What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Am I the only one who like Boldin this week? (1 Viewer)

tombonneau

Footballguy
Seems to me that Ravens secondary is living off rep this season. When Kellen Clemens and Jerricho Cotchery are putting up stats on you, you're what we like to call mortal.

Not sure where BALs secondary is ranked right now, but my guess is that it's very middle of the pack.

I don't think Edge is gonna have much room to run, and with McCallister on Fitz, I think Boldin abuses Rolle for a huge day.

I'm starting him in my flex over a decent RB2 option.

 
Looks like I'm going to bench him. I need 2 WR's and I have Q, Plax, Curry, and B. Marshall. I'm thinking Plax and Curry. Curry should light it up this week.

 
Seems to me that Ravens secondary is living off rep this season. When Kellen Clemens and Jerricho Cotchery are putting up stats on you, you're what we like to call mortal.Not sure where BALs secondary is ranked right now, but my guess is that it's very middle of the pack.I don't think Edge is gonna have much room to run, and with McCallister on Fitz, I think Boldin abuses Rolle for a huge day.I'm starting him in my flex over a decent RB2 option.
The Ravens are ranked #16 in passing defense, and yes they can be had. Bolding makes a solid WR3 or borderline WR2 this week.
 
Boldin is the number 1 in ARZ. Plus he is much more physical then Fitz. Anquan will draw McAllister, not Rolle.

HTH.

 
Why does McAllister automatically cover Fitz this weekend? And on every play?

IMO both make great plays. BAL has never been a stout team against good WRs

 
Boldin is the number 1 in ARZ. Plus he is much more physical then Fitz. Anquan will draw McAllister, not Rolle.HTH.
Interesting take General Zod. Are you a BAL homer? Do you think McA will draw Boldin most of the game? Do they mix up coverage btwn corners?
 
Boldin is the number 1 in ARZ . Plus he is much more physical then Fitz. Anquan will draw McAllister, not Rolle.

HTH.
:unsure:
Are you going to tell me that Fitz is better?
I think Fitz is the better end zone threat but Q is the better athlete.As far as fantasy I think Q is more consistent in scoring but is less likely to blow up for big points.

IMHO they are equal. Hence the 1a and 1b tabbing.

 
Boldin is the number 1 in ARZ. Plus he is much more physical then Fitz. Anquan will draw McAllister, not Rolle.HTH.
Interesting take General Zod. Are you a BAL homer? Do you think McA will draw Boldin most of the game? Do they mix up coverage btwn corners?
Not a BAL homer, and I don't expect either of these two guys to draw McAllister only and the other Rolle only. I would expect McAllister to cover Boldin on early downs where both run or pass could be expected. I would expect McAllister to then switch to Fitz in 3rd and long situations since Fitz is the more dangerous deep threat.However, in most straight man-to-man situations I fully expect McAllister to be covering Boldin. Again, Boldin is probably the single most physical WR in the NFL. He is built like Antonio Gates but as fast as a WR. He would eat Samari Rolle for breakfast and spit him out. Now granted Fitz would probaly do so also, but Rolle at least has a chance in intermediate coverage vs. Fitz, Boldin will take Rolle to the cleaners with slant routes all day long.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Boldin is the number 1 in ARZ . Plus he is much more physical then Fitz. Anquan will draw McAllister, not Rolle.

HTH.
:unsure:
Are you going to tell me that Fitz is better?
I think Fitz is the better end zone threat but Q is the better athlete.As far as fantasy I think Q is more consistent in scoring but is less likely to blow up for big points.

IMHO they are equal. Hence the 1a and 1b tabbing.
I agree with them being 1A and 1B. However, Boldin is 1A and Fitz is 1B. Most people have it twisted. Just check their stats. Even in Fitz's best season Boldin still did better on a game-per-game average .... he just missed 2.5 games and Fitz missed none. Boldin's 2005 season was BEASTLY for only playing 13.5 games and he has nothing but other awesome seasons before and after it. Fitz has one awesome season (where Boldin still did better) and some very good seasons before and after it.
 
As much as I hate to do it, I'm most likely benching Boldin this week (most likely the only time this season). Going up against the Baltimore defense, I think I have a better play with Santana Moss against that horrific Giants secondary.

 
As much as I hate to do it, I'm most likely benching Boldin this week (most likely the only time this season). Going up against the Baltimore defense, I think I have a better play with Santana Moss against that horrific Giants secondary.
Like I said above, the BAL matchup is nothing to worry about for Boldin or Fitz. Numerous WRs have had studly games vs BAL the past 2 years. (Colston, Cotchery, Chad etc). But that is a juicy matchup for Moss.
 
As much as I hate to do it, I'm most likely benching Boldin this week (most likely the only time this season). Going up against the Baltimore defense, I think I have a better play with Santana Moss against that horrific Giants secondary.
I'm doing the exact same thing. This should be a coming out week for Santana.
 
Boldin is the number 1 in ARZ . Plus he is much more physical then Fitz. Anquan will draw McAllister, not Rolle.

HTH.
:excited:
Are you going to tell me that Fitz is better?
I think Fitz is the better end zone threat but Q is the better athlete.As far as fantasy I think Q is more consistent in scoring but is less likely to blow up for big points.

IMHO they are equal. Hence the 1a and 1b tabbing.
I agree with them being 1A and 1B. However, Boldin is 1A and Fitz is 1B. Most people have it twisted. Just check their stats. Even in Fitz's best season Boldin still did better on a game-per-game average .... he just missed 2.5 games and Fitz missed none. Boldin's 2005 season was BEASTLY for only playing 13.5 games and he has nothing but other awesome seasons before and after it. Fitz has one awesome season (where Boldin still did better) and some very good seasons before and after it.
Boldin is the #1, Fitz is the #2, barely.
 
There is no #1, #2 receiver in real football...that is a fantasy football thing in real football there is an X and a Z receiver. On top of that most cornerbacks prefer to stay on one side of the field and gaurd whoever is on that side...so I think it is safe to say that Rolle will be gaurding both receivers at different points...and whoever he is on is going to get the ball

 
There is no #1, #2 receiver in real football...that is a fantasy football thing in real football there is an X and a Z receiver. On top of that most cornerbacks prefer to stay on one side of the field and gaurd whoever is on that side...so I think it is safe to say that Rolle will be gaurding both receivers at different points...and whoever he is on is going to get the ball
:goodposting:
 
I need to choose 3 out of 4 of the following: (ppr)

Wayne, Roy Williams, Boldin, Welker

I hate to say it but I most likely will be benching boldin this week.

 
Boldin is the number 1 in ARZ. Plus he is much more physical then Fitz. Anquan will draw McAllister, not Rolle.HTH.
Interesting take General Zod. Are you a BAL homer? Do you think McA will draw Boldin most of the game? Do they mix up coverage btwn corners?
Not a BAL homer, and I don't expect either of these two guys to draw McAllister only and the other Rolle only. I would expect McAllister to cover Boldin on early downs where both run or pass could be expected. I would expect McAllister to then switch to Fitz in 3rd and long situations since Fitz is the more dangerous deep threat.However, in most straight man-to-man situations I fully expect McAllister to be covering Boldin. Again, Boldin is probably the single most physical WR in the NFL. He is built like Antonio Gates but as fast as a WR. He would eat Samari Rolle for breakfast and spit him out. Now granted Fitz would probaly do so also, but Rolle at least has a chance in intermediate coverage vs. Fitz, Boldin will take Rolle to the cleaners with slant routes all day long.
So, how you think Boldin will do?
 
Looking for some local insight went to the Baltimore Sun; this is from Matchups to Watch section. Not sure how homerish their coverage is, but they call the BAL CB vs AZ WR matchup a push:

Samari Rolle, Ravens CB & Chris McAlister, Ravens CB vs. Anquan Boldin, Arizona WR & Larry Fitzgerald, Arizona WRThe Cardinals will take shots downfield, especially after the Ravens had trouble defending the pass in the fourth quarter against the New York Jets. Fitzgerald has great hands, and Boldin is a tough competitor. The Ravens won't take this duo lightly. McAlister played well Sunday, but Rolle had problems. He backed off late in the game but plays better when he presses at the line of scrimmage. If the Cardinals get time to pass, these receivers can cause problems for the Ravens. EDGE: EVEN
 
Rolle was actually a DNP. I'd say the fact that Warner played was a greater factor for Boldin's success today. Look for it to continue if Whiz keeps #13 in the lineup.

 
tombonneau said:
Markus P Dub said:
Good call. Hope you played him.....
Nope. Couldn't take my own advice. Over thought it and ended up starting Ahman Green. :moneybag: Likely cost me my game.
OUCH - you started the thread and then went against it and it burned you? Sorry, man.
 
tombonneau said:
Markus P Dub said:
Good call. Hope you played him.....
Nope. Couldn't take my own advice. Over thought it and ended up starting Ahman Green. :thumbup: Likely cost me my game.
OUCH - you started the thread and then went against it and it burned you? Sorry, man.
Hey tombonneau, sorry to hear that! I was checking in to give you your props. Still good insight, even without the follow through. I (sort of) feel your pain. All week I'm torn between Peterson and LJ. Played Peterson last week and it was correct, although only by a little. Listened a little too much to the "Don't bench your studs" crowd and went with LJ. Likely cost me my game, but that's what it's all about, baby. :lmao:
 
Even if you did start him...laying claim to seeing his production skyrocket becuz of Warners insertion into the game is...two different things.

Nobody in the world saw Warner putting the cape back on.

 
Obviously nobody can predict the future-that's the beauty of fantasy.

However, when people do predict these things they deserve a pat on the back! :goodposting:

Regardless of the "how and why" Boldin did go off so props to the OP.

I benched him-but it looks like I'm going to get a win this week. If I wouldn't have benched him though I would have finished in the weekly money. Owell I'll take a win at this point-I'm desperate!

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top