It’s not inappropriate and if someone had a problem with it, they’d surely be the kind of customer you could do without anyway.And to be clear, this isn't about if you're offended.
The question I'm asking here is if you think it's Inappropriate and/or Racist?
It offends me more as a Vikings fan.no, it offends me as an eagles' fan.
What's the upside of losing the business of those customers, though?It’s not inappropriate and if someone had a problem with it, they’d surely be the kind of customer you could do without anyway. And to be clear, this isn't about if you're offended.
The question I'm asking here is if you think it's Inappropriate and/or Racist?
Yeah, I don't get it.It's a bunch of people piling onto a truck for a ride. Why in the world would that be "racist"?
NoThe question I'm asking here is if you think it's Inappropriate and/or Racist?
These are poor struggling people?? Interesting that you knew that.Thanks for the discussion and the feedback.
Some of you have hit on the reasoning why I chose not to include it in Random Shots.
I felt like it was making a joke at the expense of poor or struggling people. And that seemed uncool.
So I guess where do you decide the line is drawn. Just a quick look at your “best of” shows week 4 having a picture of Troy Aikman with the caption “Reminder: Troy Aikman looks like white Jay Z” as well as a picture of Jesus photoshopped with Baker Mayfield’s head.Thanks for the discussion and the feedback.
Some of you have hit on the reasoning why I chose not to include it in Random Shots.
I felt like it was making a joke at the expense of poor or struggling people. And that seemed uncool.
Deciding where the line is drawn is for sure the question.So I guess where do you decide the line is drawn. Just a quick look at your “best of” shows week 4 having a picture of Troy Aikman with the caption “Reminder: Troy Aikman looks like white Jay Z” as well as a picture of Jesus photoshopped with Baker Mayfield’s head.
None of this does to me, but for instance I can easily see a huge contingent of people not wanting their messiah as a basis for promoting a QB.Deciding where the line is drawn is for sure the question.
As to how I decide, that's a good question too. I think it mostly is a gut feel.
And mostly it's a "is it ok to make a joke at the expense of _______?"
Aikman as Jay-Z or elevating Mayfield or Trubisky to Jesus status doesn't feel like it's over the line. Does it to you?
I also wonder if there isn't an element of "my side" in these.
I think as someone who likes Aikman and Jay-Z and is also a Christian, I may feel more liberty to make a Aikman/Jay-Z or Mayfield as Jesus joke.
In other words, because I'm a Christian, I'd be way less comfortable making a Muslim joke than I would a Christian joke. I wonder if that's normal?
1
Who says their Muslims?I also wonder if there isn't an element of "my side" in these.
I think as someone who like Aikman and Jay-Z and is also a Christian, I may feel more liberty to make a Aikman/Jay-Z or Mayfield as Jesus joke.
In other words, because I'm a Christian, I'd be way less comfortable making a Muslim joke than I would a Christian joke. I wonder if that's normal?
I don't understand this perspective. The joke is about Eagles fans using a picture a of an overloaded truck. It does not make fun or say anything about poor or struggling people. If it did not have the Eagles referenced and alluded to people going to work or something specific about the people in the picture in some way I could understand someone having an issue.Thanks for the discussion and the feedback.
Some of you have hit on the reasoning why I chose not to include it in Random Shots.
I felt like it was making a joke at the expense of poor or struggling people. And that seemed uncool.
Not saying anyone is Muslim. Saying for anyone I'd be way less comfortable making a Muslim joke than I would a Christian joke.Who says their Muslims?
This was the reason for me.I do agree that to some extent, this is sort of mocking poor people. So I guess maybe you could argue that that's not cool and sort of inappropriate. But I still think that's a stretch.
I really hate that this is where we are in 2018.
It's mocking Eagle fans. I really don't understand the insinuation that it is mocking poor people. Its a lot of people on a truck. If there was no captions or comment it would just be a picture of people on a truck. Nothing negative or positive or problematic. It is what it is.The "joke" is "Look at what these people are doing"
its not "Look at what these BLACK people are doing"
Not even a little racist. IMO, anyone who thinks so is going out of their way to find racism.
I do agree that to some extent, this is sort of mocking poor people. So I guess maybe you could argue that that's not cool and sort of inappropriate. But I still think that's a stretch.
I really hate that this is where we are in 2018.
Again, i think its a stretch. But I dont think simply adding an eagles logo to the truck eliminates what's "funny" (I use that loosely, as I dont think its all that humorous) about the original picture.It's mocking Eagle fans. I really don't understand the insinuation that it is mocking poor people. Its a lot of people on a truck. If there was no captions or comment it would just be a picture of people on a truck. Nothing negative or positive or problematic. It is what it is.
As for them being poor? I have no idea about their economic standing. I know that I have done the clown car routine numerous times in my life and I sure wouldn't consider myself or the people I was with to be poor.The "joke" is "Look at what these people are doing"
its not "Look at what these BLACK people are doing"
Not even a little racist. IMO, anyone who thinks so is going out of their way to find racism.
I do agree that to some extent, this is sort of mocking poor people. So I guess maybe you could argue that that's not cool and sort of inappropriate. But I still think that's a stretch.
I really hate that this is where we are in 2018.
I don't think the picture by itself is funny. It's just a picture of a crowded truck. I do see where adding the bandwagon shtick can be considered humorous (I agree that it is minimally funny). I just don't understand why the picture is "mocking poor people".Again, i think its a stretch. But I dont think simply adding an eagles logo to the truck eliminates what's "funny" (I use that loosely, as I dont think its all that humorous) about the original picture.
of course, poor yellow people that are forced to take mass transit instead of being driven around by their chauffeur.I'm dead serious about this pic
https://i1.wp.com/www.kawaiikakkoiisugoi.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/tokyo-Japan-subway-crowd.jpg?resize=475%2C340&ssl=1
Do you find this one offensive if you find the first one offensive?
Lighten up, Francis.It's in poor taste to exploit the suffering (or struggling) of the less fortunate for a cheap laugh.
It's kind of sad that so many people seem to be so eager to be "anti-PC" that they can't see the picture for what it is.
I would think business owners like Joe want to win/lose customers based on the merit of the actual product. Anything that makes them think less of your company for other reasons (besides the product) is an unforced error, no?It’s not inappropriate and if someone had a problem with it, they’d surely be the kind of customer you could do without anyway.
Don't bring logic or reality into this. It's exploitation for cheap laughs...Not inappropriate and not racist. It's a picture of reality. Deal with it.
This, I don't think there is anything racist about it, but probably not appropriate with the current migration situation at the border. At another time I probably wouldn't think it was even inappropriate.Not necessarily racist but not appropriate either. I can see where someone would be offended by this.
Let's leave the Jets out of this.What if it was a clown car in the pic with a bunch of clowns?
"Look at these people who are too poor to afford proper transportation"The "joke" is "Look at what these people are doing"
its not "Look at what these BLACK people are doing"
Who is saying it isn't proper transportation?"Look at these people who are too poor to afford proper transportation"
That's a joke to you?
Who is saying it isn't proper transportation?"Look at these people who are too poor to afford proper transportation"
That's a joke to you?
But the point of this was not to laugh at someone else's economic hardship. You can take a picture of anything and if captioned cleverly it can make you laugh. It doesn't mean you are actually laughing at some perceived hardship depicted by an out of context picture.
It might be standard transportation for the area. Hell, it might be the only available transportation for the area for all I know. And if that's the case, it's a sad fact. But that's not something that I would ever revel in. And it would make me think less of any person or business who thought it would be funny to laugh at someone else's economic hardship.
Did you not see the parenthesis around joke? (Or my other post where I said I didn't think it was very humorous)"Look at these people who are too poor to afford proper transportation"
That's a joke to you?
It is all perspective. I'm sure some of the folks on that truck would be laughing their asses off at Americans spending two hours on a freeway in rush hour or crammed into a subway like sardines. It's not a "sad fact" ... it is just reality for those parts of the world. Neither better nor worse than being sardined into a subway car.
It might be standard transportation for the area. Hell, it might be the only available transportation for the area for all I know. And if that's the case, it's a sad fact. But that's not something that I would ever revel in. And it would make me think less of any person or business who thought it would be funny to laugh at someone else's economic hardship.
Really? Pictures of Holocaust survivors can be funny to you if only someone could come up with the right caption?But the point of this was not to laugh at someone else's economic hardship. You can take a picture of anything and if captioned cleverly it can make you laugh.
They're carrying bundles with them, which makes it pretty clear that they're traveling for the long haul and are crowding aboard a truck out of necessity, not choice.As for them being poor? I have no idea about their economic standing. I know that I have done the clown car routine numerous times in my life and I sure wouldn't consider myself or the people I was with to be poor.
This comes off as a Wolf Blitzer take. "So poor, and so black."
Or going to a market.They're carrying bundles with them, which makes it pretty clear that they're traveling for the long haul and are crowding aboard a truck out of necessity, not choice.
They're also wearing a lot of clothes, which means that either it's cold and they're exposed to the elements or it's hot and they're wearing layers as an easy way to transport their clothing. .
2 or 3 sounds right- maybe a little insensitive towards the poor but that's about it, not racist.
Also go Vikings.
What kind of customers can a fantasy football website do without?It’s not inappropriate and if someone had a problem with it, they’d surely be the kind of customer you could do without anyway.
Those would be exceptions and I should have said most. Sorry for the oversight. It doesn't change my point that most things can be used out of context to get a laugh.Really? Pictures of Holocaust survivors can be funny to you if only someone could come up with the right caption?
How about pictures of car accident victims? Is that potentially funny to you also?
Have you ever had a friend or relative that died of cancer? How about a picture of them at their worst, just as they were about to die. You can find humor in that?
Come on.