What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Bobby Engram's ranking with Frye at QB? (1 Viewer)

I have no better option. I'd be satisfied with 70 yds. A TD is almost too much to hope for.

 
I am starting him. There's no one else to throw to really, and I suspect they'll be throwing a lot. I mean, I could put Walter in and start both Walter and AJ, but Engram is still the #1 option for Seattle. They will HAVE to throw vs Green Bay. And I think even Frye can get the ball on to Engram on the 10 yard and under patterns.

 
I got that prob over here. In a PPR, I am choosing between Engram, Cotchery and Mushin as my FLEX.

If Hassleback plays, what impact will this injury have on him as a whole &/or Engram? If Frye starts, what impact on Engram/passing game.

Engram was stud in PPR last year. Put up some nice points last week (and had targets) but is only coming off one game played.

A hurt Hassleback, A potential Charlie Frye start, a rusty Engram all make me nervous and leaning towards Cotch unless this thread convinces me otherwise. Having said that, Is Coles or Cotch the favorite target of Favre?

 
xenon said:
I got that prob over here. In a PPR, I am choosing between Engram, Cotchery and Mushin as my FLEX.If Hassleback plays, what impact will this injury have on him as a whole &/or Engram? If Frye starts, what impact on Engram/passing game.Engram was stud in PPR last year. Put up some nice points last week (and had targets) but is only coming off one game played. A hurt Hassleback, A potential Charlie Frye start, a rusty Engram all make me nervous and leaning towards Cotch unless this thread convinces me otherwise. Having said that, Is Coles or Cotch the favorite target of Favre?
Click to expand...
IMO, Cotch is the choice regardless of Engram's QB situation.
 
No doubt Seattle's gonnahave to throw the ball as Rodgers and the rest of the GB offense should score some decent points. Engram did get double digit targets last week anf balls may come his way more with Branch not playing. I'm starting him but I also have Lance Moore against Oakland. Do any of you think Moore's a better play than Engram? N.O should be able to runthe ball at will against the Raiders so will Brees be backing off on his attempts? Looks like Colston may play as well and then there's Devery Henderson and Robert Meachem who'll get some looks. Will Brees still be looking Moore's way with Colston back. Engram is no doubt the #1 option right now for Seattle but with the 3rd string QB starting what's that translate into terms of targets that Engram will get?

 
Man who said:
No doubt Seattle's gonnahave to throw the ball as Rodgers and the rest of the GB offense should score some decent points. Engram did get double digit targets last week anf balls may come his way more with Branch not playing. I'm starting him but I also have Lance Moore against Oakland. Do any of you think Moore's a better play than Engram? N.O should be able to runthe ball at will against the Raiders so will Brees be backing off on his attempts? Looks like Colston may play as well and then there's Devery Henderson and Robert Meachem who'll get some looks. Will Brees still be looking Moore's way with Colston back. Engram is no doubt the #1 option right now for Seattle but with the 3rd string QB starting what's that translate into terms of targets that Engram will get?
Click to expand...
Since we are now asking start/sit questions in this thread...Should I start Ocho Cinco instead of Engram in my PPR?
 
Frye is terrible. However, the Packers haven't been able to get any pass rush the last 2 weeks and have a 3rd string safety and a few back up db's playing. All that being said, Engram still isn't the safest choice. I have Engram and Housh both who have injured qb's.

 
my alternative is Steve Breaston........

Since I started this thing I guess I should ask for advice too.

 
it sounds like the starting SEA qb has yet to be determined. anyone know whether footballguys will have that info around 3:45p EST or is there a better source for the afternoon game info?

 
Thank God I went with Lance Moore instead. Howerver, had I gone Breaston over Moore I would have won.

 
SCT said:
Thank God I went with Lance Moore instead. Howerver, had I gone Breaston over Moore I would have won.
Click to expand...
:goodposting: yeah...I benched Engram for Moore at 12:55 yesterday. Wasn't sure if I would get it in in time. Phwew!
 
That useless piece of crap, Frye, was way off in his passes to Engram.

I saw one tough one that Engram probably should have caught.

 
Mr. Mojo said:
That useless piece of crap, Frye, was way off in his passes to Engram.I saw one tough one that Engram probably should have caught.
Click to expand...
Frye was off on everything. The 5 or 6 targets that Engram had were all overthrown or whipped in there too hard to catch. The first half was like 3-1 rush to pass as well limiting his targets to begin with. The Seattle WRs finished with only 2 catches, both by KoRo. The rest were dinks and dunks to RBs and TEs. Frye played nothing like he did in the final preseason game and I see why he was traded by Cleveland. Here's to hoping Hass or Wallace heal quickly and Frye can get back to holding the clipboard. He is just plain awful.
 
Assuming Hass doesn't make it back yet, any thoughts on whether Engram could hold some value with Wallace in there?

 
zamboni said:
Assuming Hass doesn't make it back yet, any thoughts on whether Engram could hold some value with Wallace in there?
Click to expand...
I've been wondering the same thing. Wallace has to be better than Frye. I remember Wallace being pretty mobile a couple years ago when he played. Saw him at Arrowhead and he was pretty slippery. I seem to recall he can make throws pretty well too.
 
Ketamine Dreams said:
zamboni said:
Assuming Hass doesn't make it back yet, any thoughts on whether Engram could hold some value with Wallace in there?
Click to expand...
I've been wondering the same thing. Wallace has to be better than Frye. I remember Wallace being pretty mobile a couple years ago when he played. Saw him at Arrowhead and he was pretty slippery. I seem to recall he can make throws pretty well too.
Click to expand...
Seneca Wallace-QB- Seahawks Oct. 13 - 6:18 pm et Seneca Wallace is expected to be the Seahawks' starting QB in Week 7 at Tampa Bay.This, of course, is assuming that his calf injury doesn't prevent him from doing so. Wallace was active in Week 6, but wasn't 100% and has re-injured the calf multiple times. The Bucs' secondary isn't playing that well, but neither are the Seattle receivers. He definitely isn't a recommended QB1 play.
 
Benched him for Moore as well and I am cutting him for K. Walters tonight. Like the NE team Seattle is looking like a dead end for fantasy players this year w the possible exception of J.Jones.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Considering dropping him also. Anyone know if there is any more definitive prognosis for Hasselbeck's injury? If he's done for year, dropping Engram is an easy decision.

 
Superbowl Shuffle said:
Considering dropping him also. Anyone know if there is any more definitive prognosis for Hasselbeck's injury? If he's done for year, dropping Engram is an easy decision.
Click to expand...
I keep wondering about this too. Hasselbeck seems to be like Palmer and we keep chasing the proverbial carrot-on-a-stick. I wonder if he'll ever be healthy AND play, especially since this season is already lost IMO. Without Hasselbeck Engram appears worthless. I am considering dropping him for a bye week cover, but may drop JTO instead.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Joe Bryant
Rank Your NFL Team's 2023 Season
2
Replies
85
Views
3K
Wingnut
Wingnut
Joe Bryant
How Good Must Your QB Be To Win A SuperBowl?
2
Replies
95
Views
3K
Hot Sauce Guy
Hot Sauce Guy
cheese
How to Rank Achane
2
Replies
59
Views
2K
TripItUp
TripItUp

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Top