http://projects.nytimes.com/guantanamo/detainees/4-abdul-haq-wasiqAbdul Haq Wasiq
A HIGH risk, as he is likely to pose a threat to the US, its interests and allies
Reasons for Continued Detention: Detainee was a high-level Taliban
intelligence officer who had direct access to the Taliban and ACM leadership. He was
central to Taliban efforts to fonn alliances with other Islamic fundamentalist groups to fight
alongside the Taliban against US and Coalition forces after the 11 September 2001 attacks.
Detainee also coordinated intelligence training between al-Qaida and the Taliban. Detainee
assisted al-Qaida and Taliban elements to elude Coalition forces.
http://projects.nytimes.com/guantanamo/detainees/6-mullah-norullah-nooriMullah Norullah Nori
Assessment: Detainee is assessed to be a HIGH risk, as he is likely to pose a threat to the US, its interests and allies. b. (S//NF) Reasons for Continued Detention: Detainee is an admitted senior member of the Taliban and led troops against US and Coalition forces. Detainee was directly subordinate to Taliban Supreme Leader Mullah Omar, commanded Taliban forces in northern Afghanistan, and in late 2001, he was in charge of Taliban troops positioned near Mazar-e-Sharif. Detainee is wanted by the UN for possible war crimes including the murder of thousands of Shiites. Detainee is also associated with members of al-Qaida, Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU), Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) and the Hezb-EIslami Gulbuddin (HIG).
http://projects.nytimes.com/guantanamo/detainees/7-mullah-mohammad-fazlMohammad Fazl
If released, detainee would likely rejoin the Taliban and establish ties with ACM
elements participating in hostilities against US and Coalition forces in Afghanistan.
GTMO detennined this detainee to be:
0 A HIGH risk, as he is likely to pose a threat to the US, its interests, and allies
Reasons for Continued Detention: Detainee is an admitted senior official of
the Taliban government and anny and was last assigned to the position of Deputy Minister of
Defense. Detainee also served as Chief of Staff ofthe Taliban Army and a commander of the
22nd Division. Detainee is wanted by the UN for possible war crimes including the murder
of thousands of Shiites. Detainee had operational associations with significant al-Qaida and
other extremist personnel. Detainee wielded considerable influence throughout the northern
region of Afghanistan and his influence continued even after his capture. If released,
detainee would likely rejoin the Taliban and establish ties with anti-Coalition militias (ACM)
participating in hostilities against US and Coalition forces in Afghanistan.
0 F) Detainee is an admitted senior official ofthe Taliban government and anny
and was last assigned to the position of Deputy Minister of Defense.
5 for 1? Looks like some bad dudes were released. I'm happy for the American, but I don't feel too good about this.
Because we implanted homing devices on the guys we released? /RedDawnWhat the hell? Why do this?
Because we kill them at least at a 50 to 1 rate.What the hell? Why do this?
And now that we've released criminals in a hostage swap, it will be open season on Amercians and soldiers to be taken and negotiated with, it's a dangerous precedent to set.Because we kill them at least at a 50 to 1 rate.What the hell? Why do this?
Now if one of these guys becomes the next 9-11 mastermind, Obama's legacy is going to go down the toilet with the independents.
Yeah I'm interested to hear the circumstances of his capture. Regardless of what they were, it was his fault and his fault alone. Having spent a good deal of time in Afghanistan, I can tell you it's not easy to just walk away.I hope the next step is Leavenworth. Screw that guy.
Maybe we didn't want him back.Why did it take 5 years to negotiate his release? Was he on a waiting list?
Found this Rolling Stone article from 2012, he pretty much just walked away and said some interesting things in the way out. He didn't sound too stable. They should keep an eye on him and make sure he's not praying towards Mecca when he's back. Pretty crazy article in it's entirety.Yeah I'm interested to hear the circumstances of his capture. Regardless of what they were, it was his fault and his fault alone. Having spent a good deal of time in Afghanistan, I can tell you it's not easy to just walk away.I hope the next step is Leavenworth. Screw that guy.
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/americas-last-prisoner-of-war-20120607#ixzz33LrksQesOn June 27th, he sent what would be his final e-mai to his parents. It was a lengthy message documenting his complete disillusionment with the war effort. He opened it by addressing it simply to "mom, dad."
"The future is too good to waste on lies," Bowe wrote. "And life is way too short to care for the damnation of others, as well as to spend it helping fools with their ideas that are wrong. I have seen their ideas and I am ashamed to even be american. The horror of the self-righteous arrogance that they thrive in. It is all revolting."
The e-mail went on to list a series of complaints: Three good sergeants, Bowe said, had been forced to move to another company, and "one of the biggest #### bags is being put in charge of the team." His battalion commander was a "conceited old fool." The military system itself was broken: "In the US army you are cut down for being honest... but if you are a conceited brown nosing #### bag you will be allowed to do what ever you want, and you will be handed your higher rank... The system is wrong. I am ashamed to be an american. And the title of US soldier is just the lie of fools." The soldiers he actually admired were planning on leaving: "The US army is the biggest joke the world has to laugh at. It is the army of liars, backstabbers, fools, and bullies. The few good SGTs are getting out as soon as they can, and they are telling us privates to do the same."
In the second-to-last paragraph of the e-mail, Bowe wrote about his broader disgust with America's approach to the war an effort, on the ground, that seemed to represent the exact opposite of the kind of concerted campaign to win the "hearts and minds" of average Afghans envisioned by counterinsurgency strategists. "I am sorry for everything here," Bowe told his parents. "These people need help, yet what they get is the most conceited country in the world telling them that they are nothing and that they are stupid, that they have no idea how to live." He then referred to what his parents believe may have been a formative, possibly traumatic event: seeing an Afghan child run over by an MRAP. "We don't even care when we hear each other talk about running their children down in the dirt streets with our armored trucks... We make fun of them in front of their faces, and laugh at them for not understanding we are insulting them."
Bowe concluded his e-mail with what, in another context, might read as a suicide note. "I am sorry for everything," he wrote. "The horror that is america is disgusting." Then he signed off with a final message to his mother and father. "There are a few more boxes coming to you guys," he said, referring to his uniform and books, which he had already packed up and shipped off. "Feel free to open them, and use them."
These are my feelings exactly. Had Bergdahl been found within 24 hours of leaving his FOB, there is a good chance he would have received a dishonorable discharge on the spot. This kid walked away from the military. Lets not forget that.The way I see it he has served his time being a prisoner of Al-Qaeda for five years. I think he should be given a other than honorable discharge, and time served. I really hope the media DOES NOT make him out as some sort of hero though, I will be very insulted if that happens.
Thanks for the post Bats.
They put gps devices up their rectums. We'll know where they are at all times.
The gps has to be installed where you have to kill the guy to remove it.They put gps devices up their rectums. We'll know where they are at all times.Damn near killed 'em, too.
5 for 1 doesn't sound ideal, especially since it looks like a few of them are really bad... On top of that, if the accusations of desertion are true, this is even worse. The precedent set here is we will negotiate with terrorists, which basically makes obtaining hostages the holy grail.
We know how to deal with deserters [chop] but Obama clearly does not watch the Game of Thrones.5 for 1 doesn't sound ideal, especially since it looks like a few of them are really bad... On top of that, if the accusations of desertion are true, this is even worse. The precedent set here is we will negotiate with terrorists, which basically makes obtaining hostages the holy grail.![]()
This was a VERY bad move, especially for someone who appears to have deserted.
Is this true?So not only did this guy desert the base and get "captured" ..... we had 6+ guys killed trying to search for him. His parents have also converted to Islam, and his dad apparently tweeted (and deleted) "I am still working to free all Guantanamo prisoners. God will repay for the death of every Afghan Child, ameen!". Hmmmmm.
23 yeard old dude is in Afghanistan as a private. He gets very disillusioned with both the mission and the army. His buddy gets killed. How he got captured depends on who you ask. In one of the videos he claimed he fell behind on a patrol and got nabbed. The Taliban said he was found drunk off base. Fox news says he went AWOL.Can someone catch me up on his story of desertion/capture?
http://m.nydailynews.com/news/national/army-sergeant-held-taliban-years-finally-free-obama-article-1.1812434Can someone catch me up on his story of desertion/capture?
the army promoted him 2 years in to his capture.He was a private? Why are they calling him Sgt?
Yes.Is this true?So not only did this guy desert the base and get "captured" ..... we had 6+ guys killed trying to search for him. His parents have also converted to Islam, and his dad apparently tweeted (and deleted) "I am still working to free all Guantanamo prisoners. God will repay for the death of every Afghan Child, ameen!". Hmmmmm.
They kept promoting him while still captive.He was a private? Why are they calling him Sgt?
And wtf is up with his dad saying he is having trouble speaking english?Not a fan of this move at all. I'm not sure about the last few posts but the dad was speaking Arabic during the press conference rather well. Don't want a Homeland situation but overall this move smells really, really bad.
twice.the army promoted him 2 years in to his capture.He was a private? Why are they calling him Sgt?
Maybe they think he will turn informant?Not a fan of this move at all. I'm not sure about the last few posts but the dad was speaking Arabic during the press conference rather well. Don't want a Homeland situation but overall this move smells really, really bad.
the dad became very obsessed with getting his son freed over the 5 years of his son being held in captivity, with no contact with the family.And wtf is up with his dad saying he is having trouble speaking english?Not a fan of this move at all. I'm not sure about the last few posts but the dad was speaking Arabic during the press conference rather well. Don't want a Homeland situation but overall this move smells really, really bad.
His dad looks radical btw.
Because they are trying to clean out Guantanamo. Not sure I see any other reason to be honest.Something about this doesn't make sense.
Why would America/Obama/whatever go against a long standing policy of not negotiating to rescue a soldier who deserted his post?
Fine, clean out Guantanamo. But why tie their release to his release effectively destroying a long held position and putting at risk future Americans?Because they are trying to clean out Guantanamo. Not sure I see any other reason to be honest.Something about this doesn't make sense.
Why would America/Obama/whatever go against a long standing policy of not negotiating to rescue a soldier who deserted his post?
No idea, doesn't make a ton of sense to me. They could have done this without making a spectacle of it also.Fine, clean out Guantanamo. But why tie their release to his release effectively destroying a long held position and putting at risk future Americans? I haven't seen a reporter ask the question which makes me also think something else is up.Because they are trying to clean out Guantanamo. Not sure I see any other reason to be honest.Something about this doesn't make sense.
Why would America/Obama/whatever go against a long standing policy of not negotiating to rescue a soldier who deserted his post?
[SIZE=10.5pt]Whether you like it or not, its a romanticized view to say we don’t negotiate with terrorists. [/SIZE][SIZE=10.5pt]We have had indirect talks with the Taliban many times. We have direct talks with warlords in Afghanistan.[/SIZE]Fine, clean out Guantanamo. But why tie their release to his release effectively destroying a long held position and putting at risk future Americans?Because they are trying to clean out Guantanamo. Not sure I see any other reason to be honest.Something about this doesn't make sense.
Why would America/Obama/whatever go against a long standing policy of not negotiating to rescue a soldier who deserted his post?