'Dr. Awesome said:
Yeah...really weird.he's also on pace for 0 td, but I agree with you.For all the people saying the targets weren't going to be there... hes on pace for over 160![]()
I think Jennings and McFadden take the cake.Is Lloyd the biggest ADP bust of the year? At least FBG has stopped ranking him like a WR1. Targets aren't points.
I'd give you some chump for him in a second.if finnegan's on him this week I wouldn't expect much, and he has a bye next week, but then he's got a couple good weeks coming before he draws the jets again.LOL... I can't even find a trash player another owner will trade for Lloyd now. Praying he has a blow up week so I can unload this boat anchor.
I offered him for Nate Washington... I have a bye issue week 9, other owner has an issue in week 11... hoping that is enough to entice the guy into pulling the trigger.'Kool-Aid Larry said:I'd give you some chump for him in a second.if finnegan's on him this week I wouldn't expect much, and he has a bye next week, but then he's got a couple good weeks coming before he draws the jets again.'Rovers said:LOL... I can't even find a trash player another owner will trade for Lloyd now. Praying he has a blow up week so I can unload this boat anchor.
week 11 vs indy?I offered him for Nate Washington... I have a bye issue week 9, other owner has an issue in week 11... hoping that is enough to entice the guy into pulling the trigger.'Kool-Aid Larry said:I'd give you some chump for him in a second.if finnegan's on him this week I wouldn't expect much, and he has a bye next week, but then he's got a couple good weeks coming before he draws the jets again.'Rovers said:LOL... I can't even find a trash player another owner will trade for Lloyd now. Praying he has a blow up week so I can unload this boat anchor.
tell him greg little 6/52/1 -- he'll throw in a reacharound.He accepted the offer without comment. I'll plug Washington in over Mal Floyd this week! (I was starting Floyd over Lloyd... again)week 11 vs indy?I offered him for Nate Washington... I have a bye issue week 9, other owner has an issue in week 11... hoping that is enough to entice the guy into pulling the trigger.'Kool-Aid Larry said:I'd give you some chump for him in a second.if finnegan's on him this week I wouldn't expect much, and he has a bye next week, but then he's got a couple good weeks coming before he draws the jets again.'Rovers said:LOL... I can't even find a trash player another owner will trade for Lloyd now. Praying he has a blow up week so I can unload this boat anchor.tell him greg little 6/52/1 -- he'll throw in a reacharound.
'Raider Nation said:Welcome to the 2012 season, Brandon!![]()

OUCH!NE - WR Brandon Lloyd limited
Source: Patriots.com
New England Patriots WR Brandon Lloyd (knee) was limited during practice Wednesday, Oct. 24.
[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ OUR VIEW ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]
We're benching Brandon Lloyd this week for a couple of reasons. First, the matchup is bad as the Rams secondary is a much improved unit. Second, Lloyd hasn't done much and doesn't have good chemistry with Tom Brady. There are better (safer) options out there than Lloyd at this time.
Me too. For blasted Nicks, who probably will limp around doing nothing.Finally benched him.![]()
I cut him.. Someone else cut Steve Smith, so made the move.Finally benched him.![]()
Perhaps Brady has stopped looking Lloyd's way because he has been dropping balls that hit him right in the hands/numbers?If any of you have game rewind if u watch the coaches film of patriots game Lloyd was abusing the guy trying to cover him in man coverage. There is 2 problems I noticed. One Brady rarely looked to Lloyd's side of the formation the biggest thing I noticed is Lloyd's routes were usually deeper routes and BRADY WAS REALLY HAVING A HARD TIME WITH THE LONGER THROWS! It wasn't Lloyd not getting open I believe a lot of it is his routes are deeper sideline routes and Brady was just missing him. Maybe Brady recognize his own arm limitations that's why he's lobbying for more Eldeman on the field. I think if a team comes up and presses Welker and Edelman Without Gronk Brady is really gonna struggle
You are not seeing things.Lloyd was wide open down the right sideline. Brady missed him badly.On a quick slant, Lloyd made an unbelievable catch on a ball over his head that was a rocket. Was more challenging than it should have been.They aren't connecting that well, but it isn't all Lloyd's fault.He has dropped some balls sure so maybe there is a lack of confidence there but the ones he does catch seems like he always gotta make spectacular catch. All I can say is watch the coaches tape he's getting open it's like Brady is a lot more effective throwing short to intermediate maybe I'm seeing things
Thank you so maybe Im not crazy. I think Brady is starting to decline and I think he over throws the deep ball because he knows his arm is weaker he really doesn't even attempt to throw deep outs. When he does throw outside its a back shoulder throw to make up for his lost of zip! This is not like Ocho cinco situation Lloyd is doing his job and getting open. Yes he has to catch the ball better but he is a excellent route runner who's being under utilizedYou are not seeing things.Lloyd was wide open down the right sideline. Brady missed him badly.On a quick slant, Lloyd made an unbelievable catch on a ball over his head that was a rocket. Was more challenging than it should have been.They aren't connecting that well, but it isn't all Lloyd's fault.He has dropped some balls sure so maybe there is a lack of confidence there but the ones he does catch seems like he always gotta make spectacular catch. All I can say is watch the coaches tape he's getting open it's like Brady is a lot more effective throwing short to intermediate maybe I'm seeing things
I agree..... but the frustration is that he is getting targets..... he has had several long bomb targers just out of reach...usually 1 or 2 a game....8 targets a game is nothing to ignore. Tonight.... 3 for 26 on 6 targets. The fact he was wide open coming across the back of the end zone mid-way in 2nd qtr and an out of character poor throw by Tom or it would have been 6.Such a disappointment. The Pats have like 90 points in the first half.Lloyd? 1 catch for 12 yards.![]()
He also missed him in the open field in the 3rd Q. Would have been a 60-something yard TD.The fact he was wide open coming across the back of the end zone mid-way in 2nd qtr and an out of character poor throw by Tom or it would have been 6.

Gaffney?Gaffney comes back to NE more seasoned and having played bigger roles on other teams. In his first go round, Gaffney secured 50-60 targets. I am not sure we should expect him to take a totally minimal role this time around when he was starting in Washington. NE already had a ton of other receivers . . . then why bring those guys in (including Gaffney) if they are only going to see 10 targets a year?As for your "that's how it was last year" comment, THAT'S WHY they went out and expanded their WR depth.Yeahhhh, that's not going to happen (bolded portion).I agree that 50 targets for WR3-6 seems low, but that's what happened last year with 612 passes, so I'm going to have to disagree with the "no way" part of your statement.No way the other receivers end up with only 20 targets. Gaffney alone will get 60 . . . and that does not include the other guys that will end up on the roster. Plus Welker has consistently averaged 10 targets a game in his tenure in NE . . . trending more than that in recent years.
OTHER WR RECEPTIONS BEYOND WR 1 + 2 . . .
2011 23
2010 43
2009 67
2008 47
2007 82
2006 50
2005 71
2004 62
2003 68
2002 64
2001 40
That's an average of 56 receptions a year for all receivers not WR1 or WR2.
Gaffney may or may not get 50-60 targets, but I still think that all WRs not named Welker or Lloyd will will account for a lot more than people are allocating them for.

This thread is full of fail. How did Hernandez and Lloyd treat your team for half the price? You get what you pay for.I love Gronk but I'll be paying half the price in auction for Hernandez and will be paying half the price of Welker for Lloyd.![]()