Never win a Superbowl.Belichick, what do you do when Brady breaks a leg?
I suppose Bill could be run over by the truck shipping his supply of hoodies.Belichick, what do you do when Brady breaks a leg?
In the last 20 years Brady has broken a leg, Bill hasn't missed time due to a hoodie truck accident.I suppose Bill could be run over by the truck shipping his supply of hoodies.
One winning season in 5 years even a poor or average coach can have similar results. What is this fox news where you just make crap up. 5-11 his last Browns season. 5-11 his first season as Pats coach. He got lucky with Brady! Cause he was a below aversge coach prior to Brady. Don't give me the one season when Brady was out. Because even a below average coach can have a winning season. The only thing special about Bill is that he has Brady. Nothing more.Survey results are telling. There are actually people who don't know history who will try to tell you he did a bad job in Cleveland. Pearls before swine.
There was a Joe Bryant thread on this exact subject last month. The year before B.B. coached the Browns, they went 3-13 with a -234 scoring diffential. Within 4 years, the Browns were 11-5, had a +136 scoring differential, made the playoffs, and had the #1 scoring defense.bucksoh said:One winning season in 5 years even a poor or average coach can have similar results. What is this fox news where you just make crap up. 5-11 his last Browns season. 5-11 his first season as Pats coach. He got lucky with Brady! Cause he was a below aversge coach prior to Brady. Don't give me the one season when Brady was out. Because even a below average coach can have a winning season. The only thing special about Bill is that he has Brady. Nothing more.
It is very easy to turn things around when you have a franchise qb. Any coach can have one good season without a franchise qb. Very few coaches are actually good with out a franchise qb. Bill isn't one of them no matter how much you bring up cleveland. He was a bad coach. Good assistant but bad HC wlithout Brady. To say otherwise is a fallacy. Once Brady gone he will revert back to being a bad HC.There was a Joe Bryant thread on this exact subject last month. The year before B.B. coached the Browns, they went 3-13 with a -234 scoring diffential. Within 4 years, the Browns were 11-5, had a +136 scoring differential, made the playoffs, and had the #1 scoring defense.
If it were so easy to turn teams around, how is that the Browns haven’t had a season like that since?
As for the following season, Teataverde got hurt early on and was never really right the rest of the season. The team announced they were moving to Baltimore, and things fell apart from there.
People forget that B.B. coached in three Super Bowls before he ever came across Tom Brady. He won twice as the DC with the Giants and lost once as an Assistant Head Coach with NE.
He *did* do a bad job there. But the key is... he learned from his mistakes. He is the coach he is today because of that experience he went through. And not everyone can do that.SeniorVBDStudent said:Survey results are telling. There are actually people who don't know history who will try to tell you he did a bad job in Cleveland. Pearls before swine.
So in 2008 and 2016 without Brady when NE went 14-6, was that Brady’s doing?It is very easy to turn things around when you have a franchise qb. Any coach can have one good season without a franchise qb. Very few coaches are actually good with out a franchise qb. Bill isn't one of them no matter how much you bring up cleveland. He was a bad coach. Good assistant but bad HC wlithout Brady. To say otherwise is a fallacy. Once Brady gone he will revert back to being a bad HC.
If you include 2000 and the first two weeks of 2001 without brady, belichick is 19-19.So in 2008 and 2016 without Brady when NE went 14-6, was that Brady’s doing?
Lol, wow.It is very easy to turn things around when you have a franchise qb. Any coach can have one good season without a franchise qb. Very few coaches are actually good with out a franchise qb. Bill isn't one of them no matter how much you bring up cleveland. He was a bad coach. Good assistant but bad HC wlithout Brady. To say otherwise is a fallacy. Once Brady gone he will revert back to being a bad HC.
All will be revealed once Brady retires.SeniorVBDStudent said:Survey results are telling. There are actually people who don't know history who will try to tell you he did a bad job in Cleveland. Pearls before swine.
Reading comprehension down lol!So in 2008 and 2016 without Brady when NE went 14-6, was that Brady’s doing?
He was a bad HC in Cleveland, hard to dispute that but that is your opinion. I don't judge HC when they have an elite qb. Unless it's Tomlin he's just horrible. When Brady is done then I will reevaluate him, but based on Cleveland I'm not expecting much.Lol, wow.
Doesn’t even need to be said. I am honestly shocked the number is up to 9 for Brady, even assuming half of those are jokes.Belichick showing again why he is the more valuable of the two. His D is shutting out the number 2 offense, while Brady is struggling vs the number 19 ranked D.
He could have won that one with just about any QB. Brady dropping like a stone at 18% which is generous. Manning wishes he was the guy lucky enough to ride Belicheck's coattails.Well he just basically won a Super Bowl without Brady, so....
I agree. I think the coaching job in all 3 of their playoffs games was the best coaching job ever in a playoff run. He simply embarrassed the other coaches, who were supposedly some of the best minds in the game and 3 of the top 5 offenses.Considering the lack of talent on the NE defense and the offense they were going against, you could argue that this was the greatest defensive performance by a Belichick defense in any Super Bowl. This surpasses what the '90 Giants did vs the Bills.
What if BB retires along with him? What if they ride off into the sunset together, holding hands while riding matching unicorns?All will be revealed once Brady retires.
That would be a storybook ending.What if BB retires along with him? What if they ride off into the sunset together, holding hands while riding matching unicorns?
I called that 3 years ago after win #5. They will both leave at the same time. Now, back to beating up the hapless, 1 franchise QB in the division in 20 years, AFC East in 2019.What if BB retires along with him? What if they ride off into the sunset together, holding hands while riding matching unicorns?
Jordan was 5-15 in the playoffs before Jackson arrived.All this Brady hate must be schtick. I mean, who would you rather have Phil Jackson for 15 years or Michael Jordan?
So you are telling me you, if starting a franchise, would take Phil Jackson over Jordan?Jordan was 5-15 in the playoffs before Jackson arrived.
NoSo you are telling me you, if starting a franchise, would take Phil Jackson over Jordan?
This isn't a fair comparison. Individual players are a lot more important o basketball since there are only 10 playing at any given moment as opposed to 22, and all those guys are playing both offense and defense. Jordan impacts games a lot more than Brady(or any QB) does.All this Brady hate must be schtick. I mean, who would you rather have Phil Jackson for 15 years or Michael Jordan?
The correct answer is Rod Thorn. He's the GM that drafted Jordan.So you are telling me you, if starting a franchise, would take Phil Jackson over Jordan?
I can’t tell if this is schtick or not, but NE doesn’t have a GM. It’s Belichick in that role.The GM has something to do with it, of course, but he and BB have been brilliant for a long time in managing this team. Brady is the captain of the ship on the field but I'd rather have the front office, head coach and culture instead of one great QB.
I can’t tell if this is schtick or not, but NE doesn’t have a GM. It’s Belichick in that role.
Wowbucksoh said:One winning season in 5 years even a poor or average coach can have similar results. What is this fox news where you just make crap up. 5-11 his last Browns season. 5-11 his first season as Pats coach. He got lucky with Brady! Cause he was a below aversge coach prior to Brady. Don't give me the one season when Brady was out. Because even a below average coach can have a winning season. The only thing special about Bill is that he has Brady. Nothing more.
Basketball and football are worlds apart as far as the impact coaching has and the impact one player can make. I can't believe that analogy/argument was even made.All this Brady hate must be schtick. I mean, who would you rather have Phil Jackson for 15 years or Michael Jordan?
A QB has just as much impact on a team as a great BB player.Basketball and football are worlds apart as far as the impact coaching has and the impact one player can make. I can't believe that analogy/argument was even made.
Lets put it this way- you take Jordan in his prime and have him play with 4 college players, its still a game. You take Brady in his prime and have him play with 21 college kids, they get blown out of the building.A QB has just as much impact on a team as a great BB player.
2000-2009: 97-30 (.764) regular season record, 14-4 post season record (.778), 93.3 passer rating, 3-1 in SB, 4-1 in AFCCG2001 superbowl mvp
2002 led nfl in passing touchdowns
2003 superbowl mvp
2004 superbowl title
2005 led nfl in passing yards
2007 nfl mvp, set nfl record for passing touchdowns
2009 comeback player of the year
2010 nfl mvp
2014 superbowl mvp
2016 superbowl mvp
2017 nfl mvp
2018 superbowl title
He's 30-10 in the post season. The next two guys on the list - montana and manning - are a combined 30-20. Montana played until he was 38 and manning until he was 39.
I understand that belichick shares those team accomplishments, and I think most people agree that the 2001 superbowl was more belichick than brady, but it was brady who delivered repeatedly in the 28-3 comeback.
And it was brady who orchestrated two touchdown drives in the last 3 minutes of the afc championship game against the chiefs. Brady without Belichick might not have won the superbowl last night. Belichick without brady would not have gotten there.
I'm immeasurably spoiled to have enjoyed rooting for both but if i could only have had one there's simply never been a quarterback with the combination of gaudy passing numbers, clutch playoff performances and selfless play.