What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Applauding a new cop in post #180 (1 Viewer)

No matter what one thinks of this particular incident, the new thread title is ridiculous.

This cop is not a hero. He's a worthless, cowardly piece of ####. Couldn't even get handcuffs on a much smaller person without slamming her to the pavement.
Needs a medal and promotion.
Because wrong + wrong = right?
BECAUSE OFFICER + RESISTING CRIMINAL = TAKEDOWN!!!
You're shouting in glee about this? Why?
BC HE IS A TRUE AMERICAN DOING THE WORK OF A HERO!!!

HERO HERO HERO!!!!
Shtick is supposed to be funny.

 
There is a report on KVUE Channel 4 that includes the dash cam video (dash cam video starts at :52 and the handcuffing at 1:17).

It seems clear to me she was not resisting just before she was slammed down.
At 1:20-1:30 the video clearly shows her trying to free her arms at which point the cop says enough is enough and completes the arrest.
I guess we're not watching the same video.

But even if I concede your contention, I don't think it follows that the coproach had no choice but to body slam her into the pavement.

You're telling me that was the only way to get her in cuffs? I don't buy that for a second.
It's the way that's the safest for everyone involved, including the cop, the kid in the car and the other people in the area.

What if she was shaking her arms loose because she had a knife or gun hidden in her shirt she was trying to grab?

Getting the suspect on the ground is a pretty standard way of immobilizing them enough to get the cuffs on.

 
No matter what one thinks of this particular incident, the new thread title is ridiculous.

This cop is not a hero. He's a worthless, cowardly piece of ####. Couldn't even get handcuffs on a much smaller person without slamming her to the pavement.
Needs a medal and promotion.
Because wrong + wrong = right?
BECAUSE OFFICER + RESISTING CRIMINAL = TAKEDOWN!!!
You're shouting in glee about this? Why?
BC HE IS A TRUE AMERICAN DOING THE WORK OF A HERO!!!

HERO HERO HERO!!!!
Shtick is supposed to be funny.
No shtick/humor intended, title of the thread speaks my opinion... my last comment is factual - He is an American doing the work of a hero :confused:

 
No matter what one thinks of this particular incident, the new thread title is ridiculous.

This cop is not a hero. He's a worthless, cowardly piece of ####. Couldn't even get handcuffs on a much smaller person without slamming her to the pavement.
Needs a medal and promotion.
Because wrong + wrong = right?
BECAUSE OFFICER + RESISTING CRIMINAL = TAKEDOWN!!!
You're shouting in glee about this? Why?
BC HE IS A TRUE AMERICAN DOING THE WORK OF A HERO!!!

HERO HERO HERO!!!!
Shtick is supposed to be funny.
No shtick/humor intended, title of the thread speaks my opinion... my last comment is factual - He is an American doing the work of a hero :confused:
If you really believe that, then you are a ####### mongoloid.

 
I think that was a little excessive, but I'm not shedding any tears for that POS. Unfortunate the daughter had to see it, but her mother put her in that position by having her with her while she was driving drunk in the first place.

I'm going to go ahead and stop short of calling the cop a "hero" though.

 
How about this:

Let's say the woman was stone sober. No kid in the car. Cop pulls her over for rolling through a stop sign. He runs her info and it comes back that she has a warrant out for something goofy like unpaid parking tickets.

When he goes to cuff her it goes down just like it does in the video.

Are we still applauding the cop?
And what if the cop had just eaten at Subway? Also, what if the woman was actually a ISIS terrorist, but the cop was unaware?

Each situation is different. Not sure what you're point is?
Come on, guy.
If it went down the exact same way, that she resisted?

No problem

 
I think that was a little excessive, but I'm not shedding any tears for that POS. Unfortunate the daughter had to see it, but her mother put her in that position by having her with her while she was driving drunk in the first place.

I'm going to go ahead and stop short of calling the cop a "hero" though.
It looked excessive. As soon as he made a move it looked like she was going down immediately and unable to stop the fall. The goal was already met before she was half way down. It looks like he may have continued applying additional (excessive) downward force. That is more than was necessary to get her down. It seems excessive to me, in a common sense kinda way but for all I know the police may be trained to do it that way.

ETA: I do not know what legal standards define "excessive force" and that's not what I'm talking about.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think that was a little excessive, but I'm not shedding any tears for that POS. Unfortunate the daughter had to see it, but her mother put her in that position by having her with her while she was driving drunk in the first place.

I'm going to go ahead and stop short of calling the cop a "hero" though.
It looked excessive. As soon as he made a move it looked like she was going down immediately and unable to stop the fall. The goal was already met before she was half way down. It looks like he may have continued applying additional (excessive) downward force. That is more than was necessary to get her down. It seems excessive to me, in a common sense kinda way but for all I know the police may be trained to do it that way.

ETA: I do not know what legal standards define "excessive force" and that's not what I'm talking about.
This is getting too nitpicky. Questioning whether or not he applied too much downward force on the way down is not productive, nor provable. She resisted, he got her on the ground. Period. That's what the cops do when you resist arrest in order to get the cuffs on you.

There are much better, recent examples for the anti-police crowd to rally behind than this one.

 
hey brohans you read the article she jerked her arm so she gets a face plant and brain injury if she would have moved her leg then the cop could have cut her arm off with a sword and if she tried to run then the cop would be well within his rights to throw her in a wood chipper and handcuff whatever came out the minute you do something that someone else says is resisting arrest you automatically are guilty and have no rights i do not believe this at all but i just wanted to get in on the crazy in this thread take that to the bank bromigos

 
hey brohans you read the article she jerked her arm so she gets a face plant and brain injury if she would have moved her leg then the cop could have cut her arm off with a sword and if she tried to run then the cop would be well within his rights to throw her in a wood chipper and handcuff whatever came out the minute you do something that someone else says is resisting arrest you automatically are guilty and have no rights i do not believe this at all but i just wanted to get in on the crazy in this thread take that to the bank bromigos
Your schtick is usually good brohan, but this is one of the worst strawmen in here.

 
hey brohans you read the article she jerked her arm so she gets a face plant and brain injury if she would have moved her leg then the cop could have cut her arm off with a sword and if she tried to run then the cop would be well within his rights to throw her in a wood chipper and handcuff whatever came out the minute you do something that someone else says is resisting arrest you automatically are guilty and have no rights i do not believe this at all but i just wanted to get in on the crazy in this thread take that to the bank bromigos
Your schtick is usually good brohan, but this is one of the worst strawmen in here.
hey man i said right in there that i do not beleive it and was just being dumb i guess i am sorry i was not more clear bromigo

 
I think that was a little excessive, but I'm not shedding any tears for that POS. Unfortunate the daughter had to see it, but her mother put her in that position by having her with her while she was driving drunk in the first place.

I'm going to go ahead and stop short of calling the cop a "hero" though.
It looked excessive. As soon as he made a move it looked like she was going down immediately and unable to stop the fall. The goal was already met before she was half way down. It looks like he may have continued applying additional (excessive) downward force. That is more than was necessary to get her down. It seems excessive to me, in a common sense kinda way but for all I know the police may be trained to do it that way.

ETA: I do not know what legal standards define "excessive force" and that's not what I'm talking about.
I'm not going to get all Zupruder film on it, I just think he went to push her down and from a combination of pushing too hard and perhaps her being shaky on her feet (witnesses said she was stumbling drunk, etc.) she dropped like a bag of dirt. I don't think there's like a second point where he continues to push her down or anything like that. She resisted, he went to take her to the ground, and it ended up slamming her down in an excessive manner. But like I said, probably not helped by the fact she's falling down drunk.

I'd give him the benefit of the doubt, and very little sympathy for her, but let's just try and do a little better next time.

 
Seems like lots of people don't understand the analysis for determining whether the use of force was appropriate or excessive. Appropriate use of force is generally defined as the "minimum amount of force required to compel compliance". Anything beyond that is "excessive". That part really isn't complicated. The amount of force he used was, quite plainly, excessive. No one can rationally argue that he couldn't have compelled compliance without the hip-toss face plant.

Where it gets more complicated is police officers are allowed to be wrong within reason. They essentially get a free pass if they can demonstrate that a reasonably trained officer facing those circumstances would have objectively thought that the amount of force used was necessary. Police officers don't have to be emotionless robots, but the standard by which we look back and judge their conduct is devoid of emotion. Is this guy going to be excused for being wrong? Dunno, depends on the jury I guess (assuming that ever happens).

Nowhere in the analysis is there a discussion about whether the suspect is a good person, is innocent, is a piece of crap, is guilty, etc. Because that generally doesn't matter (within reason -- a murder suspect isn't generally expected to be treated the same as a DUI suspect, for example, because the murder suspect reasonably carries a greater threat of violence). This chick was 120 soaking wet and certainly presented no meaningful threat of harm to the officer or anyone else at that particular moment. She wasn't going to be driving off whether he wrestled with her for another 30 seconds or not.

My sense is that this video isn't going to be used in training to demonstrate the proper application of the use of force continuum. If it's used for anything, it will be to show what not to do.

The guy sure ain't a hero.

 
I think that was a little excessive, but I'm not shedding any tears for that POS. Unfortunate the daughter had to see it, but her mother put her in that position by having her with her while she was driving drunk in the first place.

I'm going to go ahead and stop short of calling the cop a "hero" though.
It looked excessive. As soon as he made a move it looked like she was going down immediately and unable to stop the fall. The goal was already met before she was half way down. It looks like he may have continued applying additional (excessive) downward force. That is more than was necessary to get her down. It seems excessive to me, in a common sense kinda way but for all I know the police may be trained to do it that way.

ETA: I do not know what legal standards define "excessive force" and that's not what I'm talking about.
This is getting too nitpicky. Questioning whether or not he applied too much downward force on the way down is not productive, nor provable. She resisted, he got her on the ground. Period. That's what the cops do when you resist arrest in order to get the cuffs on you.

There are much better, recent examples for the anti-police crowd to rally behind than this one.
That's not nitpicky. I took expressed an opinion and explained the basis for that opinion, as well as a reasonable question about their training. If they are actually trained to pound the perp onto the ground as hard as possible then it wasn't technically excessive. If the action is designed only to get her onto the ground, then any additional force beyond that goal is excessive.

Regarding unprovable, I would think that modern video analysts can determine the amount and direction of force applied by the officer, as well as how much was applied at which points in the action. It's not my field, so I'm guessing but it seems doable.

 
RedmondLonghorn said:
fantasycurse42 said:
RedmondLonghorn said:
fantasycurse42 said:
Jack White said:
fantasycurse42 said:
32 Counter Pass said:
fantasycurse42 said:
Jack White said:
No matter what one thinks of this particular incident, the new thread title is ridiculous.

This cop is not a hero. He's a worthless, cowardly piece of ####. Couldn't even get handcuffs on a much smaller person without slamming her to the pavement.
Needs a medal and promotion.
Because wrong + wrong = right?
BECAUSE OFFICER + RESISTING CRIMINAL = TAKEDOWN!!!
You're shouting in glee about this? Why?
BC HE IS A TRUE AMERICAN DOING THE WORK OF A HERO!!!

HERO HERO HERO!!!!
Shtick is supposed to be funny.
No shtick/humor intended, title of the thread speaks my opinion... my last comment is factual - He is an American doing the work of a hero :confused:
If you really believe that, then you are a ####### mongoloid.
 
I've been called worse :shrug:

The mother of the year got what she deserved... i enjoyed the video and I'm glad she received a face full of pavement.

 
No one mentions the fact that the when you are drunk you fall harder and can get knocked out easier. I am sure that played a role in it too.

 
This does seem a little excessive, especially after watching the dash cam video. He says she is resisting, and she says she's not, she just doesn't want her kid to see her [garbled, I assume saying being arrested or something like that], just before he throws her to the ground. But according to witness, she was trying to pull her arms away from him repeatedly (and he says the same thing in the dash cam). Her being fall down drunk probably didn't help with the fall.

Still, I'm not really shedding any tears for her.

 
This does seem a little excessive, especially after watching the dash cam video. He says she is resisting, and she says she's not, she just doesn't want her kid to see her [garbled, I assume saying being arrested or something like that], just before he throws her to the ground. But according to witness, she was trying to pull her arms away from him repeatedly (and he says the same thing in the dash cam). Her being fall down drunk probably didn't help with the fall.

Still, I'm not really shedding any tears for her.
The video is clear, you can see her swaying from side to side trying to get her hands free before he dropped her. He was also giving her verbal warnings to stop doing that. She refused. Getting taken to the ground to be secured is a consequence of choosing to resist.

 
Clifford - In a lot of these threads, I'm pretty sympathetic to your point. But man do you take these things about five steps further than I would. On the scale of cops overdoing it, this one is nowhere near the top. Yet you're sounding off as if he is some monster.

Pick your battles man.
Heard. Not a monster, but did take it a step too far IMO. And honestly I blame the training, not the cop.

 
Glad this one was caught on video, otherwise I'm sure there would be outrage too:

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/conn-teen-holds-police-officer-headlock-article-1.2197437
I think the police officer used a tad too much force. Not overly excessive, but maybe just a smidgen too much force.
Would've had no issue if he would've reached into his holster and shot the kid during their struggle. All shtick aside, this guy had a lot of restraint in this situation.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Glad this one was caught on video, otherwise I'm sure there would be outrage too:

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/conn-teen-holds-police-officer-headlock-article-1.2197437
I think the police officer used a tad too much force. Not overly excessive, but maybe just a smidgen too much force.
Agree, the way he was hunched over like that while trying to get up is sure to lead to future back problems for the dude who had him in the headlock. He's the real victim here.

 
This #### was driving drunk with her daughter in the car. I have zero concern about what happens to her.

 
Glad this one was caught on video, otherwise I'm sure there would be outrage too:

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/conn-teen-holds-police-officer-headlock-article-1.2197437
I think the police officer used a tad too much force. Not overly excessive, but maybe just a smidgen too much force.
Would've had no issue if he would've reached into his holster and shot the kid during their struggle. All shtick aside, this guy had a lot of restraint in this situation.
I just feel like he could have figured out a way to subdue the guy without hurting him. I realize the cop was also being attacked, but I hold cops to a higher standard.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top