Minn. — The Minnesota Vikings are reinstating Adrian Peterson this week after he was charged with child abuse and say he will play on Sunday against the New Orleans Saints.
Vikings owners Zygi and Mark Wilf made the announcement Monday, one day Peterson was benched during a 30-7 loss to the New England Patriots after he was charged for striking his 4-year-old son with a tree branch this summer.
The Vikings say they take the issue very seriously and have given it considerable thought. But they also say they want the legal process to take its course before making any final decisions.
Peterson’s lawyer says the star player was just disciplining his child and did not mean to cause harm.
Here is the Vikings statement:
‘Today’s decision was made after significant thought, discussion and consideration. As evidenced by our decision to deactivate Adrian from yesterday’s game, this is clearly a very important issue. On Friday, we felt it was in the best interests of the organization to step back, evaluate the situation, and not rush to judgment given the seriousness of this matter. At that time, we made the decision that we felt was best for the Vikings and all parties involved.’
‘To be clear, we take very seriously any matter that involves the welfare of a child. At this time, however, we believe this is a matter of due process and we should allow the legal system to proceed so we can come to the most effective conclusions and then determine the appropriate course of action. This is a difficult path to navigate, and our focus is on doing the right thing. Currently we believe we are at a juncture where the most appropriate next step is to allow the judicial process to move forward.’
‘We will continue to monitor the situation closely and support Adrian’s fulfillment of his legal responsibilities throughout this process.’
I think there are a lot of people who share your opinion. But I'd ask the following:At the end of the day, I am not standing up for Peterson. I think he crossed the line. But, I don't think the line he crossed is the same as punching your wife in the face. Some people say, but it is a child, it is worse. I don't think that that is the case and I respect the opinion of those who disagree.
I'm surprised he just posted it and didn't start a new thread with it.This statement was already posted.EDEN PRAIRIE, Minn. — The Minnesota Vikings are reinstating Adrian Peterson this week after he was charged with child abuse and say he will play on Sunday against the New Orleans Saints.
Vikings owners Zygi and Mark Wilf made the announcement Monday, one day Peterson was benched during a 30-7 loss to the New England Patriots after he was charged for striking his 4-year-old son with a tree branch this summer.
The Vikings say they take the issue very seriously and have given it considerable thought. But they also say they want the legal process to take its course before making any final decisions.
Peterson’s lawyer says the star player was just disciplining his child and did not mean to cause harm.
Here is the Vikings statement:
‘Today’s decision was made after significant thought, discussion and consideration. As evidenced by our decision to deactivate Adrian from yesterday’s game, this is clearly a very important issue. On Friday, we felt it was in the best interests of the organization to step back, evaluate the situation, and not rush to judgment given the seriousness of this matter. At that time, we made the decision that we felt was best for the Vikings and all parties involved.’
‘To be clear, we take very seriously any matter that involves the welfare of a child. At this time, however, we believe this is a matter of due process and we should allow the legal system to proceed so we can come to the most effective conclusions and then determine the appropriate course of action. This is a difficult path to navigate, and our focus is on doing the right thing. Currently we believe we are at a juncture where the most appropriate next step is to allow the judicial process to move forward.’
‘We will continue to monitor the situation closely and support Adrian’s fulfillment of his legal responsibilities throughout this process.’
And this is all the undisputed stuff. It doesn't even take into account the boy's statement that AP threatened to hit him in the face, stuffed leaves in his mouth, "has lots of belts" and has a "whooping room." Even if you don't consider that stuff, it still seems pretty horrible, and at least in the same neighborhood as punching an adult female.I think there are a lot of people who share your opinion. But I'd ask the following:At the end of the day, I am not standing up for Peterson. I think he crossed the line. But, I don't think the line he crossed is the same as punching your wife in the face. Some people say, but it is a child, it is worse. I don't think that that is the case and I respect the opinion of those who disagree.
1) Have you seen the photos of the injury?
2) Do you realize that those were taken a full week after the incident? If they look that bad at that point, imagine how bad it looked before a week's worth of healing.
3) Did you know that the photos don't depict the worst of the injuries, namely the laceration on the front of the four-year-olds thigh, and the injury to his genitalia?
4) Did you know that this wasn't a couple strikes, but many of them? AP himself estimates 10-15, but says he didn't keep count.
5) Did you know that the boy's body still bore marks from prior physical punishment?
6) Have you imagined what a video of this "punishment" would look like? A father stripping down his four-year-old and lashing him 10, 15 or more times, causing lacerations and drawing blood, bruises across the back and cuts on his butt, legs, hands and genitals, so bad that the welts and scabs would still be visible a week later. I've imagined what that video would look like, and I'd be willing to bet it is absolutely horrifying.
Is it worse than punching your wife? I don't know, both things are pretty darn heinous.
Punishment that goes beyond what many would consider normal punishment, is still not as bad as cold cocking your wife in an elevator, and then dragging her out.I think there are a lot of people who share your opinion. But I'd ask the following:At the end of the day, I am not standing up for Peterson. I think he crossed the line. But, I don't think the line he crossed is the same as punching your wife in the face. Some people say, but it is a child, it is worse. I don't think that that is the case and I respect the opinion of those who disagree.
1) Have you seen the photos of the injury?
2) Do you realize that those were taken a full week after the incident? If they look that bad at that point, imagine how bad it looked before a week's worth of healing.
3) Did you know that the photos don't depict the worst of the injuries, namely the laceration on the front of the four-year-olds thigh, and the injury to his genitalia?
4) Did you know that this wasn't a couple strikes, but many of them? AP himself estimates 10-15, but says he didn't keep count.
5) Did you know that the boy's body still bore marks from prior physical punishment?
6) Have you imagined what a video of this "punishment" would look like? A father stripping down his four-year-old and lashing him 10, 15 or more times, causing lacerations and drawing blood, bruises across the back and cuts on his butt, legs, hands and genitals, so bad that the welts and scabs would still be visible a week later. I've imagined what that video would look like, and I'd be willing to bet it is absolutely horrifying.
Is it worse than punching your wife? I don't know, both things are pretty darn heinous.
There's still time.I'm surprised he just posted it and didn't start a new thread with it.This statement was already posted.EDEN PRAIRIE, Minn. The Minnesota Vikings are reinstating Adrian Peterson this week after he was charged with child abuse and say he will play on Sunday against the New Orleans Saints.
Vikings owners Zygi and Mark Wilf made the announcement Monday, one day Peterson was benched during a 30-7 loss to the New England Patriots after he was charged for striking his 4-year-old son with a tree branch this summer.
The Vikings say they take the issue very seriously and have given it considerable thought. But they also say they want the legal process to take its course before making any final decisions.
Petersons lawyer says the star player was just disciplining his child and did not mean to cause harm.
Here is the Vikings statement:
Todays decision was made after significant thought, discussion and consideration. As evidenced by our decision to deactivate Adrian from yesterdays game, this is clearly a very important issue. On Friday, we felt it was in the best interests of the organization to step back, evaluate the situation, and not rush to judgment given the seriousness of this matter. At that time, we made the decision that we felt was best for the Vikings and all parties involved.
To be clear, we take very seriously any matter that involves the welfare of a child. At this time, however, we believe this is a matter of due process and we should allow the legal system to proceed so we can come to the most effective conclusions and then determine the appropriate course of action. This is a difficult path to navigate, and our focus is on doing the right thing. Currently we believe we are at a juncture where the most appropriate next step is to allow the judicial process to move forward.
We will continue to monitor the situation closely and support Adrians fulfillment of his legal responsibilities throughout this process.
Goodell needs to stop suspending players before the legal process is finished. Teams are welcome to do whatever they want but the league should stay out of it until someone is found guilty.Boy what a dilemma for Goodell to be in this time. If he moves to suspend Peterson, people will say that he only did it to try to restore his image after Rice. If he lets the Vikings reinstate Peterson without comment, people will say he's weak. And let's not forget that Goodell suspended Big Ben prior to Ben being charged with a crime (and as it turns out, he never was.)
Why not? The NFL is not a court of law. If public opinion is outraged by what they perceive to have been Peterson's behavior, why shouldn't the NFL step in?Goodell needs to stop suspending players before the legal process is finished. Teams are welcome to do whatever they want but the league should stay out of it until someone is found guilty.Boy what a dilemma for Goodell to be in this time. If he moves to suspend Peterson, people will say that he only did it to try to restore his image after Rice. If he lets the Vikings reinstate Peterson without comment, people will say he's weak. And let's not forget that Goodell suspended Big Ben prior to Ben being charged with a crime (and as it turns out, he never was.)
That is what Tom Jackson said he should do and I agree. The NFL is in a crisis type moment in terms of it`s image.Here's what I would say, if I were Goodell:
"Adrian Peterson has not been found guilty of any crime. But we have his admission that he beat the child, we have the testimony of the child, and we have these photographs, which are absolutely sickening. So I am overriding the Vikings and suspending Adrian Peterson indefinitely. When and if he has either been found not guilty or served his sentence, then I will reinstate him. Not before then."