I'm not getting too excited. Every RB's been obliterating the Pats.
Yeah, I eluded to the fact that he matched up very well against NE's Wilforkless front in some thread around here and obviously that was the case. NE is a
very soft match-up right now for a myriad of reasons.
So, fluky TDs or can be trusted from here on out? Next up Jax who obviously shut him down last time and has actually been surprisingly good at slowing downs RBs (though maybe that's more a function of being easy to pass on).
What's so interesting about JAC is that before facing Palmer several weeks ago they had one of the longest streaks of not allowing a QB to top 300 yards (dated back to last year). This wasn't a product of a stout pass defense obviously but rather was a product of the fact that you never really had to pass on them.
Now, they've allowed two 300+ yard performances in the past month and hilariously it's tied to the fact that they've been much more competitive.
IIRC RBs tend to fair well on Thursday nighters.
This is true. There is likely a rather strong correlation between TNF and an increased production from the position.
Is this guy worth starting? It is playoff time for those who made it. I've had him stashed for a long time - I brought him in against the Jags two weeks ago and he made me pay. Now he goes to everyones bench and rolls out 3 TDs.
What does he do against Jax again?
I believe he's worth starting. Some factors to take into account..
- JAC is allowing the 4th most YPG on the ground (130).
- Tate is averaging 4.3 on the season, JAC is allowing 4.2.
- Defensively JAC has been atrocious at home vs. away (noticed this trend and started them @CLE this week).
- It's TNF
His performance vs. them two weeks ago was likely an outlier. I think it would be rather safe to estimate at least 60-80 total yards with him also having a good shot at a TD (JAC has allowed 12 TDs on the ground this year). I'd feel pretty good rolling him out as my RB2 this week.