grateful zed
Footballguy
IND - ty needs help
PHI - they have none
GB - adams cant do it alone
NE - need wr help regardless of qb.
PHI - they have none
GB - adams cant do it alone
NE - need wr help regardless of qb.
I wouldn't call NE a good landing spot for a WR. I agree with the other 3 however.NE - need wr help regardless of qb.
Jets need WR help badlyIND - ty needs help
PHI - they have none
GB - adams cant do it alone
NE - need wr help regardless of qb.
Not 2020 but 2021, sorry maybe that wasn’t clear. His contract will be up and it’s very unlikely he comes back. Even if he does, he will be approaching the cliff.link?
why?Not 2020 but 2021, sorry maybe that wasn’t clear. His contract will be up and it’s very unlikely he comes back. Even if he does, he will be approaching the cliff.
He will be 31 going into the 2021 season. His last 2 seasons have ended early due to injury. I could be wrong, but I would be very surprised if the Lions resign Marvin. Maybe this summer they work out a cost effective extension but I would bet the opposite.why?
he is in his prime, coming off his best season yet, and in a great situation locked in as wr2.
he will have to battle a rookie this year, but will likely not be supplanted.
im high on the guy for another few years.
There has been lots of talk about this. But it's just blurbs and rumors. More than just Bri though. Whether it actually happens I am skeptical.The only place I've seen trade rumors is you spitballing in his thread.
I am in total agreement with you. Was thinking of them in context of luring Brady and was thinking they really got everything but a true #1. Tyrell is a solid enough #2, Renfrow in slot, Waller at TE, Jacobs in backfield and strong OL would seem to me to have everything Brady wants except the true #1. And this is all true Brady related or not.As a Raider fan, I hope that you are completely wrong. I see it much differently. The Raiders have their number two in Williams and Renfrow makes a solid slot WR. The Raiders need a true WR 1 and this should a great landing spot for the WR that they draft in the first round. The rookie should be the primary target.
Slayton is the only WR in that list I'd want to own. But I can see a top rookie WR leaping to the top there. Not sure if they are really looking to draft one though. If they did I'd call it a good spot. Not great.Giants I get even less. They have a young QB in place. That's good. Shepard, Tate, Slayton and Engram with one of the best pass catching RB's sure seems awful to me.
But this is about opportunity, not who you would want to own. They just signed Shepard and Tate to fairly significant contracts last offseason. I see zero path for a rookie this year and again they got a premier pass catching TE and RB to boot. In terms of hoping for immediate production this looks like one of the worst spots in the entire league to me.Slayton is the only WR in that list I'd want to own. But I can see a top rookie WR leaping to the top there. Not sure if they are really looking to draft one though. If they did I'd call it a good spot. Not great.
Any thoughts on Hakeem Butler?Ariz seems like a top spot, a big rookie 1 with Kirk and Isabella would go a long way, for years.
Philly is the top spot to me. Good QB. Good RBs. No WRs.I don't get Giants and to a lesser extent the Saints being mentioned as top spots.
Saints do need a #2 but Thomas is clear cut #1 and they normally are among the league leaders in attempts to TE's and RB's. And frankly, for even Thomas sake, I'm worried about the future QB in general but specifically the threat of Taysom Hill in 2021.
Giants I get even less. They have a young QB in place. That's good. Shepard, Tate, Slayton and Engram with one of the best pass catching RB's sure seems awful to me.
PHI, Arizona and Green Bay are my top spots at the moment. Indy, NE and LV get in that mix but QB situation a little murky right now, if those teams improve that situation those spots could be ideal.
2014?My only issue with Philly is, when is the last time they had a wr in the top 12? top 24?
Titans if Corey Davis trade rumors are true
Depends.Twitter just seems about as believable as the "Diggs rumors"
Doesnt make any sense for TEN.
I don't see Tate and Shepard as obstacles on the field for the right rookie. But this is probably all pedantic on my part because I don't think the Giants will go that route anyway.But this is about opportunity, not who you would want to own. They just signed Shepard and Tate to fairly significant contracts last offseason. I see zero path for a rookie this year and again they got a premier pass catching TE and RB to boot. In terms of hoping for immediate production this looks like one of the worst spots in the entire league to me.
Alshon and Agholar in 2017 were both top 24My only issue with Philly is, when is the last time they had a wr in the top 12? top 24?
This just made me throw up in my mouth a little bit. I'm not a Titans fan (I'm not not a Titans fan either) but as a Henry and Brown owner I would hate to see them move on from Tannehill. They should think the football gods that they found the right chemistry for their team and not overthink it. Dalton? No way. If you're gonna go out and get a vet get Cam.Depends.
I wouldn't be totally against trading Davis for Dalton (assuming he would sign a cheaper contract extension than Tanny would cost).
+1 Very surprised this thread was almost 20 posts deep before the Raiders were mentioned. They have a dire need for a #1. Gruden's history suggests the Raiders landing spot might be money.As a Raider fan, I hope that you are completely wrong. I see it much differently. The Raiders have their number two in Williams and Renfrow makes a solid slot WR. The Raiders need a true WR 1 and this should a great landing spot for the WR that they draft in the first round. The rookie should be the primary target.
Nothing behind OBJ and Landry but a few glaring needs before WR need addressing but 'outside shot' somebody ranked high falls to the 2nd round especially from this draft class. I saw one mock that Justin Jefferson available in the 2nd to the Browns.Cleveland=1. Beckham 2. Landry 3. Ratley, I think a day 2 pick could challenge Ratley, and be insurance if they end up dealing Beckham at some point. Tyler Johnson is a guy I think could be there at 74.
Ahead of the 2020 NFL Scouting Combine, NFL Network draft analysts Daniel Jeremiah and Bucky Brooks took questions from fans online on Friday. D.J. and Bucky were asked about the upcoming combine, their top prospects and their experiences in scouting. Here are our 11 favorite moments from the Reddit AMA, hosted by the official NFL Reddit account.
8. Jeremiah and Brooks pair wide receivers to teams.
Jeremiah: Let's go Raiders and Jerry Jeudy -- and if they wanted to double up with a third round pick: Antonio Gandy-Golden. Let's go Colts and Henry Ruggs. Broncos would be one who could grab Justin Jefferson. Buffalo, I would give a bigger WR like Tee Higgins or Laviska Shenault.
Brooks: I think Eagles could go with Brandon Aiyuk or KJ Hamler. The Packers could use a Jalen Raegor type. Laviska Shenault would be a great fit in Baltimore. Michael Pittman Jr. and his physicality would also fit with the Ravens.
Yea just not how I feel. I think Tate and Shepard both performed exactly as they were paid, they just had injuries. In fact if think if all 3 of their top WR's are healthy, they will both outperform Slayton in PPR fantasy.I don't see Tate and Shepard as obstacles on the field for the right rookie. But this is probably all pedantic on my part because I don't think the Giants will go that route anyway.
Lazard seemed to grow up before my eyes last season. I like him a lot there.IND - ty needs help
PHI - they have none
GB - adams cant do it alone
NE - need wr help regardless of qb.
I have the exact opposite take on this one, personally. Rodgers is my favorite player in the league so I watch him a lot. He looked awful this year, physically. He missed so many easy short throws to open receivers it was maddening. His mechanics are awful. He throws everything off his back foot. That was fine when he was younger and had the best arm talent in the world, but he doesn't anymore and he's had a whole career engraining that habit that he just can't break.GB - If they nail WR in this draft there is no reason to think Rodgers can't put up elite numbers again. The only thing I think has fallen off with him is a little of his decision making and his WR corps. His arm is still elite and he still has it in my opinion.
8 mil this year for Davis and they have 22 free agents this year with 50mil before CBA announces a different cap total.This just made me throw up in my mouth a little bit. I'm not a Titans fan (I'm not not a Titans fan either) but as a Henry and Brown owner I would hate to see them move on from Tannehill. They should think the football gods that they found the right chemistry for their team and not overthink it. Dalton? No way. If you're gonna go out and get a vet get Cam.
As for Davis, very similarly to the fantasy trade market, it's probably impossible to get the right value that the Titans would want to make it worth it, yet no one is willing to pay that much. For getting rid of your still young 1st rounder who has shown legit flashes, but is also now clearly your #2 WR, I would think you would command quite a bit in a trade. But why do it? Unless the offers are clear overpays or unless you really think he is a bust. In which case the rest of the NFL probably knows it, too, and isn't paying what you want. I know I'm talking in circles here but I just don't think they move him anywhere and he and AJ Brown will complement each other well. But in a run first offense. With either Henry under contract and Tannehill on the tag or vice versa. I don't see Tenn as a good spot for rookie WRs this year.
Fair enough. I have to admit I am biased, too, because I am both a Bears fan and a fantasy owner that has won multiple championships with Packers stacks, including 3rd in the FBG Players Championship this year - sorry had to get that in there with an ear to ear grin I'm still fresh off it!! I have definitely watched Rodgers a lot, too, and I can't stand the Packers. But I've always valued them on my fantasy teams so it's a weird love/hate thing that basically feels dirty. That said my take on him is that he has always been ####ty at the short stuff, in terms of his mechanics as you described as well as his decision making IMO. I still see an elite arm, though, IDK. What he has excelled at in years past are those intermediate throws either on the run or off blitz reads, which I think is the key here. He hasn't had dependable 2nd option guys that know where to be in those situations, and I think a lot of those short throws you are criticizing are actually more like throw aways. I think he hangs on to the ball too long and gets himself in trouble and has always been bad about dumping it off (in a quick manner).I have the exact opposite take on this one, personally. Rodgers is my favorite player in the league so I watch him a lot. He looked awful this year, physically. He missed so many easy short throws to open receivers it was maddening. His mechanics are awful. He throws everything off his back foot. That was fine when he was younger and had the best arm talent in the world, but he doesn't anymore and he's had a whole career engraining that habit that he just can't break.
How confident are we that the Rams keep the three listed wideouts above? Plus Reynolds as #4? With the tight cap numbers in LA and two options at tight end I could see the Rams moving on from one of those three wr's this off-season.LA Rams=1. Kupp 2. Woods 3. Cooks, I almost wonder if Cooks could be a trade candidate(probably not getting his typical 1st round value anymore) but I think they'll give him another year.
To be honest, I kinda thought the offense was better when Cooks was out last year, and they increased their 2-TE looks. Then Everett got hurt, and they scrapped it when Cooks came back.How confident are we that the Rams keep the three listed wideouts above? Plus Reynolds as #4? With the tight cap numbers in LA and two options at tight end I could see the Rams moving on from one of those three wr's this off-season.
I like Buffalo as a destination.Mr. Peterson said:I don’t understand how people aren’t including Buffalo in this. All the talk around here is how badly we need a #1 WR and how likely it is we go after one in the 1st.
And it’s not like Allen can’t support a top fantasy WR. He made John Brown a good fantasy asset and he’s not that great of a WR. Imagine if Allen gets a stud he can go to.
I’m not saying it’s a top destination by any means, just that it should be in the conversation.
Buffalo should be thrilled to get any WR who is as good as Brown is. Low key one of the more solid guys at his job in the game.Mr. Peterson said:I don’t understand how people aren’t including Buffalo in this. All the talk around here is how badly we need a #1 WR and how likely it is we go after one in the 1st.
And it’s not like Allen can’t support a top fantasy WR. He made John Brown a good fantasy asset and he’s not that great of a WR. Imagine if Allen gets a stud he can go to.
I’m not saying it’s a top destination by any means, just that it should be in the conversation.
I looked this up the other day actually and not alot of cap relief with this trio based on their current contracts. All my info is from Overthecap.trader jake said:How confident are we that the Rams keep the three listed wideouts above? Plus Reynolds as #4? With the tight cap numbers in LA and two options at tight end I could see the Rams moving on from one of those three wr's this off-season.
I like Brown. I really do. But all you have to do is watch the end of the Ravens game to understand that he is nothing more than a very nice number 2.Buffalo should be thrilled to get any WR who is as good as Brown is. Low key one of the more solid guys at his job in the game.
I don’t see their QB or gameplan capable of supporting a fantasy stud at WR, especially when they already have a capable WR2 on the roster. At best it feels like a pair of WR2s who are limited by the defense, running game and QB limitations