A vote for Peyton here that doesn’t have anything to do with the Cincy game.
To me it’s worth discussing how teams are built – the old adage that “it starts in the trenches” rings true for me. Teams like NE, PITT, BAL, CAR, PHIL have historically had great success because (1) they build from the lines out, and (2) are smart $-wise. Dilfer won a SB; is he better than Peyton?
While some of the Brady backers talk about how he’s done so much with so little, I take the opposite view: Brady’s had good lines that have little weakness (as compared to Peyton’s good line..unless it’s against a 3-4 defense like SD, BAL, PITT, NE), and has simply been asked to “manage” games (not put the whole team on his back on “win” games).
Now is Brady a great QB, who has managed win after win, while occasionally winning games near single-handedly? Yes.
If I were building a team from scratch, would I choose to build from the trenches and draft a 6th round Brady over a 1st round Peyton? Yes.
But, all other considerations being equal, if I have to choose between Brady and Manning, I choose Peyton without a second thought…..without hesitation…it’s not even debatable imho.