What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Adrian Peterson's turn to get the boot from the NFL (1 Viewer)

I've been really stunned with the response of so many people to this compared to the Rice thing.

I'm seeing most people standing up for AP. And saying that yeah, hey went over the line, but don't you dare tell me how to beat my kids effectively.

People suck.

 
Not discounting the seriousness of these topics, but have NFL's ratings suffered as a result?
Not sure of that, but I do think the NFL is going to do everything to clean up its act. The problem that the league has always had is if one team took a stand and released a guy who beat his wife, or killed someone while driving drunk another team would sign that player the next day. I am not sure that is going to happen as much anymore.
Good point. I also think that if they hope to continue to attract women fans, they can't afford to be viewed as treating these issues as less than priority #1.
 
Not discounting the seriousness of these topics, but have NFL's ratings suffered as a result?
Doubt it. This particular issue is a fairly simple one, and ultimately shouldn't hurt the NFL. Goodell screwed up in handling this, but the overall point is that fans now want the NFL to give a #### and punish these guys. They are and will continue to do so.

Now, the long-term effects of Thursday Night games, further market oversaturation, long-term player health and the sport being one many reasonable parents would never allow their children to play...those should be a much bigger problem for the NFL.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
By the way, Rusty Hardin is AP's lawyer. Recall that Rusty successfully represented Roger Clemens, as well as Warren Moon. The guy is good.
If he got Clemons off he must be a great lawyer.
If memory serves, he also got Arthur Anderson's criminal conviction overturned after the Enron scandal.
Right now getting off is the least of Petersons worries. AP has already been convicted in the court of public opinion, and convicted by his peers on all the pre-games shows. I have never seen so many ex-players bash a player like they did AP yesterday. For the NFL and AP this could not have come out at a worse time. The ex-players on the pregames were all imploring the NFL and Goodell to take the harshest stand possible against Peterson including removing him from the league.

 
By the way, Rusty Hardin is AP's lawyer. Recall that Rusty successfully represented Roger Clemens, as well as Warren Moon. The guy is good.
If he got Clemons off he must be a great lawyer.
as we have seen over and over, it is very difficult to convict celebrities of crimes. Not only do the hire the very best lawyers, juries more often than not are eager to give them the benefit of the doubt.
 
Not discounting the seriousness of these topics, but have NFL's ratings suffered as a result?
short term no, but long term i think people will begin to change there viewing and appetite for other things, we are just on the cusp of this changing.

Just my thought...

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Da Guru is right. As bad as what Peterson did, if the Rice video had never happened the situation would be entirely different. That video has changed everything; it's like 9/11 for the NFL.

 
Da Guru is right. As bad as what Peterson did, if the Rice video had never happened the situation would be entirely different. That video has changed everything; it's like 9/11 for the NFL.
minus the airplanes crashing in to the buildings by Islamic terrorists and the thousands of innocent people dying and the wars that followed. Other than that its exactly like 9/11.

 
Not discounting the seriousness of these topics, but have NFL's ratings suffered as a result?
Not sure of that, but I do think the NFL is going to do everything to clean up its act. The problem that the league has always had is if one team took a stand and released a guy who beat his wife, or killed someone while driving drunk another team would sign that player the next day. I am not sure that is going to happen as much anymore.
Good point. I also think that if they hope to continue to attract women fans, they can't afford to be viewed as treating these issues as less than priority #1.
We are nearing the month of pink jerseys. All will be forgiven.

 
Da Guru is right. As bad as what Peterson did, if the Rice video had never happened the situation would be entirely different. That video has changed everything; it's like 9/11 for the NFL.
minus the airplanes crashing in to the buildings by Islamic terrorists and the thousands of innocent people dying and the wars that followed. Other than that its exactly like 9/11.
You guys are eager to jump on every remark and take it to the most literal extreme. All I meant is that, like 9/11, the Rice video changed the culture of the NFL, and we will see this specifically in terms of how they handle bad behavior from now on. I used 9/11 because there are very few clear cut examples of single incidents which create a before and after dividing line, not because of the magnitude of events which aren't in any way comparable.
 
Not discounting the seriousness of these topics, but have NFL's ratings suffered as a result?
Not sure of that, but I do think the NFL is going to do everything to clean up its act. The problem that the league has always had is if one team took a stand and released a guy who beat his wife, or killed someone while driving drunk another team would sign that player the next day. I am not sure that is going to happen as much anymore.
Good point. I also think that if they hope to continue to attract women fans, they can't afford to be viewed as treating these issues as less than priority #1.
We are nearing the month of pink jerseys. All will be forgiven.
Yes..and the Breast Cancer Foundation will get their 5% of the scraps that is left over from all the Pink NFL Gear sales. There is a lot of fingers in that pie.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
By the way, Rusty Hardin is AP's lawyer. Recall that Rusty successfully represented Roger Clemens, as well as Warren Moon. The guy is good.
If he got Clemons off he must be a great lawyer.
If memory serves, he also got Arthur Anderson's criminal conviction overturned after the Enron scandal.
Right now getting off is the least of Petersons worries. AP has already been convicted in the court of public opinion, and convicted by his peers on all the pre-games shows. I have never seen so many ex-players bash a player like they did AP yesterday. For the NFL and AP this could not have come out at a worse time. The ex-players on the pregames were all imploring the NFL and Goodell to take the harshest stand possible against Peterson including removing him from the league.
On the list of worries, I wouldn't say that going to prison is least among them.

 
back this week (along with a homophobic special teams coach). Sweet franchise in the city I live in...

The following statement is from Vikings Owners Zygi Wilf and Mark Wilf:

Today’s decision was made after significant thought, discussion and consideration. As evidenced by our decision to deactivate Adrian from yesterday’s game, this is clearly a very important issue. On Friday, we felt it was in the best interests of the organization to step back, evaluate the situation, and not rush to judgment given the seriousness of this matter. At that time, we made the decision that we felt was best for the Vikings and all parties involved.

To be clear, we take very seriously any matter that involves the welfare of a child. At this time, however, we believe this is a matter of due process and we should allow the legal system to proceed so we can come to the most effective conclusions and then determine the appropriate course of action. This is a difficult path to navigate, and our focus is on doing the right thing. Currently we believe we are at a juncture where the most appropriate next step is to allow the judicial process to move forward.

We will continue to monitor the situation closely and support Adrian’s fulfillment of his legal responsibilities throughout this process.

 
I've been really stunned with the response of so many people to this compared to the Rice thing.

I'm seeing most people standing up for AP. And saying that yeah, hey went over the line, but don't you dare tell me how to beat my kids effectively.

People suck.
I don't think a lot of people can envision themselves punching their wife in the face with a left hook. I think many, many parents (myself included) have found themselves in a situation where their anger and frustration got the best of them and resulted in them taking the punishment with their kids too far. Now, I never broke skin or anything like that, but I know that I went to a place that I wasn't comfortable with once I had calmed down.

I also know that many women can probably say the same and many women can probably recall a time when they felt their husband/father of their child went too far in punishing their child. And they also know that despite their husband going too far in that instance or on occasion that he loves and cares about his children and family.

At the end of the day, I am not standing up for Peterson. I think he crossed the line. But, I don't think the line he crossed is the same as punching your wife in the face. Some people say, but it is a child, it is worse. I don't think that that is the case and I respect the opinion of those who disagree. My feeling is that Peterson needs less in the form of punishment and more in the form of education/counseling.

Feel free to crucify me.

 
EDEN PRAIRIE, Minn. — The Minnesota Vikings are reinstating Adrian Peterson this week after he was charged with child abuse and say he will play on Sunday against the New Orleans Saints.

Vikings owners Zygi and Mark Wilf made the announcement Monday, one day Peterson was benched during a 30-7 loss to the New England Patriots after he was charged for striking his 4-year-old son with a tree branch this summer.

The Vikings say they take the issue very seriously and have given it considerable thought. But they also say they want the legal process to take its course before making any final decisions.

Peterson’s lawyer says the star player was just disciplining his child and did not mean to cause harm.

Here is the Vikings statement:


Today’s decision was made after significant thought, discussion and consideration. As evidenced by our decision to deactivate Adrian from yesterday’s game, this is clearly a very important issue. On Friday, we felt it was in the best interests of the organization to step back, evaluate the situation, and not rush to judgment given the seriousness of this matter. At that time, we made the decision that we felt was best for the Vikings and all parties involved.


To be clear, we take very seriously any matter that involves the welfare of a child. At this time, however, we believe this is a matter of due process and we should allow the legal system to proceed so we can come to the most effective conclusions and then determine the appropriate course of action. This is a difficult path to navigate, and our focus is on doing the right thing. Currently we believe we are at a juncture where the most appropriate next step is to allow the judicial process to move forward.


We will continue to monitor the situation closely and support Adrian’s fulfillment of his legal responsibilities throughout this process.

 
AP is playing next week: The Vikings. I guess he's not done yet.
Goodell could step in here and make a statement. With all that has transpired the last couple of weeks and ex-players calling for him to suspend Peterson that would not be surprising.

 
EDEN PRAIRIE, Minn. — The Minnesota Vikings are reinstating Adrian Peterson this week after he was charged with child abuse and say he will play on Sunday against the New Orleans Saints.

Vikings owners Zygi and Mark Wilf made the announcement Monday, one day Peterson was benched during a 30-7 loss to the New England Patriots after he was charged for striking his 4-year-old son with a tree branch this summer.

The Vikings say they take the issue very seriously and have given it considerable thought. But they also say they want the legal process to take its course before making any final decisions.

Peterson’s lawyer says the star player was just disciplining his child and did not mean to cause harm.

Here is the Vikings statement:

‘Today’s decision was made after significant thought, discussion and consideration. As evidenced by our decision to deactivate Adrian from yesterday’s game, this is clearly a very important issue. On Friday, we felt it was in the best interests of the organization to step back, evaluate the situation, and not rush to judgment given the seriousness of this matter. At that time, we made the decision that we felt was best for the Vikings and all parties involved.’

‘To be clear, we take very seriously any matter that involves the welfare of a child. At this time, however, we believe this is a matter of due process and we should allow the legal system to proceed so we can come to the most effective conclusions and then determine the appropriate course of action. This is a difficult path to navigate, and our focus is on doing the right thing. Currently we believe we are at a juncture where the most appropriate next step is to allow the judicial process to move forward.’

‘We will continue to monitor the situation closely and support Adrian’s fulfillment of his legal responsibilities throughout this process.’
This statement was already posted.

 
EDEN PRAIRIE, Minn. — The Minnesota Vikings are reinstating Adrian Peterson this week after he was charged with child abuse and say he will play on Sunday against the New Orleans Saints.

Vikings owners Zygi and Mark Wilf made the announcement Monday, one day Peterson was benched during a 30-7 loss to the New England Patriots after he was charged for striking his 4-year-old son with a tree branch this summer.

The Vikings say they take the issue very seriously and have given it considerable thought. But they also say they want the legal process to take its course before making any final decisions.

Peterson’s lawyer says the star player was just disciplining his child and did not mean to cause harm.

Here is the Vikings statement:

‘Today’s decision was made after significant thought, discussion and consideration. As evidenced by our decision to deactivate Adrian from yesterday’s game, this is clearly a very important issue. On Friday, we felt it was in the best interests of the organization to step back, evaluate the situation, and not rush to judgment given the seriousness of this matter. At that time, we made the decision that we felt was best for the Vikings and all parties involved.’

‘To be clear, we take very seriously any matter that involves the welfare of a child. At this time, however, we believe this is a matter of due process and we should allow the legal system to proceed so we can come to the most effective conclusions and then determine the appropriate course of action. This is a difficult path to navigate, and our focus is on doing the right thing. Currently we believe we are at a juncture where the most appropriate next step is to allow the judicial process to move forward.’

‘We will continue to monitor the situation closely and support Adrian’s fulfillment of his legal responsibilities throughout this process.’
This statement was already posted.
I'm surprised he just posted it and didn't start a new thread with it.

 
EDEN PRAIRIE, Minn. — The Minnesota Vikings are reinstating Adrian Peterson this week after he was charged with child abuse and say he will play on Sunday against the New Orleans Saints.

Vikings owners Zygi and Mark Wilf made the announcement Monday, one day Peterson was benched during a 30-7 loss to the New England Patriots after he was charged for striking his 4-year-old son with a tree branch this summer.

The Vikings say they take the issue very seriously and have given it considerable thought. But they also say they want the legal process to take its course before making any final decisions.

Peterson’s lawyer says the star player was just disciplining his child and did not mean to cause harm.

Here is the Vikings statement:

‘Today’s decision was made after significant thought, discussion and consideration. As evidenced by our decision to deactivate Adrian from yesterday’s game, this is clearly a very important issue. On Friday, we felt it was in the best interests of the organization to step back, evaluate the situation, and not rush to judgment given the seriousness of this matter. At that time, we made the decision that we felt was best for the Vikings and all parties involved.’

‘To be clear, we take very seriously any matter that involves the welfare of a child. At this time, however, we believe this is a matter of due process and we should allow the legal system to proceed so we can come to the most effective conclusions and then determine the appropriate course of action. This is a difficult path to navigate, and our focus is on doing the right thing. Currently we believe we are at a juncture where the most appropriate next step is to allow the judicial process to move forward.’

‘We will continue to monitor the situation closely and support Adrian’s fulfillment of his legal responsibilities throughout this process.’
This statement was already posted.
OMG! The FFA police are here. ####### arrest me already.

 
At the end of the day, I am not standing up for Peterson. I think he crossed the line. But, I don't think the line he crossed is the same as punching your wife in the face. Some people say, but it is a child, it is worse. I don't think that that is the case and I respect the opinion of those who disagree.
I think there are a lot of people who share your opinion. But I'd ask the following:

1) Have you seen the photos of the injury?

2) Do you realize that those were taken a full week after the incident? If they look that bad at that point, imagine how bad it looked before a week's worth of healing.

3) Did you know that the photos don't depict the worst of the injuries, namely the laceration on the front of the four-year-olds thigh, and the injury to his genitalia?

4) Did you know that this wasn't a couple strikes, but many of them? AP himself estimates 10-15, but says he didn't keep count.

5) Did you know that the boy's body still bore marks from prior physical punishment?

6) Have you imagined what a video of this "punishment" would look like? A father stripping down his four-year-old and lashing him 10, 15 or more times, causing lacerations and drawing blood, bruises across the back and cuts on his butt, legs, hands and genitals, so bad that the welts and scabs would still be visible a week later. I've imagined what that video would look like, and I'd be willing to bet it is absolutely horrifying.

Is it worse than punching your wife? I don't know, both things are pretty darn heinous.

 
EDEN PRAIRIE, Minn. — The Minnesota Vikings are reinstating Adrian Peterson this week after he was charged with child abuse and say he will play on Sunday against the New Orleans Saints.

Vikings owners Zygi and Mark Wilf made the announcement Monday, one day Peterson was benched during a 30-7 loss to the New England Patriots after he was charged for striking his 4-year-old son with a tree branch this summer.

The Vikings say they take the issue very seriously and have given it considerable thought. But they also say they want the legal process to take its course before making any final decisions.

Peterson’s lawyer says the star player was just disciplining his child and did not mean to cause harm.

Here is the Vikings statement:

‘Today’s decision was made after significant thought, discussion and consideration. As evidenced by our decision to deactivate Adrian from yesterday’s game, this is clearly a very important issue. On Friday, we felt it was in the best interests of the organization to step back, evaluate the situation, and not rush to judgment given the seriousness of this matter. At that time, we made the decision that we felt was best for the Vikings and all parties involved.’

‘To be clear, we take very seriously any matter that involves the welfare of a child. At this time, however, we believe this is a matter of due process and we should allow the legal system to proceed so we can come to the most effective conclusions and then determine the appropriate course of action. This is a difficult path to navigate, and our focus is on doing the right thing. Currently we believe we are at a juncture where the most appropriate next step is to allow the judicial process to move forward.’

‘We will continue to monitor the situation closely and support Adrian’s fulfillment of his legal responsibilities throughout this process.’
This statement was already posted.
I'm surprised he just posted it and didn't start a new thread with it.
:lmao:

 
At the end of the day, I am not standing up for Peterson. I think he crossed the line. But, I don't think the line he crossed is the same as punching your wife in the face. Some people say, but it is a child, it is worse. I don't think that that is the case and I respect the opinion of those who disagree.
I think there are a lot of people who share your opinion. But I'd ask the following:

1) Have you seen the photos of the injury?

2) Do you realize that those were taken a full week after the incident? If they look that bad at that point, imagine how bad it looked before a week's worth of healing.

3) Did you know that the photos don't depict the worst of the injuries, namely the laceration on the front of the four-year-olds thigh, and the injury to his genitalia?

4) Did you know that this wasn't a couple strikes, but many of them? AP himself estimates 10-15, but says he didn't keep count.

5) Did you know that the boy's body still bore marks from prior physical punishment?

6) Have you imagined what a video of this "punishment" would look like? A father stripping down his four-year-old and lashing him 10, 15 or more times, causing lacerations and drawing blood, bruises across the back and cuts on his butt, legs, hands and genitals, so bad that the welts and scabs would still be visible a week later. I've imagined what that video would look like, and I'd be willing to bet it is absolutely horrifying.

Is it worse than punching your wife? I don't know, both things are pretty darn heinous.
And this is all the undisputed stuff. It doesn't even take into account the boy's statement that AP threatened to hit him in the face, stuffed leaves in his mouth, "has lots of belts" and has a "whooping room." Even if you don't consider that stuff, it still seems pretty horrible, and at least in the same neighborhood as punching an adult female.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
At the end of the day, I am not standing up for Peterson. I think he crossed the line. But, I don't think the line he crossed is the same as punching your wife in the face. Some people say, but it is a child, it is worse. I don't think that that is the case and I respect the opinion of those who disagree.
I think there are a lot of people who share your opinion. But I'd ask the following:

1) Have you seen the photos of the injury?

2) Do you realize that those were taken a full week after the incident? If they look that bad at that point, imagine how bad it looked before a week's worth of healing.

3) Did you know that the photos don't depict the worst of the injuries, namely the laceration on the front of the four-year-olds thigh, and the injury to his genitalia?

4) Did you know that this wasn't a couple strikes, but many of them? AP himself estimates 10-15, but says he didn't keep count.

5) Did you know that the boy's body still bore marks from prior physical punishment?

6) Have you imagined what a video of this "punishment" would look like? A father stripping down his four-year-old and lashing him 10, 15 or more times, causing lacerations and drawing blood, bruises across the back and cuts on his butt, legs, hands and genitals, so bad that the welts and scabs would still be visible a week later. I've imagined what that video would look like, and I'd be willing to bet it is absolutely horrifying.

Is it worse than punching your wife? I don't know, both things are pretty darn heinous.
Punishment that goes beyond what many would consider normal punishment, is still not as bad as cold cocking your wife in an elevator, and then dragging her out.

 
EDEN PRAIRIE, Minn. The Minnesota Vikings are reinstating Adrian Peterson this week after he was charged with child abuse and say he will play on Sunday against the New Orleans Saints.

Vikings owners Zygi and Mark Wilf made the announcement Monday, one day Peterson was benched during a 30-7 loss to the New England Patriots after he was charged for striking his 4-year-old son with a tree branch this summer.

The Vikings say they take the issue very seriously and have given it considerable thought. But they also say they want the legal process to take its course before making any final decisions.

Petersons lawyer says the star player was just disciplining his child and did not mean to cause harm.

Here is the Vikings statement:

Todays decision was made after significant thought, discussion and consideration. As evidenced by our decision to deactivate Adrian from yesterdays game, this is clearly a very important issue. On Friday, we felt it was in the best interests of the organization to step back, evaluate the situation, and not rush to judgment given the seriousness of this matter. At that time, we made the decision that we felt was best for the Vikings and all parties involved.

To be clear, we take very seriously any matter that involves the welfare of a child. At this time, however, we believe this is a matter of due process and we should allow the legal system to proceed so we can come to the most effective conclusions and then determine the appropriate course of action. This is a difficult path to navigate, and our focus is on doing the right thing. Currently we believe we are at a juncture where the most appropriate next step is to allow the judicial process to move forward.

We will continue to monitor the situation closely and support Adrians fulfillment of his legal responsibilities throughout this process.
This statement was already posted.
I'm surprised he just posted it and didn't start a new thread with it.
There's still time.

 
Boy what a dilemma for Goodell to be in this time. If he moves to suspend Peterson, people will say that he only did it to try to restore his image after Rice. If he lets the Vikings reinstate Peterson without comment, people will say he's weak. And let's not forget that Goodell suspended Big Ben prior to Ben being charged with a crime (and as it turns out, he never was.)

 
Boy what a dilemma for Goodell to be in this time. If he moves to suspend Peterson, people will say that he only did it to try to restore his image after Rice. If he lets the Vikings reinstate Peterson without comment, people will say he's weak. And let's not forget that Goodell suspended Big Ben prior to Ben being charged with a crime (and as it turns out, he never was.)
Goodell needs to stop suspending players before the legal process is finished. Teams are welcome to do whatever they want but the league should stay out of it until someone is found guilty.

 
Here's what I would say, if I were Goodell:

"Adrian Peterson has not been found guilty of any crime. But we have his admission that he beat the child, we have the testimony of the child, and we have these photographs, which are absolutely sickening. So I am overriding the Vikings and suspending Adrian Peterson indefinitely. When and if he has either been found not guilty or served his sentence, then I will reinstate him. Not before then."

 
Boy what a dilemma for Goodell to be in this time. If he moves to suspend Peterson, people will say that he only did it to try to restore his image after Rice. If he lets the Vikings reinstate Peterson without comment, people will say he's weak. And let's not forget that Goodell suspended Big Ben prior to Ben being charged with a crime (and as it turns out, he never was.)
Goodell needs to stop suspending players before the legal process is finished. Teams are welcome to do whatever they want but the league should stay out of it until someone is found guilty.
Why not? The NFL is not a court of law. If public opinion is outraged by what they perceive to have been Peterson's behavior, why shouldn't the NFL step in?

 
Has anyone here posted Peterson's religious statement on this? I don't want to get attacked for doing so if somebody already has...

 
Here's what I would say, if I were Goodell:

"Adrian Peterson has not been found guilty of any crime. But we have his admission that he beat the child, we have the testimony of the child, and we have these photographs, which are absolutely sickening. So I am overriding the Vikings and suspending Adrian Peterson indefinitely. When and if he has either been found not guilty or served his sentence, then I will reinstate him. Not before then."
That is what Tom Jackson said he should do and I agree. The NFL is in a crisis type moment in terms of it`s image.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top